Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Updates on obesity and the obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases

Tutor, Austin W., Lavie, Carl J., Kachur, Sergey, Milani, Richard V., Ventura, Hector O.·2023·Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity has reached pandemic proportions worldwide and certainly in the United States. Obesity is a well-established independent risk factor for development of many cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including heart failure, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Therefore, it is logical to expect obesity would have a strong correlation with CVD mortality. However, a substantial body of literature demonstrates a paradox with improved prognosis of overweight and obese patients with established CVD compared to lean patients with the identical CVD. Surprisingly, similar data has also shown that cardiovascular fitness, rather than weight loss alone, influences the relationship between obesity and mortality in those with established CVD. The impact of fitness, exercise, physical activity (PA), and weight loss and their relationship to the obesity paradox are all reviewed here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.11.013

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Wei, 2021, Neighborhood sidewalk access and childhood obesity, Obes Rev, 22
  2. Parasin, 2021, Effect of air pollution on obesity in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Children (Basel)
  3. Kumar, 2020, Association of leptin with obesity and insulin resistance, Cureus, 12
  4. Sokmen, 2013, The impact of isolated obesity on right ventricular function in young adults, Arq Bras Cardiol, 101, 160
  5. Guo, 2021, The “obesity paradox” in Patients with HFpEF with or without comorbid atrial fibrillation, Front Cardiovasc Med, 8
  6. Karamichalakis, 2015, Managing atrial fibrillation in the very elderly patient: challenges and solutions, Vasc Health Risk Manag, 11, 555
  7. Higgins, 1988, Hazards of obesity--the Framingham experience, Acta Med Scand Suppl, 723, 23
  8. Frohlich, 1983, The problem of obesity and hypertension, Hypertension, 5, III71
  9. Lavie, 2022, Is there an Obesity Paradox in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation?, J Am Coll Cardiol
  10. Voigtlander, 2020, Prognostic impact of underweight (Body Mass Index <20 kg/m(2)) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (from the German Aortic Valve Registry [GARY]), Am J Cardiol, 129, 79, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.002 · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.002

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Tutor, A. W., Lavie, C. J., Kachur, S., Milani, R. V., & Ventura, H. O.
Venue
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
78
Pages
2-10
ISSN
0033-0620 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310714298
Cited by
298
References
92
FWCI
34.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updates on obesity and the obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pcad.2022.11.013
The paper
Tutor, A. W., Lavie, C. J., Kachur, S., Milani, R. V., & Ventura, H. O. (2023). Updates on obesity and the obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2022.11.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.