Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid
Open accessAbstract
Three-dimensional surface registration transforms multiple three-dimensional data sets into the same coordinate system so as to align overlapping components of these sets. Recent surveys have covered different aspects of either rigid or nonrigid registration, but seldom discuss them as a whole. Our study serves two purposes: 1) To give a comprehensive survey of both types of registration, focusing on three-dimensional point clouds and meshes and 2) to provide a better understanding of registration from the perspective of data fitting. Registration is closely related to data fitting in which it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences and constraints, and optimization. Study of these components 1) provides a basis for comparison of the novelties of different techniques, 2) reveals the similarity of rigid and nonrigid registration in terms of problem representations, and 3) shows how overfitting arises in nonrigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques. We further summarize some practical issues of registration which include initializations and evaluations, and discuss some of our own observations, insights and foreseeable research trends.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews rigid and non-rigid 3D surface registration for point clouds and meshes, framing registration as data fitting through model selection, correspondences/constraints, and optimization. It argues that non-rigid registration faces over-fitting from high-dimensional deformation models, while intrinsic/isometric techniques offer low-dimensional constraints and are a growing research focus.
Key findings
- Registration can be analyzed via three interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints, and optimization; this framing reveals similarities between rigid and non-rigid registration and highlights where over-fitting arises in non-rigid cases.
- Transformation models range from rigid (6 DoF) to piecewise rigid (e.g., N predefined skeleton DoF), general deformation (e.g., local displacement field 3N DoF, local rigid 6N DoF, local affine 12N DoF, TPS 12+3N DoF), and (nearly) isometric intrinsic models.
- Rigid registration techniques have addressed substantial challenges: the survey cites methods handling up to 35% noise and part-in-whole problems, and up to 40% outliers with down to 40% overlap.
- Non-rigid registration is described as still in its infancy; intrinsic techniques use low-dimensional embeddings and isometry constraints to avoid high-dimensional over-fitting, but often require mesh data with consistent topology and may not work on point clouds.
Methods
- Literature survey covering rigid and non-rigid surface registration over the past two decades, focused on 3D point clouds, meshes, and sparse 3D point data; techniques requiring extra information (e.g., silhouettes, specific viewpoints) or specific representations (e.g., range images) are excluded unless directly applicable to point clouds.
- The paper organizes methods by data-fitting components: functional models (Section 3), constraints for rigid and non-rigid registration (Section 4), optimization methods (Section 5), and evaluation (Section 6), with comparison tables for transformation models, constraints, and optimization techniques.
- It compares its scope and classification to prior surveys, discusses practical issues such as initialization and evaluation, and offers observations, insights, and foreseeable research trends.
Limitations
- Stated: non-rigid registration is problem- and data-dependent, still largely proof-of-concept, and lacks precise definitions or methods for evaluating correspondence quality; obtaining ground truth is difficult, and many techniques can handle only limited sequences (15–200 frames) due to memory limitations.
- Stated: intrinsic techniques often require mesh data with consistent topology, may not work on point clouds, and are affected by large topological errors and holes; isometry assumptions can fail under large topological changes or non-isometric deformation.
- Evident from the text: as a survey, it presents no new experimental validation and its coverage is bounded by the literature available at the time (2013); it also explicitly excludes 3D volume image registration and 2D image registration except by reference.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 79 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
SHOT signatures perform better than spin images.
“SHOT signatures perform better than spin images [68].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The paper's classification shows that several similar high-level constraints are used in both rigid and non-rigid registration: transformation-(deformation-) induced constraints, features, saliency, regularization, and search constraints.
“Our classification (Tables 3 and 4) shows that several similar high-level constraints are used in both rigid and non-rigid registration, namely transformation-(deformation-) induced constraints, features, saliency, regularization and search constraints.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Many features and saliency measures have been reused in nonrigid registration.
“In particular, many features and saliency have been reused in nonrigid registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Recent space-time registrations focus on reducing the dimension of the deformation by constructing a low-dimensional representation, such as skeletons, bones and joints.
“Recent space-time registrations focus on reducing the dimension of the deformation (alleviating the over-fitting problem) by constructing a lowdimensional representation (e.g.skeletons [5], bones and joints [26]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning
The Gaussian field method shows robustness in the presence of strong noise.
“This method shows robustness in the presence of strong noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
The focus of space-time surface registration is the use of weaker priors, such as regularizations and envelope of motion.
“The focus of space-time surface registration is the use of weaker priors, e.g.various regularizations and envelop of motion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
There are methods that focus on global registration in terms of the alignment order of multiple sequences to reduce accumulation errors.
“There are methods that focus on global registration in terms of the alignment order of (multiple) sequences to reduce accumulation errors [92].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Rigid and non-rigid registration techniques are typically cast as non-linear optimization.
“Rigid and non-rigid registration techniques are typically cast as non-linear optimization (see Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
By considering all three properties, registration can be cast as a voting problem [17].
“By considering all three properties, registration can be cast as a voting problem [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Li, Multi-Scale Features for Approximate Alignment of Point-Based Surfaces
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Study of these components reveals the similarity of rigid and non-rigid registration in terms of problem representations.
“Study of these components (i) provides a basis for comparison of the novelties of different techniques, (ii) reveals the similarity of rigid and non-rigid registration in terms of problem representations, and (iii) shows how over-fitting arises in non-rigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Although many non-rigid deformation models are different in formulation, they all have one common characteristic: they all try to preserve some kind of smoothness.
“Although many of these non-rigid deformation models are different in terms of formulation, they all have one common characteristic.Whether they use adjacency similarity, gradient or Laplacian fields [28] (first-order), thin-plate splines [35] (second-order), or various regularizers (Section 4.2.6), they all try to preserve some kind of smoothness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
In non-rigid registration, without strong prior assumptions, both deformation and alignment often require a lot more reliable correspondences to define than in rigid registration, where a few correspondences suffice to define one candidate rigid transformation.
“Unlike the rigid case, where a few correspondences are sufficient to define one candidate rigid transformation for hypothesis testing, both deformation and alignment in the non-rigid case, without strong prior assumptions, often require a lot more reliable correspondences to define.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Large topological errors and holes affect intrinsic techniques.
“Large topological errors and holes affect these techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CPC alone is not likely to be very effective in the non-rigid case.
“CPC alone is not likely to be very effective in the non-rigid case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Templates help control the extra degrees of freedom in non-rigid registration.
“The template helps to control the extra DoF in the non-rigid case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Non-rigid registration is typically applied to specific objects with a well-known form, such as human faces and bodies.
- Interpretationreasoning
For rigid registration, the closest point criterion (CPC) is effective because the rigidity constraint is imposed by the assumption of rigid transformation.
“For rigid registration, the closest point criterion (CPC) is effective, as the rigidity constraint is imposed by the assumption of rigid transformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In terms of data fitting, preserving smoothness ensures that the registered surface represents the surface details but not noise.
“In term of data fitting, this ensures that the registered surface represents the surface details but not noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
[63] recently provided a formal treatment of CPC showing that it guarantees the established point correspondences cannot be too wrong at each step.
“[63] recently provided a formal treatment of CPC showing that it guarantees the established point correspondences cannot be too wrong at each step: it is impossible that some correspondences are of high quality, while their neighbors are of significantly lower quality, because the relationship of correspondences are implicitly captured by the rigid transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Distance and angle preserving properties of solids can be used for pruning unreliable sparse correspondences established by other constraints.
“Distance and angle preserving properties of solids can be used for pruning unreliable sparse correspondences established by other constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When registration is required for establishing correspondences across a set of 3D models from heterogeneous data source, scale becomes an important factor.
“When registration is required for establishing correspondences across a set of 3D models from heterogeneous data source, scale becomes an important factor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The Gaussian field framework replaces a non-linear, non-smooth error function by a convex smooth approximation using mollification.
“The Gaussian field framework replaces a non-linear, non-smooth error function by a convex smooth approximation, with the help of mollification: a summation of a large number of Gaussian functions which, by the Central Limit Theorem, leads to a single Gaussian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Over-fitting often is not a concern in rigid registration as the rigid transformation is low-dimensional, and the same at all points.
