Cited by 6793D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid

Open access
Tam, G. K. L., Zhi-Quan Cheng, Yu-Kun Lai, Langbein, F. C., Yonghuai Liu, Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Xian-Fang Sun +1 more·2013·IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Abstract

Three-dimensional surface registration transforms multiple three-dimensional data sets into the same coordinate system so as to align overlapping components of these sets. Recent surveys have covered different aspects of either rigid or nonrigid registration, but seldom discuss them as a whole. Our study serves two purposes: 1) To give a comprehensive survey of both types of registration, focusing on three-dimensional point clouds and meshes and 2) to provide a better understanding of registration from the perspective of data fitting. Registration is closely related to data fitting in which it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences and constraints, and optimization. Study of these components 1) provides a basis for comparison of the novelties of different techniques, 2) reveals the similarity of rigid and nonrigid registration in terms of problem representations, and 3) shows how overfitting arises in nonrigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques. We further summarize some practical issues of registration which include initializations and evaluations, and discuss some of our own observations, insights and foreseeable research trends.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This survey reviews rigid and non-rigid 3D surface registration for point clouds and meshes, framing registration as data fitting through model selection, correspondences/constraints, and optimization. It argues that non-rigid registration faces over-fitting from high-dimensional deformation models, while intrinsic/isometric techniques offer low-dimensional constraints and are a growing research focus.

Key findings

  • Registration can be analyzed via three interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints, and optimization; this framing reveals similarities between rigid and non-rigid registration and highlights where over-fitting arises in non-rigid cases.
  • Transformation models range from rigid (6 DoF) to piecewise rigid (e.g., N predefined skeleton DoF), general deformation (e.g., local displacement field 3N DoF, local rigid 6N DoF, local affine 12N DoF, TPS 12+3N DoF), and (nearly) isometric intrinsic models.
  • Rigid registration techniques have addressed substantial challenges: the survey cites methods handling up to 35% noise and part-in-whole problems, and up to 40% outliers with down to 40% overlap.
  • Non-rigid registration is described as still in its infancy; intrinsic techniques use low-dimensional embeddings and isometry constraints to avoid high-dimensional over-fitting, but often require mesh data with consistent topology and may not work on point clouds.

Methods

  • Literature survey covering rigid and non-rigid surface registration over the past two decades, focused on 3D point clouds, meshes, and sparse 3D point data; techniques requiring extra information (e.g., silhouettes, specific viewpoints) or specific representations (e.g., range images) are excluded unless directly applicable to point clouds.
  • The paper organizes methods by data-fitting components: functional models (Section 3), constraints for rigid and non-rigid registration (Section 4), optimization methods (Section 5), and evaluation (Section 6), with comparison tables for transformation models, constraints, and optimization techniques.
  • It compares its scope and classification to prior surveys, discusses practical issues such as initialization and evaluation, and offers observations, insights, and foreseeable research trends.

Limitations

  • Stated: non-rigid registration is problem- and data-dependent, still largely proof-of-concept, and lacks precise definitions or methods for evaluating correspondence quality; obtaining ground truth is difficult, and many techniques can handle only limited sequences (15–200 frames) due to memory limitations.
  • Stated: intrinsic techniques often require mesh data with consistent topology, may not work on point clouds, and are affected by large topological errors and holes; isometry assumptions can fail under large topological changes or non-isometric deformation.
  • Evident from the text: as a survey, it presents no new experimental validation and its coverage is bounded by the literature available at the time (2013); it also explicitly excludes 3D volume image registration and 2D image registration except by reference.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvcg.2012.310

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 79 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    SHOT signatures perform better than spin images.

    “SHOT signatures perform better than spin images [68].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    The paper's classification shows that several similar high-level constraints are used in both rigid and non-rigid registration: transformation-(deformation-) induced constraints, features, saliency, regularization, and search constraints.

    “Our classification (Tables 3 and 4) shows that several similar high-level constraints are used in both rigid and non-rigid registration, namely transformation-(deformation-) induced constraints, features, saliency, regularization and search constraints.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Many features and saliency measures have been reused in nonrigid registration.

    “In particular, many features and saliency have been reused in nonrigid registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Recent space-time registrations focus on reducing the dimension of the deformation by constructing a low-dimensional representation, such as skeletons, bones and joints.

    “Recent space-time registrations focus on reducing the dimension of the deformation (alleviating the over-fitting problem) by constructing a lowdimensional representation (e.g.skeletons [5], bones and joints [26]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    The Gaussian field method shows robustness in the presence of strong noise.

    “This method shows robustness in the presence of strong noise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [95] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 125
  • May combine two claims. 73
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Curvatures are fast to compute but easily affected by noise and incomplete surfaces.

