Cited by 18Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Relapse prevention: Still neglected after all these years

Morley, Stephen·2008·Pain

Abstract

Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK *Tel.: +44 113 343 2733; fax: +44 113 343 6997. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted December 6, 2007; accepted December 7, 2007.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2007.12.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morley, S.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Morley, Stephen
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-02
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
239-240
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022601289
Cited by
18
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
relapse prevention, chronic pain, pain management, relapse
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, United Kingdom, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Failure, Secondary Prevention, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review