Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)
Open accessAbstract
Background: Meeting global health challenges requires effective behaviour change interventions (BCIs). This depends on advancing the science of behaviour change which, in turn, depends on accurate intervention reporting. Current reporting often lacks detail, preventing accurate replication and implementation. Recent developments have specified intervention content into behaviour change techniques (BCTs) – the ‘active ingredients’, for example goal-setting, self-monitoring of behaviour. BCTs are ‘the smallest components compatible with retaining the postulated active ingredients, i.e. the proposed mechanisms of change. They can be used alone or in combination with other BCTs’ (Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev 2012; 6 :1–6). Domain-specific taxonomies of BCTs have been developed, for example healthy eating and physical activity, smoking cessation and alcohol consumption. We need to build on these to develop an internationally shared language for specifying and developing interventions. This technology can be used for synthesising evidence, implementing effective interventions and testing theory. It has enormous potential added value for science and global health. Objective: (1) To develop a method of specifying content of BCIs in terms of component BCTs; (2) to lay a foundation for a comprehensive methodology applicable to different types of complex interventions; (3) to develop resources to support application of the taxonomy; and (4) to achieve multidisciplinary and international acceptance for future development. Design and participants: Four hundred participants (systematic reviewers, researchers, practitioners, policy-makers) from 12 countries engaged in investigating, designing and/or delivering BCIs. Development of the taxonomy involved a Delphi procedure, an iterative process of revisions and consultation with 41 international experts; hierarchical structure of the list was developed using inductive ‘bottom-up’ and theory-driven ‘top-down’ open-sort procedures ( n = 36); training in use of the taxonomy (1-day workshops and distance group tutorials) ( n = 161) was evaluated by changes in intercoder reliability and validity (agreement with expert consensus); evaluating the taxonomy for coding interventions was assessed by reliability (intercoder; test–retest) and validity ( n = 40 trained coders); and evaluating the taxonomy for writing descriptions was assessed by reliability (intercoder; test–retest) and by experimentally testing its value ( n = 190). Results: Ninety-three distinct, non-overlapping BCTs with clear labels and definitions formed Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). BCTs clustered into 16 groupings using a ‘bottom-up’ open-sort procedure; there was overlap between these and groupings produced by a theory-driven, ‘top-down’ procedure. Both training methods improved validity (both p < 0.05), doubled the proportion of coders achieving competence and improved confidence in identifying BCTs in workshops (both p < 0.001) but did not improve intercoder reliability. Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 of the 93 BCTs. Good within-coder agreement was observed after 1 month ( p < 0.001). Validity was good for 14 of 15 BCTs in the descriptions. The usefulness of BCTTv1 to report descriptions of observed interventions had mixed results. Conclusions: The developed taxonomy (BCTTv1) provides a methodology for identifying content of complex BCIs and a foundation for international cross-disciplinary collaboration for developing more effective interventions to improve health. Further work is needed to examine its usefulness for reporting interventions. Funding: This project was funded by the Medical Research Council Ref: G0901474/1. Funding also came from the Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.
Verified 2026-10-06 · 2 references not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
This suite of five studies developed and evaluated Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1), a consensus-based taxonomy of 93 distinct behaviour change techniques (BCTs) hierarchically clustered into 16 groupings. BCTTv1 was shown to be usable reliably and validly by trained coders for identifying BCTs in intervention descriptions, but evidence that it improves reporting of observed interventions was mixed and not clearly supportive.
Key findings
- Study 1/2 produced BCTTv1: 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings. The open-sort task yielded 16 groupings; 59 of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with 47 significant and 12 borderline. There was a significant association between the 16 “bottom-up” groupings and 13 “top-down” groupings (χ² = 437.80; p < 0.001), but only six of 208 pairings achieved satisfactory evidence of similarity.
- Study 3 found training improved trainee agreement with expert consensus for both 1-day workshops and distance group tutorials (both p < 0.05), with the proportion achieving competence (PABAK > 0.60) doubling: 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training. Confidence in identifying BCTs improved in workshops (p < 0.001), but intercoder agreement did not improve for either method (workshops p = 0.08; tutorials p = 0.57).
- Study 4 found 80 of the 93 BCTs were identified by at least one trained coder. Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 BCTs: 64 of 80 (80%) achieved mean PABAK ≥ 0.70 and 59 of 80 (74%) achieved ≥ 0.80. Test-retest reliability was good (p < 0.001), and concurrent validity was good for 14 of 15 BCTs. Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs: 9 of 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve PABAK > 0.70.
- Studies 5a–5c found unclear benefit of BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions. Study 5a showed no difference with taxonomy alone (all p > 0.05). Study 5b found descriptions by trained writers with BCTTv1 were rated poorer in quality than untrained writers without BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05), but reliability of BCT identification was greater for trained writers with BCTTv1 (mean PABAK trained = 0.87; untrained = 0.84; p < 0.05). Study 5c found within-person quality was higher after training with BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05 except replicability of mode of delivery), with no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).
Methods
- The paper reports a suite of five empirical studies using Delphi methods with an International Advisory Board, open-sort and closed-sort tasks, training evaluation, reliability/validity coding, and within- and between-participant experimental designs. A total of 400 participants were involved across studies, with some taking part in more than one study.
- Study 1 used a two-round Delphi exercise with 14 international behaviour change experts plus International Advisory Board and study team feedback to develop BCT labels and definitions. Study 2 used 18 open-sort participants and 18 closed-sort participants to generate and compare “bottom-up” and “top-down” hierarchical structures. Study 3 evaluated training with 161 trainee coders (1-day workshops and distance group tutorials). Study 4 used 40 trained coders to code 40 intervention descriptions at two time points 1 month apart. Studies 5a–5c involved 166 writers, 12 untrained raters, and 12 trained coders.
- Main analyses included prevalence-and-bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) for intercoder reliability, test-retest reliability, and agreement with expert consensus; cluster analysis and discriminant content validity methods for sort tasks; and t-tests, ANOVA, and repeated-measures ANOVA for training and reporting studies.
Limitations
- The paper states that the Delphi exercise involved 14 individuals, with a predominance of European experts from a psychological background; that arbitrary cut-offs were used for amending BCT labels and definitions; and that training covered only 24 of the 93 BCTs. It also states that study 5’s video-observation writing task was artificial, constrained by time pressure, and that training condition was confounded with time of day; the quality measures’ psychometric properties were not established.
- The paper states that samples were predominantly female and from the UK, limiting diversity; that tutorial groups were not directly compared for efficacy; and that more training is required to become expert in using BCTTv1. It also notes that reliability was poorer for frequently identified BCTs and that some BCTs (e.g. credible source, social support unspecified, instruction on how to perform behaviour) required further refinement.
- The text makes evident that the reporting studies did not show a clear benefit of BCTTv1 for writing observed intervention descriptions, and that the negative findings in study 5b may reflect task demands, insufficient training in report writing, or the artificial nature of the task rather than the taxonomy itself.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 141 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Study 5a: quality, reliability of BCT identification and validity did not differ for descriptions written by untrained writers with and without BCTTv1 (all p > 0.05).
“Study 5a: quality, reliability of BCT identification (between trained coders) and validity (trained coder agreement with expert consensus) did not differ for descriptions written by untrained writers with and without BCTTv1 (all p > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Training improved trainee confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in workshops.
“Trainee confidence in identifying BCTs assessed improved in workshops (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
- Findingown data
Training did not improve intercoder agreement for either workshop or distance group tutorial method.
“Intercoder agreement did not improve for either method (workshops p = 0.08 and tutorials p = 0.57).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
- Findingown data
Training doubled the proportion achieving competence (agreement with expert consensus PABAK > 0.60) for both workshop and distance group tutorial trainees.
“with the proportion achieving competence (i.e.agreement with expert consensus PABAK > 0.60) doubling (both p < 0.05)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
- Findingown data
Only providing the taxonomy made no difference (study 5a).
“while only providing the taxonomy made no difference (study 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Training improved trainee agreement with expert consensus for both workshop and distance group tutorial trainees.
“Trainee agreement with expert consensus improved across workshop and distance group tutorial trainees (both p < 0.05)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
- Findingreasoning
This produced a list of 94 BCTs.
“This produced a list of 94 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only six combinations achieved satisfactory evidence of similarity.
“However, only six combinations achieved satisfactory evidence of similarity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thirty-six of the 208 'bottom-up' × 'top-down' pairings showed greater overlap than expected by chance.
“Thirty-six of the 208 'bottom-up' × 'top-down' pairings (i.e.16 × 13) showed greater overlap than expected by chance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was good test-retest reliability.
“and there was good test-retest reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study 5b: quality of descriptions written by untrained raters without BCTTv1 was rated as greater than descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05).
“Study 5b: quality of descriptions written by untrained raters without BCTTv1 was rated as greater than descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Providing BCTTv1 plus training resulted in descriptions of poorer quality when comparing trained with untrained writers (study 5b).
“providing BCTTv1 plus training resulted in descriptions of poorer quality when comparing trained with untrained writers (study 5b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reliability of BCT identification was greater for descriptions written by trained than untrained writers, with BCTTv1 (study 5b).
“However, reliability of BCT identification was greater for descriptions written by trained than untrained writers, with BCTTv1 (study 5b) but not in the within-person study (study 5c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
BCTs relating to 'Reward and Punishment' and 'Cues and Cue Responses' were perceived as markedly different from other BCTs.
“BCTs relating to 'Reward and Punishment' and 'Cues and Cue Responses' were perceived as markedly different from other BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Providing BCTTv1 both with and without training did not improve validity of BCT identification.
“Providing BCTTv1 both with and without training did not improve validity of BCT identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Providing BCTTv1 plus training resulted in improvement when investigated in a within-person study (study 5c).
“but resulted in improvement when investigated in a within-person study (study 5c)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Good test-retest reliability was achieved within coders (between baseline and 1 month) (p < 0.001).
“Good test-retest reliability was achieved within coders (between baseline and 1 month) (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Good concurrent validity was achieved for 14 out of the 15 BCTs identified by experienced coders to be present in published descriptions.
“Good concurrent validity was achieved for 14 out of the 15 BCTs identified by experienced coders to be present in published descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reliability did not differ across the two time points.
“Reliability did not differ across the two time points”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study 5b: Reliability of BCT identification was greater for descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1 (mean PABAK trained = 0.87; untrained = 0.84; p < 0.05).
“Reliability of BCT identification (between trained coders) was greater for descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1 (mean PABAK trained = 0.87; untrained = 0.84; p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Study 5c: quality of descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1, was higher than descriptions written by the same writers, before training and not using BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05 except replicability of mode of delivery).
“Study 5c: quality of descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1, was higher than descriptions written by the same writers, before training and not using BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05 except replicability of mode of delivery).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant association between the 16 'bottom-up' groupings and the 13 'top-down' groupings, chi-squared = 437.80; p < 0.001.
“There was a significant association between the 16 'bottom-up' groupings and the 13 'top-down' groupings, chi-squared = 437.80;p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 of the 93 BCTs.
“Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 of the 93 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Development of BCTTv1 comprised a series of consensus exercises involving 35 experts in delivering and/or designing BCIs.
“Development comprised a series of consensus exercises involving 35 experts in delivering and/or designing BCIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Further refinement by study team members resulted in a list of 93 clearly defined, non-redundant BCTs.
“Further refinement of labels and definitions by study team members resulted in a list of 93 clearly defined, non-redundant BCTs (see Appendix 2, Table 19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
BCTTv1 encompasses a greater number of BCTs than previous taxonomies.
“The BCTTv1 encompasses a greater number of BCTs than previous taxonomies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
An extensive list of 93 distinct, non-redundant BCTs was developed with labels and definitions refined to capture the smallest components compatible with retaining the proposed active ingredients with minimum overlap (BCTTv1).
“An extensive list of 93 distinct, non-redundant BCTs was developed with labels and definitions refined to capture the smallest components compatible with retaining the proposed active ingredients with the minimum of overlap: BCTTv1 (see Appendix 2, Table 19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Together with the 21 BCTs judged satisfactory in the first round, there were 84 BCTs at the end of the Delphi exercise.
“Together with the 21 BCTs judged to be 'satisfactory' in the first round, there were 84 BCTs at the end of the Delphi exercise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 'bottom-up' open-sort task yielded systematic empirical estimates of how distinct the groupings are.
“In addition to providing 16 groupings, the 'bottom-up' open-sort task yielded systematic empirical estimates of how distinct the groupings are.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a moderate overlap between the 16 BCT groupings from the 'bottom-up' approach and the 12 groupings from the 'top-down' approach, indicating some common conceptualisation of BCTs across these two approaches.
“There was a moderate overlap between the 16 BCT groupings derived from the 'bottom-up' inductive approach and the 12 groupings from the 'top-down' theoretically driven approach, indicating some common conceptualisation of BCTs across these two approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was also an association between the 16 'bottom-up' groupings and the 13 'top-down' groupings (χ2 = 437.80; p < 0.001).
