Cited by 35Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Metamorphosis Is Ancestral for Crown Euarthropods, and Evolved in the Cambrian or Earlier

Open access
Wolfe, Joanna M.·2017·Integrative and Comparative Biology

Abstract

Macroevolutionary developmental biology employs fossilized ontogenetic data and phylogenetic comparative methods to probe the evolution of development at ancient nodes. Despite the prevalence of ecologically differentiated larval forms in marine invertebrates, it has been frequently presumed that the ancestors of arthropods were direct developers, and that metamorphosis may not have evolved until the Ordovician or later. Using fossils and new dated phylogenies, I infer that metamorphosis was likely ancestral for crown arthropods, contradicting this assumption. Based on a published morphological dataset encompassing 217 exceptionally preserved fossil and 96 extant taxa, fossils were directly incorporated into both the topology and age estimates, as in "tip dating" analyses. Using data from post-embryonic fossils representing 25 species throughout stem and crown arthropod lineages (as well as most of the 96 extant taxa), characters for metamorphosis were assigned based on inferred ecological changes in development (e.g., changes in habitat and adaptive landscape). Under all phylogenetic hypotheses, metamorphosis was supported as most likely ancestral to both ecdysozoans and euarthropods. Care must be taken to account for potential drastic post-embryonic morphological changes in evolutionary analyses. Many stem group euarthrpods may have had ecologically differentiated larval stages that did not preserve in the fossil record. Moreover, a complex life cycle and planktonic ecology may have evolved in the Ediacaran or earlier, and may have typified the pre-Cambrian explosion "wormworld" prior to the origin of crown group euarthropods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/icb/icx039

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Divergence time analyses using morphological data also recover a Cambrian origin for the Euarthropoda.

    “In addition, divergence time analyses using morphological data also recover a Cambrian origin for the Euarthropoda (Wolfe 2017).”

    From Current understanding on the Cambrian Explosion: questions and answers (2021) · cites this paper as Wolfe 2017

    The Performance of dating methods section (page unavailable) says node-dating results align with a Cambrian explosion. But it also says tip-dating results imply a much earlier history, and describes the tip-dated euarthropod age as consistent with molecular estimates predating fossil appearances. The claim is supported for the node-dated analyses, not for the morphological divergence-time analyses as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfe, J. M.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wolfe, Joanna M.
Venue
Integrative and Comparative Biology
Published
2017-07-04
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
499-509
ISSN
  • 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7023
OpenAlex
W2728434393
Cited by
35
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (EAR-1615426)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
metamorphosis, arthropod evolution, euarthropods, ecdysozoans, larval development, ontogeny, Cambrian, Ediacaran, tip-dating, ancestral state reconstruction, complex life cycles
MeSH terms
Animals, Arthropods, Fossils, Metamorphosis, Biological, Phylogeny

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review