The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting multiple instance neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We revisit the problem of solving MIL using neural networks (MINNs), which are ignored in current MIL research community. Our experiments show that MINNs are very effective and efficient.We proposed a novel MI-Net which is centered on learning bag representation in the neural networks in an end-to-end way.Recent deep learning tricks including dropout, deep supervision and residual connections are studied in MINNs. We find deep supervision and residual connections are effective for MIL.In the experiments, the proposed MINNs achieve state-of-the-art or competitive performance on several MIL benchmarks. Moreover, it is extremely fast for both testing and training, for example, it takes only 0.0003s to predict a bag and a few seconds to train on MIL datasets on a moderate CPU. Of late, neural networks and Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) are both attractive topics in the research areas related to Artificial Intelligence. Deep neural networks have achieved great successes in supervised learning problems, and MIL as a typical weakly-supervised learning method is effective for many applications in computer vision, biometrics, natural language processing, and so on. In this article, we revisit Multiple Instance Neural Networks (MINNs) that the neural networks aim at solving the MIL problems. The MINNs perform MIL in an end-to-end manner, which take bags with a various number of instances as input and directly output the labels of bags. All of the parameters in a MINN can be optimized via back-propagation. Besides revisiting the old MINNs, we propose a new type of MINN to learn bag representations, which is different from the existing MINNs that focus on estimating instance label. In addition, recent tricks developed in deep learning have been studied in MINNs; we find deep supervision is effective for learning better bag representations. In the experiments, the proposed MINNs achieve state-of-the-art or competitive performance on several MIL benchmarks. Moreover, it is extremely fast for both testing and training, for example, it takes only 0.0003 s to predict a bag and a few seconds to train on MIL datasets on a moderate CPU.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
(2011) · Cited by 6,993
Cited by
Li, B., Li, Y., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01409 · Cited by 957
PCL: Proposal Cluster Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Detection
Tang, P., Wang, X., Bai, S., Shen, W., Bai, X., Liu, W., & Yuille, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2876304 · Cited by 406
Self-citationMultiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification
Sudharshan, P. J., Petitjean, C., Spanhol, F., Oliveira, L. E., Heutte, L., & Honeine, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.049 · Cited by 369
Learning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detection
Zhao, T., Xu, X., Xu, M., Ding, H., Xiong, Y., & Xia, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01475 · Cited by 383
(2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Yan, Y., Tang, P., Bai, X., & Liu, W.
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 15-24
- ISSN
- 0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2531897166
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting multiple instance neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026
- The paper
- Wang, X., Yan, Y., Tang, P., Bai, X., & Liu, W. (2018). Revisiting multiple instance neural networks. Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.08.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.