Cited by 499Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The treatment of fear of movement/(re) injury in chronic low back pain: further evidence on the effectiveness of exposure in vivo

Open access
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S., de Jong, Jeroen, Geilen, Mario, Heuts, Peter H. T. G., van Breukelen, Gerard·2002·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Several cognitive-behavioral factors contribute to the persistence of pain disability in patients with chronic back pain. Fear-avoidance beliefs and fear of movement/(re)injury in particular have been shown to be strong predictors of physical performance and pain disability. Patients reporting substantial pain-related fear might benefit from exposure in vivo to a set of individually tailored, fear-eliciting, and hierarchically ordered physical movements rather than more general graded activity. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Six consecutive patients with chronic low back pain who reported substantial fear of movement/(re)injury were included in the study. After a no-treatment baseline measurement period, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two interventions. In the first intervention, patients received exposure in vivo first, followed by graded activity. In the second intervention, the sequence of treatment modules was reversed. Before each treatment module, treatment credibility was assessed. Daily measures of pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, and pain intensity were completed using visual analog scales. In addition, standardized measures of pain disability, pain-related fear, and pain vigilance were taken before and after each treatment module and at the 1-year follow-up. To obtain more objective data on actual activity levels, an ambulatory activity monitor was carried by the patients during 1 week before and after each treatment module. RESULTS: Time series analysis of the daily measures showed that improvements in pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing occurred only during the exposure in vivo and not during the graded activity, irrespective of the treatment order. Analysis of the pretreatment to post-treatment differences also revealed that decreases in pain-related fear also concurred with decreases in pain disability and pain vigilance and an increase in physical activity levels. All improvements remained at the 1-year follow-up.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200207000-00006

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In studies of graded in vivo exposure for chronic low back pain, all 10 patients exhibited very high levels of fear of movement and reinjury before intervention.

    “All 10 patients with chronic low back pain who participated in these studies exhibited very high levels of fear of movement and reinjury before intervention.”

    From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Participants section reports that six patients with chronic low back pain entered this study with substantial fear of movement or reinjury. The Discussion also says the study included only six patients. Our copy therefore supports the pretreatment fear finding for those six, but does not establish that all 10 patients across the studies had very high fear levels. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Results indicated that whenever graded exposure was introduced, patients exhibited substantial improvements in pain-related fear, disability, and activity level.

    “Results indicated that whenever graded exposure was introduced, patients exhibited substantial improvements in pain-related fear, disability, and activity level.”
  • These improvements were maintained during the activation intervention.

    “These results were maintained during the activation intervention.”
  • Kinesiophobia is a strong predictor for long-term pain disability and pain chronicity, and is associated with higher rates of sick leave, pain vigilance, disability, and decreased physical activity.

    “It has been demonstrated that kinesiophobia has shown to be a strong predictor for pain disability and pain chronicity in the longer term [73] associated with higher rates of sick-leaves [74], pain vigilance and disability as well as decreased physical activity levels [75–77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Asmundson GJ, Norton PJ, Norton GR. Beyond pain: the role of fear and avoidance in chronicity. Clin Psychol Rev 1999;19:97- 119.
  2. Vlaeyen JWS, De Jong J, Geilen M, et al. Graded exposure in vivo for pain-related fear: the case of chronic musculoskeletal pain. In: Rice A, Warfield C, Justins D, et al., eds. Handbook of clinical pain management. London: Arnold; in press.
  3. Davey GCL. A conditioning model of phobias. In: Davey GCL, ed. Phobias: a handbook of theory, research and treatment. Chiches- ter: John Wiley and Sons, 1997:301-22.
  4. Linton SJ, Overmeer T, Janson M, et al. Graded in vivo exposure treatment of fear-avoidant pain patients with functional disability: a case study. Cognitive Behav Ther 2002; in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., de Jong, J., Geilen, M., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & van Breukelen, G.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2002-07
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
251-261
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048514270
Cited by
499
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
chronic low back pain, kinesiophobia, fear of reinjury, graded activity, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, pain-related disability, pain vigilance, physical activity, ambulatory activity monitoring, treatment order
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Avoidance Learning, Chronic Disease, Desensitization, Psychologic, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Pain Measurement, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Cross-Over Studies, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review