    “Curvatures are fast to compute, but easily affected by noise and incomplete surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Recent intrinsic techniques enforce isometric consistency.

    “From a high level viewpoint, recent intrinsic techniques enforce isometric consistency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Integral invariants are robust to noise and give similar information to curvature.

    “Integral invariants are robust to noise and give similar information to curvature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    No rigid registration methods use templates, while many non-rigid methods do.

    “A significant difference is that while no rigid registration methods use templates, many non-rigid methods do.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some constraints have been adopted by non-rigid registration; for example, an isometry constraint based on Euclidean distance in [46] is replaced by geodesic distance in [2].

    “Some constraints have been adopted by non-rigid registration, e.g., [46] defines an isometry constraint based on Euclidean distance, which is replaced by geodesic distance in [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Choice of features for feature matching is not well discussed in the literature.

    “Choice of features for feature matching is not well discussed in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Registration cast as global optimization does a complete search with bounds or approximates/relaxes the problem into continuous settings to find a near global solution.

    “Registration, when cast as global optimization, does a complete search with bounds (exact global solution), or approximates / relaxes the problem into continuous settings so that a near global solution can be found.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Space-time registration techniques usually target sequences, require denser temporal sampling, assume small deformation, and require large overlap of regions for feature correspondences between consecutive frames.

    “These techniques usually target sequences, require denser temporal sampling, assume small deformation and large overlap of regions for feature correspondences between consecutive frames.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Many registration techniques optimize both transformations and correspondences, while some optimize transformations or find correspondences only.

    “Many techniques optimize both transformations and correspondences whilst some optimize transformations or find correspondences only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Most methods based on CPC formulate an energy functional with data and regularization terms.

    “Most methods based on CPC formulate an energy functional with data and regularization terms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The distance root mean squared error used by [48] as a bound on CPC error is both tight and fast to compute.

    “as a bound on CPC error (Eqn 5); it is both tight and fast to compute.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Gelfand, Robust Global Registration

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Many techniques model registration and correspondence determination with statistics and probabilistic approaches to handle noise, outliers and missing data.

    “Many techniques model registration and the correspondence determination problem with statistics and probabilistic approaches in order to handle datasets with noise, outliers and missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Both registration and data fitting are formulated as optimization problems which can be solved in a similar fashion.

    “Both registration and data fitting are formulated as optimization problems which can be solved in a similar fashion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    One of the major concerns in data-fitting is to avoid overfitting, when χ fits noise rather than the data. The same applies to registration where the models f of extrinsic techniques usually have high degrees of freedom. This potentially leads to over-fitting problems.

    “One of the major concerns in data-fitting is to avoid overfitting, when χ fits noise rather than the data.The same applies to registration where the models f of extrinsic techniques usually have high degrees of freedom.This potentially leads to over-fitting problems (in which there are too many parameters to describe the transformation).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    A general observation made by all extrinsic models of non-rigid techniques is that the more high frequency information on the surface, the more DoF required.

    “A general observation made by all extrinsic models of non-rigid techniques is that the more high frequency information on the surface, the more DoF required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [3] can handle up to 35% noise and the part-in-whole problem.

    “These include [3] which can handle up to 35% noise, and part-in-whole problem”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [5] can handle large gaps in 4D sequences and reduce high dimensionality of deformations through automatic construction of consensus skeletons.

    “[5] that can handle large gaps in 4D sequences, reduce high dimensionality of deformations through automatic construction of consensus skeletons”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    In the extreme case, non-rigid registration methods that handle large deformation involving articulation or fine detail preservation use 12 DoF (an affine transformation) per point or node.

    “In the extreme case, non-rigid registration methods that handle large deformation involving articulation or fine detail preservation, use 12 DoF (an affine transformation) per point or node.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In extrinsic techniques, regularization becomes highly essential, not only to obtain a smooth surface, but also to constrain arbitrary transformation to obtain a reasonable solution.

    “In these techniques, regularization becomes highly essential, not only to obtain a smooth surface, but also to constrain arbitrary transformation to obtain a reasonable solution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    E_reg is a regularization term that provides additional information to constrain an arbitrary transformation so that the solution a is a reasonable one.

    “E reg is a regularization term that provides additional information to constrain an arbitrary transformation so that the solution a is a reasonable one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Registration can be further classified into extrinsic and intrinsic techniques.

    “Registration can be further classified into extrinsic and intrinsic techniques (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Four main types of transformation models are common: rigid transformation, piecewise rigid deformation, general deformation and (nearly) isometric deformation.

    “Four main types are common: rigid transformation, piecewise rigid deformation, general deformation and (nearly) isometric deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When non-rigid registrations assume high DoFs, overfitting can become a problem (though not frequently discussed).

