A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aerodynamic efficiency improvements need turbulence modeling that relies heavily on ML-based surrogate models.
“Aerodynamic efficiency improvements need turbulence modeling that is often computationally intensive and relies heavily on ML-based surrogate models [865].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [865]
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486 · see citing works
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421 · see citing works
Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0936 · Cited by 49,169 · see citing works
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,340 · see citing works
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134 · see citing works
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138 · see citing works
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022627411411 · Cited by 34,565 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271368 · Cited by 27,236 · see citing works
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566 · see citing works
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 14,979 · see citing works
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585 · see citing works
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992) · Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130401 · Cited by 11,992 · see citing works
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705 · see citing works
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
Gunst, R. F., Myers, R. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270613 · Cited by 9,576 · see citing works
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271432 · Cited by 8,270 · see citing works
Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
Friedman, J. H. (1991) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347963 · Cited by 8,108 · see citing works
Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems.
Bell, J. B., Tikhonov, A. N., & Arsenin, V. Y. (1978) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2006360 · Cited by 8,096 · see citing works
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012413 · Cited by 6,960 · see citing works
Addelman, S., Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1267766 · Cited by 6,753 · see citing works
Introduction to the theory of neural computation
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)90014-0 · Cited by 6,431 · see citing works
Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates
Sobol′, I. M. (2001) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6 · Cited by 6,389 · see citing works
Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures
Sirovich, L. (1987) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/910462 · Cited by 6,266 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2 · Cited by 5,871 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Kim, H., Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270959 · Cited by 5,536 · see citing works
Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction
Moore, B. C. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1981.1102568 · Cited by 5,289 · see citing works
Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces
Freeny, A. E., Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270169 · Cited by 5,238 · see citing works
Matheron, G. (1963) · Economic Geology · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 · Cited by 4,851 · see citing works
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,600 · see citing works
On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions
Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. (1951) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x · Cited by 4,488 · see citing works
The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. J., & Lumley, J. L. (1993) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543 · Cited by 4,478 · see citing works
Levary, R. R. (1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90093-5 · Cited by 4,170 · see citing works
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2000) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 4,115 · see citing works
Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables
Box, G. E. P., & Behnken, D. W. (1960) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912 · Cited by 3,993 · see citing works
The design of optimum multifactorial experiments
PLACKETT, R. L., & BURMAN, J. P. (1946) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/33.4.305 · Cited by 3,906 · see citing works
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R., & Conover, W. J. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268522 · Cited by 3,834 · see citing works
Classical and Modern Regression With Applications.
Steinhorst, R. K., & Myers, R. H. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288958 · Cited by 3,691 · see citing works
Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams
Okabe, A., Boots, B. N., & Sugihara, K. (1992) · Cited by 3,573 · see citing works
An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms
Müller, K. R., Mika, S., Rätsch, G., Tsuda, K., & Schölkopf, B. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.914517 · Cited by 3,485 · see citing works
On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions
Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. (1992) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_23 · Cited by 3,472 · see citing works
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
Gunst, R. F. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509 · Cited by 3,302 · see citing works
Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry
Holmes, P. J., Lumley, J. L., & Berkooz, G. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622700 · Cited by 3,152 · see citing works
Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms, and applications
Fausett, L. V. (1994) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 3,036 · see citing works
Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.
