Cited by 8,219Advanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models

Comparing partitions

Hubert, Lawrence, Arabie, Phipps·1985·Journal of Classification

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01908075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cluster assignments produced by the label propagation method were highly consistent across 100 runs for each network, as measured by the Adjusted Rand Index.

    “To confirm that we can produce consistent clusters across different runs we executed the algorithm one hundred times for each network and compared the label assignments produced by every run.”

    From Political Polarization on Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Hubert and Arabie 1985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Classification
Published
1985-12
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
193-218
ISSN
  • 0176-4268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1343
OpenAlex
W4235169531
Cited by
8,219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 999 · 2025: 749 · 2024: 653 · 2023: 573 · 2022: 634 · 2021: 602 · 2020: 468 · 2019: 480 · 2018: 388 · 2017: 356 · 2016: 321 · 2015: 270 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 260 · 2012: 201
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Classification (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Keywords
partition comparison, Rand index, cluster validation, finite sets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review