Distribution and dispersal history of Eurypterida (Chelicerata)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eurypterids are known from the Ordovician until the Permian, but many were marginal marine.
“Eurypterids are known from the Ordovician until the Permian (Tetlie 2007), but many were marginal marine.”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Tetlie 2007
Cites
Large–scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies
Smith, A. B. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0768 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): The palaeoecological dimension
Servais, T., Owen, A. W., Harper, D. A. T., Kröger, B., & Munnecke, A. (2010) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.05.031 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts
Klug, C., Frey, L., Pohle, A., De Baets, K., & Korn, D. (2017) · Bulletin of Geosciences · doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1648 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Metamorphosis Is Ancestral for Crown Euarthropods, and Evolved in the Cambrian or Earlier
Wolfe, J. M. (2017) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icx039 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tetlie, O. E.
- Venue
- Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 557-574
- ISSN
- 0031-0182
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
