The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity
Abstract
This experiment tested whether meaning influences the experience of pain. Thirty-one healthy students participated in a study on evaluations of various stimuli placed against the neck. By suggesting that a very cold metal bar was either hot or cold, the potentially tissue-damaging property of the stimulus was experimentally manipulated. A manipulation check revealed that participants believed the experimenter's information, as they rated the bar as more hot in the corresponding condition than in the other condition. Confirming the hypothesis that tissue-damaging meaning influences the experience of pain, participants who were told that the bar was hot rated it as more painful than participants who were told that it was cold. Damage interpretations mediated the effect of information on pain intensity scores, which supported the theory that tissue-damage is a crucial aspect of meaning to influence the subjective intensity of pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., de Jong, J., Geilen, M., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & van Breukelen, G. (2002) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200207000-00006 · Cited by 499 · cited 1×
“Recently developed treatments focusing at such misinterpretations are extremely successful, not only in reducing fear and avoidance, but also in reducing the pain experience (Vlaeyen et al., 2001, 2002a,b).”
BackgroundVlaeyen, J. W. S., de Jong, J., Geilen, M., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & van Breukelen, G. (2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00174-6 · Cited by 469
Cited by
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence
Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0 · Cited by 2,261
Fear-avoidance model of chronic musculoskeletal pain: 12 years on
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.12.009 · Cited by 1,281
Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future
Moseley, G. L., & Butler, D. S. (2015) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005 · Cited by 856
Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception
Wiech, K., Ploner, M., & Tracey, I. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.005 · Cited by 737
Metadata
- Authors
- Arntz, A., & Claassens, L.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053679281
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.030
- The paper
- Arntz, A., & Claassens, L. (2004). The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
