The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenges and progress towards understanding the role of effectors in plant–fungal interactions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal Effectors and Plant Susceptibility
Lo Presti, L., Lanver, D., Schweizer, G., Tanaka, S., Liang, L., Tollot, M., Zuccaro, A., Reissmann, S., & Kahmann, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114623 · Cited by 1,249
Filamentous plant pathogen effectors in action
Giraldo, M. C., & Valent, B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3119 · Cited by 498
Giraldo, M. C., Dagdas, Y. F., Gupta, Y. K., Mentlak, T. A., Yi, M., Martinez-Rocha, A. L., Saitoh, H., Terauchi, R., Talbot, N. J., & Valent, B. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2996 · Cited by 424
Nematode effector proteins: an emerging paradigm of parasitism
Mitchum, M. G., Hussey, R. S., Baum, T. J., Wang, X., Elling, A. A., Wubben, M., & Davis, E. L. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12323 · Cited by 355
Tools of the crook-infection strategies of fungal plant pathogens
Rodriguez‐Moreno, L., Ebert, M. K., Bolton, M. D., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13810 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafiqi, M., Ellis, J. G., Ludowici, V. A., Hardham, A. R., & Dodds, P. N.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-482
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038535911
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges and progress towards understanding the role of effectors in plant–fungal interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.05.003
- The paper
- Rafiqi, M., Ellis, J. G., Ludowici, V. A., Hardham, A. R., & Dodds, P. N. (2012). Challenges and progress towards understanding the role of effectors in plant–fungal interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.05.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
