Using factor analysis to validate the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale in sample of science, technology, engineering and mathematics doctoral students
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impostor Phenomenon Measurement Scales: A Systematic Review
Mak, K. K. L., Kleitman, S., & Abbott, M. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00671 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Bernard, D. L., Jones, S. C. T., & Volpe, V. V. (2020) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798420924529 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“This summative approach is supported by evidence that the one-factor model may be the most parsimonious for diverse samples (e.g., Simon & Choi, 2017).”
Method
- Authors
- Simon, M., & Choi, Y.-J.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Simon, Marsha
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 173-175
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2762641588
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- impostor syndrome, Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, factor structure, scale validation, doctoral students, one-factor model, correlated residuals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
