The utility of pain assessment for analgesic use in persons with dementia
Abstract
Ameliorating pain symptoms in persons with severe dementia is difficult due to the inherent problems of pain assessment and communication with this population. This study aims to examine the utility of nine pain assessments in identifying pain and documenting responsiveness to pain medication in 121 nursing home residents with dementia. The assessments included self-report, informant ratings by nursing staff, and direct observations. This was an open medication study, with comparison groups of persons with dementia. Those evaluated as having pain were included in the pain medication protocol. Three comparison groups were utilized: those not considered in pain at baseline, those in pain at baseline for whom caregivers refused to follow the pain medication protocol, and a subset of those not in pain at baseline who were followed for a period of time similar in length to the treatment group. Informant ratings were the assessments most likely to detect pain and direct observations were least likely to do so. Both self-report and informant ratings showed a significantly greater decrease in pain in the treatment group relative to the comparison groups. All participants who followed the pain protocol reached a pain free stage by the study criteria. A limitation of the study was the reduced endpoint number due to family or physician resistance to following treatment recommendations. The results present a methodology that caregivers can use to increase the detection of pain in persons…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PAINE is superior to other assessments for detecting pain in this population.
“For this reason, the PAINE data was used for the estimate rather than the reports of RAs or NAs, as this assessment has been shown to be superior to others for the detection of pain in this population (Cohen-Mansfield and Lipson, 2008).”
From Which unmet needs contribute to behavior problems in persons with advanced dementia? (2015) · cites this paper as Cohen-Mansfield and Lipson, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Cohen-Mansfield, J., & Lipson, S.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-23
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085705622
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- pain assessment, dementia, analgesic use, nursing home residents, self-report, informant ratings, direct observation, pain detection, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Single-Blind Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review