S273 – Does Nasal Obstruction Mean that the Nose Is Obstructed?
Abstract
Objectives To what extent a sense of nasal obstruction correlates with objective measures for nasal space and air flow is still a matter of controversy. Knowledge about this is important in the evaluation of nasal complaints and the planning of treatment. The primary objectives of our study were to evaluate the relationship between subjective nasal blockage and 1) acoustic rhinometry (AR), and 2) Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF). Methods 2341 consecutive patients referred to ENT specialist for evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea, snoring, or nose‐related complaints were included in this cross‐sectional study. Subjects underwent AR and nasal flow measurements (PNIF). Subjective grading of nasal obstruction was obtained by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Associations between VAS recordings and measurements of PNIF and AR were evaluated with multivariate analysis using linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, asthma, allergy and smoking history. The study was conducted in the period 2005–2007. Results The sense of nasal obstruction was correlated to volumes in both anterior and middle segments of the nasal cavities (p<0,001), to minimal cross‐sectional areas in middle segments, and for the nasal airway as a whole (p<0,001) and to PNIF (p<0,001). Conclusions The present study indicates that there are significant correlations between the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction and the corresponding measures for space and air flow. We conclude that AR and PN…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The visual analog scale is a well-studied tool for assessing the severity of nasal obstruction and has been validated with reference to other subjective measures such as symptom score and to objective measures such as rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow in adults and nasal endoscopy in children.
“The VAS is a well-studied tool for assessing the severity of NO and has been validated with reference to other subjective measures such as symptom score [31] and to objective measures such as rhinomanometry (RMN), acoustic rhinometry (AcR), and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) in adults [32,33] and nasal endoscopy in children [34].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kjaergaard, T., Cvancarova, M. S., & Steinsvåg, S.
- ORCID
- Steinsvåg, Sverre
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- S2
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W2062379717
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Keywords
- nasal obstruction, acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow, obstructive sleep apnea, snoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review