“Over-fitting often is not a concern in rigid registration as the rigid transformation is low-dimensional, and the same at all points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
When there is no ground truth correspondence, evaluation of techniques using dataset types 1 and 2 is usually based on visual assessment by connecting sparse correspondences with lines.
“When there is no ground truth correspondences, evaluation of techniques using dataset types 1 and 2 are usually based on visual assessment by connecting spare correspondences with lines [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Transformation-induced constraints are stronger and can often be used for evaluating and pruning correspondences established by features and saliency.
“The transformation-induced constraints are stronger and can often be used for evaluating and pruning correspondences established by the latter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The resulting alignment of two general surfaces need not represent physically correct correspondences between homologous structures on the surface.
“However, the resulting alignment need not represent physically correct correspondences between homologous structures on the surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Methods handling large deformations generally start optimization with small emphasis on the data term because CPC tends to be invalid.
“Methods handling large deformations generally start the optimization with small emphasis on the data term because CPC tends to be invalid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent intrinsic techniques [36], [38], [39] use low dimensional embedding to by-pass the high-dimensionality problem by assuming a strong inelastic isometry constraint.
“Recent intrinsic techniques [36], [38], [39] use low dimensional embedding to by-pass the high-dimensionality problem by assuming a strong inelastic isometry constraint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Tracking the global extremum is easier in the Gaussian field framework because the error is differentiable even for noisy input data.
“Tracking the global extremum is much easier as the error is differentiable even for noisy input data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Simply comparing the residual errors or the rate of convergence for two non-rigid extrinsic registration techniques tells us little about which produces the more meaningfully correct result.
“Indeed, simply comparing the residual errors or the rate of convergence for two non-rigid extrinsic registration techniques tells us little about which produces the more meaningfully correct result.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Finding a large set of correspondences with high mutual compatibility can be formulated as an inlier selection process of a non-cooperative game.
“Finding a large set of correspondences that express a high level of mutual compatibility can be formulated as an inlier selection process of a non-cooperative game [101].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Most existing methods assume a single model for the two surfaces being aligned.
“Most existing methods assume a single model for the two surfaces being aligned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Non-rigid registration requires higher degrees of freedom (e.g., local affine transformations have 12n DoFs, where n is the number of points or nodes).
“Non-rigid registration, however, requires higher DoF.(e.g.local affine transfor-mations have 12n DoFs, where n is the number of points or nodes.)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For general extrinsic non-rigid registrations with high DoF, this strong domain theory is lost.
“For general extrinsic non-rigid registrations with high DoF, this strong domain theory is lost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A comparison of registration techniques reveals that rigid registration and intrinsic techniques are based on strong prior knowledge (or at least, assumptions).
“A comparison of registration techniques reveals that rigid registration and intrinsic techniques are based on strong prior knowledge (or at least, assumptions).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given only two surfaces and a high-dimensional deformation model (like [6], [32]), the solution can only be regularized by other prior knowledge-mostly in the form of regularizations to ensure smoothness.
“Yet, given only two surfaces and a high-dimensional deformation model (like [6], [32]), the solution can only be regularized by other prior knowledge-mostly in the form of regularizations to ensure smoothness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
This explains why recent extrinsic non-rigid techniques focus heavily on registering space-time sequences.
“This explains why recent extrinsic non-rigid techniques focus heavily on registering space-time sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Most techniques can cope with only limited sequences (15-200 frames), mainly due to memory limitations.
“However, most techniques can cope with only limited sequences (15-200 frames), mainly due to memory limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
In nearly all existing work, deformation models are predetermined and thus require a priori knowledge.
“A closely related issue is how to automatically determine the most appropriate deformation model: in nearly all existing work, deformation models are predetermined and thus require a priori knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A major obstacle to adapting optimization techniques to non-rigid cases is the high dimensionality, causing most extrinsic approaches to use quasi-Newton techniques instead of the more stable Newton or L-M methods.
“A major obstacle to adapting these techniques is the high dimensionality, causing most extrinsic approaches to use quasi-Newton techniques instead of the more stable Newton or L-M methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
[41] combines intrinsic (conformal map) and extrinsic measures (e.g. texture, Gaussian maps, curvatures) to handle non-isometric deformation.
“[41] combines intrinsic (conformal map) and extrinsic measures (e.g.texture, Gaussian maps, curvatures) to handle non-isometric deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Quasi-Newton techniques may not converge if the initial alignment is too far from the optimal solution.
“The former, however, may not converge if the initial alignment is too far from the optimal solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The rigid transformation is not perfect (i.e. cannot always explain the optimal solution) under noise, outliers and limited amount of overlap.
“Similarly, the rigid transformation is not perfect (i.e.cannot always explain the optimal solution) under noise, outliers and limited amount of overlap.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 125
- May combine two claims. 73
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCurvatures are fast to compute but easily affected by noise and incomplete surfaces.
“Curvatures are fast to compute, but easily affected by noise and incomplete surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenRecent intrinsic techniques enforce isometric consistency.
“From a high level viewpoint, recent intrinsic techniques enforce isometric consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIntegral invariants are robust to noise and give similar information to curvature.
“Integral invariants are robust to noise and give similar information to curvature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningNo rigid registration methods use templates, while many non-rigid methods do.
“A significant difference is that while no rigid registration methods use templates, many non-rigid methods do.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSome constraints have been adopted by non-rigid registration; for example, an isometry constraint based on Euclidean distance in [46] is replaced by geodesic distance in [2].
“Some constraints have been adopted by non-rigid registration, e.g., [46] defines an isometry constraint based on Euclidean distance, which is replaced by geodesic distance in [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenChoice of features for feature matching is not well discussed in the literature.
“Choice of features for feature matching is not well discussed in the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRegistration cast as global optimization does a complete search with bounds or approximates/relaxes the problem into continuous settings to find a near global solution.
“Registration, when cast as global optimization, does a complete search with bounds (exact global solution), or approximates / relaxes the problem into continuous settings so that a near global solution can be found.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSpace-time registration techniques usually target sequences, require denser temporal sampling, assume small deformation, and require large overlap of regions for feature correspondences between consecutive frames.
“These techniques usually target sequences, require denser temporal sampling, assume small deformation and large overlap of regions for feature correspondences between consecutive frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMany registration techniques optimize both transformations and correspondences, while some optimize transformations or find correspondences only.
“Many techniques optimize both transformations and correspondences whilst some optimize transformations or find correspondences only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMost methods based on CPC formulate an energy functional with data and regularization terms.
“Most methods based on CPC formulate an energy functional with data and regularization terms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe distance root mean squared error used by [48] as a bound on CPC error is both tight and fast to compute.
“as a bound on CPC error (Eqn 5); it is both tight and fast to compute.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Gelfand, Robust Global Registration
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMany techniques model registration and correspondence determination with statistics and probabilistic approaches to handle noise, outliers and missing data.
“Many techniques model registration and the correspondence determination problem with statistics and probabilistic approaches in order to handle datasets with noise, outliers and missing data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBoth registration and data fitting are formulated as optimization problems which can be solved in a similar fashion.
“Both registration and data fitting are formulated as optimization problems which can be solved in a similar fashion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOne of the major concerns in data-fitting is to avoid overfitting, when χ fits noise rather than the data. The same applies to registration where the models f of extrinsic techniques usually have high degrees of freedom. This potentially leads to over-fitting problems.
“One of the major concerns in data-fitting is to avoid overfitting, when χ fits noise rather than the data.The same applies to registration where the models f of extrinsic techniques usually have high degrees of freedom.This potentially leads to over-fitting problems (in which there are too many parameters to describe the transformation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA general observation made by all extrinsic models of non-rigid techniques is that the more high frequency information on the surface, the more DoF required.
“A general observation made by all extrinsic models of non-rigid techniques is that the more high frequency information on the surface, the more DoF required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation[3] can handle up to 35% noise and the part-in-whole problem.
“These include [3] which can handle up to 35% noise, and part-in-whole problem”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[5] can handle large gaps in 4D sequences and reduce high dimensionality of deformations through automatic construction of consensus skeletons.