Collings, B. J., & Niederreiter, H. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290359 · Cited by 2,944 · see citing works
Glover, K. (1984) · International Journal of Control · doi:10.1080/00207178408933239 · Cited by 2,883 · see citing works
Ripley, B. D. (1981) · Cited by 2,819 · see citing works
Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods
Niederreiter, H. (1992) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970081 · Cited by 2,786 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing
Liu, J. S. (2004) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76371-2 · Cited by 2,734 · see citing works
(2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71107-2 · Cited by 2,696 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Grice, J. V., & Montgomery, D. C. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271458 · Cited by 2,656 · see citing works
Surrogate-based analysis and optimization
Queipo, N. V., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R., & Tucker, P. K. (2005) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 · Cited by 2,465 · see citing works
The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems
Schetzen, M. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,404 · see citing works
Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization
Forrester, A. I. J., & Keane, A. J. (2009) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001 · Cited by 2,382 · see citing works
Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces
Sirovich, L., & Kirby, M. J. L. (1987) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.4.000519 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms
Du, Q., Faber, V., & Gunzburger, M. (1999) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144599352836 · Cited by 2,303 · see citing works
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
(2004) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2004.s753 · Cited by 2,275 · see citing works
A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces
Jones, D. R. (2001) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1012771025575 · Cited by 2,160 · see citing works
Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review
van der Maaten, L., Postma, E. O., & van den Herik, H. J. (2009) · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models
Homma, T., & Saltelli, A. (1996) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6 · Cited by 2,014 · see citing works
Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation
Chaturantabut, S., & Sorensen, D. C. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/090766498 · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems
Benner, P., Gugercin, S., & Willcox, K. E. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/130932715 · Cited by 1,959 · see citing works
Aerodynamic design via control theory
Jameson, A. (1988) · Journal of Scientific Computing · doi:10.1007/bf01061285 · Cited by 1,943 · see citing works
Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods
Caflisch, R. E. (1998) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492900002804 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
Kernel methods in machine learning
Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2008) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053607000000677 · Cited by 1,758 · see citing works
Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization
Wang, G. G., & Shan, S. (2006) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.2429697 · Cited by 1,718 · see citing works
Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications
Wasserstein, R. (1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485133 · Cited by 1,697 · see citing works
Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria
Jin, R., Chen, W., & Simpson, T. W. (2001) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
Törn, A., & Žilinskas, A. (1989) · Cited by 1,671 · see citing works
A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables
Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J. (1982) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918208812265 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Handbook of Global Optimization
Horst, R., & Pardalos, P. M. (1995) · Nonconvex optimization and its applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2025-2 · Cited by 1,638 · see citing works
The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows
Lumley, J. L. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,615 · see citing works
Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available
Kennedy, M. C. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.1.1 · Cited by 1,610 · see citing works
Crosilla, F., & Russo, T. (1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0986 · Cited by 1,573 · see citing works
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges
Jin, Y. (2011) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.05.001 · Cited by 1,547 · see citing works
Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state
Back, T., Hammel, U., & Schwefel, H.-P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585888 · Cited by 1,536 · see citing works
Barrault, M., Maday, Y., Nguyen, N. C., & Patera, A. T. (2004) · Comptes Rendus Mathématique · doi:10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.006 · Cited by 1,535 · see citing works
Minimax and maximin distance designs
Johnson, M. E., Moore, L. M., & Ylvisaker, D. (1990) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-b · Cited by 1,451 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing
Hesterberg, T. (2002) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2002.s85 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
KERNEL METHODS IN MACHINE LEARNING
Hofmann, T., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2008) · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Theory of Functionals and of Integral and Integro-Differential Equations
Volterra, V. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,296 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Experiments
Gupta, A. K., & Kabe, D. G. (2013) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/8889 · Cited by 1,250 · see citing works
Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design
Vanderplaats, G. N. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Exploratory designs for computational experiments
Morris, M. D., & Mitchell, T. J. (1995) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-t · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications
Zhang, Y., Wang, S., & Ji, G. (2015) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2015/931256 · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments
Fang, K.-T., Li, R., & Sudjianto, A. (2005) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420034899 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Experiments - Planning, Analysis and Parameter Design Optimization
(2001) · Journal of Tropical Pediatrics · doi:10.1093/tropej/47.2.126 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
Foundations of Machine Learning
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
Advanced methods in neural computing
Wasserman, P. D. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods
Iooss, B., & Lemaître, P. (2015) · Operations research, computer science. Interface series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5 · Cited by 1,115 · see citing works
Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods
Kroese, D. P., Taimre, T., & Botev, Z. I. (2011) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118014967 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
A Survey of Dimension Reduction Techniques
Fodor, I. K. (2002) · doi:10.2172/15002155 · Cited by 1,109 · see citing works
A New Method of Locating the Maximum Point of an Arbitrary Multipeak Curve in the Presence of Noise
Kushner, H. J. (1964) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3653121 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Foundations of Machine Learning
(2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8291.003.0006 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Stein, A. A. (2003) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.018 · Cited by 1,098 · see citing works
Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J., & Mistree, F. (2001) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/2.1234 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Survey of Multifidelity Methods in Uncertainty Propagation, Inference, and Optimization
Peherstorfer, B., Willcox, K. E., & Gunzburger, M. (2018) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/16m1082469 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications
Deng, L., Hedayat, A., Sloane, N. J. A., & Stufken, J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270971 · Cited by 1,079 · see citing works
Weiss, S. M. (1990) · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling
Forrester, A. I. J., Sóbester, A., & Keane, A. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1900 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Stochastic Approximation Algorithms and Applications
Puhalskii, A. A., Kushner, H. J., & Yin, G. G. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669885 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
Willcox, K. E., & Peraire, J. (2002) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/2.1570 · Cited by 998 · see citing works
Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists
Antony, J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-03558-2 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates
Booker, A. J., Dennis, J. E., Frank, P. D., Serafini, D. B., Torczon, V. J., & Trosset, M. W. (1999) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01197708 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics
Lucia, D. J., Beran, P., & Silva, W. A. (2004) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.12.001 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Statistical design and analysis of experiments: with applications to engineering and science
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2741 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Nonlinear System Theory: The Volterra / Wiener Approach
Rugh, W. J. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Designs for Computer Experiments
Sacks, J., Schiller, S. B., & Welch, W. J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488474 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments.