“There was also an association between the 16 'bottom-up' groupings and the 13 'top-down' groupings (χ 2 = 437.80;p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
This was not significantly different from the level of expertise reported by participants in the open-sort task.
“This was not significantly different from the level of expertise reported by participants in the open-sort task: behaviour change theory, mean = 3.00, SD = 0.88, t(34) = 0.64; p > 0.10; BCIs, mean = 2.42, SD = 0.96, t(34) = 0.63; p > 0.10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Twenty-one of the 91 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' TDF domain combinations showed greater than expected overlap with positive Pearson's residual values.
“Twenty one of the 91 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' TDF domain combinations showed a greater than expected overlap with positive Pearson's residual values (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only two combinations achieved Pearson's residual values > 5: 'grouping 1' with 'reinforcement' (6.61) and 'grouping 5' with 'social influences' (5.04).
“Only two combinations achieved Pearson's residual values > 5, which were: 'grouping 1′ with 'reinforcement' (Pearson's residual value = 6.61) and 'grouping 5′ with 'social influences' (Pearson's residual value = 5.04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The following commonly identified BCTs were not linked to any theoretical domains: problem-solving, credible source, discrepancy between current behaviour, self-monitoring of outcome of behaviour, monitoring of outcome behaviour by others without feedback, and pharmacological support.
“The following commonly identified BCTs were not linked to any of the theoretical domains: problem-solving, credible source, discrepancy between current behaviour, self-monitoring of outcome of behaviour, monitoring of outcome behaviour by others without feedback and pharmacological support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the 16-grouping open-sort solution, there are six points at which groupings split into groupings containing similar BCTs, creating seven higher-order strategy groupings.
“Within the reported 16-grouping open-sort solution of the taxonomy, there are six points at which groupings of BCTs split into groupings containing similar BCTs (creating seven split groupings, i.e. higher order strategy groupings).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Thirty-seven BCTs were allocated to three domains that also had high confidence ratings and ICCs: beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, and social influences.
“Thirty-seven BCTs were allocated to three domains that also had high confidence ratings and ICCs: 'beliefs about consequences', 'reinforcement' and 'social influences'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 24 most commonly occurring BCTs, 18 (75%) were reliably linked to seven of the theory domains, with a further two (8%) obtaining borderline statistical significance.
“Of the 24 most commonly occurring BCTs (see Michie et al. 40 ), 18 (75%) were reliably linked to seven of the theory domains, with a further two (8%) obtaining borderline statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michie et al. 40
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Most of the commonly used BCTs were associated with a theoretical domain.
“Most of the commonly used BCTs were associated with a theoretical domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Comparison of the BCT groupings derived from the higher-order 'bottom-up' sorting strategies and the 'top-down' TDF derived groupings revealed a significant association (χ2 = 236.13; p < 0.001).
“Comparison of the BCT groupings derived from the higher-order 'bottom-up' sorting strategies, shown in the dendrogram and the 'top-down' TDF derived groupings (see Table 3) revealed a significant association (χ 2 = 236.13;p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two domains, social/professional role and identity and memory, attention and decision processes, had no BCTs significantly assigned to them.
“Two domains, 'social/professional role and identity' and 'memory, attention and decision processes' had no BCTs significantly assigned to them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
BCTs related to reward and threat, and those related to cues and cue responses, were conceptualised quite distinctly from the other BCTs.
“Examination of this hierarchical structure revealed that BCTs related to reward and threat, and those related to cues and cue responses, were conceptualised quite distinctly from the other BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thirty-six of the 208 combinations showed greater than expected overlap, achieving positive Pearson's residual values.
“Thirty six of the 208 combinations showed greater than expected overlap, achieving positive Pearson's residual values (see Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trainees rated activities that used the taxonomy to code short excerpts and longer descriptions from published reports as being useful opportunities to apply their newly learned skills.
“Trainees rated activities that used the taxonomy to code short excerpts and longer descriptions from published reports as being useful opportunities to apply their newly learned skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After distance group tutorial training, four BCTs were rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees: self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour, self-monitoring of behaviour, goal-setting (outcome) and credible source.
“After training, four BCTs were rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees: self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour, self-monitoring of behaviour, goal-setting (outcome) and credible source.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, the BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and after training.
“The BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and this was also achieved after training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, agreement with expert consensus increased for 8 out of the 12 BCTs: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, non-specific reward, goal-setting (outcome), material reward (behaviour), credible source and demonstration of the behaviour (average increase in PABAK = 0.36, SD = 0.33; range = 0.02-0.95).
“Across the BCTs assessed, agreement with expert consensus increased for 8 out of the 12 BCTs: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, non-specific reward, goal-setting (outcome), material reward (behaviour), credible source and demonstration of the behaviour (average increase in PABAK for these eight BCTs = 0.36, SD = 0.33; range = 0.02-0.95).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For distance group tutorials, there was an increase in self-reported confidence in using the taxonomy from before training (mean = 3.42, SD = 1.00) to after training (mean = 4.08, SD = 0.56), t(51) = -5.27; p < 0.001.
“There was an increase in self-reported confidence in using the taxonomy from before training: mean = 3.42, SD = 1.00 to after training: mean = 4.08, SD = 0.56, t(51) = -5.27;p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Tutorial trainees also reported increased overall confidence in using the taxonomy.
“Tutorial trainees also reported increased overall confidence in using the taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After one-day workshop training, four BCTs ('demonstration of the behaviour', 'material reward (behaviour)', 'behavioural practice/rehearsal' and 'self-monitoring of behaviour') were rated with high confidence by 90% or more of trainees.
“After training, four of the BCTs -'demonstration of the behaviour', 'material reward (behaviour)', 'behavioural practice/rehearsal' and 'self-monitoring of behaviour'were rated with high confidence by 90% or more of trainees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For distance group tutorials, reported intention to use BCT taxonomies in the future remained high from before training (mean = 4.23, SD = 0.74) to after training (mean = 4.16, SD = 1.02); t(51) = 0.44; p = 0.66.
“Reported intention to use BCT taxonomies in the future remained high from before training: mean = 4.23, SD = 0.74 to after training: mean = 4.16, SD = 1.02; t(51) = 0.44; p = 0.66.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some BCTs consistently achieved poor reliability before and/or after training, for example goal-setting (outcome), social support (unspecified), and information about social and environmental consequences.
“Some BCTs consistently achieved poor reliability before and/or after training, for example goal-setting (outcome), social support (unspecified), and information about social and environmental consequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Material reward (behaviour) was the only frequently used BCT that achieved good reliability without training for workshops and tutorials.
“There was only one frequently used BCT that achieved good reliability without training for workshops and tutorials: material reward (behaviour).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For distance group tutorials, across the 17 BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings increased, t(16) = -3.40; p < 0.001.
“Across the 17 BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings increased, t(16) = -3.40;p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, change in intercoder agreement across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.90; p = 0.39.
“However, change across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.90; p = 0.39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, training achieved good validity and reliability for between one-quarter and one-third of the BCTs.
“Overall, training achieved good validity and reliability for between one-quarter and one-third of the BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, there was a trend for intercoder agreement between trainees to increase from before training (mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.34) to after training (mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.26), t(54) = 1.77; p = 0.08.
“Intercoder agreement between trainees: there was a trend for intercoder agreement to increase across trainees, t(54) = 1.77; p = 0.08 (before training: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.34); after training: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, the number of high confidence ratings increased for 6 out of the 12 BCTs: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, material reward, credible source and demonstration of the behaviour.
“The number of high confidence ratings increased for 6 out of the 12 BCTs: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, material reward, credible source and demonstration of the behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For one-day workshops, overall trainee agreement with expert consensus increased from before training (mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29) to after training (mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28), t(108) = 3.26; p < 0.0001.
“Agreement with expert consensus: overall, trainee agreement with expert consensus increased, t(108) = 3.26; p < 0.0001 (before training: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29; after training: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For distance group tutorials, 'self-monitoring of behaviour' and 'self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour' achieved good reliability before and after training.
“Two further BCTs -'self-monitoring of behaviour' and 'self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour'achieved good reliability before and after training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Before distance group tutorial training, 'self-monitoring of behaviour' was rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees.
“Before training, one of the BCTs -'self-monitoring of behaviour'was rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Self-monitoring of behaviour and self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour achieved good reliability without training for tutorial trainees.
“Two other BCTs achieved good reliability without training for tutorial trainees: self-monitoring of behaviour and self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Compared with workshop trainees, tutorial trainees started with a greater level of experience and expertise in using BCT taxonomies.
“Compared with workshop trainees, tutorial trainees started with a greater level of experience and expertise in using BCT taxonomies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Expert consensus was reached about the presence of 17 BCTs in each of the two tutorial descriptions: feedback on behaviour, credible source, information about health consequences, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the
“Expert consensus was reached about the presence of 17 BCTs in each of the two descriptions (see Table 9): feedback on behaviour, credible source, information about health consequences, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Expert consensus was reached about the presence of 12 BCTs in the workshop descriptions: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, non-specific reward, goal-setting (outcome), material reward (behaviour), credible source, problem-solving, demonstration of the behaviour, information about health consequences, goal-setting (behaviour) and social support (un
“The coders reached consensus about the presence of 12 BCTs in the descriptions: self-monitoring of behaviour, feedback on behaviour, behavioural practice/rehearsal, non-specific reward, goal-setting (outcome), material reward (behaviour), credible source, problem-solving, demonstration of the behaviour, information about health consequences, goal-setting (behaviour) and social support (unspecified”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Before one-day workshop training, 'information about health consequences' was rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees.
“Before training, one of the BCTs, 'information about health consequences' was rated with high confidence by over 90% of trainees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Training methods (workshop vs. distance tutorial) were equally effective at increasing competence, F(1,318) = 0.35; p = 0.55.
“Training methods were equally effective at increasing competence, F(1,318) = 0.35; p = 0.55.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trainees valued the combination of 'working through practical examples' alongside the 'opportunity to clarify and discuss' any coding they found unclear.
“In particular, trainees valued the combination of 'working through practical examples' alongside the 'opportunity to clarify and discuss' any coding they found unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For distance group tutorials, trainee agreement with expert consensus increased from before training (mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11) to after training (mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14), t(51) = 6.60; p < 0.001.
“Agreement with expert consensus: trainee agreement with expert consensus increased, t(51) = 6.60; p < 0.001 (before training: mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11; after training: mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across the 40 intervention descriptions, mean PABAK scores ranged between 0.73 and 0.96 (mean=0.87, SD=0.05).
“Across the 40 intervention descriptions, mean PABAK scores ranged between 0.73 and 0.96 (mean = 0.87, SD = 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 93 BCTs in BCTTv1, 80 (86%) were identified by at least one trained coder at time 1.
“Of the 93 BCTs in BCTTv1, 80 (86%) were identified by at least one trained coder, at time 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The percentage of high confidence ratings significantly differed according to frequency of BCT identification at time 2.
“however, they significantly differed at time 2 [F(2,77) = 3.48; p < 0.05].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The percentage of high confidence ratings did not differ according to frequency of BCT identification at time 1.
“The percentage of high confidence ratings did not differ according to frequency of BCT identification at time 1 [F(2,77) = 2.55; p = 0.08];”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean trained coders' PABAK scores ranged from 0.40 to 0.85 (overall mean=0.70).
“Mean trained coders' PABAK scores ranged from 0.40 to 0.85 (overall mean = 0.70).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The BCT 'credible source' reduced overall intercoder reliability for both experienced and trained coders (PABAK=0.60 and 0.40, respectively).
“The BCT 'credible source', reduced the overall intercoder reliability for both the experienced coders and the trained coders (PABAK score = 0.60 and 0.40 for experienced coders and trained coders, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pattern of mean PABAK scores across BCTs identified did not significantly change, t(79)=0.56; p=0.58, time 1 mean=0.88, SD=0.17; time 2 mean=0.87, SD=0.17.
“The pattern of mean PABAK scores across the BCTs identified also did not significantly change, [t(79) = 0.56; p = 0.58, time 1 PABAK mean = 0.88, SD = 0.17; time 2 PABAK: mean = 0.87, SD = 0.17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trained coders appeared to be more confident about identifying BCTs at time 2 than the same BCTs at time 1.
“The trained coders appeared to be more confident about identifying BCTs at time 2 than the same BCTs at time 1: t( 79”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pattern of mean PABAK scores at time 1 and time 2 did not significantly change, t(15)=-0.05; p=0.97.
“The pattern of mean PABAK scores at time 1 and time 2 did not significantly change, t(15) = -0.05;p = 0.97.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intercoder reliability at time 1 and time 2 was strongly correlated, r(14)=0.97; p<0.001.
“Intercoder reliability at time 1 and at time 2 was strongly correlated, r(14) = 0.97; p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlational analyses showed the relationship between mean PABAK and mean AC1 scores across BCTs at time 1 was near perfect (r=0.96; p<0.001).
