Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisiting multiple instance neural networks

Open access
Wang, Xinggang, Yan, Yongluan, Tang, Peng, Bai, Xiang, Liu, Wenyu·2018·Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We revisit the problem of solving MIL using neural networks (MINNs), which are ignored in current MIL research community. Our experiments show that MINNs are very effective and efficient.We proposed a novel MI-Net which is centered on learning bag representation in the neural networks in an end-to-end way.Recent deep learning tricks including dropout, deep supervision and residual connections are studied in MINNs. We find deep supervision and residual connections are effective for MIL.In the experiments, the proposed MINNs achieve state-of-the-art or competitive performance on several MIL benchmarks. Moreover, it is extremely fast for both testing and training, for example, it takes only 0.0003s to predict a bag and a few seconds to train on MIL datasets on a moderate CPU. Of late, neural networks and Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) are both attractive topics in the research areas related to Artificial Intelligence. Deep neural networks have achieved great successes in supervised learning problems, and MIL as a typical weakly-supervised learning method is effective for many applications in computer vision, biometrics, natural language processing, and so on. In this article, we revisit Multiple Instance Neural Networks (MINNs) that the neural networks aim at solving the MIL problems. The MINNs perform MIL in an end-to-end manner, which take bags with a various number of instances as input and directly output the labels of bags. All of the parameters in a MINN can be optimized via back-propagation. Besides revisiting the old MINNs, we propose a new type of MINN to learn bag representations, which is different from the existing MINNs that focus on estimating instance label. In addition, recent tricks developed in deep learning have been studied in MINNs; we find deep supervision is effective for learning better bag representations. In the experiments, the proposed MINNs achieve state-of-the-art or competitive performance on several MIL benchmarks. Moreover, it is extremely fast for both testing and training, for example, it takes only 0.0003 s to predict a bag and a few seconds to train on MIL datasets on a moderate CPU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X., Yan, Y., Tang, P., Bai, X., & Liu, W.
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
74
Pages
15-24
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531897166
Cited by
498
References
32
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting multiple instance neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026
The paper
Wang, X., Yan, Y., Tang, P., Bai, X., & Liu, W. (2018). Revisiting multiple instance neural networks. Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.