Freeman, H. A., Davies, O. L., Box, G. E. P., Connor, L. R., Cousins, W. R., Davies, O. L., Himsworth, F. R., & Sillitto, G. P. (1955) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280981 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Karhunen–Loève procedure for gappy data
Everson, R., & Sirovich, L. (1995) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.12.001657 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Bratley, P., & Fox, B. L. (1988) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/42288.214372 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
(2008) · doi:10.2514/masm08 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models
Martin, J. D., & Simpson, T. W. (2005) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.8650 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
Model Order Reduction: Theory, Research Aspects and Applications
Bock, H.-G., van der Vorst, H. A., Tornberg, A., Schilders, W. H. A., Scherzer, O., Santosa, F., Rusten, T., Rommes, J., Pulleyblank, W. R., Neunzert, H., et al. (2008) · Mathematics in industry · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78841-6 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods
Borkowf, C. B., & Gentle, J. E. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270960 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Optimum Designs in Regression Problems
Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1959) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706252 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications
(1996) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0377-0427(97)80822-9 · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide
Loeppky, J. L., Sacks, J., & Welch, W. J. (2009) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2009.08040 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Neural Networks for Statistical Modeling
Smith, M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Currin, C., Mitchell, T. J., Morris, M. D., & Ylvisaker, D. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1991.10475138 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces.
Pike, D. J., Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1988) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982196 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity
Amsallem, D., & Farhat, C. (2008) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.35374 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Goel, T., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., & Queipo, N. V. (2006) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-006-0051-9 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Über lineare Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung
Karhunen, K. (1947) · Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia eBooks · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Odeh, I., McBratney, A. B., & Chittleborough, D. J. (1995) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(95)00007-b · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Carlberg, K., Bou‐Mosleh, C., & Farhat, C. (2010) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1002/nme.3050 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
A Short Review on Model Order Reduction Based on Proper Generalized Decomposition
Chinesta, F., Ladevèze, P., & Cueto, E. (2011) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-011-9064-7 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments
Jin, R., Chen, W., & Sudjianto, A. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.02.014 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Carlberg, K., Farhat, C., Cortial, J., & Amsallem, D. (2013) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.02.028 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Analysis of the Publications on the Applications of Particle Swarm Optimisation
Poli, R. (2008) · Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications · doi:10.1155/2008/685175 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Reduced Basis Methods for Partial Differential Equations: An Introduction
Quarteroni, A. M., Manzoni, A., & Negri, F. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15431-2 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization
Alexandrov, N. M., Dennis, J. E., Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V. J. (1998) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/bf01197433 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction
Higdon, D., Kennedy, M. C., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., & Ryne, R. D. (2004) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827503426693 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments
Kleijnen, J. P. C., Sanchez, S. M., Lucas, T. W., & Cioppa, T. M. (2005) · INFORMS journal on computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1050.0136 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Shewry, M. C., & Wynn, H. P. (1987) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664768700000020 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction With Applications.
Haas, T. C., & Wackernagel, H. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291758 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Shan, S., & Wang, G. G. (2009) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0420-2 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.
(2004) · doi:10.1109/wsc.2004 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Rewieński, M., & White, J. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2002.806601 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams
Watson, D. (1993) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/0098-3004(93)90024-y · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Schölkopf, B. (1997) · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization
Altland, H. W. (2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/004017001316975952 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
(2006) · doi:10.2514/masm06 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems
Lall, S., Marsden, J. E., & Glavaški, S. (2002) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.657 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Matrix formulation of co-kriging
Myers, D. E. (1982) · Mathematical Geology · doi:10.1007/bf01032887 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
Roy Salam, I., & Bil, C. (2012) · doi:10.2514/masm12 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Statistical aspects of neural networks
Ripley, B. D. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3099-6_2 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces
Constantine, P. G., Dow, E., & Wang, Q. (2014) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/130916138 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Nonlinear model order reduction based on local reduced‐order bases
Amsallem, D., Zahr, M. J., & Farhat, C. (2012) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1002/nme.4371 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling
Lemieux, C. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78165-5 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling
Han, Z., & Görtz, S. (2012) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j051354 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Unsteady flow sensing and estimation via the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition
Willcox, K. E. (2005) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.11.006 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Thompson, S. K. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10474975 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Factorial Experiments Derivable from Combinatorial Arrangements of Arrays
Rao, C. R. (1947) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.2307/2983576 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Zhang, W., & Goh, A. T. C. (2014) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Classical and Modern Regression With Applications
Cornell, J. A., & Myers, R. H. (1987) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1987.10488247 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Design of Experiments -- A Realistic Approach.