    “When non-rigid registrations assume high DoFs, overfitting can become a problem (though not frequently discussed).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Rigid alignment with non-rigid correction is a transitional case between the rigid and non-rigid models.

    “Rigid alignment with non-rigid correction is a transitional case between the rigid and non-rigid models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [7] supports facial capture and animation of avatar heads in real-time.

    “[7] that supports facial capture and animation of avatar heads in real-time”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Study of these components shows how over-fitting arises in non-rigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques.

    “Study of these components (i) provides a basis for comparison of the novelties of different techniques, (ii) reveals the similarity of rigid and non-rigid registration in terms of problem representations, and (iii) shows how over-fitting arises in non-rigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    To alleviate overfitting, [2], [6], [32] reduce the DoF explicitly by computing local transformations with respect to clusters or nodes, and most non-rigid registration methods use regularization to further constrain the solutions.

    “To alleviate it, [2], [6], [32] reduce the DoF explicitly by computing local transformations with respect to clusters or nodes, and most non-rigid registration methods use regularization to further constrain the solutions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In rigid registration, correspondences assist in further pruning the transformation search space, whilst in the non-rigid case, establishing correspondences is the essential step that drives alignment.

    “In rigid registration, correspondences assist in further pruning the transformation search space, whilst in the non-rigid case, establishing correspondences is the essential step that drives alignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Registration is closely related to data fitting in that it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints, and optimization.

    “Registration is closely related to data fitting in that it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints and optimization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The rigid transformation is global, can be uniquely defined by three non-collinear pairs of correspondences, and has low dimension (6 DoF).

    “This transformation (i) is global-the same for every point p i , (ii) can be uniquely defined by three non-collinear pairs of correspondences, and (iii) has low dimension (6 DoF).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Comparatively, non-rigid registration techniques are still in their infancy.

    “Comparatively, non-rigid registration techniques are still in their infancy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In rigid registration, the overfitting problem is generally ignored because there are 6 DoF only.

    “In rigid registration, the overfitting problem is generally ignored because there are 6 DoF only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [6] can register 4D surfaces and produce an urshape template.

    “[6] that can register 4D surfaces and produce an urshape template”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [4] can handle up to 40% outliers and down to 40% overlap as demonstrated in their experiments.

    “[4] which can handle up to 40% outliers, and down to 40% overlap as demonstrated in their experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    While not every registration technique fits well into this framework derived from data fitting, these components and constraints do exist in most surveyed methods.

    “While not every registration technique fits well into this framework derived from data fitting, these components and constraints do exist in most surveyed methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [8], [9] can handle near-to approximate isometric deformation.

    “[8], [9] that can handle near-to approximateisometric deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using the first two properties, if both point sets contain at least one pair of triplets that match exactly and provide the correct transformation, it takes O(N^6) time to test all possible transformations for sets of N points.

    “Using the first two properties, if both point sets contain at least one pair of triplets that match exactly and provide the correct transformation, it takes O(N 6 ) time to test all possible transformations for sets of N points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    All these have changed the landscape of digital geometry processing, migrating the focuses to dynamic scenes and motions.

    “All these have changed the landscape of digital geometry processing, migrating the focuses to dynamic scenes and motions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In intrinsic techniques, both P and Q are transformed into a canonical form and the mapping function h is usually low-dimensional. The intrinsic transformation g provides the most important constraint to avoid arbitrary transformation. This is one reason why these techniques have become the recent research focus.

    “In intrinsic techniques, both P and Q are transformed into a canonical form and the mapping function h is usually low-dimensional.The intrinsic transformation g provides the most important constraint to avoid arbitrary transformation.This is one reason why these techniques have become the recent research focus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Non-rigid registration is more difficult than rigid registration because it must account for deformation, making the solution space much larger.

    “Non-rigid registration is even more difficult, as it not only faces the above challenges but also needs to account for deformation, so the solution space is much larger.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [62] gives a fast ICP algorithm based on localization. They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.

    “Localization: [62] gives a fast ICP algorithm (Section 4.1.1)based on localization.They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Features and saliency used in nonrigid registration are usually defined on local surface geometry and are at least assumed to be invariant under transformation.

    “They are usually defined on local surface geometry and are (at least, assumed to be) invariant under transformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Regularization involves adding penalty terms to the objective function. It incorporates a priori information, improves search, and avoids local minima during optimization.

    “Regularization involves adding penalty terms to the objective function.It incorporates a priori information, improves search, and avoids local minima during optimization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Intrinsic models assume (nearly) isometric deformation.

    “Intrinsic models assume (nearly) isometric deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Given two surfaces P and Q in arbitrary initial poses, [4] randomly selects a 4-point tuple from P and another 4-point tuple from Q, and compares the affine ratios. If they form a correspondence, their affine ratio will match.