“Correlational analyses showed that the relationship between mean PABAK scores and mean AC1 scores across BCTs at time 1 was near perfect (r = 0.96; p < 0.001, two-tailed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across the 80 BCTs identified, the percentage of identifications judged by coders to have been made with high confidence ranged from 0% to 100%, with an average of 57%.
“The percentage of identifications judged by coders to have been made with high confidence ('++') across the 80 BCTs identified, ranged from 0% to 100% with an average percentage of 57%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AC1 was significantly more likely than PABAK to generate reliability scores exceeding the 0.70 threshold [χ2(1, n=160)=10.58; p<0.001].
“AC1 was significantly more likely than PABAK to generate reliability scores that exceeded the 0.70 threshold [χ 2 (degrees of freedom = 1, n = 160) = 10.58;p < 0.001].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intercoder reliability remained similar across two tests separated by 1 month.
“and remained similar across two tests separated by 1 month, indicating temporal stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Intercoder reliability was equally good across intervention descriptions.
“Intercoder reliability was equally good across intervention descriptions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Frequently identified BCTs were rated with more confidence than rarely identified BCTs.
“Frequently identified BCTs were rated with more confidence (mean percentage = 70.45,SD = 9.68) than those BCTs that were rarely identified BCTs [p < 0.05 (mean percentage = 55.33,SD = 32.53)]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Three of the 12 BCTs highlighted as unclear or requiring refinement were among the 15 BCTs identified by experienced coders achieving mean PABAK validity scores of < 0.70.
“Three of these were among the 15 BCTs identified by the experienced coders achieving mean PABAK validity scores of < 0.70.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The BCT 'credible source' was the lowest intercoder reliability score among experienced BCT coders.
“It was also the lowest intercoder reliability score among experienced BCT coders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The data reported provide good overall intercoder and test-retest reliability for 80 of the BCTTv1 definitions among trained coders.
“The data reported here provide good overall intercoder and test-retest reliability for 80 of those definitions among trained coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nine of the 12 BCTs highlighted as unclear or requiring refinement were among the 12 BCTs achieving mean PABAK reliability scores of < 0.70.
“Nine of these (75%) BCTs were among the 12 BCTs achieving mean PABAK reliability scores of < 0.70 (listed above).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There tended to be a negative correlation between trained coders' confidence of BCT identification and intercoder agreement.
“There tended to be a negative correlation between trained coders' confidence of BCT identification and intercoder agreement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The confusion between 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and 'demonstration of the behaviour' was one of four pairs of BCTs with which coders reported difficulty.
“This was one of four pairs of BCTs (including two goal-setting definitions) with which coders reported difficulty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Eighty of the 93 BCTs defined in BCTTv1 were identified in 40 intervention descriptions by at least one trained coder.
“Eighty of the 93 BCTs defined in BCTTv1 were identified in 40 intervention descriptions by at least one trained coder,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in confidence between rarely and occasionally identified BCTs.
“and there were no significant differences between categories of rarely and occasionally (p = 0.18),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was good trained coder agreement with developer consensus about the 15 BCTs agreed on as present.
“There was also good trained coder agreement with developer consensus about the 15 BCTs agreed on as present, thus indicating concurrent validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 93 BCTs in BCTTv1, trained coders highlighted 12 as being unclear or requiring further refinement.
“Of the 93 BCTs in BCTTv1, trained coders highlighted 12 as being unclear or requiring further refinement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in confidence between occasionally and frequently identified BCTs.
“or between categories of occasionally and frequently (p = 1.00) identified BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trained coders' confidence in their identification of the 15 BCTs agreed by experienced consensus was not associated with mean PABAK scores.
“Confidence ratings were not associated with validity; trained coders' confidence in their identification of the 15 BCTs agreed by experienced consensus was not associated with mean PABAK scores [r(13) = 0.27; p > 0.10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Forty-seven BCTs were identified in at least six of 40 descriptions.
“and 47 BCTs were identified in at least six of 40 descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 80 BCTs identified by trained coders, confidence was not correlated with greater reliability.
“For the 80 BCTs identified by trained coders, confidence was not correlated with greater reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 22 BCTs observed in 16 or more of 40 intervention descriptions, 18 (82%) were also identified in the Abraham and Michie 20 BCT taxonomy.
“Of the 22 BCTs observed in 16 or more of 40 intervention descriptions, 18 (82%) were also identified in the Abraham and Michie 20 BCT taxonomy, confirming the frequent occurrence of these 18 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three additional BCT definitions were identified by trained coders as being in need of clarification and/or refinement: demonstration of the behaviour, action planning and restructuring the physical environment.
“Three additional BCT definitions were identified by trained coders as being in need of clarification and/or refinement.These were: demonstration of the behaviour, action planning and restructuring the physical environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intercoder reliability was poor for 'instruction on how to perform behaviour'.
“Intercoder reliability was poor for 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and individual coder feedback suggested confusion with 'demonstration of the behaviour'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean PABAK scores tended to be negatively correlated with confidence, r(78) = -0.37, p = 0.07 (two tailed).
“Perhaps surprisingly, mean PABAK scores were not positively correlated with confidence, but rather tended to be negatively correlated, r(78) = -0.37;p = 0.07 (two tailed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the most frequently identified BCTs, the two indices differ significantly in their representation of reliability, with PABAK generating lower reliability scores than AC1.
“We found, however, that for the most frequently indentified BCTs, the two indices differ significantly in their representation of reliability with PABAK generating lower reliability scores than AC1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Reliability was consistently higher when represented by the AC1 statistic than the PABAK statistic.
“Reliability was consistently higher when represented by the AC1 statistic than the PABAK statistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fifty per cent of the BCT definitions judged by trained coders as being in need of further clarification belonged to the same BCT grouping in BCTTv1.
“Fifty per cent of the BCT definitions judged by trained coders as being in need of further clarification belonged to the same BCT grouping in BCTTv1, therefore, referring to the same underlying mechanism of change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Individual coder feedback suggested confusion between 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and 'demonstration of the behaviour'.
“Intercoder reliability was poor for 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and individual coder feedback suggested confusion with 'demonstration of the behaviour'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
These frequently identified BCTs were less reliably identified than other BCTs.
“These frequently identified BCTs were less reliably identified than other BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The PABAK and AC1 indices generate very similar patterns of intercoder scores across identified BCTs.
“Reassuringly, our findings indicate that these indices generate very similar patterns of intercoder scores across identified BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Twenty-two BCTs were identified in at least 16 descriptions.
“22 BCTs were identified in at least 16 descriptions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, replicability of active ingredients was non-significant, F(1,74) = 3.57; p = 0.06.
“For replicability of active ingredients, this was non-significant F(1,74) = 3.57; p = 0.06.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant interaction effects between being trained and video for agreement with expert consensus in study 5a.
“There were no significant interaction effects between being trained and video, F(1,38) = 0.70; p = 0.41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In an earlier study, there were no significant interaction effects between being trained and video described, F(1,81) = 3.24; p = 0.08.
“There was no significant interaction effects between being trained and video described, F(1,81) = 3.24; p = 0.08.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A marginally significant interaction effect suggested that agreement was greater for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1 about video 2.
“A marginally significant interaction effect was found, suggesting that agreement was greater for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1 about video 2, F(1,81) = 3.59; p = 0.06.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were around the mid-point for both groups of writers.
“Means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were also around the mid-point for both groups of writers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, coder agreement with expert consensus was not significantly different for descriptions written before training and after training using BCTTv1, F(1,74) = 1.20; p = 0.28.
“Agreement with expert consensus (RQ 1c): coder agreement with expert consensus was not significantly different for descriptions written before training and after training using BCTTv1, F(1,74) = 1.20; p = 0.28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were above the mid-point on both occasions.
“Means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were also above the mid-point on both occasions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Despite not explicitly drawing on theory, the BCT groupings appeared to make theoretical sense.
“Despite not explicitly drawing on theory, the BCT groupings appeared to make theoretical sense.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, means for sufficiency of time allocated were above the mid-point of the scale both before and after training.
“Usability and acceptability (RQ 2): means for sufficiency of time allocated were above the mid-point of the scale both before and after training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no interaction effects between being trained and video for identification of BCTs in study 5a.
“There were no interaction effects between being trained and video F(1,38) = 0.07; p = 0.79.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In an earlier study, trained coder agreement with expert consensus did not differ significantly for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1, F(1,81) = 2.84; p = 0.10.
“Agreement with expert consensus (RQ 1c): trained coder agreement with expert consensus did not differ significantly for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1, F(1,81) = 2.84; p = 0.10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Untrained writers produced descriptions rated higher in quality (clarity and replicability) than untrained writers in study 5b, in which participants were randomised and no practice effects were possible.
“Untrained writers produced descriptions that were rated to be of higher quality (clarity and replicability) than untrained writers in study 5b, in which participants were randomised and no practice effects were possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no interaction effects between being trained and video described for any of the dependent variables in study 5b.
“There were no interaction effects between being trained and video described for any of the dependent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agreement between trained coders about the absence/presence of BCTs was greater for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1.
“Identification of BCTs in descriptions (RQ 1b): agreement between trained coders about the absence/ presence of BCTs was greater for descriptions written by trained writers using BCTTv1: F(1,81) = 5.02; p < 0.05 (trained: mean = 0.87, SD = 0.06; untrained: mean = 0.84, SD = 0.07).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reliability testing revealed that reliable use of BCTTv1 would be enhanced by training in addition to simply publishing BCTTv1 as a list of BCTs for people to use.
“The reliability testing revealed that reliable use of BCTTv1 would be enhanced by training in addition to simply publishing BCTTv1 as a list of BCTs for people to use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, agreement between coders about the absence/presence of BCTs did not differ significantly for descriptions written before training and after training using BCTTv1, F(1,74) = 0.46; p = 0.50.
“Identification of BCTs in descriptions (RQ 1b): agreement between coders about the absence/presence of BCTs did not differ significantly for descriptions written before training and after training using BCTTv1, F(1,74) = 0.46; p = 0.50.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In an earlier study, means for sufficiency of time allocated were above the mid-point of the scale both for writers provided with BCTTv1 and for those who were not.
“Usability and acceptability (RQ 2): means for sufficiency of time allocated were above the mid-point of the scale both for writers provided with BCTTv1 and for those who were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, there were no interaction effects between being trained and video described for any of the dependent variables.
“There were no interaction effects between being trained and video described for any of the dependent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was evidence of poorer performance among those who had been trained and had access to BCTTv1 than among those who received no training and BCTTv1.
“In contrast, there was evidence of poorer performance among those who had been trained and had access to BCTTv1 than those who received no training and BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trained coder agreement with expert consensus was not significantly different for descriptions written by writers using and not using BCTTv1.
“Agreement with expert consensus (RQ 1c): trained coder agreement with expert consensus was not significantly different for descriptions written by writers using and not using BCTTv1, F(1,38) = 0.25; p = 0.62.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Baseline scores in study 5c were much lower than for the comparable group in study 5b.
“Baseline scores in study 5c, for example, were much lower than for the comparable group in study 5b.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agreement between trained coders about the presence/absence of BCTs did not differ significantly for descriptions written by writers using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by writers not using BCTTv1.
“Identification of BCTs in descriptions (RQ 1b): agreement between trained coders about the presence/ absence of BCTs did not differ significantly for descriptions written by writers using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by writers not using BCTTv1, F(1,38) = 0.01; p = 0.93.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Means for sufficiency of time allocated were around the mid-point of the scale both for writers provided with BCTTv1 and for those who were not.
“Usability and acceptability (RQ 2): means for sufficiency of time allocated were around the mid-point of the scale both for writers provided with BCTTv1 and for those who were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Quality of written intervention descriptions did not differ significantly for descriptions written by writers using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by writers not using BCTTv1.
“did not differ significantly for descriptions written by writers using BCTTv1 and for descriptions written by writers not using BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies 3 and 4 showed that BCTTv1 offers a generally reliable method for specifying the active ingredients of BCIs when used by trained coders.
“Studies 3 and 4 showed that BCTTv1 offers a generally reliable method for specifying the active ingredients of BCIs when used by trained coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In an earlier study, the data for the easy-difficult paired adjective item suggest that both groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task, as means were above the mid-point of the scale.
“However, the data for the 'easy-difficult' paired adjective item suggest that both groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task as means were above the mid-point of the scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Study 5c, the data for the easy-difficult paired adjective item suggest that on both occasions writers considered using BCTTv1 a difficult task, as means were above the mid-point of the scale.
“However, the data for the 'easy-difficult' paired adjective item suggest that on both occasions they considered using BCTTv1 a difficult task as means were above the mid-point of the scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no interaction effects between being trained and the video described for any of the dependent variables in study 5a.
“There were no interaction effects between being trained and the video described for any of the dependent variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Taking in detailed information about an intervention by watching a video is not something participants were experienced in doing.
“However, taking in detailed information about an intervention by watching an intervention is not something participants were experienced in doing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was unevenness of disciplines involved in the work, with the majority being psychologists.
