Cited by 150Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsPersonality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Dispositional and state forgiveness: The role of self-esteem, need for structure, and narcissism

Eaton, Judy, Ward Struthers, C., Santelli, Alexander G.·2006·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 150

Authors
Eaton, J., Ward Struthers, C., & Santelli, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Eaton, Judy
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
371-380
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061904638
Cited by
150
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
dispositional forgiveness, self-esteem, need for structure, narcissism, transgression, interpersonal transgressions, personality traits, interpersonal motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review