Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown

Open access
Hong, Jon-Chao, Lee, Yi-Fang, Ye, Jian-Hong·2021·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

During the lockdown due to SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus lockdown), there has been a tremendous increase in the number of students taking online courses. Few studies, however, have examined the individual dispositions that influence self-regulated online learning during the coronavirus lockdown. To address this gap, the present study explored the ineffectiveness of online learning and examined how it can be predicted by self-regulated online learning and participants' procrastination disposition. Data of 433 participants were collected and subjected to confirmatory factor analysis with structural equation modeling. The results indicated that procrastination is negatively related to 6 sub-constructs of self-regulated online learning: task strategy, mood adjustment, self-evaluation, environmental structure, time management, and help-seeking. These sub-constructs were negatively related to the learners' perceived ineffectiveness of online learning. However, the relationship between perceived learning ineffectiveness and environmental structure or help-seeking was weaker than that with task strategy or mood adjustment, indicating that the latter two subtypes of self-regulated online learning should be considered before students engage in online learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Allen, 2007, Likert scales and data analyses, Quality Progress, 40, 64
  2. Ruhland, 2001, Implementing an assessment plan to document student learning in a two-year technical college, Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26, 141, 10.5328/JVER26.2.141 · doi:10.5328/jver26.2.141

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Hong, J.-C., Lee, Y.-F., & Ye, J.-H.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
174
Pages
110673
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128979532
Cited by
283
References
72
FWCI
40.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University
  • Ministry of Education
  • National Taiwan Normal University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
The paper
Hong, J.-C., Lee, Y.-F., & Ye, J.-H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.