Cited by 71Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Rumination and depressive symptoms: Evidence for the moderating role of hope

Geiger, Katherine A., Kwon, Paul·2010·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geiger, K. A., & Kwon, P.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Paul
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
391-395
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070873350
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rumination, hope, depressive symptoms, moderation, brooding, reflection, goal-directed behavior, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review