Cited by 1,405Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pain catastrophizing: a critical review.

Open access
Quartana, Phillip J, Campbell, Claudia M, Edwards, Robert R·2009·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Pain catastrophizing is conceptualized as a negative cognitive-affective response to anticipated or actual pain and has been associated with a number of important pain-related outcomes. In the present review, we first focus our efforts on the conceptualization of pain catastrophizing, highlighting its conceptual history and potential problem areas. We then focus our discussion on a number of theoretical mechanisms of action: appraisal theory, attention bias/information processing, communal coping, CNS pain processing mechanisms, psychophysiological pathways and neural pathways. We then offer evidence to suggest that pain catastrophizing represents an important process factor in pain treatment. We conclude by offering what we believe represents an integrated heuristic model for use by researchers over the next 5 years; a model we believe will advance the field most expediently.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1586/ern.09.34

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Fear-Avoidance Model describes core cognitive-behavioural processes, including pain catastrophising, pain-related fear, pain hypervigilance and pain avoidance, which contribute to the transition from acute to persistent pain, including maintaining and exacerbating processes.

    “The Fear-Avoidance Model (FAM)65–71 describes core cognitive–behavioural processes, including pain catastrophising, pain-related fear, pain hypervigilance and pain avoidance, which contribute to the transition from acute to persistent pain, including maintaining and exacerbating processes.”

    From Optimising psychological treatment for pain after breast cancer: a factorial design study protocol in Denmark (2023) · cites this paper as [70]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pain catastrophizing is linked to pain intensity, depressive symptoms, disability, and delayed recovery in patients with chronic pain.

    “a construct previously linked to pain intensity, depressive symptoms, disability, and delayed recovery in patients with chronic pain [56,57].”

    From The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis as a brain correlate of psychological inflexibility in fibromyalgia (2020) · cites this paper as [57]

    The section “Association of pain catastrophizing with pain-related outcomes” links catastrophizing to clinical pain severity, depression, and disability in chronic pain samples. It also reports adverse postsurgical outcomes, but does not specifically establish delayed recovery in patients with chronic pain. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People with persistent pain often catastrophise, seen as exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings in response to actual or anticipated pain.

    “Similarly, people with persistent pain often catastrophise. This is seen as exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings in response to actual or anticipated pain.10”

    From Protocol for a feasibility and acceptability study using a brief ACT-based intervention for people from Southwest Wales who live with persistent pain (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    The ‘Pain catastrophizing: conceptual & measurement considerations’ section (page unavailable) defines it as exaggerated negative cognitive and emotional responses to actual or anticipated pain. The ‘Association of pain catastrophizing with pain-related outcomes’ section discusses people with chronic pain, but does not establish that they often catastrophise. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pain acceptance addresses pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia.

    “pain acceptance addresses: (1) pain catastrophizing, which is an exaggerated cognitive or emotional response to actual or anticipated pain [51-53], and (2) kinesiophobia, which is the avoidance of activities or movements due to excessive anxiety that it will cause pain or injury [54].”
  • Catastrophizing has been linked to increased hypervigilance and heightened activity in brain regions involved in threat detection and affective processing.

    “Additionally, catastrophizing has been linked to increased hypervigilance and heightened activity in brain regions involved in threat detection and affective processing.45,46”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G Cognitive Therapy of Depression Guilford Press NY, USA 1979
  2. [76]Edwards RR Kronfli T Haythornthwaite JA Association of catastrophizing with interleukin-6 responses to acute pain Pain 140 1 135 144 2008 18778895 PMC2659503

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., & Edwards, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2009-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
745-758
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2122400634
Cited by
1,405
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k23ar051315-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH075884)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS063624)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23-AR051315)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, appraisal theory, attentional bias, information processing, communal coping, central sensitization, neural pathways, pain management, heuristic model
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Humans, Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review