Cited by 185Environmental Education and SustainabilitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year bayesian mediation analysis

Milfont, Taciano L., Sibley, Chris G.·2016·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Milfont, Taciano L.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
90
Pages
85-88
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1901836544
Cited by
185
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
22.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Marsden Fast-Start (E1908)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
gender differences, environmentalism, empathy, social dominance orientation, environmental values, pro-environmental attitudes, mediation, gender socialization, pro-environmental behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review