    “Given two surfaces P and Q in arbitrary initial poses, [4] randomly selects a 4-point tuple from P and another 4-point tuple from Q, and compares the affine ratios.If they form a correspondence, their affine ratio will match.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [65] uses the term to maximize correspondences and bias the objective function towards more matches. This maximizes the overlapping area.

    “Maximizing Correspondences: [65] uses the term i j M ij to maximize correspondences and bias the objective function towards more matches (i.e. it favors M ij = 1 over M ij = 0).This maximizes the overlapping area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Templates simplify the part-to-part alignment problem to part-to-whole alignment, by providing strong structural information including priors for shape, constraints on arbitrary deformation, and connectivity. These greatly help to handle topological noise and missing data.

    “Templates simplify the part-to-part alignment problem to part-to-whole alignment, by providing strong structural information including priors for shape, constraints on arbitrary deformation, and connectivity.These greatly help to handle topological noise and missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Extrinsic non-rigid registration allows fairly arbitrary deformation due to high dimensionality (an over-fitting problem) but encourages isometry through heavy regularization.

    “Extrinsic non-rigid registration allows fairly arbitrary deformation (due to the high dimensionality of the models (an over-fitting problem)) but encourages isometry through the heavy use of regularization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    PCA methods are most useful for whole object registration.

    “PCA methods are most useful for whole object registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Slippage analysis is unsuited to smooth surfaces due to its definition.

    “Slippage analysis is unsuited to smooth surfaces due to its definition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Point-to-plane ICP minimizes the shortest distance between a point and the tangent plane of the closest point on another surface. This allows faster tangential movement of the surfaces.

    “The first of these was point-to-plane ICP.[51] minimizes the shortest distance between a point and the tangent plane of the closest point on another surface.This allows faster tangential movement of the surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [6], [28], [79] constructs a template, an urshape, by accumulating and filling in missing data from other scans in the same sequence. They have been used extensively in non-rigid registration to constrain dense correspondences. This works for objects with well defined forms, such as the human face and body.

    “[6], [28], [79] constructs a template, an urshape, by accumulating and filling in missing data from other scans in the same sequence.They have been used extensively in non-rigid registration to constrain dense correspondences [23], [29], [32], [34], [80].This works for objects with well defined forms, such as the human face and body.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [79] Wand, Reconstruction of Deforming Geometry from Time-Varying Point Clouds

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [67] proposed a similar method based on a generalized Gauss-Markov model which uses a statistical framework to model noise.

    “Independently, [67] proposed a similar method based on a generalized Gauss-Markov model which uses a statistical framework to model noise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Higher-dimensional features offer greater pruning power because of the low probability of matching all components of the feature, but often take longer to compute.

    “Higher-dimensional features offer greater pruning power because of the low probability of matching all components of the feature, but often take longer to compute.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful for it.

    “Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Isometry is a very powerful constraint sufficient to define a class of intrinsic transformation models and is used in optimization in various ways.

    “Isometry is a very powerful constraint which is sufficient to define a class of intrinsic transformation models (Section 3.5), and is used in optimization in various ways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Markers and templates are explicit prior knowledge provided by users.

    “Markers and templates are explicit prior knowledge provided by users.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Fine surface details are usually ignored when establishing correspondences in intrinsic models, due to their intrinsic nature.

    “Fine surface details are usually ignored when establishing correspondences, due to their intrinsic nature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    RANSAC-based DARCES [47] uses distance-preserving constraint to enumerate and test three pairs of correspondences in a sphere to limit the transformation search space.

    “RANSAC-based DARCES [47] uses distance-preserving constraint to enumerate and test three pairs of correspondences in a sphere to limit the transformation search space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The appropriate model to use depends on the data itself.

    “The appropriate model to use depends on the data itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most non-rigid constraints, both extrinsic and intrinsic, focus on modelling the relationship between correspondences, whereas in rigid registration this relationship is implicitly captured by the rigid transformation.

    “In general, most non-rigid constraints (both extrinsic and intrinsic) focus on modelling the relationship between correspondences, whilst this relationship is implicitly captured by the rigid transformation in rigid registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Saliency is a measure of local significance in a surface: salient points/regions are those whose properties are unlike most of their neighbours. They are used for key point/region detection, often in conjunction with features. They reduce the size of correspondence space, potential mismatches and obtain more reliable coarse correspondences.

    “Saliency is a measure of local significance in a surface: salient points/regions are those whose properties are unlike most of their neighbours.They are used for key point/region detection, often in conjunction with features (Section 4.1.2).They reduce the size of correspondence space, potential mismatches and obtain more reliable coarse correspondences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [46] assumes that the Euclidean distance between the centers of a pair of features on a surface, and the angles between their principal directions and their connecting line, are preserved under a rigid transformation.

