Cited by 3,167Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability.

Waddell, Gordon, Newton, Mary, Henderson, Iain, Somerville, Douglas, Main, Chris J.·1993·Pain

Abstract

Pilot studies and a literature review suggested that fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity and work might form specific cognitions intervening between low back pain and disability. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) was developed, based on theories of fear and avoidance behaviour and focussed specifically on patients' beliefs about how physical activity and work affected their low back pain. Test-retest reproducibility in 26 patients was high. Principal-components analysis of the questionnaire in 210 patients identified 2 factors: fear-avoidance beliefs about work and fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity with internal consistency (alpha) of 0.88 and 0.77 and accounting for 43.7% and 16.5% of the total variance, respectively. Regression analysis in 184 patients showed that fear-avoidance beliefs about work accounted for 23% of the variance of disability in activities of daily living and 26% of the variance of work loss, even after allowing for severity of pain; fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity explained an additional 9% of the variance of disability. These results confirm the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs and demonstrate that specific fear-avoidance beliefs about work are strongly related to work loss due to low back pain. These findings are incorporated into a biopsychosocial model of the cognitive, affective and behavioural influences in low back pain and disability. It is recommended that fear-avoidance beliefs should be considered in the medical management of low back pain and disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-b

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waddell, G., Newton, M., Henderson, I., Somerville, D., & Main, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
  • Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Waddell, Gordon
Venue
Pain
Published
1993-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
157-168
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084880898
Cited by
3,167
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 147 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 126
FWCI
16.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
fear-avoidance beliefs, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, chronic low back pain, disability, work loss, physical activity, activities of daily living, biopsychosocial model, questionnaire development, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sciatica, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review