The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene duplication as a driver of plant morphogenetic evolution
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Transcription regulation and animal diversity
Levine, M., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01763 · Cited by 1,309
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Cited by
The Physcomitrella patens chromosome‐scale assembly reveals moss genome structure and evolution
Lang, D., Ullrich, K. K., Murat, F., Fuchs, J., Jenkins, J., Haas, F. B., Piednoel, M., Gundlach, H., Van Bel, M., Meyberg, R., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13801 · Cited by 423
Self-citationPlant Malectin-Like Receptor Kinases: From Cell Wall Integrity to Immunity and Beyond
Franck, C. M., Westermann, J., & Boisson-Dernier, A. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040557 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Rensing, S. A.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 43-48
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042035854
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene duplication as a driver of plant morphogenetic evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.11.002
- The paper
- Rensing, S. A. (2014). Gene duplication as a driver of plant morphogenetic evolution. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
