Cited by 15,556Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and SplicingSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation

Open access
Trapnell, Cole, Williams, Brian A, Pertea, Geo, Mortazavi, Ali, Kwan, Gordon, van Baren, Marijke J, Salzberg, Steven L, Wold, Barbara J +1 more·2010·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

High-throughput mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) promises simultaneous transcript discovery and abundance estimation. However, this would require algorithms that are not restricted by prior gene annotations and that account for alternative transcription and splicing. Here we introduce such algorithms in an open-source software program called Cufflinks. To test Cufflinks, we sequenced and analyzed >430 million paired 75-bp RNA-Seq reads from a mouse myoblast cell line over a differentiation time series. We detected 13,692 known transcripts and 3,724 previously unannotated ones, 62% of which are supported by independent expression data or by homologous genes in other species. Over the time series, 330 genes showed complete switches in the dominant transcription start site (TSS) or splice isoform, and we observed more subtle shifts in 1,304 other genes. These results suggest that Cufflinks can illuminate the substantial regulatory flexibility and complexity in even this well-studied model of muscle development and that it can improve transcriptome-based genome annotation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.1621

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transcripts of between 8000 and 16,000 protein-coding genes expressed from a single cell type can be detected depending on data and analysis criteria.

    “transcripts of between 8000 and 16 000 protein-coding genes expressed from a single cell type can be detected”

    From Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line (2011) · cites this paper as Trapnell et al, 2010

  • Reads were assembled into 49,000 unique transcripts mapping to 16,554 different protein-coding genes.

    “assembled into 49 000 unique transcripts (Trapnell et al, 2010) that mapped to 16 554 different protein-coding genes”

    From Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line (2011) · cites this paper as Trapnell et al, 2010

  • Cufflinks estimates transcript expression from a mapping to the genome using an expectation-maximization approach that estimates transcript abundances.

    “Cufflinks [39] estimates transcript expression from a mapping to the genome obtained from mappers such as TopHat using an expectation-maximization approach that estimates transcript abundances.”

    From A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Mortazavi A Williams B Mccue K Schaeffer L Wold B Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq Nature Methods 5 621 628 2008 18516045 PMC13303166
  2. [25]Fuglede B Topsøe F Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 3 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trapnell, C., Williams, B. A., Pertea, G., Mortazavi, A., Kwan, G., van Baren, M. J., Salzberg, S. L., Wold, B. J., & Pachter, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Pachter, Lior
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2010-05
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
511-515
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2141458291
Cited by
15,556
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 449 · 2025: 708 · 2024: 865 · 2023: 1081 · 2022: 1349 · 2021: 1458 · 2020: 1444 · 2019: 1349 · 2018: 1319 · 2017: 1225 · 2016: 1051 · 2015: 936 · 2014: 889 · 2013: 684 · 2012: 447
FWCI
185.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG004576, R01HG006102)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083873)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM006845)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
transcript assembly, transcript quantification, Cufflinks, unannotated transcripts, isoform switching, alternative splicing, alternative transcription, cell differentiation, myogenesis, genome annotation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, RNA, Messenger, Software, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Genome, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Protein Isoforms, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review