Cited by 122Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesPersonality Traits and PsychologyGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

In search of the arousal procrastinator: Investigating the relation between procrastination, arousal-based personality traits and beliefs about procrastination motivations

Simpson, W. Kyle, Pychyl, Timothy A.·2009·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.013

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, W. K., & Pychyl, T. A.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Simpson, W. Kyle
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
906-911
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994972954
Cited by
122
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
procrastination, sensation seeking, extraversion, General Procrastination Scale, academic procrastination, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review