CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fractionation mutagenesis and similar consequences of mechanisms removing dispensable or less-expressed DNA in plants

Freeling, Michael, Woodhouse, Margaret R, Subramaniam, Shabarinath, Turco, Gina, Lisch, Damon, Schnable, James C·2012·Current Opinion in Plant Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlike in mammals, plants rapidly delete functionless, nonrepetitive DNA from their genomes. Following paleopolyploidies, duplicate genes are deleted by intrachromosomal recombination. This may explain how flowering plants have survived multiple whole genome duplications. Genes are disproportionately lost from one parental subgenome, the subgenome that is less expressed in the polyploid. The origin of this unbalanced expression between genomes remains unknown. The consequences of the tradeoffs between transposon repression and gene expression represent one potential explanation of genome dominance. If so, the same mechanisms may act in heterosis: genome dominance is like inbreeding depression. Regulatory DNA deletion following polyploidy combined with abundant RNA-seq expression datasets are being used to generate testable hypothesizes regarding the function of specific cis-regulatory sequences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Liman, 2003, Relaxed selective pressure on an essential component of pheromone transduction in primate evolution, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100, 3328, 10.1073/pnas.0636123100 · DOI
  2. Schrider, 2009, All human-specific gene losses are present in the genome as pseudogenes, J Comput Biol, 16, 1419, 10.1089/cmb.2009.0085 · DOI
  3. Woodhouse, 2010, Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs, PLoS Biology, 8, 15, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000409 · DOI
  4. The-Brassica-rapa-genome-sequencing-project-consortium: The genome of the mesohexaploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics 2011, 43:1035–1039. · DOI
  5. Gallardo, 1999, Discovery of tetraploidy in a mammal, Nature, 401, 341, 10.1038/43815 · DOI
  6. Tian, 2009, Do genetic recombination and gene density shape the pattern of DNA elimination in rice long terminal repeat retrotransposons?, Genome Res, 19, 2221, 10.1101/gr.083899.108 · DOI
  7. Baucom, 2009, Exceptional diversity, non-random distribution, and rapid evolution of retroelements in the B73 maize genome, PLoS Genet, 5, e1000732, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000732 · DOI
  8. Devos, 2002, Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis, Genome Res, 12, 1075, 10.1101/gr.132102 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Petrov, 1996, High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila, Nature, 384, 346, 10.1038/384346a0 · DOI
  10. Laughnan, 1970, Observations on genetic properties of intrachromosomal recombination, Molecular General Genetics, 108, 93, 10.1007/BF00343188 · DOI
  11. Schnable, 2011, Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 4069, 10.1073/pnas.1101368108 · DOI
  12. Springer, 2009, Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content, PLoS Genet, 5, e1000734, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734 · DOI
  13. Swanson-Wagner, 2010, Pervasive gene content variation and copy number variation in maize and its undomesticated progenitor, Genome Res, 20, 1689, 10.1101/gr.109165.110 · DOI
  14. Tang H, M.R. W, Cheng F, Schnble JC, Pedersen BS, Wang X, Freeling M, Pires CJ: Altered patterns of fractionation and exon deletion in Brassica rapa support a two-step model for paleohexaploidy. Genetics 2012, accepted. · DOI
  15. Freeling, 2009, Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition, Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60, 433, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092122 · DOI
  16. Birchler, 2010, The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution, New Phytol, 186, 54, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03087.x · DOI
  17. Veitia, 2010, A generalized model of gene dosage and dominant negative effects in macromolecular complexes, FASEB J, 24, 994, 10.1096/fj.09-146969 · DOI
  18. Schnable, 2011, Dose-sensitivity, conserved noncoding sequences and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses, Frontiers in Plant Genetics and Genomics, 2, 1
  19. Flagel, 2010, Evolutionary rate variation, genomic dominance and duplicate gene expression evolution during allotetraploid cotton speciation, New Phytol, 186, 184, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03107.x · DOI
  20. Buggs, 2010, Tissue-specific silencing of homoeologs in natural populations of the recent allopolyploid Tragopogon mirus, New Phytol, 186, 175, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03205.x · DOI
  21. Buggs, 2010, Characterization of duplicate gene evolution in the recent natural allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus by next-generation sequencing and Sequenom iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping, Mol Ecol, 19, 132, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04469.x · DOI
  22. Chang, 2011, Homoeolog-specific retention and use in allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica depends on parent of origin and network partners, Genome Biol, 11, R125, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r125 · DOI
  23. Thomas, 2006, Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes, Genome Research, 16, 934, 10.1101/gr.4708406 · DOI
  24. Sankoff, 2010, The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication, BMC Genomics, 11, 313, 10.1186/1471-2164-11-313 · DOI
  25. Schnable, 2011, Genes Identified by Visible Mutant Phenotypes Show Increased Bias toward One of Two Subgenomes of Maize, PLoS One, 6, e17855, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017855 · DOI
  26. Hollister, 2011, Transposable elements and small RNAs contribute to gene expression divergence between Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 2322, 10.1073/pnas.1018222108 · DOI
  27. Hollister, 2009, Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression, Genome Res, 19, 1419, 10.1101/gr.091678.109 · DOI