“[5] that can handle large gaps in 4D sequences, reduce high dimensionality of deformations through automatic construction of consensus skeletons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn the extreme case, non-rigid registration methods that handle large deformation involving articulation or fine detail preservation use 12 DoF (an affine transformation) per point or node.
“In the extreme case, non-rigid registration methods that handle large deformation involving articulation or fine detail preservation, use 12 DoF (an affine transformation) per point or node.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn extrinsic techniques, regularization becomes highly essential, not only to obtain a smooth surface, but also to constrain arbitrary transformation to obtain a reasonable solution.
“In these techniques, regularization becomes highly essential, not only to obtain a smooth surface, but also to constrain arbitrary transformation to obtain a reasonable solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenE_reg is a regularization term that provides additional information to constrain an arbitrary transformation so that the solution a is a reasonable one.
“E reg is a regularization term that provides additional information to constrain an arbitrary transformation so that the solution a is a reasonable one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenRegistration can be further classified into extrinsic and intrinsic techniques.
“Registration can be further classified into extrinsic and intrinsic techniques (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenFour main types of transformation models are common: rigid transformation, piecewise rigid deformation, general deformation and (nearly) isometric deformation.
“Four main types are common: rigid transformation, piecewise rigid deformation, general deformation and (nearly) isometric deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhen non-rigid registrations assume high DoFs, overfitting can become a problem (though not frequently discussed).
“When non-rigid registrations assume high DoFs, overfitting can become a problem (though not frequently discussed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRigid alignment with non-rigid correction is a transitional case between the rigid and non-rigid models.
“Rigid alignment with non-rigid correction is a transitional case between the rigid and non-rigid models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[7] supports facial capture and animation of avatar heads in real-time.
“[7] that supports facial capture and animation of avatar heads in real-time”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStudy of these components shows how over-fitting arises in non-rigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques.
“Study of these components (i) provides a basis for comparison of the novelties of different techniques, (ii) reveals the similarity of rigid and non-rigid registration in terms of problem representations, and (iii) shows how over-fitting arises in non-rigid registration and the reasons for increasing interest in intrinsic techniques.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTo alleviate overfitting, [2], [6], [32] reduce the DoF explicitly by computing local transformations with respect to clusters or nodes, and most non-rigid registration methods use regularization to further constrain the solutions.
“To alleviate it, [2], [6], [32] reduce the DoF explicitly by computing local transformations with respect to clusters or nodes, and most non-rigid registration methods use regularization to further constrain the solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn rigid registration, correspondences assist in further pruning the transformation search space, whilst in the non-rigid case, establishing correspondences is the essential step that drives alignment.
“In rigid registration, correspondences assist in further pruning the transformation search space, whilst in the non-rigid case, establishing correspondences is the essential step that drives alignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRegistration is closely related to data fitting in that it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints, and optimization.
“Registration is closely related to data fitting in that it comprises three core interwoven components: model selection, correspondences & constraints and optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe rigid transformation is global, can be uniquely defined by three non-collinear pairs of correspondences, and has low dimension (6 DoF).
“This transformation (i) is global-the same for every point p i , (ii) can be uniquely defined by three non-collinear pairs of correspondences, and (iii) has low dimension (6 DoF).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComparatively, non-rigid registration techniques are still in their infancy.
“Comparatively, non-rigid registration techniques are still in their infancy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIn rigid registration, the overfitting problem is generally ignored because there are 6 DoF only.
“In rigid registration, the overfitting problem is generally ignored because there are 6 DoF only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[6] can register 4D surfaces and produce an urshape template.
“[6] that can register 4D surfaces and produce an urshape template”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[4] can handle up to 40% outliers and down to 40% overlap as demonstrated in their experiments.
“[4] which can handle up to 40% outliers, and down to 40% overlap as demonstrated in their experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile not every registration technique fits well into this framework derived from data fitting, these components and constraints do exist in most surveyed methods.
“While not every registration technique fits well into this framework derived from data fitting, these components and constraints do exist in most surveyed methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[8], [9] can handle near-to approximate isometric deformation.
“[8], [9] that can handle near-to approximateisometric deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningUsing the first two properties, if both point sets contain at least one pair of triplets that match exactly and provide the correct transformation, it takes O(N^6) time to test all possible transformations for sets of N points.
“Using the first two properties, if both point sets contain at least one pair of triplets that match exactly and provide the correct transformation, it takes O(N 6 ) time to test all possible transformations for sets of N points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAll these have changed the landscape of digital geometry processing, migrating the focuses to dynamic scenes and motions.
“All these have changed the landscape of digital geometry processing, migrating the focuses to dynamic scenes and motions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn intrinsic techniques, both P and Q are transformed into a canonical form and the mapping function h is usually low-dimensional. The intrinsic transformation g provides the most important constraint to avoid arbitrary transformation. This is one reason why these techniques have become the recent research focus.
“In intrinsic techniques, both P and Q are transformed into a canonical form and the mapping function h is usually low-dimensional.The intrinsic transformation g provides the most important constraint to avoid arbitrary transformation.This is one reason why these techniques have become the recent research focus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNon-rigid registration is more difficult than rigid registration because it must account for deformation, making the solution space much larger.
“Non-rigid registration is even more difficult, as it not only faces the above challenges but also needs to account for deformation, so the solution space is much larger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[62] gives a fast ICP algorithm based on localization. They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.
“Localization: [62] gives a fast ICP algorithm (Section 4.1.1)based on localization.They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFeatures and saliency used in nonrigid registration are usually defined on local surface geometry and are at least assumed to be invariant under transformation.
“They are usually defined on local surface geometry and are (at least, assumed to be) invariant under transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRegularization involves adding penalty terms to the objective function. It incorporates a priori information, improves search, and avoids local minima during optimization.
“Regularization involves adding penalty terms to the objective function.It incorporates a priori information, improves search, and avoids local minima during optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIntrinsic models assume (nearly) isometric deformation.
“Intrinsic models assume (nearly) isometric deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGiven two surfaces P and Q in arbitrary initial poses, [4] randomly selects a 4-point tuple from P and another 4-point tuple from Q, and compares the affine ratios. If they form a correspondence, their affine ratio will match.
“Given two surfaces P and Q in arbitrary initial poses, [4] randomly selects a 4-point tuple from P and another 4-point tuple from Q, and compares the affine ratios.If they form a correspondence, their affine ratio will match.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[65] uses the term to maximize correspondences and bias the objective function towards more matches. This maximizes the overlapping area.
“Maximizing Correspondences: [65] uses the term i j M ij to maximize correspondences and bias the objective function towards more matches (i.e. it favors M ij = 1 over M ij = 0).This maximizes the overlapping area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTemplates simplify the part-to-part alignment problem to part-to-whole alignment, by providing strong structural information including priors for shape, constraints on arbitrary deformation, and connectivity. These greatly help to handle topological noise and missing data.
“Templates simplify the part-to-part alignment problem to part-to-whole alignment, by providing strong structural information including priors for shape, constraints on arbitrary deformation, and connectivity.These greatly help to handle topological noise and missing data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExtrinsic non-rigid registration allows fairly arbitrary deformation due to high dimensionality (an over-fitting problem) but encourages isometry through heavy regularization.
“Extrinsic non-rigid registration allows fairly arbitrary deformation (due to the high dimensionality of the models (an over-fitting problem)) but encourages isometry through the heavy use of regularization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPCA methods are most useful for whole object registration.
“PCA methods are most useful for whole object registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSlippage analysis is unsuited to smooth surfaces due to its definition.
“Slippage analysis is unsuited to smooth surfaces due to its definition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPoint-to-plane ICP minimizes the shortest distance between a point and the tangent plane of the closest point on another surface. This allows faster tangential movement of the surfaces.
“The first of these was point-to-plane ICP.[51] minimizes the shortest distance between a point and the tangent plane of the closest point on another surface.This allows faster tangential movement of the surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[6], [28], [79] constructs a template, an urshape, by accumulating and filling in missing data from other scans in the same sequence. They have been used extensively in non-rigid registration to constrain dense correspondences. This works for objects with well defined forms, such as the human face and body.