Greensmith, R., Anderson, V. L., & Mclean, R. A. (1975) · Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977) · doi:10.2307/3008227 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction
Quarteroni, A. M., Quarteroni, A., & Rozza, G. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02090-7 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting
(2014) · doi:10.2514/masm14 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics.
Caliński, T., Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532120 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models
Schonlau, M., Welch, W. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998) · Lecture notes-monograph series · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215456182 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Artificial Neural Networks: Approximation and Learning Theory
White, H. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Missing Point Estimation in Models Described by Proper Orthogonal Decomposition
Astrid, P., Weiland, S., Willcox, K. E., & Backx, T. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.2006102 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Fine-Tuning of Algorithms Using Fractional Experimental Designs and Local Search
Adenso-Dı́az, B., & Laguna, M. (2006) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.1050.0243 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Optimum Allocation in Linear Regression Theory
Elfving, G. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729442 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs
Ye, K. Q., Li, W. H. C., & Sudjianto, A. (2000) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00105-1 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor
Viana, F. A. C., Haftka, R. T., & Steffen, V. (2009) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0338-0 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I
Box, G. E. P., & Hunter, J. S. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271430 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach
Ryckelynck, D. (2004) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2004.07.015 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Han, Z., Görtz, S., & Zimmermann, R. (2012) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2012.01.006 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Armstrong, M. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58727-6 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists
Antony, J. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-4709-0.x5000-5 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Francisco Chinesta, C., Ammar, A., & Cueto, E. (2010) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9049-y · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Overview of Modern Design of Experiments Methods for Computational Simulations (Invited)
Giunta, A., Wojtkiewicz, S. F., & Eldred, M. (2003) · AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2003-649 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Boissonnat, J., & Yvinec, M. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139172998 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Minimum Aberration 2 k-p Designs
Fries, A., & Hunter, W. G. (1980) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268198 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Koehler, J. R., & Owen, A. B. (1996) · Handbook of statistics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7161(96)13011-x · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Viana, F. A. C., Simpson, T. W., Balabanov, V. O., & TOROPOV, V. V. (2014) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j052375 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Model Reduction for Large-Scale Systems with High-Dimensional Parametric Input Space
Bui–Thanh, T., Willcox, K. E., & Ghattas, O. N. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/070694855 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Grepl, M., & Patera, A. T. (2005) · ESAIM Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1051/m2an:2005006 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Design of computer experiments: space filling and beyond
Pronzato, L., & Müller, W. G. (2011) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-011-9242-3 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Minimum Aberration 2k–pDesigns
Fries, A., & Hunter, W. G. (1980) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1980.10486210 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments
Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2015) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18087-8 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Stochastic Global Optimization
Zhigljavsky, A. A., & Zilinskas, A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74740-8 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
Parkinson, A. R., Sorensen, C. D., & Pourhassan, N. (1993) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.2919328 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Orthogonal Arrays of Index Unity
Bush, K. A. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729387 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
The Proper Generalized Decomposition for Advanced Numerical Simulations
Francisco Chinesta, C., Keunings, R., & Leygue, A. (2013) · SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02865-1 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Maximum projection designs for computer experiments
Joseph, V. R., Gul, E., & Ba, S. (2015) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asv002 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Mapping temperature using kriging with external drift: Theory and an example from scotland
Hudson, G., & Wackernagel, H. (1994) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.3370140107 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy Experiments
Qian, P. Z. G., & Wu, C. (2008) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/004017008000000082 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Model Order Reduction for Linear and Nonlinear Systems: A System-Theoretic Perspective
Baur, U., Benner, P., & Feng, L. (2014) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-014-9111-2 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
The 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I
Box, G. E. P., & Hunter, J. S. (1961) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266725 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
An Online Method for Interpolating Linear Parametric Reduced-Order Models
Amsallem, D., & Farhat, C. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/100813051 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
(1998) · doi:10.2514/masm98 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis
Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.005 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Efficient Nearly Orthogonal and Space-Filling Latin Hypercubes
Cioppa, T. M., & Lucas, T. W. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/004017006000000453 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
A survey of dimensionality reduction techniquesPreprint
Sorzano, C. Ó. S., Vargas, J., & Pascual-Montano, A. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.2877 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments
Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71813-2 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
9 of the 548 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization
Li, J., Du, X., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2022) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100849 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
“As shown in Table 2, commonly-used surrogate models include the polynomial response surface method, kriging, and neural networks [343, 344].”
