Cited by 15Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Structured diabetes self-management education and its association with perceived diabetes knowledge, information, and disease distress: Results of a nationwide population-based study

Open access
Heise, M., Heidemann, C., Baumert, J., Du, Y., Frese, T., Avetisyan, M., Weise, S.·2022·Primary Care Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, how participation in structured diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs is associated with perceived level of knowledge about diabetes, information needs, information sources and disease distress. METHODS: We included 796 ever- and 277 never-DSME participants of the population-based survey "Disease knowledge and information needs - Diabetes mellitus (2017)" from Germany. Data on perceived level of diabetes knowledge (12 items), information needs (11 items), information sources (13 items) and disease distress (2 indices) were collected. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association of DSME-participation with these outcomes. RESULTS: DSME-participants showed a higher level of diabetes knowledge compared to never-DSME participants, particularly in aspects concerning diabetes in general (odds ratio 2.53; 95% confidence intervals 1.48-4.33), treatment (2.41; 1.36-4.26), acute complications (1.91; 1.07-3.41) and diabetes in everyday life (1.83; 1.04-3.22). DSME-participants showed higher information needs regarding late complications (1.51; 1.04-2.18) and acute complications (1.71; 1.71-2.48) than DSME never participants. DSME-participants more frequently consulted diabetologists (5.54; 3.56-8.60) and diabetes care specialists (5.62; 3.61-8.75) as information sources. DSME participation was not associated with disease distress. CONCLUSION: DSME is a valuable tool for improving individual knowledge about diabetes. However, DSME should focus more on psychosocial aspects to reduce the disease burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.03.016

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heise, M., Heidemann, C., Baumert, J., Du, Y., Frese, T., Avetisyan, M., & Weise, S.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Heise, M.
  • Heidemann, C.
  • Baumert, J.
  • Du, Y.
  • Frese, T.
  • Avetisyan, M.
  • Weise, S.
Venue
Primary Care Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
387-394
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223564216
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (GE20150323, GE20160358, GE20190305)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
diabetes self-management education, diabetes knowledge, information needs, information sources, diabetes complications, patient education, psychosocial burden
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Educational Status, Humans, Self Care, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review