    “[46] assumes that the Euclidean distance between the centers of a pair of features on a surface, and the angles between their principal directions and their connecting line, are preserved under a rigid transformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Many intrinsic methods require mesh data with consistent topology, and may not work on point cloud data.

    “Many methods of this kind require mesh data with consistent topology, and may not work on point cloud data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [48] uses (Euclidean) distance-based lower-bounding and the branch-and-bound to reduce the correspondence search space.

    “[48] uses (Euclidean) distancebased lower-bounding and the branch-and-bound to reduce the correspondence search space (Section 5.2.1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Gelfand, Robust Global Registration

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    3D markers provide sparse correspondences.

    “3D markers provide sparse correspondences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The iterative closest point algorithm must be carefully initialized.

    “This iterative algorithm must be carefully initialized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [65] casts registration as a continuous optimization problem that handles both rigid transformation and correspondence determination simultaneously. It uses CPC, and formulates a regularization term based on entropy. This term can be interpreted as equalizing the importances of point matches, forcing them to the same distance and thus causing the surfaces to run parallel, rather than intersecting.

    “Equalization: [65] casts registration as a continuous optimization problem that handles both rigid transformation and correspondence determination simultaneously.It uses CPC, and formulates a regularization term based on entropy:i j M ij log M ij where M is the matching probability matrix of all correspondences.When all point matches are equally likely, the entropy reaches a maximum.This term can”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [65] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Search constraints are for efficiency.

    “Search constraints are for efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Principal axes, computed through PCA, are three orthogonal directions where the greatest variance of the datapoints lie.

    “Principal axes, computed through principal component analysis (PCA), are three orthogonal directions (eigenvectors correspond to the largest eigenvalues) where the greatest variance of the datapoints lie.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [56] uses a hierarchy of surface features in the form of points, curves and finally surfaces. They estimate a Euclidean transformation using a few salient points. The transformation is then refined using curves, and surfaces.

    “[56] uses a hierarchy of surface features in the form of points, curves and finally surfaces.They estimate a Euclidean transformation using a few salient points.The transformation is then refined using curves, and surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Krsek, Range Image Registration Driven by a Hierarchy of Surface Differential Features

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.

    “[13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.

    “In nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Non-rigid registration results should adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Low-dimensional features are quick to compute and are usually used in conjunction with other constraints like saliency.

    “Low-dimensional features are quick to compute and is usually used in conjunction with other constraints like saliency (Section 4.1.3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A recent advance [49] combines PCA with the least median of squares, providing resistance to noise and outliers.

    “A recent advance [49] combines PCA with the least median of squares, providing resistance to noise and outliers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    [62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique. Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.

    “Hierarchical Approaches: [62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique.Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Features are quantities that describe a point. Multiple features can be concatenated to form a feature vector. When features of two points match, a meaningful correspondence may exist.

    “Features are quantities (e.g.principal curvatures) that describe a point.Multiple features can be concatenated to form a feature vector.When features of two points (or clusters) match, a meaningful correspondence may exist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [115] discusses how to evaluate registration without ground truth.

    “In the computer vision literature, [115] discusses how to evaluate registration without ground truth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115] Schestowitz, 2006, Non-Rigid Registration Assessment Without Ground Truth, Medical Image Understanding and Analysis

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Local deterministic optimization methods are efficient but depend heavily on initialization and often converge to local minima.

    “These techniques are efficient but also depend heavily on initialization and often converge to local minimum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    More temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.

    “The idea is that more temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: More temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Two general surfaces can always be brought into alignment with arbitrarily small error.

    “Ultimately, two general surfaces can always be brought into alignment with arbitrarily small error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    A surface comprises different materials and may undergo different kinds of deformation.

    “However, a surface comprises different materials and may undergo different kinds of deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The efficiency of branch-and-bound depends on how tight the bound is and how quickly it can be computed.

    “Its efficiency depends on how tight the bound is, and how quickly it can be computed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Isometric distortion is meaningful only if the datasets are undergoing a (near-)isometric deformation.

    “Note that isometric distortion is meaningful only if the datasets are undergoing a (near-)isometric deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Transformation-induced constraints allow registration on highly sparse data, single-view data, and often in a pairwise manner.

    “These constraints allow registration to be carried out on highly sparse data, or data from a single view, and often in a pairwise manner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    One idea to evaluate registration without ground truth is to use image-based techniques [116] and compare the results with non-rigid registrations.

    “One idea is to use image-based techniques [116] and compare the results with non-rigid registrations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [116] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    After a few steps, more emphasis is put on the data term because the original shape has been deformed close enough to the aligning shape.

