Cited by 33Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and Health

Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: An open-pilot intervention study in secondary care

Open access
Dombrowski, Stephan U., Sniehotta, Falko F., Johnston, Marie, Broom, Iain, Kulkarni, Utkarsh, Brown, Jenny, Murray, Lynne, Araújo-Soares, Vera·2012·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To test and optimize the feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity (PA) and healthy eating behavior change intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities.Methods Open-pilot intervention study using an uncontrolled pre and post design with ongoing measures on intervention acceptability and feasibility. Participants received 5 weekly nurse-led one-hour long group sessions. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed throughout. PA, dietary behavior and weight were measured before and after the intervention.Results Of 74 consenting participants, 61 (82%) received and 47 (64%) completed the intervention. Average ratings of intervention materials and components by participants ranged between 4.1 and 4.9 out of 5. Average facilitator satisfaction rating was 90% (range 75-100%). The intervention delivery was feasible as indicated by ratings and comments from participants and the facilitator. Participants lost -0.86 kg of weight t(45)=3.84, p=0.0001, and increased PA by an additional 1.6 (SD=2.7) sessions/week, t(31)=-3.3, p=0.002. No significant dietary differences emerged.Conclusion The intervention was acceptable to the facilitator and participants and feasible for delivery. Several intervention aspects were further optimized.Practice implications The current study outlines a PA and dietary behavior change pilot intervention coupled with a systematic and transparent process of intervention optimization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 33

Authors
Dombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Johnston, M., Broom, I., Kulkarni, U., Brown, J., Murray, L., & Araújo-Soares, V.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • NHS Grampian (GB)
Corresponding author
Dombrowski, Stephan U.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
108-119
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069300988
Cited by
33
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • NHS Grampian Endowment Grant (08/41)
  • Aberdeen CORE Centre for Obesity Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
obesity, obesity-related comorbidities, physical activity, healthy eating habits, behavioral interventions, treatment acceptability, intervention feasibility, weight loss, dietary behavior, secondary care, intervention optimization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Exercise, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review