Cited by 387Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Endocannabinoid signaling system and brain reward: emphasis on dopamine

GARDNER, E·2005·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

The brain's reward circuitry consists of an "in series" circuit of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens (Acb), and that portion of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) which links the VTA and Acb. Drugs which enhance brain reward (and have derivative addictive potential) have common actions on this core DA reward system and on animal behaviors relating to its function. Such drugs enhance electrical brain-stimulation reward in this reward system; enhance neural firing and DA tone within it; produce conditioned place preference (CPP), a behavioral model of incentive motivation; are self-administered; and trigger reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in animals extinguished from drug self-administration. Cannabinoids were long considered different from other reward-enhancing drugs in reward efficacy and in underlying neurobiological substrates activated. However, it is now clear that cannabinoids activate these brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors in similar fashion to other reward-enhancing drugs. This brief review discusses the roles that endogenous cannabinoids (especially activation of the CB1 receptor) may play within the core reward system, and concludes that while cannabinoids activate the reward pathways in a manner consistent with other reward-enhancing drugs, the neural mechanisms by which this occurs may differ.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 264 · Cited by 387

Authors
GARDNER, E.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
GARDNER, E
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
263-284
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046083062
Cited by
387
References
264
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
20.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
endocannabinoid system, brain reward, dopamine, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, medial forebrain bundle, CB1 receptor, conditioned place preference, self-administration, reinstatement of drug seeking, incentive motivation, drug addiction
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Cannabinoids, Dopamine, Humans, Reward, Self Administration, Signal Transduction, Substance-Related Disorders, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review