Cited by 22Statistical Methods and InferenceText and Document Classification TechnologiesMachine Learning and Data Classification

Incremental relevance sample-feature machine: a fast marginal likelihood maximization approach for joint feature selection and classification

Mohsenzadeh, Yalda, Sheikhzadeh, Hamid, Nazari, Sobhan·2016·Pattern Recognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.06.028

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML provides higher estimation accuracy than DA, as pointed out in [147] by comparing IC analysis with two ML techniques (GPR and random forest regression).

    “ML provides higher estimation accuracy than DA as pointed out in [147] by comparing the IC analysis with two ML techniques (GPR and random forest regression).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohsenzadeh, Y., Sheikhzadeh, H., & Nazari, S.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Mohsenzadeh, Yalda
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
60
Pages
835-848
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2468540678
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
marginal likelihood maximization, constructivist learning, basis function selection, sparse models, training efficiency, large training sets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review