Cited by 111Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression Recognition

Comparative evaluation of 3D vs. 2D modality for automatic detection of facial action units

Savran, Arman, Sankur, Bülent, Taha Bilge, M.·2012·Pattern Recognition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.07.022

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savran, A., Sankur, B., & Taha Bilge, M.
Affiliations
Boğaziçi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Savran, Arman
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
767-782
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130571344
Cited by
111
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial action units, facial expression recognition, 3D face data, facial action coding system, multimodal fusion, feature selection, classifier comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review