Cited by 61Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPain Management and Treatment

A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain: replication in a UK primary care low back pain population

Dunn, Kate M., Croft, Peter R., Main, Chris J., Von Korff, Michael·2008·Pain

Abstract

A novel prognostic approach to defining chronic pain was developed in a US primary care low back pain population, using a combination of information about pain history, current status and likely prognosis. We tested whether this method was generalizable to a UK population. A prospective cohort of 426 patients who consulted with back pain at one of five UK general practices, and who returned follow-up information 1-year later were included. A baseline risk score was calculated based on pain severity and prognostic measures (depression, diffuse pain, pain duration), and cut-points from the US study applied for the risk of future clinically significant back pain, as defined by Chronic Pain Grades 2-4. New cut-points were also derived for the UK population using identical methods. The cut-points for probable and possible chronic pain developed in the US population (80% and 50% probability of future clinically significant back pain, respectively) were appropriate for the UK population, but the cut-point for classifying people at low risk (20% probability) was not replicated in the UK sample. The newly derived cut-points in the UK sample were similar; they remained the same for probable chronic pain, were slightly increased for possible chronic pain, and slightly reduced for those at intermediate or low risk. This method for defining chronic pain prospectively, using risk thresholds for future clinically significant pain, appears to be generalizable to a UK back pain population, particularly for identifying probable chronic pain, and may be generalizable to other primary care low back pain populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The items used for impact stratification (pain intensity, pain interference, and functional status) have substantial research support for their discriminatory and prognostic importance.

    “These items have substantial research support to validate their discriminatory and prognostic importance. 13, 19, 31, 38, 39, 43, 47–49, 53, 54, 57–60, 66–68, 73, 76, 80, 82, 85, 86, 97, 106, 108, 110, 112–116, 122”
  • Definitions based solely on pain duration do not consider the multidimensional nature of chronic pain, namely activity limitations and participation restrictions.

    “Although conceptually appealing, this hotly debated7 approach does not consider the multidimensional nature of chronic pain, namely, the presence of activity limitations and participation restrictions,5,17,30–36 classifications recognized by the World Health Organization.37”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, K. M., Croft, P. R., Main, C. J., & Von Korff, M.
Affiliations
Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Kate M.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-03
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
48-54
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000462586
Cited by
61
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, low back pain, prognostic stratification, risk score, cut points, generalizability, primary care, pain intensity, depression, diffuse pain, pain duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review