  28. Du, 2009, The polychromatic Helitron landscape of the maize genome, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 19916, 10.1073/pnas.0904742106 · DOI
  29. Naito, 2009, Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression, Nature, 461, 1130, 10.1038/nature08479 · DOI
  30. Hegarty, 2006, Transcriptome shock after interspecific hybridization in Senecio is ameliorated by genome duplication, Current Biology, 16, 1652, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.071 · DOI
  31. Buggs, 2011, Transcriptomic shock generates evolutionary novelty in a newly formed, natural allopolyploid plant, Curr Biol, 21, 551, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.016 · DOI
  32. Birchler, 2010, Heterosis. Plant Cell, 22, 2105, 10.1105/tpc.110.076133 · DOI
  33. Dobzahnsky, 1950, Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila psuedoobscura, Genetics, 35, 288, 10.1093/genetics/35.3.288 · DOI
  34. Hale, 2009, Production and processing of siRNA precursor transcripts from the highly repetitive maize genome, PLoS Genet, 5, e1000598, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000598 · DOI
  35. Chen, 2010, Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor, Trends Plant Sci, 15, 57, 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.003 · DOI
  36. Hu, 2011, The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change, Nat Genet, 43, 476, 10.1038/ng.807 · DOI
  37. Hawkins, 2009, Rapid DNA loss as a counterbalance to genome expansion through retrotransposon proliferation in plants, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 17811, 10.1073/pnas.0904339106 · DOI
  38. Zou, 2009, Evolutionary and expression signatures of pseudogenes in Arabidopsis and rice, Plant Physiol, 151, 3, 10.1104/pp.109.140632 · DOI
  39. Freeling, 2008, Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales, Genome Res, 18, 1924, 10.1101/gr.081026.108 · DOI
  40. Poliseno, 2010, A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology, Nature, 465, 1033, 10.1038/nature09144 · DOI
  41. Tam, 2008, Pseudogene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes, Nature, 453, 534, 10.1038/nature06904 · DOI
  42. Guo, 2009, Small RNAs originated from pseudogenes: cis- or trans-acting?, PLoS Comput Biol, 5, e1000449, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000449 · DOI
  43. The-Arabidopsis-Genome-Consortium, 2000, Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, Nature, 408, 796, 10.1038/35048692 · DOI · Paper page
  44. McMullen, 2009, Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population, Science, 325, 737, 10.1126/science.1174320 · DOI
  45. Woodhouse, 2010, Transposed genes in Arabidopsis are often associated with flanking repeats, PLoS Genetics, 6, e1000949, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000949 · DOI
  46. Wicker, 2010, Patching gaps in plant genomes results in gene movement and erosion of colinearity, Genome Res, 20, 1229, 10.1101/gr.107284.110 · DOI
  47. Yang, 2011, Lowly expressed genes in Arabidopsis thaliana bear the signature of possible pseudogenization by promoter degradation, Mol Biol Evol, 28, 1193, 10.1093/molbev/msq298 · DOI
  48. Freeling, 2009, Conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) in higher plants, Curr Opin Plant Biol, 12, 126, 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.01.005 · DOI
  49. Van de Peer, 2011, A mystery unvield, Genome Biology, 12, 113, 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-113 · DOI
  50. Lyons, 2008, The value of nonmodel genomes and an example using SynMap within CoGe to dissect the paleohexaploidy at preceeds the rosids, Tropical Plant Biology, 1, 181, 10.1007/s12042-008-9017-y · DOI
  51. Tang, 2011, Guided synteny alignment between duplicated genomes through integer programming, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 102, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-102 · DOI
  52. Groszmann, 2011, Changes in 24-nt siRNA levels in Arabidopsis hybrids suggest an epigenetic contribution to hybrid vigor, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, 2617, 10.1073/pnas.1019217108 · DOI
  53. Kenan-Eichler, 2011, Wheat hybridization and polyploidization results in deregulation of small RNAs, Genetics, 188, 263, 10.1534/genetics.111.128348 · DOI
  54. Chen, 2010, Expression analysis of miRNAs and highly-expressed small RNAs in two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids, J Integr Plant Biol, 52, 971, 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00985.x · DOI
  55. Slotkin, 2009, Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in pollen, Cell, 136, 461, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.038 · DOI
  56. Li, 2010, Epigenetic reprogramming during vegetative phase change in maize, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 22184, 10.1073/pnas.1016884108 · DOI
  57. Bowers, 2003, Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events, Nature, 422, 433, 10.1038/nature01521 · DOI
  58. Davidson, 2011, Utility of RNA sequencing for analysis of maize reproductive transcriptomes, The Plant Genome, 4, 191, 10.3835/plantgenome2011.05.0015 · DOI
  59. Li, 2010, The developmental dynamics of the maize leaf transcriptome, Nat Genet, 42, 1060, 10.1038/ng.703 · DOI
  60. Jia, 2009, Loss of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (RDR2) function causes widespread and unexpected changes in the expression of transposons, genes, and 24-nt small RNAs, PLoS Genet, 5, e1000737, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000737 · DOI
  61. Wang, 2009, Genome-wide and organ-specific landscapes of epigenetic modifications and their relationships to mRNA and small RNA transcriptomes in maize, The Plant Cell, 21, 1053, 10.1105/tpc.109.065714 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Freeling, M., Woodhouse, M. R., Subramaniam, S., Turco, G., Lisch, D., & Schnable, J. C.
Venue
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
131-139
ISSN
1369-5266
DOI
10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.015
Cited by
198
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review