The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury
Abstract
Predictors of outcome following whiplash injury are limited to socio-demographic and symptomatic factors, which are not readily amenable to secondary and tertiary intervention. This prospective study investigated the predictive capacity of early measures of physical and psychological impairment on pain and disability 6 months following whiplash injury. Motor function (ROM; kinaesthetic sense; activity of the superficial neck flexors (EMG) during cranio-cervical flexion), quantitative sensory testing (pressure, thermal pain thresholds, brachial plexus provocation test), sympathetic vasoconstrictor responses and psychological distress (GHQ-28, TSK, IES) were measured in 76 acute whiplash participants. The outcome measure was Neck Disability Index scores at 6 months. Stepwise regression analysis was used to predict the final NDI score. Logistic regression analyses predicted membership to one of the three groups based on final NDI scores (<8 recovered, 10-28 mild pain and disability, >30 moderate/severe pain and disability). Higher initial NDI score (1.007-1.12), older age (1.03-1.23), cold hyperalgesia (1.05-1.58), and acute post-traumatic stress (1.03-1.2) predicted membership to the moderate/severe group. Additional variables associated with higher NDI scores at 6 months on stepwise regression analysis were: ROM loss and diminished sympathetic reactivity. Higher initial NDI score (1.03-1.28), greater psychological distress (GHQ-28) (1.04-1.28) and decreased ROM (1.03-1.25) predicted subjects with persistent milder symptoms from those who fully recovered. These results demonstrate that both physical and psychological factors play a role in recovery or non-recovery from whiplash injury. This may assist in the development of more relevant treatment methods for acute whiplash.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Cited by
Course and prognostic factors of whiplash: A systematic review and meta-analysis ☆
Kamper, S. J., Rebbeck, T. J., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., & Sterling, M. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.019 · Cited by 324
Self-citationJull, G., Sterling, M., Kenardy, J., & Beller, E. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.030 · Cited by 256
Self-citationWicksell, R. K., Ahlqvist, J., Bring, A., Melin, L., & Olsson, G. L. (2008) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070802078970 · Cited by 235
Fishbain, D. A., Pulikal, A., Lewis, J. E., & Gao, J. (2017) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw065 · Cited by 228
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thibault, P., Simmonds, M. J., Milioto, M., Cantin, A.-P., & Velly, A. M. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.031 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Sterling, M., Jull, G., Vicenzino, B., Kenardy, J., & Darnell, R.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-148
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129727087
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.005
- The paper
- Sterling, M., Jull, G., Vicenzino, B., Kenardy, J., & Darnell, R. (2005). Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.