CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Measurement Invariance of WISC-IV across Normative and Clinical Samples

Chen, Hsinyi, Zhu, Jianjun·2012·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To compare test scores of individuals from different populations or groups in a meaningful and reliable way, it is essential for any diagnostic instrument used to provide measures that have the same meaning across those groups.

    “In order to be able to compare test scores of individuals from different populations or groups in a meaningful and reliable way, it is essential for any diagnostic instrument used to provide measures that have the same meaning across those groups in question (e.g., Chen and Zhu 2012; Millsap and Kwok 2004; Wicherts 2016).”

    From Measurement Invariance of the WISC-V across a Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents with ADHD and a Matched Control Group (2024) · cites this paper as Chen and Zhu 2012

  • Construct validity of diagnostic instruments can be significantly affected when conducted on different populations or specific clinical groups, given that standardization is often based on population-representative data.

    “Given that the standardization of diagnostic instruments is often based on population-representative data, construct validity of such instruments can be significantly affected when conducted on different populations or specific clinical groups (Chen and Zhu 2012).”

    From Measurement Invariance of the WISC-V across a Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents with ADHD and a Matched Control Group (2024) · cites this paper as Chen and Zhu 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., & Zhu, J.
Affiliations
National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Hsinyi
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
161-166
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.006
OpenAlex
W2034161429
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
WISC-IV, measurement invariance, children, Coding subtest, Comprehension subtest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review