Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,589

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognition

Wu, Zifeng, Shen, Chunhua, van den Hengel, Anton·2019·Pattern Recognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bai, 2017, Text/non-text image classification in the wild with convolutional neural networks, Pattern Recogn., 66, 437, 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.005 · DOI
  2. Shi, 2018, Pairwise based deep ranking hashing for histopathology image classification and retrieval, Pattern Recogn., 81, 14, 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.015 · DOI
  3. Zhou, 2018, Deep super-class learning for long-tail distributed image classification, Pattern Recogn., 80, 118, 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.003 · DOI
  4. Long, 2017, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 39, 640, 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Mishkin, 2017, Systematic evaluation of CNN advances on the ImageNet, Comp. Vis. Image Understanding, 161, 11, 10.1016/j.cviu.2017.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. J. Wu, C.-W. Xie, J.-H. Luo, Dense CNN learning with equivalent mappings, 2016, (CoRR abs/1605.07251). · arXiv
  7. Srivastava, 2014, Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929
  8. Z. Wu, C. Shen, A. van den Hengel, Bridging category-level and instance-level semantic image segmentation, 2016, (CoRR abs/1605.06885). · arXiv
  9. Zhou, 2018, Places: A 10 million image database for scene understanding, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 40, 1452, 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2723009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, F. Schroff, H. Adam, Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation, 2017, (CoRR abs/1706.05587). · arXiv
  11. Lin, 2017, Exploring context with deep structured models for semantic segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 40, 1352, 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2708714 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,589

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Z., Shen, C., & van den Hengel, A.
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
90
Pages
119-133
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558580397
Cited by
1,589
References
22
FWCI
77.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.006
The paper
Wu, Z., Shen, C., & van den Hengel, A. (2019). Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognition. Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.