Cited by 123Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Pain coping strategies play a role in the persistence of pain in post-herpetic neuralgia

Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A, Clark, Michael R, Pappagallo, Marco, Raja, Srinivasa N·2003·Pain

Abstract

Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a neuropathic pain state that is often difficult to treat. Although frequently discussed in the clinical literature, little is known about the impact of pain on daily function and the extent to which psychosocial factors, in particular pain coping strategies, influence adaptation to this chronic illness. In the context of a crossover pharmacological trial, 68 patients with PHN completed a battery of psychological measures during a first drug-free baseline period. Following discontinuation of approximately 8 weeks of treatment, 49 of these patients completed data collection during a second drug-free assessment prior to beginning a second drug phase. Twice-weekly telephone pain ratings were combined with questionnaire measures of perceived interference due to pain, overall activity level, depressive symptoms, and pain coping strategies. Cross-sectional hierarchical regression analyses indicated that catastrophizing correlated with depressive symptoms but not pain, and coping self-statements were correlated with higher levels of overall activity. Prospective hierarchical regression analyses indicated that catastrophizing at baseline predicted level of pain 8 weeks later, an effect that was independent of baseline pain and depressive symptoms. Patients who reported increasing their activity in response to pain also reported more perceived interference due to pain 8 weeks later. Higher levels of ignoring pain sensations at baseline were prospectively correlated with more depressive symptoms 8 weeks later. These findings support a role for the continued investigation of cognitive-behavioral factors affecting the adaptation of elderly individuals experiencing PHN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 123

Authors
Haythornthwaite, J. A., Clark, M. R., Pappagallo, M., & Raja, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-12
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
453-460
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968277256
Cited by
123
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K24NS002225, K24-NS02225)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
postherpetic neuralgia, pain coping, pain catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, activity level, cognitive-behavioral factors, elderly patients, neuropathic pain
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Double-Blind Method, Female, Herpes Simplex, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Regression Analysis, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review