“There was also an unevenness of disciplines involved in the work, the majority being psychologists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Training by either method increased the percentage of trainees achieving an acceptable standard of coding competence as indicated by agreement with expert consensus, 75% for tutorials and 45% for workshops.
“we showed that training by either method increased the percentage of trainees achieving an acceptable standard of coding competence as indicated by agreement with expert consensus (75% for tutorials and 45% for workshops).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was moderate overlap between the obtained structure and an alternative structure generated using a simple integrated classification of theoretical constructs.
“We found moderate overlap between the two structures, suggesting that apparently a theoretical use of BCTs may involve implicit theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In study 4, a subgroup of trained coders successfully applied their knowledge and skills to a more extensive coding exercise, achieving good reliability at baseline and at 1 month later.
“In study 4 (see Chapter 5), a subgroup of trained coders then went on to successfully apply their knowledge and skills to a more extensive coding exercise, achieving good reliability at baseline and at 1 month later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Rates of informed choice were significantly higher after reading the informed choice invitation than after the standard invitation.
“Rates of informed choice were significantly higher after reading the informed choice invitation compared to the standard invitation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In study 4, coders used 80 BCTs to describe the 40 intervention descriptions.
“Nevertheless, coders in study 4 used 80 BCTs to describe the 40 intervention descriptions and it may therefore be important to expand from the initial 22 BCTs to fully specify the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
BCTs in earlier taxonomies (e.g. motivational interviewing) were removed from BCTTv1 as they did not meet the definition of a BCT.
“Finally, in contrast to earlier taxonomies, BCTTv1 was developed using robust methods and is based on expert consensus, and BCTs in earlier taxonomies (e.g.motivational interviewing) were removed from BCTTv1 as they did not meet the definition of a BCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The 22 BCTs found to frequently occur in 40 intervention descriptions include 18 of the 22 BCTs included in the Abraham and Michie taxonomy based on more than 200 intervention descriptions.
“These 22 found to frequently occur in 40 intervention descriptions include 18 of the 22 BCTs including in the Abraham and Michie taxonomy 20 based on more than 200 intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The moderate overlap between the groupings indicates some tendency to implicitly conceptualise BCTs in terms of the same theoretical domains.
“The moderate overlap between the groupings indicates some tendency to implicitly conceptualise BCTs in terms of the same theoretical domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The BCTTv1 can be used accurately and reliably by trained coders to specify BCTs in BCIs.
“The BCTTv1 can be used accurately and reliably by trained coders to specify BCTs in BCIs: good intercoder reliability was observed across 80 BCTs identified in the protocols”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Titles and abstracts of published interventions have been found to mention the active components of the intervention in only 56% of published descriptions compared with over 90% in pharmacological interventions.
“Titles and abstracts of published interventions (i.e. the materials screened for inclusion in systematic reviews) have been found to mention the active components of the intervention in only 56% of published descriptions compared with over 90% in pharmacological interventions.42”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] McCleary, 2013, Active ingredients are reported more often for pharmacologic than non-pharmacologic interventions: an illustrative review of reporting practices in titles and abstracts, Trials source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Abraham and Michie's taxonomy of 22 BCTs and four BCT packages observed in BCIs was demonstrated to have good intercoder reliability among the taxonomy developers and trained coders across 221 intervention descriptions in papers and manuals.
“Abraham and Michie's 20 taxonomy of 22 BCTs and four BCT packages observed in BCIs was demonstrated to have good intercoder reliability (i.e. the extent to which coders agreed on the presence/absence of BCTs) among the taxonomy developers and trained coders across 221 intervention descriptions in papers and manuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abraham and Michie
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first cross-domain BCT taxonomy consisted of 22 BCTs and four BCT packages.
“The first cross-domain BCT taxonomy consisted of 22 BCTs and four BCT packages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abraham and Michie
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
It is unclear whether or not BCTTv1 benefits reporting of descriptions of observed interventions.
“It is unclear whether or not BCTTv1 benefits reporting of descriptions of observed interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The absence of standardised definitions and labels for intervention components means that systematic reviewers develop their own systems for classifying behavioural interventions and synthesising study findings.
“The absence of standardised definitions and labels for intervention components means that systematic reviewers develop their own systems for classifying behavioural interventions and synthesising study findings [e.g.Hardeman et al., 18 Albarracín et al., 19 Mischel (Presidential address given at the Association for Psychological Science Annual Convention, Washington, DC; 2012) and West et al. 46 ]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hardeman et al., 18
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Albarracín et al., 19
Not checked in the free run.
- cites West et al. 46
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Study 1 presented the synthesis of existing BCT taxonomies into a single comprehensive, cross-context, overarching BCT taxonomy: BCTTv1.
“Study 1 presented the synthesis of existing BCT taxonomies into a single comprehensive, cross-context, overarching BCT taxonomy: BCTTv1.8,17,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Michie, 2012, Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Michie, 2011, Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The BCTs have a hierarchical structure such that deleting overlapping BCTs would leave only the superordinate BCT and lose specific variation.
“During this process, one reason for overlap became evident: there was a hierarchical structure meaning that deleting overlapping BCTs would end up with only the superordinate BCT and a loss of specific variation (e.g.adopting the higher order BCT 'consequences' would have deleted 'reward').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For BCIs, further information is required to specify the active ingredients.
“However, for BCIs, further information is required to specify the active ingredients, that is 'components within an intervention that can be specifically linked to its effect on outcomes such that, if they were omitted, the intervention would be ineffective'.42”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] McCleary, 2013, Active ingredients are reported more often for pharmacologic than non-pharmacologic interventions: an illustrative review of reporting practices in titles and abstracts, Trials source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The UK MRC guidance called for improved methods of specifying and reporting intervention content in order to address the problems of lack of consistency and consensus.
“Consequently, the UK MRC guidance 5 for developing and evaluating complex interventions called for improved methods of specifying and reporting intervention content in order to address the problems of lack of consistency and consensus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Craig, 2008, Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Identifying the presence of BCTs in intervention descriptions included in systematic reviews and national datasets of outcomes has allowed the identification of BCTs associated with effective interventions.
“Identifying the presence of BCTs in intervention descriptions included in systematic reviews and national datasets of outcomes has allowed the identification of BCTs associated with effective interventions.46,47”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] West, 2010, Behavior change techniques used by the English Stop Smoking Services and their associations with short-term quit outcomes, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] West, 2011, Behavior change techniques used in group-based behavioral support by the English stop-smoking services and preliminary assessment of association with short-term quit outcomes, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The taxonomy demonstrated reliability in identifying 22 BCTs and four BCT packages.
“The taxonomy demonstrated reliability in identifying 22 BCTs (e.g.'self-monitoring') and four BCT packages (e.g.'relapse prevention').”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Previous classification systems have mainly been developed for particular behavioural domains (e.g. physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption or safer sex).
“Previous classification systems have mainly been developed for particular behavioural domains (e.g.physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption or safer sex).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous BCT groupings have been based on judgements made by the study author.
“Previous BCTs groupings have been based on judgements made by the study author.20,27,32,33”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Michie, 2011, Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Michie, 2011, Identifying evidence-based competencies required to deliver behavioural support for smoking cessation, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
In light of the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 and the large number of behaviour change theories and component constructs, grouping by individual theoretical constructs is impractical.
“In light of the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 and the large number of behaviour change theories and component constructs, 60 grouping by individual theoretical constructs is impractical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Hobbs, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The amendments of BCT labels and definitions were based on a wide range of inputs: data from Delphi participants and coders, expert modification, international advice and lay user improvements.
“Our amendments of the BCT labels and definitions also depend on the expertise available and, therefore, we based our amendments on a wide range of inputsthe data we collected from Delphi participants and coders, expert modification, international advice and lay user improvements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The authors made arbitrary decisions such as cut-offs for amending BCT labels and descriptions.
“At various stages we made arbitrary decisions such as the cut-offs for amending BCT labels and descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Behavioural medicine researchers and practitioners have reported low confidence in their ability to replicate highly effective behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention.
“Further, behavioural medicine researchers and practitioners have reported low confidence in their ability to replicate highly effective behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention.45”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Michie, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
A comprehensive, cross-behavioural domain taxonomy of BCTs was used rather than BCTs relevant for a single behavioural domain.
“A second advance was that a comprehensive, cross-behavioural domain taxonomy of BCTs was used rather than BCTs relevant for a single behavioural domain (e.g.road safety, 82 smoking cessation, 32 weight management 83 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [82] Ludwig, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Michie, 2011, Identifying evidence-based competencies required to deliver behavioural support for smoking cessation, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [83] Hardeman, 2009, Impact of a physical activity intervention program on cognitive predictors of behaviour among adults at risk of type 2 diabetes (ProActive randomised controlled trial), Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Coding BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with BCT labels and definitions and complex interpretative judgements.
“The process of coding BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with the BCT labels and definitions and one which requires coders to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.87,88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [87] Hak, 1996, Coder training: theoretical training or practical socialization?, Qual Sociol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] Bernard, 2004, How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature, Rev Educ Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The BCTs were grouped according to the perceived active ingredients underlying BCTs, rather than by categorisations that may not have reflected how people think about BCTs.
“Third, the BCTs were grouped according to the perceived active ingredients underlying BCTs, rather than by categorisations that may not have reflected how people think about BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As a result, the groupings reported here are potentially more robust than those derived using consensus methods among a few people.
“As a result, the groupings reported here are potentially more robust than those derived using consensus methods among a few people.43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Michie, 2008, From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques, Appl Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
For the two theoretical domains for which no BCTs were reliably assigned, there would appear to be no shared, or recognised, way of changing them.
“For the two theoretical domains for which no BCTs were reliably assigned, there would appear to be no shared, or recognised, way of changing them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This suggests that these are the theoretical domains for which there is the greatest number of agreed methods for bringing about change.
“This suggests that these are the theoretical domains for which there is the greatest number of agreed methods for bringing about change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Experts did not consistently allocate or rate highly any BCTs to these two domains.
“This indicates that, although both of these domains had BCTs allocated to them during the sort process (15 and 49, respectively), experts did not consistently allocate or rate highly any of the BCTs to these two domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Distinct sets of individual items with semantic similarity can be more easily recalled than a single list of individual items both in the short term and long term, particularly when the semantic category is cued.
“Distinct sets of individual items with semantic similarity can be more easily recalled than a single list of individual items both in the short term and long term, particularly when the semantic category is cued.[84][85][86]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84][85][86]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Achievement of good intercoder reliability is a function of both the clarity of the taxonomy and its coding guidelines and the competence of its coders.
“Achievement of good intercoder reliability (i.e. the extent to which coders agree on the presence/absence of BCTs identified in intervention descriptions using the taxonomy as a coding framework) is therefore not only a function of the clarity of the taxonomy and its coding guidelines, but also of the competence of its coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The grouping methods employed in the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks improve on previous attempts to group BCTs using consensus approaches.
“The grouping methods employed in the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks improve on previous attempts to group BCTs using consensus approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Intercoder reliability has been demonstrated in using BCT taxonomies among coders with varying amounts of training and experience.
“Intercoder reliability has been demonstrated in using BCT taxonomies among coders with varying amounts of training and experience.20,23,[28][29][30]48”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 20,23,[28][29][30]48
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The 'top-down' mapping of BCTs to theoretical domains advances the limited consensus methods used by Michie et al. by using an improved BCT taxonomy, an empirically validated TDF, and a larger number of respondents.
“The 'top-down' mapping of BCTs to theoretical domains advances the limited consensus methods used by Michie et al. 43 by using an improved BCT taxonomy, an empirically validated TDF and a larger number of respondents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Michie, 2008, From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques, Appl Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Results from two initial phases of reliability testing indicated BCTTv1 to be reliable in specifying 26 frequently occurring BCTs when used by the taxonomy developers.
“Results from two initial phases of reliability testing indicated BCTTv1 to be reliable in specifying 26 frequently occurring BCTs when used by the taxonomy developers.40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is not only the content and form of the taxonomy that drives reliable and valid application of BCT labels/definitions but also the extent to which the user has been trained to use the taxonomy.
“However, it is not only the content and form of the taxonomy that drives reliable and valid application of BCT labels/definitions but also the extent to which the user has been trained to use the taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These BCTs may require further definition and/or refinement of labels and examples for trained coders to be able to identify them with high reliability and validity.
“These BCTs may require further definition and/or refinement of labels and examples for trained coders to be able to identify them with high reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The difference between training methods in the proportion of those achieving an acceptable standard of coding competence may be partly due to differences in the percentage showing competence before training.
“The difference between training methods in the proportion of those achieving an acceptable standard of coding competence may be partly due to differences in the percentage showing competence before training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This evidence and these principles reflect the relevance and use of BCTs such as feedback on behaviour, goal-setting, social support and behavioural practice/rehearsal directed at changing skilled behaviours.
“This evidence and these principles clearly reflect the relevance and use of BCTs such as feedback on behaviour, goal-setting, social support and behavioural practice/rehearsal directed at changing skilled behaviours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
BCTTv1 represents an advance in methods for specifying BCIs.