    “After a few steps, more emphasis is put on the data term because the original shape has been deformed to lie close enough to the aligning shape [29], [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    It is well-known theoretically that high dimensionality can lead to over-fitting.

    “It is well-known theoretically that such high dimensionality can lead to over-fitting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Global optimization tries to find a global solution and avoid local minima.

    “Global optimization tries to find a global solution and to avoid local minima.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In rigid transformation estimation, a closed-form least-squares solution exists if three or more distinct non-collinear pairs of correspondences are given, and can be solved by SVD, quaternions, orthonormal matrices or dual quaternions.

    “In rigid transformation estimation, a closed-form least-squares solution (preferable for efficiency and robustness) exists if three or more distinct non-collinear pairs of correspondences are given [100], which can be solved by SVD, quaternions, orthonormal matrices or dual quaternions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Low-dimensional representations enable registration techniques to handle sparser data and multiple or all frames at a time, and generate more accurate results.

    “These enable registration techniques to handle sparser data and multiple or all frames at a time, and generate more accurate results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [8] recruited a volunteer to label 10-35 semantically meaningful and consistent feature points for each class of objects in the watertight meshes dataset [114].

    “[8] also recruited a volunteer to label 10-35 semantically meaningful and consistent feature points for each class of objects in the watertight meshes dataset [114].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [114] Giorgi, 2013, SHREC: Shape Retrieval Contest: Watertight Models Track

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A benchmark database [91] based on TOSCA allows evaluations on isometry, topology, holes, scale, sampling, and noise of features and saliency.

    “A benchmark database [91] based on TOSCA further allows evaluations on isometry, topology, holes, scale, sampling, and noise of features and saliency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Boyer, SHREC 2011: Robust Feature Detection and Description Benchmark

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Transformation-induced constraints and reliable features and saliency measures are important priors.

    “Transformation (deformation)-induced constraints and reliable features & saliency measures are important priors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Existing extrinsic techniques encourage smoothness through (i) formulating a priori knowledge or assumptions as regularization, (ii) introducing additional equations by some linear constraints on neighborhoods or (iii) uses a reduced representation (e.g. embedded graph nodes, meshless element models).

    “To alleviate the over-fitting problem, existing extrinsic techniques encourage smoothness through (i) formulating a priori knowledge or assumptions as regularization, (ii) introducing additional equations by some linear constraints on neighborhoods or (iii) uses a reduced representation (e.g.embedded graph nodes, meshless element models).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [8] uses the sum of isometric distortion-difference of geodesic distances between the end-points of one correspondence with respect to all the other correspondences.

    “[8] uses sum of isometric distortion-difference of geodesic distances between the end-points of one correspondence with respect to all the other correspondences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Related techniques [118] are emerging.

    “Related techniques [118] are emerging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [118] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The area of using physical models relating tissues, bones and muscles in 3D face registration is yet to explore, possibly due to the complexity of facial physiology.

    “This area is yet to explore, possibly due to the complexity of facial physiology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [9] sums isometric distortions all over the surface to obtain one single number.

    “[9] sums these isometric distortions all over the surface to obtain one single number.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Branch-and-bound is a complete search technique based on a lower bound on the cost function.

    “Branch-and-bound is a complete search technique, which is based on a lower bound on the cost function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In general, obtaining ground truth data is difficult.

    “In general, obtaining ground truth data is difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The main difficulties of using multiple deformation models are the need for surface segmentation, constraints between adjacent models, and approaches to merge registration and deformation results.

    “The main difficulties of doing so are the need for surface segmentation, constraints between adjacent models, and approaches to merge registration and deformation results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Local optimization can become stuck in local minima if the initial solution is not close to a global solution.

    “Local optimization can become stuck in local minima if the initial solution is not close to a global solution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The evaluation of new techniques on dataset type 3 may actually compare their performance against the techniques that create the dataset.

    “Note also that the evaluation of new techniques on dataset type 3 may actually compare their performance against the techniques that create the dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Assuming a single model for the two surfaces being aligned is practical, enabling optimization to simultaneously find the best transformations for all points.

    “This is practical, enabling optimization to simultaneously find the best transformations for all points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The envelope of motion is perhaps the weakest prior and requires both dense spatial and temporal sampling.

    “Perhaps the weakest prior is the envelop of motion which requires both dense spatial and temporal sampling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Search constraints are mostly for efficiency.

    “(Search constraints are mostly for efficiency.)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Given ground truth data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves may be used to evaluate registration.

    “Given ground truth data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which are plots of true positive rate against false positive rate, may be used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    One way to evaluate registration without ground truth is to evaluate the results by generalizing them to unseen data.

    “One way is to evaluate the results by generalizing them to unseen data (a well known method in datafitting).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    In general, non-rigid registration is problem- and data-dependent.

