Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A person-specific, rigorous aging model of the human face

Scandrett (née Hill), Catherine M., Solomon, Christopher J., Gibson, Stuart J.·2006·Pattern Recognition Letters

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Burt, 1995, Perception of age in adult Caucasian male faces: Computer graphic manipulation of shape and colour information, Roy. Soc. London Ser. B, 259, 137, 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021 · DOI
  2. Cootes, 2001, Active appearance models, IEEE Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 23, 681, 10.1109/34.927467 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Frowd, 2004, EvoFIT: A holisitc, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 1, 19, 10.1145/1008722.1008725 · DOI
  4. Gibson, 2003, Facial attribute manipulation for composite systems and computer graphics applications, vol. 1, 146
  5. Hutton, 2003, Estimating average growth trajectories in shape-space using kernel smoothing, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 22, 747, 10.1109/TMI.2003.814784 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lanitis, 2002, Toward automatic simulation of aging effects on face images, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 24, 442, 10.1109/34.993553 · DOI
  7. Pittenger, 1975, Aging faces as visual-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception, Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform., 1, 374, 10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.374 · DOI
  8. Pittenger, 1979, Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth, Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform., 5, 478, 10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.478 · DOI
  9. Stegmann, M., 2000. Active appearance models-theory, extensions & cases, second ed. Master’s thesis, Technical University of Denmark.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Scandrett (née Hill), C. M., Solomon, C. J., & Gibson, S. J.
Venue
Pattern Recognition Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
27
Issue
15
Pages
1776-1787
ISSN
0167-8655
Cited by
60
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review