“[6], [28], [79] constructs a template, an urshape, by accumulating and filling in missing data from other scans in the same sequence.They have been used extensively in non-rigid registration to constrain dense correspondences [23], [29], [32], [34], [80].This works for objects with well defined forms, such as the human face and body.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[67] proposed a similar method based on a generalized Gauss-Markov model which uses a statistical framework to model noise.
“Independently, [67] proposed a similar method based on a generalized Gauss-Markov model which uses a statistical framework to model noise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHigher-dimensional features offer greater pruning power because of the low probability of matching all components of the feature, but often take longer to compute.
“Higher-dimensional features offer greater pruning power because of the low probability of matching all components of the feature, but often take longer to compute.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful for it.
“Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIsometry is a very powerful constraint sufficient to define a class of intrinsic transformation models and is used in optimization in various ways.
“Isometry is a very powerful constraint which is sufficient to define a class of intrinsic transformation models (Section 3.5), and is used in optimization in various ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMarkers and templates are explicit prior knowledge provided by users.
“Markers and templates are explicit prior knowledge provided by users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningFine surface details are usually ignored when establishing correspondences in intrinsic models, due to their intrinsic nature.
“Fine surface details are usually ignored when establishing correspondences, due to their intrinsic nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRANSAC-based DARCES [47] uses distance-preserving constraint to enumerate and test three pairs of correspondences in a sphere to limit the transformation search space.
“RANSAC-based DARCES [47] uses distance-preserving constraint to enumerate and test three pairs of correspondences in a sphere to limit the transformation search space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe appropriate model to use depends on the data itself.
“The appropriate model to use depends on the data itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMost non-rigid constraints, both extrinsic and intrinsic, focus on modelling the relationship between correspondences, whereas in rigid registration this relationship is implicitly captured by the rigid transformation.
“In general, most non-rigid constraints (both extrinsic and intrinsic) focus on modelling the relationship between correspondences, whilst this relationship is implicitly captured by the rigid transformation in rigid registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSaliency is a measure of local significance in a surface: salient points/regions are those whose properties are unlike most of their neighbours. They are used for key point/region detection, often in conjunction with features. They reduce the size of correspondence space, potential mismatches and obtain more reliable coarse correspondences.
“Saliency is a measure of local significance in a surface: salient points/regions are those whose properties are unlike most of their neighbours.They are used for key point/region detection, often in conjunction with features (Section 4.1.2).They reduce the size of correspondence space, potential mismatches and obtain more reliable coarse correspondences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[46] assumes that the Euclidean distance between the centers of a pair of features on a surface, and the angles between their principal directions and their connecting line, are preserved under a rigid transformation.
“[46] assumes that the Euclidean distance between the centers of a pair of features on a surface, and the angles between their principal directions and their connecting line, are preserved under a rigid transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMany intrinsic methods require mesh data with consistent topology, and may not work on point cloud data.
“Many methods of this kind require mesh data with consistent topology, and may not work on point cloud data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[48] uses (Euclidean) distance-based lower-bounding and the branch-and-bound to reduce the correspondence search space.
“[48] uses (Euclidean) distancebased lower-bounding and the branch-and-bound to reduce the correspondence search space (Section 5.2.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Gelfand, Robust Global Registration
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given3D markers provide sparse correspondences.
“3D markers provide sparse correspondences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe iterative closest point algorithm must be carefully initialized.
“This iterative algorithm must be carefully initialized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation[65] casts registration as a continuous optimization problem that handles both rigid transformation and correspondence determination simultaneously. It uses CPC, and formulates a regularization term based on entropy. This term can be interpreted as equalizing the importances of point matches, forcing them to the same distance and thus causing the surfaces to run parallel, rather than intersecting.
“Equalization: [65] casts registration as a continuous optimization problem that handles both rigid transformation and correspondence determination simultaneously.It uses CPC, and formulates a regularization term based on entropy:i j M ij log M ij where M is the matching probability matrix of all correspondences.When all point matches are equally likely, the entropy reaches a maximum.This term can”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSearch constraints are for efficiency.
“Search constraints are for efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPrincipal axes, computed through PCA, are three orthogonal directions where the greatest variance of the datapoints lie.
“Principal axes, computed through principal component analysis (PCA), are three orthogonal directions (eigenvectors correspond to the largest eigenvalues) where the greatest variance of the datapoints lie.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[56] uses a hierarchy of surface features in the form of points, curves and finally surfaces. They estimate a Euclidean transformation using a few salient points. The transformation is then refined using curves, and surfaces.
“[56] uses a hierarchy of surface features in the form of points, curves and finally surfaces.They estimate a Euclidean transformation using a few salient points.The transformation is then refined using curves, and surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Krsek, Range Image Registration Driven by a Hierarchy of Surface Differential Features
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.
“[13] uses a similar argument involving equalization of confidence weightings based on mean field variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.
“In nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Non-rigid registration results should adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLow-dimensional features are quick to compute and are usually used in conjunction with other constraints like saliency.
“Low-dimensional features are quick to compute and is usually used in conjunction with other constraints like saliency (Section 4.1.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA recent advance [49] combines PCA with the least median of squares, providing resistance to noise and outliers.
“A recent advance [49] combines PCA with the least median of squares, providing resistance to noise and outliers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation[62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique. Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.
“Hierarchical Approaches: [62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique.Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFeatures are quantities that describe a point. Multiple features can be concatenated to form a feature vector. When features of two points match, a meaningful correspondence may exist.
“Features are quantities (e.g.principal curvatures) that describe a point.Multiple features can be concatenated to form a feature vector.When features of two points (or clusters) match, a meaningful correspondence may exist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[115] discusses how to evaluate registration without ground truth.
“In the computer vision literature, [115] discusses how to evaluate registration without ground truth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Schestowitz, 2006, Non-Rigid Registration Assessment Without Ground Truth, Medical Image Understanding and Analysis
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLocal deterministic optimization methods are efficient but depend heavily on initialization and often converge to local minima.
“These techniques are efficient but also depend heavily on initialization and often converge to local minimum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMore temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.
“The idea is that more temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: More temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTwo general surfaces can always be brought into alignment with arbitrarily small error.
“Ultimately, two general surfaces can always be brought into alignment with arbitrarily small error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenA surface comprises different materials and may undergo different kinds of deformation.
“However, a surface comprises different materials and may undergo different kinds of deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe efficiency of branch-and-bound depends on how tight the bound is and how quickly it can be computed.
“Its efficiency depends on how tight the bound is, and how quickly it can be computed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIsometric distortion is meaningful only if the datasets are undergoing a (near-)isometric deformation.
“Note that isometric distortion is meaningful only if the datasets are undergoing a (near-)isometric deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTransformation-induced constraints allow registration on highly sparse data, single-view data, and often in a pairwise manner.
“These constraints allow registration to be carried out on highly sparse data, or data from a single view, and often in a pairwise manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne idea to evaluate registration without ground truth is to use image-based techniques [116] and compare the results with non-rigid registrations.
“One idea is to use image-based techniques [116] and compare the results with non-rigid registrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAfter a few steps, more emphasis is put on the data term because the original shape has been deformed close enough to the aligning shape.
“After a few steps, more emphasis is put on the data term because the original shape has been deformed to lie close enough to the aligning shape [29], [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIt is well-known theoretically that high dimensionality can lead to over-fitting.
“It is well-known theoretically that such high dimensionality can lead to over-fitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenGlobal optimization tries to find a global solution and avoid local minima.
“Global optimization tries to find a global solution and to avoid local minima.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn rigid transformation estimation, a closed-form least-squares solution exists if three or more distinct non-collinear pairs of correspondences are given, and can be solved by SVD, quaternions, orthonormal matrices or dual quaternions.
“In rigid transformation estimation, a closed-form least-squares solution (preferable for efficiency and robustness) exists if three or more distinct non-collinear pairs of correspondences are given [100], which can be solved by SVD, quaternions, orthonormal matrices or dual quaternions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLow-dimensional representations enable registration techniques to handle sparser data and multiple or all frames at a time, and generate more accurate results.
