Cited by 34Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementation

Stop Stroke: Development of an innovative intervention to improve risk factor management after stroke

Redfern, Judith, Rudd, Anthony D., Wolfe, Charles D.A., McKevitt, Christopher·2008·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Stroke survivors are at high risk of stroke recurrence yet current strategies to reduce recurrence risk are sub-optimal. The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) have proposed a framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions, such as community management of stroke secondary prevention. The Framework outlines a five-phased approach from theory through to implementation of effective interventions. This paper reports Phases I-III of the development of a novel intervention to improve risk factor management after stroke.Methods The pre-clinical/theoretical phase entailed reviewing the literature and undertaking quantitative and qualitative studies to identify current practices and barriers to secondary prevention. In Phase I (modelling), findings were used to design an intervention with the potential to overcome barriers to effective stroke secondary prevention management. The feasibility of delivering the intervention and its acceptability were tested in the Phase II exploratory trial involving 25 stroke survivors and their general practitioners.Results This led to the development of the definitive risk factor management intervention. This comprises multiple components and involves using an on-going population stroke register to target patients, carers and health care professionals with tailored secondary prevention advice. Clinical, socio-demographic and service use data collected by the stroke register are transformed to provide an individualised secondary prevention package for patients, carers and health care professionals at three time points: within 10 weeks, 3 and 6 months post-stroke.Conclusion The intervention is currently being evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. Further research is needed to test generalisability to other aspects of stroke management and for other chronic diseases.Practice implications The MRC Framework for complex interventions provides a structured approach to guide the development of novel interventions in public health. Implications for practice in stroke secondary prevention will emerge when the results of our randomised controlled trial are published.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.006

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Redfern, J., Rudd, A. D., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Redfern, Judith
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
201-209
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052267636
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Stroke Association
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
secondary stroke prevention, risk factor control, stroke recurrence, complex intervention development, MRC framework for complex interventions, stroke registry, caregivers, general practitioners, intervention feasibility and acceptability, post-stroke care
MeSH terms
Aftercare, Feasibility Studies, United Kingdom, Health Promotion, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Primary Health Care, Recurrence, Registries, Research Design, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Survivors, Total Quality Management, Risk Assessment, Needs Assessment, Stroke, Qualitative Research, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review