“Although BCTTv1 represents an advance in methods for specifying BCIs, reliable and valid application of BCTTv1 will require skills and, therefore, training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Training incorporating these principles and BCTs improved trainees' coding competence (agreement with expert consensus) in a prior smoking cessation study.
“This study found that training improved trainees' coding competence (i.e.their agreement with expert consensus about which BCTs are present).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This suggests that intercoder reliability remained stable over time.
“This suggests that intercoder reliability remained stable over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings suggested that user training may be required because high reliability depends not only on taxonomy content but also on the user's skill.
“It also suggested that user training may be required as high reliability is not only dependent on the content of the taxonomy but also on the extent that the user is skilled in using it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These findings demonstrated that BCTs can be reliably identified in published descriptions.
“Thus, these findings demonstrated that BCTs can be reliably identified in published descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There was no indication that any particular description or subset of descriptions influenced intercoder reliability.
“There was no indication therefore, that any particular description or subset of the descriptions influenced intercoder reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premiseown data
Findings showed no significant difference between reliability scores, indicating trained coders could identify BCTs as reliably as coders involved in defining BCTs.
“Findings showed no significant difference between reliability scores indicating that trained coders could identify BCTs as reliably as coders involved in defining BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Abraham and Michie reported >93% agreement between three pairs of coders (including the authors).
“Abraham and Michie 20 reported > 93% agreement between three pairs of coders (including the authors).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Since Abraham and Michie's initial paper, intercoder reliability has been demonstrated for various subsequent BCT taxonomies.
“Since Abraham and Michie's 20 initial paper, intercoder reliability has been demonstrated for various subsequent BCT taxonomies.20,23,27,28,30,48”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Michie, 2009, Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Michie, 2011, Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even PABAK is more appropriate for this type of data than a simple kappa.
“Nevertheless, even PABAK takes account of the high prevalence of negative codes and of the extent to which coders use similar marginal totals and, therefore, is more appropriate for this type of data than a simple kappa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Newly trained coders can code accurately as defined by agreement with experienced coder consensus.
“Furthermore, the data suggest that newly trained coders can code accurately as defined by agreement with experienced coder consensus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Perceived professional competence of intervention facilitators has been found to predict effectiveness of human immunodeficiency virus preventative interventions.
“Perceived professional competence of intervention facilitators has also been found to predict effectiveness of human immunodeficiency viruspreventative interventions.152”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Durantini, 2006, Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups, Psychol Bull source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Training in BCTTv1 improves the identification of BCTs.
“We used trained coders as we showed that training in BCTTv1 improves the identification of BCTs 96”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Wood, 2014, Applying the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy v1: a study of user training, Transl Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The four BCTs with mean PABAK scores of 0.68 and 0.69 at time 1 were considered close enough to the 0.70 threshold to be counted as reliably identified.
“We considered these as being close enough to the 0.70 threshold to be counted as reliably identified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
At least in some contexts, the two statistics may not be directly interchangeable when data similar to the current data are investigated.
“Thus, our findings suggest that, at least in some contexts, the two statistics may not be directly interchangeable when data similar to the current data are investigated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AC1 may be a more appropriate index than PABAK.
“AC1 may therefore be a more appropriate index.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There was considerable correspondence between coders' individual judgements of BCT definition clarity, BCT intercoder reliability and validity.
“This suggests that there was considerable correspondence between coders' individual judgements of BCT definition clarity, BCT intercoder reliability and validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
BCTTv1 can be used by trained coders to reliably identify BCTs included in intervention descriptions.
“In conclusion, our results show that BCTTv1 can be used by trained coders to reliably identify BCTs included in intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
BCTTv1 provides the most comprehensive listing of BCTs to date.
“The BCTTv1 taxonomy of BCT labels and definitions is an important development of previous work and provides the most comprehensive listing of BCTs to date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The BCT definitions judged as needing further clarification that belonged to the same BCT grouping referred to the same underlying mechanism of change.
“Fifty per cent of the BCT definitions judged by trained coders as being in need of further clarification belonged to the same BCT grouping in BCTTv1, therefore, referring to the same underlying mechanism of change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Study 5b was a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of training plus provision of BCTTv1 compared with a control group who received neither BCTTv1 nor training.
“Study 5b also used a RCT design and examined the effects of training plus provision of BCTTv1 compared with a control group who received neither BCTTv1 nor training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The consistently higher AC1 scores suggest that the data may have been influenced by random judgement effects that are controlled in AC1 but not PABAK, with resulting lower scores in PABAK.
“The consistently higher AC1 scores suggest that our data may have been influenced by random judgement effects that are controlled in AC1 but not PABAK, with resulting lower scores in PABAK.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Feedback from coders highlights several BCT definitions that require further classification and refinement before they can be identified reliably.
“Feedback from our coders highlights several BCT definitions that require further classification and refinement before they can be identified reliably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Coding intervention descriptions for message source or facilitator characteristics is important.
“This highlights that coding intervention descriptions for message source or facilitator characteristics is important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Similarities between intervention facilitators and recipients explained differential effectiveness of interventions.
“Similarities between intervention facilitators and recipients (e.g.age, ethnicity and behaviour risk group membership) explained differential effectiveness of interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The frequent occurrence of the 18 BCTs also identified in the Abraham and Michie taxonomy is confirmed.
“Of the 22 BCTs observed in 16 or more of 40 intervention descriptions, 18 (82%) were also identified in the Abraham and Michie 20 BCT taxonomy, confirming the frequent occurrence of these 18 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Correspondence between trained coder judgements and experienced developers' judgements was regarded as a measure of the validity of the trained coders' judgements.
“Given the expertise derived from the experience of developing BCT definitions and the previous experience of the developers in identifying BCTs in intervention descriptions, correspondence between trained coder judgements and experienced developers' judgements was regarded as a measure of the validity of the trained coders' judgements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Specification of BCIs requires at least this range of BCTs to describe the active content.
“Clearly specification of BCIs requires at least this range of BCTs to describe the active content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Perceived confidence does not appear to be a useful indicator of accuracy of identification of BCTs in intervention descriptions.
“This suggests that perceived confidence does not appear to be a useful indicator of accuracy of identification of BCTs in intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is a lack of guidance about how to report intervention descriptions in terms of both the proposed active content (BCTs) and supportive content necessary to engage the participant.
“There is a lack of guidance about how to report intervention descriptions in terms of both the proposed active content (BCTs) and supportive content necessary to engage the participant.32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Michie, 2011, Identifying evidence-based competencies required to deliver behavioural support for smoking cessation, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The similarity of intercoder reliability across two tests separated by 1 month indicates temporal stability.
“and remained similar across two tests separated by 1 month, indicating temporal stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Good trained coder agreement with developer consensus about the 15 BCTs agreed on as present indicates concurrent validity.
“There was also good trained coder agreement with developer consensus about the 15 BCTs agreed on as present, thus indicating concurrent validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The BCTTv1 taxonomy can be used successfully, with appropriate training, by a wide range of users to identify a wide range of BCTs included in intervention descriptions.
“Therefore, the BCTTv1 taxonomy can be used successfully, with appropriate training, by a wide range of users to identify a wide range of BCTs included in intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Coding for source characteristics in intervention descriptions has been shown to predict intervention effectiveness in meta-analytic studies.
“and coding for source characteristics in intervention descriptions has been shown to predict intervention effectiveness in meta-analytic studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Across Studies 5a, 5b and 5c, the results do not show a clear benefit of providing BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions.
“The results do not show clear benefit of providing BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The finding of unexpected negative effects of training is consistent with some counterintuitive findings reported in the psychology literature.
“The finding of unexpected negative effects of training is consistent with some of the counterintuitive findings reported in the psychology literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [156] Baumeister, 1984, Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance, J Pers Soc Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [157] Wegner, 1997, Ironic effects of trying to relax under stress, Behav Res Ther source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [158] Henry, 1993, Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: mediators of therapists’ responses to training, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
Trained coders had all demonstrated competence in using BCTTv1 to reliably and validly specify the content of BCIs, achieving criteria of satisfactory performance on coding intervention descriptions following training in a formal assessment of coding competence.
“Coders had all demonstrated competence in using BCTTv1 to reliably and validly specify the content of BCIs, that is they achieved criteria of satisfactory performance on coding intervention descriptions following training, in a formal assessment of coding competence.107”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] Abraham, 2015, Reliability of identification of behavior change techniques in intervention descriptions [published online ahead of print August 20 2015], Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In conclusion, the authors did not find a clear benefit of providing BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions.
“In conclusion, we did not find a clear benefit of providing BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The moderate overlap between the two structures suggests that apparently theoretical use of BCTs may involve implicit theory.
“We found moderate overlap between the two structures, suggesting that apparently a theoretical use of BCTs may involve implicit theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In reviews of interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating, interventions with the combination of self-monitoring, goal-setting and action planning were twice as effective as those that were not.
“They found that interventions with the combination of self-monitoring, goal-setting and action planning were twice as effective as those that were not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Michie et al. 24
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dombrowski et al.21 Dombrowski, 2012, Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care, Patient Educ Couns source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Behavioural interventions to increase fidelity of intervention delivery have the potential to bring about as great, or greater, health gains than medical advances on their own.
“Behavioural interventions to increase fidelity of intervention delivery have the potential to bring about as great, or greater, health gains than medical advances on their own.177”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177] Woolf, 2005, The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered, Ann Fam Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The theoretically based combination of BCTs associated with provision of information, increasing motivation and enhancing behavioural skills has been found to reduce the frequency of sexual interactions that increase health risk.
“The theoretically based combination of BCTs associated with provision of information, increasing motivation and enhancing behavioural skills 171 has been found to reduce the frequency of sexual interactions that increase health risk.169”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [171] Fisher, 1992, Changing AIDS-risk behavior, Psychol Bull source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [169] Smoak, 2006, Sexual risk reduction interventions do not inadvertently increase the overall frequency of sexual behavior: a meta-analysis of 174 studies with 116,735 participants, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Meta-analyses lack power to test the effectiveness of most BCTs, as was evident in the NICE 2014 Behaviour Change guidance which used BCT methodology.
“Meta-analyses lack power to test the effectiveness of most BCTs, as was evident in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2014 Behaviour Change guidance which used BCT methodology.166”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [166] NICE, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
BCTTv1 allows both intervention and control conditions to be coded in terms of BCTs, allowing identification of the BCTs used in the intervention over and above those used in control or usual-care conditions.
“It allows both intervention and control conditions to be coded in terms of BCTs which allows the identification of the BCTs that were used in the intervention over and above those used in the control or usual-care conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a recent Cochrane review of audit and feedback interventions, adding the BCTs of goal-setting and action planning to interventions increased the effect of feedback.
“A similar analytic approach was used to investigate audit and feedback interventions 168 in a recent Cochrane review, 49 finding that adding the BCTs of goal-setting and action planning to interventions increased the effect of feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [168] Gardner, 2010, Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback, Soc Sci Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Ivers, 2012, Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The authors used consensus following independent judgements by experienced expert coders as their best approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements could be evaluated.
“We used consensus following independent judgements by experienced, 'expert', coders as our best approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements could be evaluated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Consensus following independent judgements by experienced expert coders is the best available approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements can be evaluated.
- Interpretationreasoning
Given the typically small number of studies that have used any particular BCT and potential influence of confounders, there are limits to BCT methodology.
“However, given the typically small number of studies that have used any particular BCT and potential influence of confounders, there are limits to this methodology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There are several examples of meta-analyses that have investigated both individual BCTs and combinations of BCTs that theory predicts would work synergistically together.
“There are several examples of meta-analyses which have investigated both individual BCTs and combinations of BCTs that theory predicts would work synergistically together.21,24,49,168,169”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [21] Dombrowski, 2012, Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care, Patient Educ Couns source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Michie, 2009, Low-income groups and behaviour change interventions: a review of intervention content, effectiveness and theoretical frameworks, J Epidemiol Community Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Ivers, 2012, Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [168] Gardner, 2010, Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback, Soc Sci Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [169] Smoak, 2006, Sexual risk reduction interventions do not inadvertently increase the overall frequency of sexual behavior: a meta-analysis of 174 studies with 116,735 participants, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Meta-CART has been used to identify groups of BCTs to predict intervention effects in a reanalysis of data from Michie et al.
“An alternative method of combining BCTs is to use CARTs, referred to as Meta-CART, 39 to analyse meta-analytic data.This has been used to identify groups of BCTs to predict intervention effects in a reanalysis of data from Michie et al. 23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Dusseldorp, 2014, Combinations of techniques that effectively change health behavior: evidence from Meta-CART analysis, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Michie, 2009, Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
There were limitations in the methods used in study 5 that limit confidence in the findings.
“As mentioned earlier, there were limitations in the methods used in study 5 that limit our confidence in the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Many active controls such as usual care involve implementation of multiple BCTs, overlapping with those that constitute the intervention itself.