“These enable registration techniques to handle sparser data and multiple or all frames at a time, and generate more accurate results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[8] recruited a volunteer to label 10-35 semantically meaningful and consistent feature points for each class of objects in the watertight meshes dataset [114].
“[8] also recruited a volunteer to label 10-35 semantically meaningful and consistent feature points for each class of objects in the watertight meshes dataset [114].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Giorgi, 2013, SHREC: Shape Retrieval Contest: Watertight Models Track
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA benchmark database [91] based on TOSCA allows evaluations on isometry, topology, holes, scale, sampling, and noise of features and saliency.
“A benchmark database [91] based on TOSCA further allows evaluations on isometry, topology, holes, scale, sampling, and noise of features and saliency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Boyer, SHREC 2011: Robust Feature Detection and Description Benchmark
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTransformation-induced constraints and reliable features and saliency measures are important priors.
“Transformation (deformation)-induced constraints and reliable features & saliency measures are important priors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenExisting extrinsic techniques encourage smoothness through (i) formulating a priori knowledge or assumptions as regularization, (ii) introducing additional equations by some linear constraints on neighborhoods or (iii) uses a reduced representation (e.g. embedded graph nodes, meshless element models).
“To alleviate the over-fitting problem, existing extrinsic techniques encourage smoothness through (i) formulating a priori knowledge or assumptions as regularization, (ii) introducing additional equations by some linear constraints on neighborhoods or (iii) uses a reduced representation (e.g.embedded graph nodes, meshless element models).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[8] uses the sum of isometric distortion-difference of geodesic distances between the end-points of one correspondence with respect to all the other correspondences.
“[8] uses sum of isometric distortion-difference of geodesic distances between the end-points of one correspondence with respect to all the other correspondences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRelated techniques [118] are emerging.
“Related techniques [118] are emerging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe area of using physical models relating tissues, bones and muscles in 3D face registration is yet to explore, possibly due to the complexity of facial physiology.
“This area is yet to explore, possibly due to the complexity of facial physiology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[9] sums isometric distortions all over the surface to obtain one single number.
“[9] sums these isometric distortions all over the surface to obtain one single number.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBranch-and-bound is a complete search technique based on a lower bound on the cost function.
“Branch-and-bound is a complete search technique, which is based on a lower bound on the cost function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn general, obtaining ground truth data is difficult.
“In general, obtaining ground truth data is difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe main difficulties of using multiple deformation models are the need for surface segmentation, constraints between adjacent models, and approaches to merge registration and deformation results.
“The main difficulties of doing so are the need for surface segmentation, constraints between adjacent models, and approaches to merge registration and deformation results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLocal optimization can become stuck in local minima if the initial solution is not close to a global solution.
“Local optimization can become stuck in local minima if the initial solution is not close to a global solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe evaluation of new techniques on dataset type 3 may actually compare their performance against the techniques that create the dataset.
“Note also that the evaluation of new techniques on dataset type 3 may actually compare their performance against the techniques that create the dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAssuming a single model for the two surfaces being aligned is practical, enabling optimization to simultaneously find the best transformations for all points.
“This is practical, enabling optimization to simultaneously find the best transformations for all points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe envelope of motion is perhaps the weakest prior and requires both dense spatial and temporal sampling.
“Perhaps the weakest prior is the envelop of motion which requires both dense spatial and temporal sampling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSearch constraints are mostly for efficiency.
“(Search constraints are mostly for efficiency.)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenGiven ground truth data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves may be used to evaluate registration.
“Given ground truth data, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, which are plots of true positive rate against false positive rate, may be used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenOne way to evaluate registration without ground truth is to evaluate the results by generalizing them to unseen data.
“One way is to evaluate the results by generalizing them to unseen data (a well known method in datafitting).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn general, non-rigid registration is problem- and data-dependent.
“In general, non-rigid registration is problem-and data-dependent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFor non-rigid shapes, many deformations are only near/approximate isometric, which may lead to matching ambiguities [8].
“For non-rigid shapes, many deformations are only near/approximateisometric, which may lead to matching ambiguities [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese transformations are similar to the domain theory in analytical learning-a global rule, one reason why these techniques can be cast as optimization problems and solved using the Hough transform [17], [39] or RANSAC technique [4], [71] efficiently.
“These transformations are similar to the domain theory in analytical learning-a global rule, one reason why these techniques can be cast as optimization problems and solved using the Hough transform [17], [39] or RANSAC technique [4], [71] efficiently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIn cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.
“In cases with large topological changes, the isometry assumption may fail [38]; handling such issues is a challenging task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGroupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.
“Groupwise registration techniques have been developed [33], [123] which are typically more reliable, and reduce the accumulated errors that arise in pairwise registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationAs has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g. geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.
“As has been found in medical imaging, registration utilizing heterogeneous information (e.g.geometry and texture [41], [120]) may give higher accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOne way of providing more training data is to look into the temporal domain.
“One way of providing more training data is to look into the temporal domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[98] answers how many correspondences are required to constrain deformations of non-rigid shapes.
“[98] further answers how many correspondences are required to constrain deformations of non-rigid shapes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis is similar to inductive learning with limited prior knowledge.
“This is similar to inductive learning with limited prior knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnalytical learning uses domain theory (e.g. rules) and deductive inference to derive hypothesis.
“Analytical learning uses domain theory (e.g.rules) and deductive inference to derive hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Mitchell, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComputation efficiency is another issue.
“Computation efficiency is another issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere are no precise definitions and methods for evaluating quality of correspondences.
“As we have noted, there are no precise definitions and methods for evaluating quality of correspondences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRecent research in intrinsic geometry and isometric consistency has led to important advances for isometric deformation, especially for face and body modeling.
“Recent research in intrinsic geometry and isometric consistency has led to important advances for isometric deformation, especially for face and body modeling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany challenges posed by rigid registration have been addressed [2].
“Many challenges posed by rigid registration have been addressed [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIntrinsic transformations require the two surfaces (and all points on them) to satisfy isometric consistency.
“Intrinsic transformations require the two surfaces (and all points on them) to satisfy isometric consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEvaluation of correspondences and transformations are two important areas.
“Evaluation of correspondences and transformations are two important areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFurther challenges lie in (i) avoiding the need for markers or templates, and (ii) capturing and processing fine scale details [32].
“Further challenges lie in (i) avoiding the need for markers or templates, and (ii) capturing and processing fine scale details [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe pitfall of analytical learning is that it depends on a perfect domain theory.
“The pitfall of analytical learning is that it depends on a perfect domain theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAnalytical learning does not require lots of training data but is seriously affected if the domain theory is incorrect.
“It does not require lots of training data but is seriously affected if the domain theory is incorrect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenStochastic approaches are promising methods that are not sensitive to initialization.
“Stochastic approaches are promising methods that are not sensitive to initialization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRecent research has focused on analyzing sequences of 3D scans: (i) hardware for capturing such sequences at a high frame rate is now readily available, and (ii) sequences assist registration by providing intermediate information, and thereby constraints.
“Recent research has focused on analyzing sequences of 3D scans: (i) hardware for capturing such sequences at a high frame rate is now readily available, and (ii) sequences assist registration by providing intermediate information, and thereby constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf one wants to register surfaces from heterogeneous sources (e.g., two totally different human faces and their expressions), these techniques do not work.
“If one wants to register surfaces from heterogeneous sources (e.g., two totally different human faces and their expressions), these techniques do not work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[8] has started in this direction using blended conformal maps.
“[8] has started in this direction using blended conformal maps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy transforming non-rigid shapes into the intrinsic domain, many stochastic methods have found applications in establishing correspondences, and often near globally optimal solutions are obtained.
“By transforming non-rigid shapes into the intrinsic domain, many stochastic methods have found applications in establishing correspondences, and often near globally optimal solutions are obtained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese approaches may be considered a combination of inductive and analytical learning techniques [122].
“These approaches may be considered a combination of inductive and analytical learning techniques [122].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Mitchell, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[40] suggests that fixing one correspondence, all other correspondences can be inferred for non-rigid shapes.
“[40] suggests that fixing one correspondence, all other correspondences can be inferred for non-rigid shapes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOptimization is an important issue in registration as it affects accuracy, robustness and convergence.
