Pain coping strategies play a role in the persistence of pain in post-herpetic neuralgia
Abstract
Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain state that is often difficult to treat. Although frequently discussed in the clinical literature, little is known about the impact of pain on daily function and the extent to which psychosocial factors, in particular pain coping strategies, influence adaptation to this chronic illness. In the context of a crossover pharmacological trial, 68 patients with PHN completed a battery of psychological measures during a first drug-free baseline period. Following discontinuation of approximately 8 weeks of treatment, 49 of these patients completed data collection during a second drug-free assessment prior to beginning a second drug phase. Twice-weekly telephone pain ratings were combined with questionnaire measures of perceived interference due to pain, overall activity level, depressive symptoms, and pain coping strategies. Cross-sectional hierarchical regression analyses indicated that catastrophizing correlated with depressive symptoms but not pain, and coping self-statements were correlated with higher levels of overall activity. Prospective hierarchical regression analyses indicated that catastrophizing at baseline predicted level of pain 8 weeks later, an effect that was independent of baseline pain and depressive symptoms. Patients who reported increasing their activity in response to pain also reported more perceived interference due to pain 8 weeks later. Higher levels of ignoring pain sensations at baseline were prospectively correlated with more depressive symptoms 8 weeks later. These findings support a role for the continued investigation of cognitive-behavioral factors affecting the adaptation of elderly individuals experiencing PHN.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sex and gender are important factors in pain perception and experience.
“Sex and gender are important factors in the perception and experience of pain 148–151.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [151]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Haythornthwaite, J. A., Clark, M. R., Pappagallo, M., & Raja, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 453-460
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968277256
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K24NS002225, K24-NS02225)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- postherpetic neuralgia, pain coping, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, activity level, cognitive-behavioral factors, elderly patients, neuropathic pain
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Double-Blind Method, Female, Herpes Simplex, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Regression Analysis, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review