A mean field annealing approach to accurate free form shape matching
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.
“[13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.”
From Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid (2013) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Aberystwyth University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yonghuai
- ORCID
- Liu, Yonghuai
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2418-2436
- ISSN
- 0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096179475
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Aberystwyth University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- deterministic annealing, mean field annealing, 3D shape matching, camera motion estimation, weighted least squares, saddle-point solutions, partial overlap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
