Stages of change in readiness to adopt a self-management approach to chronic pain: the moderating role of early-treatment stage progression in predicting outcome
Abstract
Relative readiness to assume a self-management approach to chronic pain can be conceptualised as a stage model. Although both initial stage (precontemplation, action) and changes in attitudes reflecting stage orientation have been shown to predict treatment outcome, the joint contributions of these factors need to be examined. Sixty-five chronic pain patients, participating in a 4-week multidisciplinary pain program, completed the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ), subscales of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory at pre-, mid- and post-treatment. Patients were assigned to stage group (precontemplation or action) based on whether their Precontemplation or Action subscale scores were highest. Results showed that: (a) stage group interacted with pre- to mid-treatment Precontemplation subscale changes to predict mid- to late-treatment pain severity and interference changes such that precontemplation attitude decreases were related to reduced pain and interference only among patients who were already action stage at pre-treatment; (b) stage group interacted with pre- to mid-treatment Action subscale changes to predict mid- to late-treatment interference and activity changes such that action attitude increases were related to reduced interference and increased activity only among patients at the action stage at pre-treatment; (c) pre- to mid-treatment decreases in depression did not account for these effects. Results suggest that any adv…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients who start a program at least partly convinced that managing pain is their responsibility benefit far more than patients whose notions of pain management remain focused on medical management.
“Patients who start a program at least partly convinced that managing pain is their responsibility benefit far more than patients whose notions of pain management remain focused on medical management.2”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)
Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 · Cited by 2,128 · see citing works
Kerns, R. D., & Rosenberg, R. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00184-0 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Burns, J. W., Johnson, B. J., Mahoney, N., Devine, J., & Pawl, R. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.434 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pain catastrophizing: a critical review.
Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.34 · Cited by 1,405 · see citing works
Jensen, M. P., Moore, M. R., Bockow, T. B., Ehde, D. M., & Engel, J. M. (2011) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.021 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Zenker, S., Petraschka, M., Schenk, M., Reißhauer, A., Newie, T., Hermanns, K., Wernecke, K.-D., & Spies, C. (2006) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.446 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burns, J. W., Glenn, B., Lofland, K., Bruehl, S., & Harden, N. R.
- Affiliations
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burns, John W.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 322-331
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094135618
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- chronic pain, self-management, stages of change, precontemplation, action stage, readiness to change, multidisciplinary pain program, pain intensity, pain interference, activity level, depression, treatment outcomes, moderating effect
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Predictive Value of Tests, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review