“Optimization is an important issue in registration as it affects accuracy, robustness and convergence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe justification of inductive learning is based on statistical inference.
“The justification is based on statistical inference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNon-rigid registration is similar to data fitting, where there are many well-established techniques for model selection: cross-validation, early stopping and model comparison (e.g. information-based criteria).
“However, non-rigid registration is similar to data fitting, where there are many well-established techniques for model selection: cross-validation, early stopping and model comparison (e.g.information-based criteria).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenExisting techniques focus mostly on modelling near-isometric deformation and obtaining a global consistent set of correspondences.
“Existing techniques focus mostly on modelling near-isometric deformation and obtaining a global consistent set of correspondences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInductive learning (e.g. neural network) generalizes hypotheses, in terms of a function, from training examples to unseen data.
“Inductive learning (e.g.neural network) generalizes hypotheses, in terms of a function, from training examples to unseen data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Mitchell, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMost techniques focus on registering surfaces of similar sources.
“Most techniques focus on registering surfaces of similar sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationRigid Registration is becoming more robust and reliable over the past two decades of researches.
“Rigid Registration is becoming more robust and reliable over the past two decades of researches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis type of technique assumes the deformation (hypotheses) can be learnt from sufficient training data.
“This type of technique assumes the deformation (hypotheses) can be learnt from sufficient training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDefining the semantic meaning of correspondences is a hard problem in itself, and currently no work considers the evaluation of transformations.
“Defining the semantic meaning of correspondences is a hard problem in itself, and currently no work considers the evaluation of transformations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHaving a rigid transformation requires all points to transform rigidly.
“Having a rigid transformation requires all points to transform rigidly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMany optimization techniques used in rigid registration have yet to be applied to non-rigid cases.
“Many optimization techniques used in rigid registration have yet to be applied to non-rigid cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe advantage of inductive learning is that it requires little prior knowledge, but the hypothesis may be incorrect if there is not sufficient training data-overfitting.
“The advantage is that it requires little prior knowledge, but the hypothesis may be incorrect if there is not sufficient training data-overfitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAlthough many techniques and constraints have been proposed to facilitate correspondence search, human assistance and visual inspection are sometimes required to provide semantic input.
“Although many techniques and constraints have been proposed to facilitate correspondence search, human assistance and visual inspection are sometimes required to provide semantic input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMany existing non-rigid techniques are still in the stage of proof-of-concept-showing what can be done.
“Many existing non-rigid techniques are still in the stage of proof-of-concept-showing what can be done.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRecent efforts of the community is to model and study these factors (e.g. Section 4.1.4).
“Recent efforts of the community is to model and study these factors (e.g.Section 4.1.4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.
“In information theory, the minimum description length criterion is well-known for determining the best model from data; it has been used in image registration [119], face (texture and depth) registration [120] and medical data registration [121] in computer vision, but is relatively little used in computer graphics and shape analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere are two kinds of learning methods in ML [122]: inductive and analytical learning.
“There are two kinds of learning methods in ML [122]: inductive and analytical learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Mitchell, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAdapting these techniques to large scale data, deriving specific objective functions, handling various levels of geometric and topological noise, and extending them to non-isometric and elastic deformation are some of the challenges.
“Adapting these techniques to large scale data, deriving specific objective functions, handling various levels of geometric and topological noise, and extending them to non-isometric and elastic deformation are some of the challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA hypothesis in inductive learning is assumed to be found/fitted empirically from a large amount of training data.
“A hypothesis is assumed to be found/fitted empirically from a large amount of training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMeaningful correspondences should relate homologous sections of the shapes, i.e., sections that are semantically related.
“Meaningful correspondences should relate homologous sections of the shapes, i.e., sections that are semantically related.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNon-Rigid Registration, in general, is still at its infant stage, largely because of the large varieties of transformations in the real world and the shortage of our knowledge of these transformations.
“Non-Rigid Registration, in general, is still at its infant stage, largely because of the large varieties of transformations in the real world and the shortage of our knowledge of these transformations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
In registration, most 3D scanned data are assumed to be multiple views of the same object which share the same scale.
“The major reason is that, in registration, most of the 3D scanned data are assumed to be multiple views of the same object which share the same scale.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Using too many degrees of freedom can overfit noise.
“It is well-known that using too many DoF can overfit noise.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-rigid registration is typically applied to specific objects with a well-known form, such as human faces and bodies.
“This works because non-rigid registration is typically applied to specific objects with a well-known form, such as human faces and bodies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes.
“Rigid registration is often applied to unknown or much more general objects and scenes, and templates are less useful.”
The paper relies on this without support.
More temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.
“The idea is that more temporal data helps constrain an arbitrary deformation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-rigid registration results should adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.
“In nonrigid registration, most deformation models allow arbitrary local transformation, and the results may not adequately respect the material properties of the underlying surfaces.”
Cites
A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes
Besl, P., & Mckay, N. D. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.121791 · Cited by 22,163 · see citing works
Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm
Rusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M. (2002) · Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling · doi:10.1109/im.2001.924423 · Cited by 3,945 · see citing works
Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey
Pluim, J. P. W., Maintz, J. B. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2003.815867 · Cited by 2,882 · see citing works
Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift
Myronenko, A., & Song, X. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.46 · Cited by 2,774 · see citing works
Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes
Johnson, A., & Hebert, M. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.765655 · Cited by 2,656 · see citing works
KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera
Izadi, S., Kim, D., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Newcombe, R. A., Kohli, P., Shotton, J., Hodges, S., Freeman, D., Davison, A., et al. (2011) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/2047196.2047270 · Cited by 2,601 · see citing works
A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration
Chui, H., & Rangarajan, A. (2003) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/s1077-3142(03)00009-2 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
SCAPE: shape completion and animation of people
Anguelov, D., Srinivasan, P., Koller, D., Thrun, S., Rodgers, J., & Davis, J. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073207 · Cited by 1,489 · see citing works
Unique Signatures of Histograms for Local Surface Description
Tombari, F., Salti, S., & Di Stefano, L. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15558-1_26 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
A Concise and Provably Informative Multi‐Scale Signature Based on Heat Diffusion
Sun, J. Z., Ovsjanikov, M., & Guibas, L. J. (2009) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01515.x · Cited by 1,466 · see citing works
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Fouss, F., Pirotte, A., Renders, J.-M., & Saerens, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2007.46 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints
Leordeanu, M., & Hebert, M. (2005) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2005.20 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
Generalizing motion edits with Gaussian processes
Ikemoto, L., Arıkan, O., & Forsyth, D. A. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1477926.1477927 · Cited by 1,225 · see citing works
Reverse engineering of geometric models—an introduction
Várady, T., Martin, R. R., & Cox, J. J. (1997) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/s0010-4485(96)00054-1 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Self-citationA graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching
Gold, S., & Rangarajan, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.491619 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Deformation transfer for triangle meshes
Sumner, R. W., & Popović, J. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1015706.1015736 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans
Allen, B., Curless, B., & Popović, Z. (2003) · ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers · doi:10.1145/1201775.882311 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
As-Rigid-As-Possible Surface Modeling
Sorkine‐Hornung, O., & Alexa, M. (2007) · doi:10.2312/sgp/sgp07/109-116 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Optimal Step Nonrigid ICP Algorithms for Surface Registration
Amberg, B., Romdhani, S., & Vetter, T. R. (2007) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383165 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Numerical Geometry of Non-Rigid Shapes
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., & Kimmel, R. (2008) · Texts and monographs in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73301-2 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
The wave kernel signature: A quantum mechanical approach to shape analysis
Aubry, M., Schlickewei, U., & Cremers, D. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2011.6130444 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice
Crum, W. R., Hartkens, T., & Hill, D. (2004) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/25329214 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Scale-invariant heat kernel signatures for non-rigid shape recognition
Bronstein, M. M., & Kokkinos, I. (2010) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539838 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
4-points congruent sets for robust pairwise surface registration
Aiger, D., Mitra, N. J., & Cohen-Or, D. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1360612.1360684 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation
Chen, X., Golovinskiy, A., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1531326.1531379 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
ICP registration using invariant features
Sharp, G. C., Lee, S. W., & Wehe, D. K. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.982886 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
A Survey on Shape Correspondence
van Kaick, O. M., Zhang, H., Hamarneh, G., & Cohen‐Or, D. (2011) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01884.x · Cited by 606 · see citing works
A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation
Salví, J., Matabosch, C., David Fofi, B., & Forest, J. (2006) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.05.012 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Generalized multidimensional scaling: A framework for isometry-invariant partial surface matching
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., & Kimmel, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508601103 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Gelfand, N., Mitra, N. J., Guibas, L., & Pottmann, H. (2005) · doi:10.2312/sgp/sgp05/197-206 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Least squares 3D surface and curve matching
Gruen, A., & Akca, D. (2005) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.006 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Fast exact and approximate geodesics on meshes
Surazhsky, V., Surazhsky, T., Kirsanov, D., et al. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073228 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Salient geometric features for partial shape matching and similarity
Gal, R., & Cohen‐Or, D. (2006) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1122501.1122507 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Snavely, N., Curless, B., & Seitz, S. M. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1015706.1015759 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
On bending invariant signatures for surfaces
Elad, A., & Kimmel, R. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1233902 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Realtime performance-based facial animation
Weise, T., Bouaziz, S., Li, H., & Pauly, M. V. (2011) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1964921.1964972 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Crane, K., Weischedel, C., & Wardetzky, M. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2516971.2516977 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
An algorithmic overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging
Audette, M. A., Ferrie, F. P., & Peters, T. M. (2000) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(00)00014-1 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Global Correspondence Optimization for Non‐Rigid Registration of Depth Scans
Li, H., Sumner, R. W., & Pauly, M. V. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01282.x · Cited by 401 · see citing works
A Review of Geometric Transformations for Nonrigid Body Registration
Holden, M. P. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.904691 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Chen, C.-S., Hung, Y.-P., & Cheng, J.-B. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.809117 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Realtime performance-based facial animation
Weise, T., Bouaziz, S., Li, H., & Pauly, M. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2010324.1964972 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Geometrically stable sampling for the ICP algorithm
Gelfand, N., Ikemoto, L., Rusinkiewicz, S. M., et al. (2004) · doi:10.1109/im.2003.1240258 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Robust single-view geometry and motion reconstruction
Li, H., Adams, B., Guibas, L. J., & Pauly, M. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1618452.1618521 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Möbius voting for surface correspondence
Lipman, Y., & Funkhouser, T. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1531326.1531378 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching
Huang, Q.-X., Flöry, S., Gelfand, N., Hofer, M., & Pottmann, H. (2006) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1141911.1141925 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Kim, V. G., Lipman, Y., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2011) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1964921.1964974 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
One Point Isometric Matching with the Heat Kernel
Ovsjanikov, M., Mérigot, Q., Mémoli, F., & Guibas, L. (2010) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01764.x · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Kim, V. G., Lipman, Y., & Funkhouser, T. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2010324.1964974 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Non‐Rigid Registration Under Isometric Deformations
Huang, Q., Adams, B., Wicke, M., & Guibas, L. J. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01285.x · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Articulated body deformation from range scan data
Allen, B., Curless, B., & Popović, Z. (2002) · ACM SIGGRAPH Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/566570.566626 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Kimmel, R., Mahmoudi, M., & Sapiro, G. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0301-6 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective
Mitra, N. J., Gelfand, N., Pottmann, H., & Guibas, L. J. (2004) · Symposium on Geometry Processing · doi:10.1145/1057432.1057435 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
3D analysis of facial morphology
Hammond, P., Hutton, T. J., Allanson, J. E., Campbell, L., Hennekam, R. C. M., Holden, S. B., Patton, M. A., Shaw, A. C., Temple, I. K., Trotter, M. W. B., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20665 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Efficient Computation of Isometry‐Invariant Distances Between Surfaces
Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., & Kimmel, R. (2006) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/050639296 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Physiology-Based Face Recognition in the Thermal Infrared Spectrum
Buddharaju, P., Pavlidis, I. T., Tsiamyrtzis, P., & Bazakos, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1007 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
High resolution passive facial performance capture
Bradley, D., Heidrich, W., Popa, T., & Sheffer, A. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1778765.1778778 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
SHREC '11: Robust Feature Detection and Description BenchmarkPreprint
Boyer, E., Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M., Bustos, B., Darom, T., Horaud, R., Hotz, I., Keller, Y., Keustermans, J., Kovnatsky, A., et al. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.2312/3dor/3dor11/071-078 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
da Silva, L. T., Bellon, O. R. P., & Boyer, K. L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.108 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Geometry and Convergence Analysis of Algorithms for Registration of 3D Shapes
Pottmann, H., Qi-xing Huang, A., Yang, Y., & Hu, S. (2006) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-5167-2 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Integral invariants for robust geometry processing
Pottmann, H., Wallner, J., Huang, Q., et al. (2008) · Computer Aided Geometric Design · doi:10.1016/j.cagd.2008.01.002 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Deformation transfer for triangle meshes
Sumner, R. W., & Popović, J. (2004) · ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers · doi:10.1145/1186562.1015736 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
The Correlated Correspondence Algorithm for Unsupervised Registration of Nonrigid Surfaces
Anguelov, D., Srinivasan, P., Pang, H.-C., Koller, D., Thrun, S., & Davis, J. (2004) · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Li, H., Weise, T., & Pauly, M. V. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1778765.1778769 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Persistent Heat Signature for Pose‐oblivious Matching of Incomplete Models
Dey, T. K., Li, K., Luo, C., et al. (2010) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01763.x · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Geometry-aware direction field processing
Ray, N., Vallet, B., Alonso, L., et al. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1640443.1640444 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Lipman, Y., Rustamov, R. M., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1805964.1805971 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Articulated body deformation from range scan data
Allen, B., Curless, B., & Popović, Z. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/566654.566626 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Outlier Robust ICP for Minimizing Fractional RMSD
Phillips, J. M., Liu, R., & Tomasi, C. (2007) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/3dim.2007.39 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Articulated Shape Matching Using Laplacian Eigenfunctions and Unsupervised Point Registration
Mateus, D., Horaud, R., Knossow, D., Fabio Cuzzolin, A., & Boyer, E. (2008) · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Multi-scale features for approximate alignment of point-based surfaces
Li, X., & Guskov, I. (2005) · doi:10.5555/1281920.1281955 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Deformation‐Driven Shape Correspondence
Zhang, H., Sheffer, A., Cohen‐Or, D., Zhou, Q., van Kaick, O. M., & Tagliasacchi, A. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01283.x · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Pottmann, H., Leopoldseder, S., & Höfer, M. (2004) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2004.04.002 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Physiology-Based Face Recognition in the Thermal Infrared Spectrum
Pavlidis, I. T., & Buddharaju, P. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420008340.ch13 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Global non-rigid alignment of 3-D scans
Brown, B. J., & Rusinkiewicz, S. M. (2007) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1275808.1276404 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Dense non-rigid surface registration using high-order graph matching
Zeng, Y., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Gu, X. D., Samaras, D., & Nikos Paragios, A. (2010) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540189 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Robust 3D Shape Correspondence in the Spectral Domain
Jain, V., & Zhang, H. (2006) · IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2006 (SMI'06) · doi:10.1109/smi.2006.31 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
SHape REtrieval Contest 2007: Watertight Models Track
Giorgi, D., Biasotti, S., & Paraboschi, L. (2007) · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Global non-rigid alignment of 3-D scans
Brown, B. J., & Rusinkiewicz, S. M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1276377.1276404 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A Comparison of Four Algorithms for Estimating 3-D Rigid Transformations.