MethodSurrogate modelling for sustainable building design – A review
Westermann, P., & Evins, R. (2019) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.057 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Overview of Surrogate Modeling in Chemical Process Engineering
McBride, K., & Sundmacher, K. (2019) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.201800091 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Data-driven modeling for unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
Kou, J., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100725 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Strategies towards a more sustainable aviation: A systematic review
Afonso, F., Sohst, M., Diogo, C. M. A., Rodrigues, S. S., Ferreira, A. F., Ribeiro, I., Marques, R., Rego, F., Sohouli, A., Portugal‐Pereira, J., et al. (2023) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100878 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Tackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Efficient Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Deep-Learning-Based Geometric Filtering
Li, J., Zhang, M., Martins, J. R. R. A., & Shu, C. (2020) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j059254 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Surrogate-assisted global sensitivity analysis: an overview
Cheng, K., Lü, Z., Ling, C., & Zhou, S. (2020) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-019-02413-5 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Chen, G., Zhang, K., Xue, X., Zhang, L., Yao, C., Wang, J., & Yao, J. P. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108353 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Surrogate Modeling Methods for Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation
Wang, C., Qiang, X., Xu, M., & Wu, T. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14061219 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Stochastic Model Updating with Uncertainty Quantification: An Overview and Tutorial
Bi, S., Beer, M., Cogan, S., & Mottershead, J. E. (2023) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110784 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A review on the recent developments in thermal management systems for hybrid-electric aircraft
Coutinho, M., Bento, D., Souza, A., Cruz, R., Afonso, F., Lau, F. J. P., Suleman, A., Barbosa, F. R., Gandolfi, R., Affonso, W., et al. (2023) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120427 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Non-intrusive reduced-order modeling for fluid problems: A brief review
Yu, J. Z., Yan, C. Y., & Guo, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1177/0954410019890721 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“For more a priori sampling approaches, the readers are referred to the review work by Yondo et al.70”
MethodReview of machine learning-based surrogate models of groundwater contaminant modeling
Luo, J., Ma, X., Ji, Y., Li, X., Song, Z. F., & Lu, W. (2023) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.117268 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Lee, B. C. Y., Mahtab, M. S., Neo, T. H., Farooqi, I. H., & Khursheed, A. (2022) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102673 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Uncertainty analysis of impact of geometric variations on turbine blade performance
Wang, X., & Zou, Z. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.140 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Multifidelity Genetic Transfer: An Efficient Framework for Production Optimization
Yin, F., Xue, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, K., Han, J., Liu, B., Wang, J., & Yao, J. P. (2021) · SPE Journal · doi:10.2118/205013-pa · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Data-based approach for wing shape design optimization
Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2021) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2021.106639 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Response surface methodology for process optimization in livestock wastewater treatment: A review
Reza, A., Chen, L., & Mao, X. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30326 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…RSM application for optimization have focused on fields like analytical chemistry [43], natural product research [44], engineering [45], aerodynamic analyses [46], food industry [47], product design [19], biofuel production [48], metabolomics-related studies [49], and pharmaceutical industry [50].”
BackgroundSurrogate-based optimization for mixed-integer nonlinear problems
Kim, S. H., & Boukouvala, F. (2020) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106847 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Li, K., Kou, J., & Zhang, W. (2022) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j061330 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Currently, these data-driven models have been widely used in flow reconstruction [20, 21], flight dynamics [22], aeroelasticity [23], flow control [24, 25], and optimization design [26].”
MethodElwy, I., & Hagishima, A. (2024) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114769 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Surrogate modeling: tricks that endured the test of time and some recent developments
Viana, F. A. C., Gogu, C., & Goel, T. (2021) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-021-03001-2 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Yondo et al. [224] has presented an excellent overview of different DOE techniques.”
BackgroundNagahisarchoghaei, M., Nur, N., Cummins, L., Nur, N., Karimi, M. M., Nandanwar, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Rahimi, S. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12051092 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
A Review of Proxy Modeling Highlighting Applications for Reservoir Engineering
Bahrami, P., Moghaddam, F. S., & James, L. A. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15145247 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“ROMs can be grouped [15] based on the type of system (linear, partially linear or non-linear, parametric or non-parametric, and time-dependent or time-independent).”