“The key point here is that many active controls such as 'usual care' involve implementation of multiple BCTs, overlapping with those that constitute the intervention itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Bruin et al. 162
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Among the studies in that meta-analysis that claimed a theory basis, 90% did not report links between all BCTs and specific theoretical constructs.
“However, 90% of these did not report links between all of the BCTs and specific theoretical constructs.58”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Prestwich, 2014, Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of 190 interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating found that 56% of studies claimed the interventions were based on a theory.
“For example, a meta-analysis of 190 interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating interventions found that 56% of studies claimed the interventions were based on a theory.58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Prestwich, 2014, Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The scientific study of behaviours sometimes occurs in 'silos' so that one may miss potentially effective BCTs that are used in other behaviours.
“This needs to be balanced with the potential problem that the scientific study of behaviours sometimes occurs in 'silos' so that one may miss potentially effective BCTs that are used in other behaviours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The unevenness in the sample of coders prevented the study from examining reliability across types of coder.
“The unevenness in our sample of coders (as discussed in Chapter 8) prevented us from examining reliability across types of coder”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Information from coding delivery of BCTs aids the interpretation of trial results, e.g. the extent to which any lack of effects is due to the intervention itself or poor fidelity of delivery.
“It also aids the interpretation of trial results, e.g. the extent to which any lack of effects is due to the intervention itself or poor fidelity of delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is ample evidence from reviews and primary studies that intervention protocols are often implemented with insufficient fidelity.
“There is ample evidence from reviews and primary studies that intervention protocols are often implemented with insufficient fidelity.12,[179][180][181][182]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 12,[179][180][181][182]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
Adolescents who received a threshold exposure of A-CRA were significantly more likely to be in recovery at follow-up.
“Similarly, our prior research has shown that adolescents who received a threshold exposure of A-CRA were significantly more likely to be in recovery at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In an intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus delivered by trained and quality-assured facilitators, 58% of BCTs specified in the intervention protocol were not faithfully delivered.
“For example, in an intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus delivered by trained and quality-assured facilitators, 58% of BCTs specified in the intervention protocol were not faithfully delivered.182”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Hardeman, 2007, Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: predictors and consequences, Psychol Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Increasing the number of adolescents who receive Target A-CRA would be expected to increase the likelihood that adolescents have more positive treatment outcomes.
“Increasing the number of adolescents who receive Target A-CRA would be expected to result in a higher likelihood that adolescents would have more positive treatment outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
This insufficient fidelity was particularly the case for BCTs directed at maintenance of behaviour change.
“This was particularly the case for BCTs directed at maintenance of behaviour change.183”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] Carroll, 1994, Implementing treatment and protecting the validity of the independent variable in treatment matching studies, J Stud Alcohol Suppl source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Coding the delivery of BCTs using observations, audio or video recordings of interventions allows researchers and practitioners to find out how many of the intervention's proposed active ingredients are actually delivered.
“Coding the delivery of BCTs using observations, audio or video recordings, of interventions allows researchers and practitioners to find out how many of the intervention's proposed active ingredients are actually delivered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
At least two journals have editorial policies stating that trials of interventions will only be published if the interventions are described in sufficient detail for replication and implementation, citing BCT methodology as an example.
“At least two journals have editorial policies stating that trials of interventions will only be published if the interventions are described in sufficient detail for replication and implementation, citing BCT methodology as an example.10,178”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Michie, 2009, Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [178] West, 2008, Providing full manuals and intervention descriptions: addiction policy, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 156
- May combine two claims. 174
- The quote only partly states this claim. 15
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataGroupings were created by those with experience of BCIs: average of 15.11 groupings (SD 6.11, range 5-24 groupings).
“Groupings were created by those with experience of BCIs: average of 15.11 groupings (standard deviation 6.11, range 5-24 groupings).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBCTTv1 comprises 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings.
“It comprises 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudy 5c: There were no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).
“There were no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 'bottom-up' method resulted in 16 groupings, which had some overlap with the theory-driven groupings.
“The 'bottom-up' method resulted in 16 groupings, which had some overlap with the theory-driven groupings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataForty-six per cent of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training.
“Forty-six per cent of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 15 BCTs agreed by expert consensus to be present in the descriptions, good agreement was achieved for 14, indicating good validity.
“Of the 15 BCTs agreed by expert consensus to be present in the descriptions, good agreement was achieved for 14, thus indicating good validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFifty-nine of the BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of the 14 theoretical domains; 47 were significant and 12 were of borderline significance.
“Fifty-nine of the BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of the 14 theoretical domains; 47 were significant and 12 were of borderline significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenBCTTv1 is the first cross-behaviour taxonomy to be established by an international group of experienced BCT coders.
“The BCTTv1 is the first cross-behaviour taxonomy to be established by an international group of experienced BCT coders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Lack of a methodology for unpacking the 'black box' of behaviour change interventions prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.
- Rests on an assumption: There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenOne additional BCT was identified by the study team, given a label and definition and added to the system.
“One additional BCT was identified by the study team, given a label and definition and added to the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReliability was poorer for frequent BCTs; 9 out of the 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve a good level of reliability (PABAK > 0.70).
“Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs; 9 out of the 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve a good level of reliability, that is a PABAK score of > 0.70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 124 BCTs in the prototype classification system, 31 were removed: five composite BCTs and 26 BCTs overlapping with others, which were rated to have better definitions.
“Of the 124 BCTs in the prototype classification system, 31 were removed: five composite BCTs and 26 BCTs overlapping with others, which were rated to have better definitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining was evaluated positively by trainees with both types of training receiving uniformly high ratings in terms of usefulness.
“Training was evaluated positively by trainees with both types of training receiving uniformly high ratings in terms of usefulness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
- Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the basis of Delphi second-round scores, 38 BCTs were judged satisfactory and 32 requiring further consideration.
“On the basis of these scores, 38 BCTs were judged to be 'satisfactory' and 32 'requiring further consideration'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michie et al. 40
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the basis of Delphi first-round scores, 21 BCTs were judged satisfactory and 73 requiring further consideration.
“On the basis of these scores, 21 BCTs were judged to be 'satisfactory' and 73 'requiring further consideration'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michie et al. 40
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 70 BCTs reconsidered in the second round, seven labels were amended, 35 definitions were rephrased, and seven BCTs were removed, giving 63 BCTs.
“Of the 70 BCTs reconsidered, seven labels were amended, 35 definitions were rephrased and seven BCTs were removed, giving 63 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFeedback from the International Advisory Board led to the addition of two and removal of four BCTs.
“Feedback from members led to the addition of two and the removal of four BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese experts were drawn from a variety of disciplines including psychology, behavioural medicine and health promotion, and from seven countries.
“These experts were drawn from a variety of disciplines including psychology, behavioural medicine and health promotion, and from seven countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, the Netherlands, Finland and Germany).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 73 reconsidered BCTs in the first round, four were removed, four were divided, and one was added, giving 74 BCTs.
“Of the 73 reconsidered BCTs, four were removed, four were divided and one BCT was added, giving 74 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe BCTs were grouped using an inductive 'bottom-up' method based on similarity of active ingredients, yielding 16 distinct sets of BCTs.
“The BCTs were grouped using an inductive 'bottom-up' method based on the similarity of their active ingredients.This process yielded 16 distinct sets of BCTs, as follows (with number of BCTs in parentheses): scheduled consequences (10), reward/threat (7), repetition/replacement (7), antecedents (4), associations (8), covert learning (3), natural consequences (6), feedback and monitoring (5), goals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the higher-order groupings created by the top-down task, there were only two similarly strong overlaps with the BCTs allocated to the equivalent TDF domains, indicating that the relationship between higher-order sorting strategies and theoretically derived groupings is not strong.
“For the higher-order groupings created by the top-down task, there were only two similarly strong overlaps with the BCTs allocated to the equivalent TDF domains indicating that the relationship between higher-order sorting strategies and theoretically derived groupings is not strong.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe least distinct groupings (social support, comparison of behaviour, self-belief, comparison of outcome, identity) comprised BCTs relating to social support, social comparisons, and self and identity, suggesting less clarity about BCTs within these theoretical domains.
“The least distinct groupings (i.e.'social support', 'comparison of behaviour', 'self-belief', 'comparison of outcome' and 'identity') comprised BCTs relating to social support, social comparisons, and self and identity, suggesting that there is less clarity about the BCTs within these theoretical domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin these domains, 59 (68%) of the BCTs were considered reliably allocated, with a further 12 (14%) having borderline statistical significance and six being allocated to multiple domains.
“Within these domains, 59 (68%) of the BCTs were considered to be reliably allocated, with a further 12 (14%) BCTs having borderline statistical significance (p > 0.05 but p < 0.1) and six being allocated to multiple domains (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExamination of the hierarchical structure of BCTTv1 uncovered a 'higher-order' grouping strategy taken by experts in the 'bottom-up' task, and some groupings within the 16-grouping solution are more clearly distinct from others.
“Examination of the hierarchical structure of BCTTv1 uncovered a 'higher-order' grouping strategy taken by the behaviour change experts in the 'bottom-up' task and the dendrogram indicates that some groupings of BCTs within the 16-grouping solution can be considered as more clearly distinct from others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataEighteen of 19 participants approached from the pool of experts completed the open-sort task.
“Eighteen of 19 participants approached from the pool of experts completed the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationOf the 24 most frequently identified BCTs, 18 were clearly grouped into one of the 14 domains and the remaining seven BCTs were not reliably allocated to any domain even though they could be identified reliably in the intervention descriptions.
“Of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs in Michie et al., 40 18 were clearly grouped into one of the 14 domains and the remaining seven BCTs were not reliably allocated to any domain even though they could be identified reliably in the intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michie et al., 40
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe age of participants did not differ significantly between the two sort tasks, but the number of female and male participants did, as did the country of residence.
“Although the age of participants did not differ significantly between the two sort tasks [t(34) = 0.77; p > 0.10] the number of female and male participants did [χ 2 (1) = 4.33; p < 0.05] as did the country of residence (χ 2 = 20.76;p < 0.001) (Monte-Carlo simulation using 2000 replicates was used to compute the p-value given that a number of the expected cell values were < 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe authors improved the quality of BCTTv1 labels and definitions and developed a hierarchical structure of BCTTv1.
“In order to enhance understanding and use of BCTs in BCIs, we have improved the quality of their labels and definitions, and developed a hierarchical structure of BCTTv1.73”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Cane, 2015, From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs, Br J Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe closed-sort task was conducted on an earlier version of the taxonomy containing 87 BCTs and the open-sort task an even earlier version containing 85 BCTs.
“The closed-sort task was conducted on an earlier version of the taxonomy containing 87 BCTs and the open-sort task an even earlier version containing 85 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSix of the open-sort task groupings (repetition and substitution, goals and planning, covert learning, self-belief, scheduled consequences, antecedents) showed a high level of overlap with the BCTs assigned to the equivalent TDF domains, suggesting that experts may have sorted BCTs by theoretical constructs or domains across both tasks.
“Six of the open-sort tasks groupings, 'repetition and substitution, 'goals and planning', 'covert learning', 'self-belief', 'scheduled consequences' and 'antecedents', showed a high level of overlap with the BCTs assigned to the equivalent TDF domains, suggesting that experts may have sorted BCTs by theoretical constructs or domains (implicitly or explicitly) across both tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEighteen people (72%) met the eligibility criteria and all who were eligible consented to complete the closed-sort task.
“Eighteen people (72%) met the eligibility criteria and all who were eligible consented to complete the task (Table 1 shows demographic information).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll TDF domains had BCTs allocated to them in the closed-sort task, with numbers ranging from 15 for social/professional role and identity to 68 for behavioural regulation.
“All TDF domains had BCTs allocated to them in the closed-sort task, with the number of BCTs allocated ranging from 15 for social/professional role and identity to 68 for behavioural regulation (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants for the closed-sort task reported moderately high levels of expertise in behaviour change theory (mean = 3.17, SD = 0.71) and in delivering BCIs (mean = 2.17, SD = 1.38).
“Participants for the closed-sort task reported moderately high levels of expertise in behaviour change theory (mean = 3.17, SD = 0.71) and in delivering BCIs (mean = 2.17, SD = 1.38) as measured on 5-point scales (scores are reversed so a higher score indicates more experience).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis allocation was reliable for 12 of the 14 domains, with BCTs allocated consistently with high confidence across experts (p < 0.05).
“This allocation was reliable for 12 of the 14 domains, that is BCTs were allocated consistently with high confidence across experts, leading to p < 0.05 (see Table 2 for frequencies and see Table 4 for confidence ratings, ICC values and related p-values).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOther domains also showed high agreement but had fewer associated BCTs: behavioural regulation had only one assigned BCT but achieved good agreement, while goals had five BCTs assigned with good agreement.
“Other domains also showed high agreement but had fewer associated BCTs -'behavioural regulation' had only one assigned BCT but achieved good agreement, while 'goals' had five BCTs assigned with good agreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the 'top-down' task, 59 out of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to one or more TDF domains, with a further 12 BCTs having borderline statistical significance.