    “In general, non-rigid registration is problem-and data-dependent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    For non-rigid shapes, many deformations are only near/approximate isometric, which may lead to matching ambiguities [8].

    “For non-rigid shapes, many deformations are only near/approximateisometric, which may lead to matching ambiguities [8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These transformations are similar to the domain theory in analytical learning-a global rule, one reason why these techniques can be cast as optimization problems and solved using the Hough transform [17], [39] or RANSAC technique [4], [71] efficiently.

    “These transformations are similar to the domain theory in analytical learning-a global rule, one reason why these techniques can be cast as optimization problems and solved using the Hough transform [17], [39] or RANSAC technique [4], [71] efficiently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] Li, Multi-Scale Features for Approximate Alignment of Point-Based Surfaces

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [39] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.

    “In cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Groupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.

    “Groupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [33] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [123] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    As has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g. geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.

    “As has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g.geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [120] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One way of providing more training data is to look into the temporal domain.

    “One way of providing more training data is to look into the temporal domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [98] answers how many correspondences are required to constrain deformations of non-rigid shapes.

    “[98] further answers how many correspondences are required to constrain deformations of non-rigid shapes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This is similar to inductive learning with limited prior knowledge.

    “This is similar to inductive learning with limited prior knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Analytical learning uses domain theory (e.g. rules) and deductive inference to derive hypothesis.

    “Analytical learning uses domain theory (e.g.rules) and deductive inference to derive hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Mitchell, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Computation efficiency is another issue.

    “Computation efficiency is another issue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    There are no precise definitions and methods for evaluating quality of correspondences.

    “As we have noted, there are no precise definitions and methods for evaluating quality of correspondences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent research in intrinsic geometry and isometric consistency has led to important advances for isometric deformation, especially for face and body modeling.

    “Recent research in intrinsic geometry and isometric consistency has led to important advances for isometric deformation, especially for face and body modeling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many challenges posed by rigid registration have been addressed [2].

    “Many challenges posed by rigid registration have been addressed [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Intrinsic transformations require the two surfaces (and all points on them) to satisfy isometric consistency.

    “Intrinsic transformations require the two surfaces (and all points on them) to satisfy isometric consistency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Evaluation of correspondences and transformations are two important areas.

    “Evaluation of correspondences and transformations are two important areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Further challenges lie in (i) avoiding the need for markers or templates, and (ii) capturing and processing fine scale details [32].

    “Further challenges lie in (i) avoiding the need for markers or templates, and (ii) capturing and processing fine scale details [32].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The pitfall of analytical learning is that it depends on a perfect domain theory.

    “The pitfall of analytical learning is that it depends on a perfect domain theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Analytical learning does not require lots of training data but is seriously affected if the domain theory is incorrect.

    “It does not require lots of training data but is seriously affected if the domain theory is incorrect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Stochastic approaches are promising methods that are not sensitive to initialization.

    “Stochastic approaches are promising methods that are not sensitive to initialization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent research has focused on analyzing sequences of 3D scans: (i) hardware for capturing such sequences at a high frame rate is now readily available, and (ii) sequences assist registration by providing intermediate information, and thereby constraints.

    “Recent research has focused on analyzing sequences of 3D scans: (i) hardware for capturing such sequences at a high frame rate is now readily available, and (ii) sequences assist registration by providing intermediate information, and thereby constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If one wants to register surfaces from heterogeneous sources (e.g., two totally different human faces and their expressions), these techniques do not work.

    “If one wants to register surfaces from heterogeneous sources (e.g., two totally different human faces and their expressions), these techniques do not work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [8] has started in this direction using blended conformal maps.

    “[8] has started in this direction using blended conformal maps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By transforming non-rigid shapes into the intrinsic domain, many stochastic methods have found applications in establishing correspondences, and often near globally optimal solutions are obtained.

    “By transforming non-rigid shapes into the intrinsic domain, many stochastic methods have found applications in establishing correspondences, and often near globally optimal solutions are obtained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These approaches may be considered a combination of inductive and analytical learning techniques [122].

    “These approaches may be considered a combination of inductive and analytical learning techniques [122].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Mitchell, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    [40] suggests that fixing one correspondence, all other correspondences can be inferred for non-rigid shapes.

    “[40] suggests that fixing one correspondence, all other correspondences can be inferred for non-rigid shapes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Optimization is an important issue in registration as it affects accuracy, robustness and convergence.

    “Optimization is an important issue in registration as it affects accuracy, robustness and convergence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The justification of inductive learning is based on statistical inference.

    “The justification is based on statistical inference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Non-rigid registration is similar to data fitting, where there are many well-established techniques for model selection: cross-validation, early stopping and model comparison (e.g. information-based criteria).

