Cited by 196Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-traumatic distress and the presence of post-traumatic growth and meaning in life: Experiential avoidance as a moderator

Open access
Kashdan, Todd B., Kane, Jennifer Q.·2011·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Existing models of trauma suggest that for recovery to occur, trauma related cues and emotions require awareness and openness while survivors continue committing action toward valued life aims (other than regulating emotions). Based on this theoretical framework, an unwillingness to be in contact with distressing thoughts and feelings (experiential avoidance) might operate together with posttraumatic distress to predict when people find benefits and meaning in the aftermath of trauma. We hypothesized that people reporting posttraumatic distress and less reliance on experiential avoidance would report greater posttraumatic growth and meaning in life compared with other trauma survivors. We administered questionnaires to 176 college students reporting at least one traumatic event. Results supported these moderation models. This is the fourth study (with different samples, measures, and methodologies) to provide evidence that a combination of excessive anxiety and a heavy reliance on experiential avoidance leads to attenuated well-being. We discuss the implications for understanding heterogeneous trauma reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.028

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–196 of 196

Metadata

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., & Kane, J. Q.
Affiliations
Argosy University (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
84-89
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036452911
Cited by
190
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, meaning in life, experiential avoidance, trauma survivors, anxiety, well-being, university students, trauma recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review