“In this 'top-down' task, 59 out of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to one or more of the TDF domains with a further 12 BCTs having borderline statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA few trainees commented on the 'Ready, steady, point!' exercises as being a useful method to increase their ability to identify BCTs at speed.
“A few trainees commented on the 'Ready, steady, point!' exercises as being a useful method to increase their ability to identify BCTs at speed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, high confidence ratings increased for 13 out of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (behaviour), self-monitoring of outcome(s) of
“Ratings increased for 13 out of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (behaviour), self-monitoring of outcome(s) of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, agreement with expert consensus increased for 11 of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of
“Agreement with expert consensus increased for 11 of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining increased confidence in identifying BCTs assessed for both training methods and significantly so among workshop trainees.
“Training increased confidence in identifying BCTs assessed for both training methods and significantly so among workshop trainees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTime constraints on the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' were particularly an issue for trainees from different time zones.
“This was particularly an issue for trainees from different time zones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor one-day workshops, change in agreement with expert consensus across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.56; p = 0.59.
“However, change across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.56; p = 0.59.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenFor distance group tutorials, the BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and after training.
“As for workshops, the BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and this was also achieved after training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTrainees commented that they occasionally found the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' difficult to put into practice owing to time constraints.
“Trainees commented that they occasionally found them difficult to put into practice owing to time constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, across the BCTs assessed, trainee agreement with expert consensus increased, t(16) = 2.35; p < 0.05.
“Across the BCTs assessed, trainee agreement with expert consensus also increased, t(16) = 2.35; p < 0.05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMany trainees commented that the tutorials provided a useful opportunity to learn 'the consensus answers and the rationale behind coding' for specific BCTs and then 'discuss any reasons for discrepancies with other members of the group'.
“Many of the trainees commented that the tutorials provided a useful opportunity to learn 'the consensus answers and the rationale behind coding' for specific BCTs and then 'discuss any reasons for discrepancies with other members of the group'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, the number of high confidence ratings (++) that trainees assigned did not change, t(51) = -0.57; p = 0.57.
“Confidence for BCTs identified: the number of high confidence ratings (i.e.'++') that trainees assigned did not change, t(51) = -0.57;p = 0.57.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor one-day workshops, the number of high confidence ratings (++) that trainees assigned increased from before training (mean = 8.38, SD = 1.91) to after training (mean = 9.56, SD = 1.93), t(108) = 4.89; p < 0.001.
“Confidence for BCTs identified: the number of high confidence ratings (i.e.'++') that trainees assigned increased, t(108) = 4.89; p < 0.001 (before training: mean number of BCTs = 8.38, SD = 1.91; after training: mean number of BCTs = 9.56, SD = 1.93).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChange from before to after training competence was significant for workshops, F(1,216) = 9.66; p < 0.05, and for tutorials, F(1,102) = 38.38; p < 0.001.
“Change from before to after training competence was significant for workshops, F(1,216) = 9.66; p < 0.05, and for tutorials, F(1,102) = 38.38;p < 0.001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority commented that having access to a wide range and number of excerpts taken from published reports provided a useful opportunity to practice applying the taxonomy.
“The majority commented that having access to a wide range and number of excerpts taken from published reports provided a useful opportunity to practice applying the taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the majority agreed that the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' components were both useful in principle, feedback suggested that trainees generally wanted more guidance on how to use them.
“Although the majority agreed that the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' components were both useful in principle, feedback suggested that trainees generally wanted more guidance on how to use them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe opportunity to apply new knowledge and skills in a number of coding tasks followed by group discussion was evaluated as being a useful approach by trainees.
“The opportunity to apply new knowledge and skills in a number of coding tasks followed by group discussion was evaluated as being a useful approach by trainees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, intercoder agreement increased for 8 out of the 17 BCTs: feedback on behaviour, credible source, demonstration of the behaviour, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform behaviour and material reward (behaviour) (average increase in PABAK = 0.38, SD = 0.26; range = 0.08-0.69).
“Across the BCTs assessed, intercoder agreement increased for 8 out of the 17 BCTs: feedback on behaviour, credible source, demonstration of the behaviour, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform behaviour and material reward (behaviour) (average increase in PABAK for these eight BCTs = 0.38, SD = 0.26; range = 0.08-0.69).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter training, 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score of ≥ 0.60, meeting the acceptable standard of competence (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14).
“After training, the proportion of trainees reaching this threshold increased across both methods: 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score of ≥ 0.60 therefore meeting the acceptable standard of competence (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBefore training, 22% of workshop trainees and 35% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score (agreement with expert consensus) of ≥ 0.60 (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11).
“Before training, 22% of workshop trainees and 35% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score (in terms of agreement with expert consensus) of ≥ 0.60 (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, change in intercoder agreement across the 17 BCTs was non-significant, t(16) = 0.28; p = 0.78.
“However, change across the 17 BCTs was non-significant, t(16) = 0.28; p = 0.78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of tutorial trainees had a moderate level of expertise in BCIs (mean = 3.50, SD = 0.71).
“The majority of tutorial trainees had a moderate level of expertise in BCIs (mean = 3.50, SD = 0.71).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, 54% (n = 28) of trainees had previously used a BCT taxonomy to code BCIs and 69% (n = 36) to describe BCIs.
“Previous experience: 54% (n = 28) of trainees had previously used a BCT taxonomy to code BCIs and 69% (n = 36) to describe BCIs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTutorial trainees reported that the combination of practical tasks and the opportunity for structured discussion during the tutorial sessions was particularly useful.
“Tutorial trainees reported that the combination of practical tasks and the opportunity for structured discussion during the tutorial sessions was particularly useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor one-day workshops, across BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings increased, t(11) = 2.89; p < 0.05.
“Across BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings also increased, t(11) = 2.89; p < 0.05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining was effective for some BCTs, defined as poor agreement and intercoder agreement before training but good after training; for example, behavioural practice/rehearsal.
“We identified BCTs for which training was effective, that is when agreement and intercoder agreement were poor before training but good after training; for example, behavioural practice/rehearsal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor distance group tutorials, intercoder agreement across trainees did not change, t(25) = 0.57; p = 0.57.
“Intercoder agreement between trainees: intercoder agreement across trainees did not change, t(25) =0 .57;p = 0.57.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining was evaluated positively by trainees with all components receiving high usefulness ratings (workshops: mean = 4.62, SD = 0.68; range = 3-5; tutorials: mean = 4.30, SD = 0.67; range 4-5).
“Training was evaluated positively by trainees with all components receiving high ratings (on the scale of 1-5) in terms of usefulness (workshops: mean = 4.62, SD = 0.68; range = 3-5; tutorials: mean = 4.30, SD = 0.67; range 4-5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean PABAK scores for experienced coders for the 15 BCTs ranged from 0.60 to 0.90 (overall mean=0.77); all but one BCT achieved ≥0.70.
“Mean PABAK scores for experienced coders for the 15 BCTs (see Table 13) ranged from 0.60 to 0.90 (overall mean = 0.77); all but one BCT achieved a mean PABAK score of ≥ 0.70.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe poorest validity was for 'credible source', with 'social support (practical)' and 'goal-setting (outcome)' also low; all three had also shown low intercoder reliability.
“The poorest validity was for 'credible source', with 'social support (practical)' and 'goals-setting (outcome)' also being low and all three of these had also shown low intercoder reliability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSixteen BCTs failed to reach the 0.70 PABAK threshold, with nine falling below 0.60; all were frequently identified.
“Sixteen BCTs failed to reach the 0.70 PABAK threshold with nine falling below 0.60.All were frequently identified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur analyses have shown that reliability of BCT identification was not positively correlated with coder confidence and indeed tended to be negatively correlated.
“However, our analyses have shown that reliability of BCT identification was not positively correlated with coder confidence and indeed tended to be negatively correlated.109”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Wynne, 1987, Inability of trained nurses to perform basic life support, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean reliability scores for experienced and trained coders were correlated with a large effect size [r(13)=0.69; p<0.01] but were significantly different [t(14)=3.01; p<0.01], with experienced coders achieving higher PABAK scores for 13 of 15 BCTs.
“The mean reliability scores for experienced coders and trained coders were correlated with a large effect size [r(13) = 0.69; p < 0.01, two tailed] but were significantly different [t(14) = 3.01; p < 0.01] with experienced coders achieving higher PABAK scores for 13 out of the 15 BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean PABAK validity scores across trained coder consensus pairs did not significantly change with time [t(31)=0.84; p=0.41] and scores on the two occasions were correlated [r(30)=0.67; p<0.001].
“The mean PABAK validity scores across trained coder consensus pairs did not significantly change with time [t(31) = 0.84; p = 0.41] and scores on the two occasions were correlated [r(30) = 0.67; p < 0.001].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean PABAK scores ranged from 0.30 to 1.00 over the 80 BCTs identified; 64/80 (80%) achieved ≥0.70 and 59/80 (74%) achieved ≥0.80, indicating good intercoder reliability across BCTs by trained coders.
“Mean PABAK scores ranged from 0.30 to 1.00 over the 80 BCTs identified, and 64 out of the 80 observed BCTs (80%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0. 70 and 59(74%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.80 indicating that good intercoder reliability was observed across BCTs by trained coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver the 32 coders providing data at both time points, mean PABAK scores ranged from 0.84 to 0.99; 14/32 (44%) achieved ≥0.80 and 18/32 (56%) achieved ≥0.90.
“Over the 32 coders providing data at both time points, mean PABAK scores for the two occasions ranged from 0.84 to 0.99, and 14 out of the 32 coders (44%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.80 and 18 (56%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining 12 BCTs with PABAK <0.70 were goal-setting (outcome) (0.61), prompts/cues (0.66), feedback on outcome(s) of behaviour (0.62), adding objects to the environment (0.57), information about health consequences (0.50), feedback on behaviour (0.57), social support (practical) (0.51), goal-setting (behaviour) (0.48), information about social and environmental consequences (0.50), instructi
“The remaining 12 were goal-setting (outcome) (0.61), prompts/cues (0.66), feedback on outcome(s) of behaviour (0.62), adding objects to the environment (0.57), information about health consequences (0.50), feedback on behaviour (0.57), social support (practical) (0.51), goal-setting (behaviour) (0.48), information about social and environmental consequences (0.50), instruction on how to perform”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll occasionally and rarely identified BCTs achieved mean PABAK ≥0.70, but only 6/22 (27%) of frequently identified BCTs reached the 0.70 threshold.
“All of the BCTs under 'occasionally' and 'rarely' identified categories achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.70 but only 6 out of the 22 (27%) of the BCTs in the 'frequently' identified category reached the 0.70 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConcurrent validity scores for the 15 BCTs at time 1 ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, with four BCTs having scores <0.70.
“Concurrent validity scores for the 15 BCTs at time 1 ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, with four BCTs having scores < 0.70.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwenty of the 22 frequently identified BCTs meet the 0.70 threshold when reliability is represented by AC1, but only six meet it when represented by PABAK [χ2(1, n=44)=15.89; p<0.001].
“Twenty of the 22 of the BCTs from the 'frequently' identified category meet the threshold of 0.70 when reliability is represented by AC1 but only six meet this threshold when represented by PABAK [χ 2 (degrees of freedom = 1, n = 44) = 15.89;p < 0.001].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPoorer reliabilities were more common for frequently occurring BCTs; just 12 of the 22 (55%) achieved mean PABAK scores of at least 0.68 and six (27%) achieved at least 0.70.
“Poorer reliabilities were more common for frequently occurring BCTs; just 12 of the 22 (55%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.68 and six (27%) achieved ≥ 0.70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReliability was high and similar over the 40 intervention protocols coded.
“We found that reliability was high and similar over the 40 intervention protocols coded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe BCT 'credible source' created considerable difficulty as indicated by low reliability and validity for coders, and also low reliability for the experienced coders.
“The BCT 'credible source', created considerable difficulty as indicated by low reliability and validity for coders, but also low reliability for the experienced coders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe BCT 'credible source' showed poor intercoder reliability among coders and poor validity.
“This BCT showed poor intercoder reliability among coders and poor validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth prompts/cues and adding objects to the environment fell below the 0.70 threshold.
“Both prompts/cues and adding objects to the environment also fell below the 0.70 threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFree response feedback was categorised into three themes: BCT definitions and labels that remain unclear/require refinement; improving reliable and valid application; and methods to improve the usability of BCTTv1.
“Free response feedback was categorised into three themes: (1) BCT definitions and labels that remain unclear/require refinement, (2) improving reliable and valid application and (3) methods to improve the usability of BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGood intercoder reliability was observed across the 80 identified BCTs, with 80% achieving mean PABAK scores of at least 0.70 and 74% with scores of at least 0.80.