BackgroundLog-Sum-Exp Neural Networks and Posynomial Models for Convex and Log-Log-Convex Data
Calafiore, G. C., Gaubert, S., & Possieri, C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2910417 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Lazzara, M., Chevalier, M., Colombo, M., Garcia, J. G., Lapeyre, C., & Teste, O. (2022) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107629 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Surrogate-Model-Based Design and Optimization
Jiang, P., Zhou, Q., & Shao, X. (2019) · Springer tracts in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0731-1_7 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A numerical study on choosing the best configuration of the blade for vertical axis wind turbines
Zhang, T.-T., Wang, Z., Huang, W., Ingham, D. B., Ma, L., & Pourkashanian, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104162 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Aeroacoustic airfoil shape optimization enhanced by autoencoders
Kou, J., Botero-Bolívar, L., Ballano, R., Mariño, O. A., de Santana, L. D., Valero, E., & Ferrer, E. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119513 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationBig data and smart aviation information management system
Dou, X. (2020) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2020.1766736 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Its role is to facilitate the intelligent and automated management of crew and cabin passenger service to reduce management costs and operational errors and improve management performance (Gupta et al., 2018; Yondo et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSurrogate Model Monte Carlo simulation for stochastic flutter analysis of wind turbine blades
Li, S., & Caracoglia, L. (2019) · Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2019.02.004 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Parnianifard, A., Azfanizam, A. S., Ariffin, M., & Ismail, M. (2019) · SIMULATION · doi:10.1177/0037549719846988 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“In a recent review paper by Yondo et al., 12 the latest developments of metamodel-based optimization approaches including various metamodeling techniques and sampling design methods have been comprehensively reviewed, with an emphasis on aircraft aerodynamic design.”
BackgroundPelz, P. F., Leise, P., & Meck, M. (2021) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100714 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Numerical investigation of minimum drag profiles in laminar flow using deep learning surrogates
Chen, L., Çakal, B. A., Hu, X., & Thuerey, N. (2021) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.398 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Multi-Objective Optimization of Cascade Blade Profile Based on Reinforcement Learning
Qin, S., Wang, S., Wang, L., Wang, C., Sun, G., & Zhong, Y. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11010106 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Surrogate models can provide aerodynamic information rapidly, which reduces the computation during optimization and shortens optimization period [52,53].”
BackgroundInvertible Neural Networks for Airfoil Design
Glaws, A., King, R., Vijayakumar, G., & Ananthan, S. (2022) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j060866 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Metamodeling techniques for CPU-intensive simulation-based design optimization: a survey
Khatouri, H., Benamara, T., Breitkopf, P., & Demange, J. (2022) · Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40323-022-00214-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“A more general review is completed by [232] on design space sampling, model selection, ROM, and assisted surrogate models in aeronautics.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialData-Driven Aerodynamic Modeling Using the DLR SMARTy Toolbox
Bekemeyer, P., Bertram, A., Hines, D., Ribeiro, M. D., Garbo, A., Kiener, A. L., Sabater, C., Stradtner, M., Wassing, S., Widhalm, M., et al. (2022) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2022-3899 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
An efficient surrogate model for damage forecasting of composite laminates based on deep learning
Wang, G., Zhang, L., Xuan, S., Fan, X., Fu, B., Xiao, X., & Yao, X. (2023) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117863 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cantero‐Chinchilla, S., Malik, M. K., Chronopoulos, D., & Chiachío, J. (2021) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113849 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
A review of surrogate-assisted design optimization for improving urban wind environment
Wu, Y., & Quan, S. J. (2024) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111157 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tian, K., Ma, X., Li, Z., Lin, S., Wang, B., & Waas, A. M. (2020) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.02.007 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Sohst, M., do Vale, J. L., Afonso, F., & Suleman, A. (2022) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107531 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Cheng, H., Zhou, C., Li, Z., Lu, X., Zhao, S., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2023.108569 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Model order reduction in aerodynamics: Review and applications
Mendonça, G., Afonso, F., & Lau, F. J. P. (2019) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1177/0954410019853472 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“These models allow for a simple computation of the drag and lift of the aircraft without being too costly to calculate, being well adapted to optimization routines that require frequent model computations.(2) However, these simplified models and surrogate models are limited in their predicting power.”
BackgroundLiu, C., Amei, B., Zhang, Y., Dawei, C., Junjun, G., & Ren, D. (2022) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118145 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Aerodynamic performance of a bio-inspired flapping wing with local sweep morphing
Wang, C., Liu, Y., Xu, D., & Wang, S. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0090718 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Adaptive surrogate model-based optimization framework applied to battery pack design
Xu, H., Liu, L., & Zhang, M. (2020) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108938 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ou, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110196 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Janković, A., Chaudhary, G., & Goia, F. (2025) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111931 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A knowledge-based system for numerical design of experiments processes in mechanical engineering
Blondet, G., Duigou, J. L., & Boudaoud, N. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.013 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Li, R., Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2021.10.028 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Adaptive sampling methods typically begin with a relatively small number of initial samples generated by stationary methods, and then new samples are sequentially added based on several criteria, to most effectively improve the surrogate model [23, 24].”