Larusso, A., Eggert, D., & Fisher, R. (1995) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 1995 · doi:10.5244/c.9.24 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Efficient reconstruction of nonrigid shape and motion from real-time 3D scanner data
Wand, M., Adams, B., Ovsjanikov, M., Berner, A., Bokeloh, M., Jenke, P., Guibas, L., Seidel, H.-P., & Schilling, A. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1516522.1516526 · Cited by 136 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Template DC, D [6], [23], [28], [34]”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation
Chen, X., Golovinskiy, A., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2009) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Papers (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1576246.1531379 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Global Optimization for Shape Fitting
Lempitsky, V., & Boykov, Y. (2007) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383293 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Articulated shape matching using Laplacian eigenfunctions and unsupervised point registration
Mateus, D., Horaud, R., Knossow, D., Cuzzolin, F., & Boyer, E. (2008) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587538 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Jost, T., & Hugli, H. (2004) · Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/im.2003.1240278 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Snavely, N., Curless, B., & Seitz, S. M. (2004) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1186562.1015759 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Articulated Object Reconstruction and Markerless Motion Capture from Depth Video
Pekelny, Y., & Gotsman, C. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01137.x · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A tensor-based algorithm for high-order graph matching
Duchenne, O., Bach, F., Kweon, I.-S., & Ponce, J. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206619 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Continuous capture of skin deformation
Sand, P., McMillan, L., & Popović, J. (2003) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1201775.882310 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Automatic Registration for Articulated Shapes
Chang, W., & Zwicker, M. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01286.x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Reconstruction of deforming geometry from time-varying point clouds
Wand, M., Jenke, P., Qi-xing Huang, A., Bokeloh, M., Guibas, L. J., & Schilling, A. (2007) · doi:10.5555/1281991.1281998 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Mitra, N. J., Flöry, S., Ovsjanikov, M., Gelfand, N., Guibas, L. J., & Pottmann, H. (2007) · doi:10.5555/1281991.1282015 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Modeling deformable objects from a single depth camera
Liao, M., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Yang, R., & Gong, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459161 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Isometric registration of ambiguous and partial data
Tevs, A., Bokeloh, M., Wand, M., Schilling, A., & Seidel, H. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206775 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Volumetric heat kernel signatures
Raviv, D., Bronstein, M. M., Bronstein, A. M., & Kimmel, R. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1877808.1877817 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Global registration of dynamic range scans for articulated model reconstruction
Chang, W., & Zwicker, M. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1966394.1966405 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Automatic registration of overlapping 3D point clouds using closest points
Liu, Y. (2006) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.01.009 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstructing Animated Meshes from Time‐Varying Point Clouds
Süßmuth, J., Winter, M., & Greiner, G. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01287.x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Grouping with Asymmetric Affinities: A Game-Theoretic Perspective
Torsello, A., Bulo, S. R., & Pelillo, M. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.130 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Computing Accurate Correspondences across Groups of Images
Cootes, T. F., Twining, C. J., Petrovic, V. S., Babalola, K. O., & Taylor, C. J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.193 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Consensus Skeleton for Non‐rigid Space‐time Registration
Zheng, Q., Sharf, A., Tagliasacchi, A., Chen, B., Zhang, H., Sheffer, A., & Cohen‐Or, D. (2010) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01633.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Special Issue on Registration and Fusion of Range Images
Rodrigues, M., Fisher, R. B., & Liu, Y. (2002) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2002.0978 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationToldo, R., Beinat, A., & Crosilla, F. (2010) · International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Intrinsic Shape Matching by Planned Landmark Sampling
Tevs, A., Berner, A., Wand, M., Ihrke, I., & Seidel, H. ‐. (2011) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01879.x · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A spectral notion of Gromov–Wasserstein distance and related methods
Mémoli, F. (2010) · Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.acha.2010.09.005 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Diffusion-geometric maximally stable component detection in deformable shapes
Litman, R., Bronstein, A. M., & Bronstein, M. M. (2011) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2011.03.011 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Minimum-Distortion Isometric Shape Correspondence Using EM Algorithm
Sahillioglu, Y., & Yemez, Y. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.26 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Groupwise point pattern registration using a novel CDF-based Jensen-Shannon Divergence
Wang, F., Vemuri, B. C., & Rangarajan, A. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.131 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Robust principal axes determination for point-based shapes using least median of squares
Liu, Y.-S., & Ramani, K. (2009) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2008.10.012 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationParticle filtering for registration of 2D and 3D point sets with stochastic dynamics
Sandhu, R., Dambreville, S., & Tannenbaum, A. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587794 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Automatic 3d free form shape matching using the graduated assignment algorithm
Liu, Y. (2005) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.008 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal temporal registration of multiple non-rigid surface sequences
Huang, P., Budd, C., & Hilton, A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995438 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Affine-invariant diffusion geometry for the analysis of deformable 3D shapes
Raviv, D., Bronstein, M. M., Bronstein, A. M., Kimmel, R., & Sochen, N. (2011) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995486 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Li, H., Weise, T., & Pauly, M. V. (2010) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1833349.1778769 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A new method for the registration of three-dimensional point-sets: The Gaussian Fields framework
Boughorbel, F., Mercimek, M., Koschan, A., & Abidi, M. (2010) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.05.003 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
2D piecewise algebraic splines for implicit modeling
Li, Q., & Tian, J. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1516522.1516524 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Reconstruction of Deforming Geometry from Time-Varying Point Clouds
Wand, M., Jenke, P., Qi-xing Huang, A., Bokeloh, M., Guibas, L. J., & Schilling, A. (2007) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · doi:10.2312/sgp/sgp07/049-058 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A mean field annealing approach to accurate free form shape matching
Liu, Y. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.11.025 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient groupwise non-rigid registration of textured surfaces
Sidorov, K. A., Richmond, S., & Marshall, D. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995632 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationA Non-cooperative Game for 3D Object Recognition in Cluttered Scenes
Albarelli, A., Rodolà, E., Bergamasco, F., et al. (2011) · doi:10.1109/3dimpvt.2011.39 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Fuzzy Geodesics and Consistent Sparse Correspondences For: eformable Shapes
Sun, J. Z., Chen, X., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2010) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01762.x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Intrinsic dense 3D surface tracking
Zeng, Y., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Gu, X., Samaras, D., & Paragios, N. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995513 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Assessing the Accuracy of Non-Rigid Registration With and Without Ground Truth
Schestowitz, R. S., Twining, C., Cootes, T. F., et al. (2006) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2006.1625048 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Spectral descriptors for deformable shapesPreprint
Bronstein, A. M. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1110.5015 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Stable volumetric features in deformable shapes
Litman, R., Bronstein, A. M., & Bronstein, M. M. (2012) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2012.03.034 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Constraints for closest point finding
Liu, Y. (2008) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2007.12.004 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationReplicator Dynamics in the Iterative Process for Accurate Range Image Matching
Liu, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0210-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation3D Point Correspondence by Minimum Description Length in Feature Space
Chen, J.-H., Zheng, K. C., & Shapiro, L. G. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15558-1_45 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
An intrinsic algorithm for computing geodesic distance fields on triangle meshes with holes
Quynh, D. T. P., He, Y., Xin, S., et al. (2012) · Graphical Models · doi:10.1016/j.gmod.2012.04.009 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Non-Rigid Registration Assessment Without Ground Truth
Schestowitz, R. S., Twining, C., Petrović, V., et al. (2006) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Multilinear models for face synthesis
Vlasic, D., Brand, M., Pfister, H., et al. (2004) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1186223.1186293 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Krsek, Range Image Registration Driven by a Hierarchy of Surface Differential Features, 175
- Bokeloh, 2008, Slippage Features
- Digne, The Level Set Tree on Meshes
- Mitchell, 1997, Machine Learning
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneanu, C. A., Simon, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2515606 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Cho, J., Kim, Y. J., Sunwoo, L., Lee, G. P., Nguyen, T. Q., Cho, S. J., Baik, S. H., Bae, Y. J., Choi, B. S., Jung, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.739639 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., & Rosin, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Aberystwyth University (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1199-1217
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965805571
- Semantic Scholar
- 78f2ecd259252386754729c7205ed8c70f0dabac
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 27.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orca.cardiff.ac.uk
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Keywords
- 3D surface registration, point clouds, mesh, rigid registration, non-rigid registration, data fitting, model selection, optimization, overfitting, initialization, registration evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review