    “However, non-rigid registration is similar to data fitting, where there are many well-established techniques for model selection: cross-validation, early stopping and model comparison (e.g.information-based criteria).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Existing techniques focus mostly on modelling near-isometric deformation and obtaining a global consistent set of correspondences.

    “Existing techniques focus mostly on modelling near-isometric deformation and obtaining a global consistent set of correspondences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Inductive learning (e.g. neural network) generalizes hypotheses, in terms of a function, from training examples to unseen data.

    “Inductive learning (e.g.neural network) generalizes hypotheses, in terms of a function, from training examples to unseen data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Mitchell, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Most techniques focus on registering surfaces of similar sources.

    “Most techniques focus on registering surfaces of similar sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationcitation

    Rigid Registration is becoming more robust and reliable over the past two decades of researches.

    “Rigid Registration is becoming more robust and reliable over the past two decades of researches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This type of technique assumes the deformation (hypotheses) can be learnt from sufficient training data.

    “This type of technique assumes the deformation (hypotheses) can be learnt from sufficient training data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Defining the semantic meaning of correspondences is a hard problem in itself, and currently no work considers the evaluation of transformations.

    “Defining the semantic meaning of correspondences is a hard problem in itself, and currently no work considers the evaluation of transformations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Having a rigid transformation requires all points to transform rigidly.

    “Having a rigid transformation requires all points to transform rigidly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Many optimization techniques used in rigid registration have yet to be applied to non-rigid cases.

    “Many optimization techniques used in rigid registration have yet to be applied to non-rigid cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The advantage of inductive learning is that it requires little prior knowledge, but the hypothesis may be incorrect if there is not sufficient training data-overfitting.

    “The advantage is that it requires little prior knowledge, but the hypothesis may be incorrect if there is not sufficient training data-overfitting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Although many techniques and constraints have been proposed to facilitate correspondence search, human assistance and visual inspection are sometimes required to provide semantic input.

    “Although many techniques and constraints have been proposed to facilitate correspondence search, human assistance and visual inspection are sometimes required to provide semantic input.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many existing non-rigid techniques are still in the stage of proof-of-concept-showing what can be done.

    “Many existing non-rigid techniques are still in the stage of proof-of-concept-showing what can be done.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Recent efforts of the community is to model and study these factors (e.g. Section 4.1.4).

    “Recent efforts of the community is to model and study these factors (e.g.Section 4.1.4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.

    “In information theory, the minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [119] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [120] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [121] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are two kinds of learning methods in ML [122]: inductive and analytical learning.

    “There are two kinds of learning methods in ML [122]: inductive and analytical learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Mitchell, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adapting these techniques to large scale data, deriving specific objective functions, handling various levels of geometric and topological noise, and extending them to non-isometric and elastic deformation are some of the challenges.

    “Adapting these techniques to large scale data, deriving specific objective functions, handling various levels of geometric and topological noise, and extending them to non-isometric and elastic deformation are some of the challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    A hypothesis in inductive learning is assumed to be found/fitted empirically from a large amount of training data.

    “A hypothesis is assumed to be found/fitted empirically from a large amount of training data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Meaningful correspondences should relate homologous sections of the shapes, i.e., sections that are semantically related.

    “Meaningful correspondences should relate homologous sections of the shapes, i.e., sections that are semantically related.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Non-Rigid Registration, in general, is still at its infant stage, largely because of the large varieties of transformations in the real world and the shortage of our knowledge of these transformations.

    “Non-Rigid Registration, in general, is still at its infant stage, largely because of the large varieties of transformations in the real world and the shortage of our knowledge of these transformations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
156 of 156
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In registration, most 3D scanned data are assumed to be multiple views of the same object which share the same scale.

    “The major reason is that, in registration, most of the 3D scanned data are assumed to be multiple views of the same object which share the same scale.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.

    “It is well-known that using too many DoF can overfit noise.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-rigid registration is typically applied to specific objects with a well-known form, such as human faces and bodies.

    “This works because non-rigid registration is typically applied to specific objects with a well-known form, such as human faces and bodies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes.

    “Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    More temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.

    “The idea is that more temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-rigid registration results should adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.

    “In nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.”
6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Krsek, Range Image Registration Driven by a Hierarchy of Surface Differential Features, 175
  2. Bokeloh, 2008, Slippage Features
  3. Digne, The Level Set Tree on Meshes
  4. Mitchell, 1997, Machine Learning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., & Rosin, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2013-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
1199-1217
ISSN
1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965805571
Cited by
679
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
27.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
3D surface registration, point clouds, mesh, rigid registration, non-rigid registration, data fitting, model selection, optimization, overfitting, initialization, registration evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review