BackgroundWang, M., Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, W. (2025) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2025.2500116 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“The relationship between input and output data can be described using a surrogate model, such as the Kriging model (KM) [48,54], neural network (NN) [46,54], response surface method (RSM) [54,55], and so on.”
Actuation response model from sparse data for wall turbulence drag reduction
Fernex, D., Semaan, R., Albers, M., Meysonnat, P. S., Schröder, W., & Noack, B. R. (2020) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.073901 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Surrogate models are typically used for optimization [Forrester and Keane, 2009, Yondo et al., 2018] and for visualization and design space analysis [Holden, 2004].”
MethodVelásquez, L., Posada, A., & Chica, E. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120357 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Luo, J., Lu, W., Yang, Q., Ji, Y., & Xin, X. (2020) · Hydrogeology Journal · doi:10.1007/s10040-020-02130-0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Hundie, K. B., Shumi, L. D., & Bullo, T. A. (2022) · South African Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.sajce.2022.06.002 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring Approach Using Guided Lamb Wave Responses
Borate, P., Wang, G., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0001145 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wang, X. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107995 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“The goal is to sample the design space or select a good set of discrete points to most efficiently cover the space of parameters, which may be involved during the optimization procedure [41].”
BackgroundMulti-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics
Ravi, K., Fediukov, V., Dietrich, F., Neckel, T., Buse, F., Bergmann, M., & Bungartz, H. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad7ad5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Surrogates, also known as digital twins, have various applications in design optimization [1, 2], uncertainty quantification [3, 4], real-time predictions [5, 6], etc.”
Amrit, A., Leifsson, L., & Koziel, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Aircraft · doi:10.2514/1.c035500 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Huang, M. J., Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107506 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Chowdhary, K., Hoang, C., Lee, K., Ray, J., Weirs, V. G., & Carnes, B. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115396 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Montoya, M. C., Bai, H., & Ye, M. (2023) · Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105568 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Ding, S., Ni, C., Chu, X., Lu, Q., & Wang, X. (2025) · Combustion and Flame · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.113981 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Adaptive non-intrusive reduced order modeling for compressible flows
Yu, J. Z., Yan, C. Y., Jiang, Z., Yuan, W., & Chen, S.-S. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.07.053 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Multi-fidelity non-intrusive reduced-order modelling based on manifold alignment
Perron, C., Rajaram, D., & Mavris, D. N. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0495 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Comparative Studies of Surrogate Models Based on Multiple Evaluation Criteria
Xiwang, H., Liangliang, Y., Renjie, R., Fawen, Z., & Song, X. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.3901/jme.2022.16.403 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Parnianifard, A., Zemouche, A., Chancharoen, R., Imran, M. A., & Wuttisittikulkij, L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242613 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Multilevel surrogate modeling of an amine scrubbing process for CO2 capture
Goldstein, D. P., Heyer, M., Jakobs, D., Schultz, E. S., & Biegler, L. T. (2022) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.17705 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Manifold Alignment-Based Nonintrusive and Nonlinear Multifidelity Reduced-Order Modeling
Decker, K., Iyengar, N., Rajaram, D., Perron, C., & Mavris, D. N. (2022) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j061720 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Surrogate-based optimisation of process systems to recover resources from wastewater
Durkin, A., Otte, L., & Guo, M. (2024) · Computers and Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108584 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Ferrer, E., Martínez-Cava, A., Zheng, Y., & Valero, E. (2019) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5090032 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationA reduced-order model for gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimisation
Yao, W., Marques, S. P., Robinson, T., Armstrong, C., & Sun, L. (2020) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.106120 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Geng, X., Wang, M., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2024) · Thin-Walled Structures · doi:10.1016/j.tws.2024.112241 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Parnianifard, A., Chancharoen, R., Phanomchoeng, G., & Wuttisittikulkij, L. (2020) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.2991/ijcis.d.201014.001 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“For the past decades, lots of practical engineers and scientists have not trusted expensive model-based optimization methods to obtain designs [21].”
Hou, Z., Lao, W., Wang, Y., & Lu, W. (2021) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104837 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Exploiting active subspaces of hyperparameters for efficient high-dimensional Kriging modeling
Chen, L., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Yang, Z., & Xu, D. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108643 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A New Sequential Surrogate Method for Reliability Analysis and its Applications in Engineering
Song, K., Zhang, Y., Yu, X., & Song, B. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2915350 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“However, the key to construct a high-precision surrogate model is how to determine experimental design samples, and the methods to determine samples are often named Design of Experiments (DoE) [20], [21].”
