Endocannabinoid signaling system and brain reward: emphasis on dopamine
Abstract
The brain's reward circuitry consists of an "in series" circuit of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens (Acb), and that portion of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) which links the VTA and Acb. Drugs which enhance brain reward (and have derivative addictive potential) have common actions on this core DA reward system and on animal behaviors relating to its function. Such drugs enhance electrical brain-stimulation reward in this reward system; enhance neural firing and DA tone within it; produce conditioned place preference (CPP), a behavioral model of incentive motivation; are self-administered; and trigger reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in animals extinguished from drug self-administration. Cannabinoids were long considered different from other reward-enhancing drugs in reward efficacy and in underlying neurobiological substrates activated. However, it is now clear that cannabinoids activate these brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors in similar fashion to other reward-enhancing drugs. This brief review discusses the roles that endogenous cannabinoids (especially activation of the CB1 receptor) may play within the core reward system, and concludes that while cannabinoids activate the reward pathways in a manner consistent with other reward-enhancing drugs, the neural mechanisms by which this occurs may differ.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The actions of cannabinoids in the VTA may be more complex than those of opiates, but appear to involve disinhibitory mechanisms to activate dopamine neurons.
“The actions of cannabinoids in the VTA may be more complex than those of opiates, but appear to involve disinhibitory mechanisms to activate dopamine neurons (Lupica et al., 2004; Gardner, 2005).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Gardner, 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 264 · Cited by 387
- Authors
- GARDNER, E.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- GARDNER, E
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-284
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046083062
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 264
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- endocannabinoid system, brain reward, dopamine, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, medial forebrain bundle, CB1 receptor, conditioned place preference, self-administration, reinstatement of drug seeking, incentive motivation, drug addiction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cannabinoids, Dopamine, Humans, Reward, Self Administration, Signal Transduction, Substance-Related Disorders, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review