Cited by 176Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Efficacy of therapeutic patient education in chronic diseases and obesity

Lagger, Grégoire, Pataky, Zoltan, Golay, Alain·2010·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical, methodological and reporting aspects of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in order to determine the efficacy of therapeutic patient education (TPE). Methods A thorough search of the medical and nursing literature recorded in MedLine database from 1999 to August 2009 was conducted using the keywords: patient education, efficacy, diabetes, asthma, COPD, hypertension, cardiology, obesity, rheumatology, and oncology. Results Thirty five relevant meta-analyses were identified and initially selected for critical analyses (598 studies concerning approximately 61,000 patients). The detailed description of the educative intervention was present in 4% of articles whereas in 23% the interventions were briefly described. In the majority of studies, the educative interventions were only named (49%) or totally absent (24%). The majority of studies reported improvement of patient outcomes due to the TPE (64%), 30% of studies reported no effect of TPE and 6% of the analysed reviews and meta-analyses reported worsening of measured outcomes. Conclusion Patient education could improve patient outcomes. The high benefit from TPE was shown by articles with detailed description of educational intervention as well as by those who report multidimensional and multidisciplinary educational intervention. Practice implications The impact of therapeutic patient education on health outcomes is 50-80%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapeutic patient education has been shown to be effective in chronic diseases.

    “Therapeutic patient education is an element of nonpharmacological patient management and has been shown to be effective in chronic diseases.65”

    From Adrenal crisis: prevention and management in adult patients (2019) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagger, G., Pataky, Z., & Golay, A.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Golay, Alain
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
283-286
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991157086
Cited by
176
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
therapeutic education, chronic disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, rheumatology, multidisciplinary education, patient outcomes
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Communication, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Review Literature as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review