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Mak, S., Wu, C. F. J., & Yang, V. (2021) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j060574 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Surrogatemodelsaredesignedtocloselymimictheresultsofhigh-fidelity simulation with significantly reduced computing time and resource [8 – 11].”
Manifold alignment-based multi-fidelity reduced-order modeling applied to structural analysis
Perron, C., Sarojini, D., Rajaram, D., Corman, J. A., & Mavris, D. N. (2022) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-022-03274-1 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
An adaptive failure boundary approximation method for reliability analysis and its applications
Song, K., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, X., Yu, X., & Song, B. (2020) · Engineering With Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01011-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“To construct surrogate models, many DOE methods have been proposed in recent decades, such as full factorial design (FFD), central composite design (CCD), orthogonal arrays design (OAD) and Latin hypercube design (LHD) [19].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDevelopment of a Multi-Fidelity Reduced-Order Model Based on Manifold Alignment
Perron, C., Rajaram, D., & Mavris, D. N. (2020) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-3124 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Multisource aerodynamic data reconstruction method using an enhanced multifidelity neural network
Wang, X., Huailu, L. I., Lin, H., Tang, H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111707 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Toward aerodynamic surrogate modeling based on β-variational autoencoders
Francés-Belda, V., Solera-Rico, A., Nieto-Centenero, J., Andrés, E., Vila, C. S., & Castellanos, R. (2024) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0232644 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationNon-intrusive reduced order modeling for flowfield reconstruction based on residual neural network
Ma, W., Zhang, J., & Yu, J. Z. (2020) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.11.050 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cheng, J., Jiang, P., Zhou, Q., Hu, J., Yu, T., Shu, L., & Shao, X. (2019) · Engineering Computations · doi:10.1108/ec-08-2018-0390 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rajaram, D., Gautier, R. H., Perron, C., Pinon-Fischer, O. J., & Mavris, D. N. (2020) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-3184 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Parnianifard, A., Chaudhary, S., Mumtaz, S., Wuttisittikulkij, L., & Imran, M. A. (2023) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-023-03493-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“2011), Geostatistics and environmental science (Li and Heap 2011), and aerospace and aerodynamic design challenges (Yondo et al. 2018; Jeong et al. 2005) in particular.”
BackgroundBian, J., Ruan, D., Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Gu, Z. (2023) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129925 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Active learning for efficient data-driven aerodynamic modeling in spaceplane design
Zhang, H., Huang, W., Shen, Y., Xu, D., & Niu, Y. (2024) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0213613 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Qian, J., Yi, J., Zhang, J., Cheng, Y., & Liu, J. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10103554 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“It mentions that LCB methods have been widely applied to solve real engineering problems [36,37].”
MethodBērziņš, A., Helmig, J., Key, F., & Elgeti, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.13706 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This is an indication that adaptive sampling methods can o ff er a performance boost [70].”
BackgroundBrence, J., Tanevski, J., Adams, J., Malina, E., & Džeroski, S. (2022) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-022-06155-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“The use of available simulation or observed data to construct machine learning models as surrogates for specific areas of application (Yondo et al. 2018; Verdel et al. 2020; Cai et al. 2021; Servera et al. 2021) or to assist the optimization process in general (Schweidtmann and Mitsos 2019; Lukšič…”
Methodde Bosscher, B. C. D., Ziabari, S. S. M., & Sharpanskykh, A. (2023) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102811 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wang, H., Wu, L., Huang, D., Chen, J., Guo, J., Yu, C., Li, Y., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Engineering With Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-024-02014-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Monte Carlo
Pahija, E., Hwangbo, S., Saulnier‐Bellemare, T., & Patience, G. S. (2024) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.25374 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Verma, S., Montoya, M. C., & Mishra, A. (2024) · Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105769 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
An adaptive surrogate-assisted particle swarm optimization for expensive problems
Li, X.-M., & Li, S. (2021) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-021-06348-2 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yondo, R., Andrés, E., & Valero, E.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
- Ingeniería de Sistemas para la Defensa de España (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Yondo, Raul
- Venue
- Progress in Aerospace Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 23-61
- ISSN
- 0376-0421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776493547
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 548
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Aerospace Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN, 608087)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Keywords
- surrogate models, aircraft aerodynamic design, surrogate-based optimization, experimental design, sampling strategy, dimensionality reduction, sensitivity analysis, uncertainty quantification, multi-fidelity modeling, civil transport aircraft, computational complexity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review