The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals
Open accessAbstract
A new approach is introduced to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. The presented technique is based on an exhaustive screening taking into account all combinations of signal features extracted from the recorded acoustic emission signals. For each possible combination of signal features an investigation of the classification performance of the k-means algorithm is evaluated ranging from two to ten classes. The numerical degree of cluster separation of each partition is calculated utilizing the Davies-Bouldin and Tou indices, Rousseeuw's silhouette validation method and Hubert's Gamma statistics. The individual rating of each cluster validation technique is cumulated based on a voting scheme and is evaluated for the number of clusters with best performance. This is defined as the best partitioning for the given signal feature combination. As a second step the numerical ranking of all these partitions is evaluated for the globally optimal partition in a second voting scheme using the cluster validation methods results. This methodology can be used as an automated evaluation of the number of natural clusters and their partitions without previous knowledge about the cluster structure of acoustic emission signals. The suitability of the current approach was evaluated using artificial datasets with defined degree of separation. In addition the application of the approach to clustering of acoustic emission signals is demonstrated for signals obtained from failure during loading of carbon fiber reinforced plastic specimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01908075 · Cited by 8,219
Cited by
Hassani, S., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23042204 · Cited by 492
Cluster analysis of acoustic emission signals for 2D and 3D woven glass/epoxy composites
Li, L., Lomov, S. V., Yan, X., & Carvelli, V. (2014) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.023 · Cited by 255
Structural Health Monitoring Damage Detection Systems for Aerospace
(2021) · Springer Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72192-3 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sause, M. G. R., Gribov, A., Unwin, A. R., & Horn, S.
- Venue
- Pattern Recognition Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-23
- ISSN
- 0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970887162
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.018
- The paper
- Sause, M. G. R., Gribov, A., Unwin, A. R., & Horn, S. (2012). Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. Pattern Recognition Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.09.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.