CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 392Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care

Denison, Eva, Åsenlöf, P., Lindberg, P.·2004·Pain
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the relations between disability, as measured by the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and self-efficacy, fear avoidance variables (kinesiophobia and catastrophizing), and pain intensity, using a prospective design. Two primary health care samples (n(1)=210; n(2)=161) of patients with subacute, chronic or recurring musculoskeletal pain completed sets of questionnaires at the beginning of a physiotherapy treatment period. Multiple hierarchial regression analyses showed that self-efficacy explained a considerably larger proportion of the variance in disability scores than the fear avoidance variables in the first sample. This finding was replicated in the second sample. Pain intensity explained a small, but significant proportion of the variance in disability scores in one sample only. Gender, age, and pain duration were not related to disability. These findings suggest that self-efficacy beliefs are more important determinants of disability than fear avoidance beliefs in primary health care patients with musculoskeletal pain. The findings also suggest that pain-related beliefs, such as self-efficacy and fear avoidance, in turn, are more important determinants of disability than pain intensity and pain duration in these patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.001

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–392 of 392

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Denison, E., Åsenlöf, P., & Lindberg, P.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Denison, Eva
ORCID
Åsenlöf, P.
Venue
Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2004-10
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
245-252
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.001
OpenAlex
W2072413892
Cited by
392
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vårdalstiftelsen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
self-efficacy, fear avoidance, pain intensity, disability, musculoskeletal pain, chronic pain, subacute pain, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, Pain Disability Index, pain beliefs, physiotherapy, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Avoidance Learning, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Primary Health Care, Regression Analysis, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review