The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Cannon, S. B., Mitra, A., Baumgarten, A., Young, N. D., & May, G. (2004) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-4-10 · Cited by 2,372
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise
Newman, J. R. S., Ghaemmaghami, S., Ihmels, J., Breslow, D. K., Noble, M., DeRisi, J. L., & Weissman, J. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04785 · Cited by 1,483
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
Self-citationBlanc, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.021345 · Cited by 1,233
Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution[W]
Blanc, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.021410 · Cited by 1,076
Freeling, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092122 · Cited by 1,015
A Scan for Positively Selected Genes in the Genomes of Humans and Chimpanzees
Nielsen, R., Bustamante, C., Clark, A. G., Glanowski, S., Sackton, T. B., Hubisz, M. J., Fledel-Alon, A., Tanenbaum, D. M., Civello, D., White, T. J., et al. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030170 · Cited by 1,007
Cited by
Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants
Panchy, N., Lehti-Shiu, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.00523 · Cited by 1,757
Albalat, R., & Cañestro, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · Cited by 775
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times
Van de Peer, Y., Ashman, T.-L., Soltis, P. S., & Soltis, D. E. (2021) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koaa015 · Cited by 732
The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J., & Soltis, P. S. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400178 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A., & Pires, J. C.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089499317
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.008
- The paper
- Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A., & Pires, J. C. (2014). Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