“Good intercoder reliability was observed across the 80 identified BCTs, with 80% achieving mean PABAK scores of at least 0.70 and 74% with scores of ≥ 0.80.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFour BCTs achieved intercoder reliability mean PABAK scores of 0.68 and 0.69 at time 1: problem-solving (0.69), demonstration of the behaviour (0.69), self-monitoring of behaviour (0.69) and monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback (0.68).
“Four BCTs achieved intercoder reliability mean PABAK scores of 0.68 and 0.69, at time 1.These were: problem-solving (0.69), demonstration of the behaviour (0.69), self-monitoring of behaviour (0.69) and monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback (0.68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCoders' confidence in identifying BCTs was not related to either intercoder agreement or to agreement with experienced coders.
“Coders' confidence in identifying BCTs was not related to either intercoder agreement or to agreement with experienced coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTrained coders' confidence in their BCT identifications increased from time 1 to time 2 and varied across BCTs.
“Trained coders' confidence in their BCT identifications increased from time 1 to time 2, and varied across BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCoders tended to find several pairs of BCTs difficult to distinguish: instruction on how to perform the behaviour versus demonstration of the behaviour; goal-setting (behaviour) versus goal-setting (outcome); goal-setting (behaviour) versus action planning; and restructuring the physical environment versus adding objects to the environment.
“Coders tended to find several 'pairs' of BCTs difficult to distinguish: instruction on how to perform the behaviour versus demonstration of the behaviour; goal-setting (behaviour) versus goal-setting (outcome); goal-setting (behaviour) versus action planning and restructuring the physical environment versus adding objects to the environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBCTTv1 defines 93 separate BCTs, 80 of which were identified by coders in 40 published intervention descriptions.
“BCTTv1 defines 93 separate BCTs, 80 of which were identified by coders in 40 published intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Study 5c, a total of 78 written intervention descriptions were assessed, 39 written before training and 39 written by the same writers after training using BCTTv1.
“A total of 78 written intervention descriptions were assessed; 39 written before training and 39 written by the same writers following training and using BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe process involved much iteration through testing, refinement and consultation with 77 users and training 351 coders and writers in the taxonomy to identify BCTs in descriptions and report observed interventions.
“The process involved much iteration through testing, refinement and consultation with 77 users and training 351 coders and writers in the taxonomy to identify BCTs in descriptions and report observed interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Study 5c, writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a useful, good and desirable concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were used, with all means above the mid-point of the scale.
“Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn Study 5c, quality of written intervention descriptions, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged greater for descriptions written after training using BCTTv1.
“Quality of written intervention descriptions (RQ 1a): quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery and replicability of mode of delivery was judged to be greater for descriptions written after training using BCTTv1: clarity of active ingredients”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn an earlier study, means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were above the mid-point for both groups of writers.
“Means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were also above the mid-point for both groups of writers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDescriptions produced in the trained and/or BCTTv1 condition were only found to perform better than the control condition for reliability of identification of BCTs in study 5b and for rated clarity and replicability of descriptions in study 5c.
“As Tables 16 and 17 show, the descriptions produced in the trained and/or BCTTv1 condition were only found to perform better than those of the control condition for the reliability of identification of BCTs (study 5b) and for the rated clarity and replicability of the descriptions (study 5c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExpert consensus established the presence/absence of 21 BCTs in video 1 and 15 BCTs in video 2.
“This process established expert consensus about the presence/absence of 21 BCTs in video 1 and 15 BCTs in video 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSince launching in early 2014, the BCTTv1 app has received 500 downloads via the Google Play and Apple App stores.
“Since launching in early 2014, the app has received 500 downloads via the Google Play™ store and Apple App SM store (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTo date, the team have trained 350 people in eight full- and four half-day workshops and 75 people in group tutorials.
“To date, we have trained 350 people in eight full-and four half-day workshops and 75 people in group tutorials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn an earlier study, writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a useful, good and desirable concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were used, with all means above the mid-point of the scale.
“Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBCTTv1 was developed and evaluated in a series of stages involving 400 behaviour change experts.
“This taxonomy was developed and evaluated in a series of stages involving 400 behaviour change experts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDemand for face-to-face training remains high; since completion of the project, the team have facilitated a further 100 workshops, training approximately 3000 researchers, practitioners and policy-makers.
“Demand for face-to-face training remains high.Since completion of the project, the team have facilitated a further 100 workshops, training approximately 3000 researchers, practitioners and policy-makers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task, as means were above the mid-point of the scale.
“However, the data for the 'easy-difficult' paired adjective item suggest that both groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task as means were above the mid-point of the scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataQuality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery, replicability of active ingredients and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged to be greater for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.
“Quality of written intervention descriptions (RQ 1a): quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery, replicability of active ingredients and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged to be greater for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1: clarity of active ingredients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 85 written intervention descriptions were assessed in study 5b: 29 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and 56 written by trained writers using BCTTv1.
“A total of 85 written intervention descriptions were assessed; 29 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and 56 written by trained writers using BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWriters thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used.
“Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBCTTv1 is a hierarchical taxonomy of 93 distinctive, non-overlapping BCTs clustered into 16 groupings, each with a clear label, definition and examples.
“This resulted in a hierarchical taxonomy of 93 distinctive, non-overlapping BCTs clustered into 16 groupings, each with a clear label, definition and examples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 42 written intervention descriptions were assessed in study 5a: 18 written by untrained writers using BCTTv1 and 24 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.
“A total of 42 written intervention descriptions were assessed: 18 written by untrained writers using BCTTv1 and 24 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe training was four distance group tutorials, substantially less than the training that the authors' research groups used when applying precursor taxonomies.
“The training was four distance group tutorials, which is substantially less than the training that the authors' research groups used when applying precursor taxonomies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFace-to-face training is labour intensive for trainers, and the study team has been unable to meet the demand from users wanting to be trained.
“As face-to-face training, delivered either in a 1-day workshop or distance group tutorial format, is labour intensive for the trainers, the study team has been unable to meet the demand from users wanting to be trained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth workshop and distance group tutorial training formats increased validity of coding BCTs in intervention descriptions.
“We showed that both workshop and distance group tutorial training formats increased validity of coding BCTs in intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRecruitment was conducted via known networks and contacts, resulting in the 400 people involved being predominantly from Europe and the USA, with only a sprinkling from countries beyond.
“Constraints in terms of both time and financial resources meant that recruitment was conducted via known networks and contacts, with the result that the 400 people involved in the work were predominantly from Europe and the USA, with only a sprinkling from countries beyond this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost of the training focused on identifying BCTs from written descriptions and videos; only 30 minutes was devoted to how to write sentences about active ingredients using BCTTv1 with a single task, and no emphasis was placed on writing down other intervention components alongside active ingredients.
“Most of the training focused on identifying BCTs from written descriptions and videos; however, only 30 minutes was devoted to how to write sentences about active ingredients using the BCTTv1 with a single task, and no emphasis was placed on the importance of writing down other intervention components, e.g.delivery procedures, alongside the active ingredients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants did not express dissatisfaction with the writing task in their feedback.
“Nevertheless, participants did not express dissatisfaction with this task in their feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Findingnone givenOur experience has shown that a large number of users and potential users wish to undergo formal training in the use of BCTTv1.
“Our experience has shown that a large number of users and potential users wish to undergo formal training in the use of BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining in BCTTv1 was as likely to make descriptions worse as to improve them, although it was limited to the context of reporting interventions for which the only source of information was watching a brief video.
“Our training was as likely to make the descriptions worse as it was to improve them, although it was limited to the context of reporting interventions for which the only source of information was watching a brief video.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe time pressure of the workshops meant that the videos were very brief and there was not time to show them more than once.
“Additionally, the time pressure of the workshops meant that the videos were very brief and there was not time to show them more than once (which many participants requested).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll seven participants enrolled while the initial contingency management procedures were in place reported difficulty adhering to the intervention schedule, and only two attended at least 12 of their 36 visits.
“All seven participants enrolled in the study while the above procedures were in place reported difficulty adhering to the intervention schedule, and only two attended ≥ 12 of their 36 visits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiterature reviews find that even essential elements of interventions are frequently omitted from intervention descriptions; an analysis of trials and reviews found that 67% of pharmacological intervention descriptions were adequate, compared with only 29% of non-pharmacological intervention descriptions.
“Literature reviews find that even essential elements of interventions are frequently omitted from intervention descriptions; an analysis of trials and reviews found that 67% of pharmacological intervention descriptions were adequate, compared with only 29% of non-pharmacological intervention descriptions.41”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Glasziou, 2008, What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates specifying intervention content in terms of BCTs.
“The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates this approach (Craig P, Dieppe O, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ 2008;337:a1655).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Craig P, Dieppe O, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ 2008;337:a1655
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe TIDieR checklist and guide for reporting all types of interventions was developed using consensus methods with international participants from several disciplines and proposes a minimum set of information.
“The TIDieR checklist and guide for reporting all types of interventions was developed using consensus methods with international participants from several disciplines and proposes a minimum set of information: brief name, why (rationale), what materials, what procedure, who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, changes, how well monitored and how well delivered.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Hoffmann, 2014, Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent meta-analysis found that BCIs are often not designed on a clear theoretical foundation; only 22.5% of 235 implementation studies explicitly used theories of behaviour change, and the majority of those doing so gave no clear explanation for why the selected theories had been used.
“However, a recent meta-analysis found that BCIs are often not designed on a clear theoretical foundation; for example, only 22.5% of 235 implementation studies explicitly used theories of behaviour change 58,59 and the majority of those doing so gave no clear explanation for why the selected theories had been used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] Prestwich, 2014, Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Davies, 2010, A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationTherefore, there is a clear need for improving methods for applying theory to intervention design to increase understanding of how BCTs exert their influences.
“Therefore, there is a clear need for improving methods for applying theory to intervention design to increase our understanding of how BCTs exert their influences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbraham and Michie developed the first cross-behaviour BCT taxonomy, building on previous intervention content analyses.
“Abraham and Michie 20 developed the first cross-behaviour BCT taxonomy, building on previous intervention content analyses.18,19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Hardeman, 2000, Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods, Int J Obes (Lond) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Albarracín, 2005, A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic, Psychol Bull source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the 93 items of BCTTv1, it is necessary to group the BCTs to make the taxonomy more memorable and useable.
“Given the 93 items of BCTTv1, it is necessary to group the BCTs to make the taxonomy more memorable and useable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe resulting BCTs have relevance among experts from varied behavioural domains, disciplines and countries, and potential relevance to the populations from which they were drawn.
“Therefore, the resulting BCTs have relevance among experts from varied behavioural domains, disciplines and countries, and potential relevance to the populations from which they were drawn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMorton et al. had considerable difficulty in identifying the necessary components of motivational interviewing and as a result found it difficult to synthesise evidence of efficacy.
“Morton et al. 44 had considerable difficulty in identifying the necessary components of motivational interviewing and as a result found it difficult to synthesise evidence of efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Morton, 2015, The effectiveness of motivational interviewing for health behaviour change in primary care settings: a systematic review [published online ahead of print 2014], Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe sample of experts had some diversity but was predominantly European and from a psychological background.
“Although we had some diversity of expertise, we acknowledge the predominance of European experts from a psychological background within our sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGrouping BCTs by theory would help guide understanding of the functional relationships between BCTs, the underlying mechanisms through which they exert their effects, and the most effective ways in which BCTs can be applied.
“Grouping BCTs by theory would help guide understanding of the functional relationships between BCTs, the underlying mechanisms through which they exert their effects and the most effective ways in which BCTs can be applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlthough subsequent development of classification systems of defined and reliably identifiable BCTs has been accompanied by a progressive increase in their comprehensiveness and clarity, this work has been conducted by only a few research groups, but with each developing their own methodology.
“Although the subsequent development of classification systems of defined and reliably identifiable BCTs has been accompanied by a progressive increase in their comprehensiveness and clarity, this work has been conducted by only a few research groups, but with each developing their own methodology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Delphi-type methods involved 14 individuals, an appropriate number for these methods.
“Our Delphi-type methods involved 14 individuals, an appropriate number for these methods, 51 but a number that makes the choice of participants important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Pill, 1971, The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography, Socio Econ Plan Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe importance of understanding the theoretical underpinnings of BCTs has been highlighted in previous research.
“The importance of understanding the theoretical underpinnings of BCTs has been highlighted in previous research.10,21,56,57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Michie, 2009, Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Dombrowski, 2012, Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care, Patient Educ Couns source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Taylor, 2012, The impact of theory on the effectiveness of worksite physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis and meta-regression, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffective BCTs have been identified for interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating, and to support smoking cessation, reduce excessive alcohol consumption, prevent sexually transmitted infections and change professional behaviour.
“Effective BCTs have been identified for interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating, 23,48 and to support smoking cessation, 27,46 reduce excessive alcohol consumption, 29 prevent sexually transmitted infections 19,30 and change professional behaviour.49”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [23] Michie, 2009, Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Dombrowski, 2010, Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Michie, 2011, Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] West, 2010, Behavior change techniques used by the English Stop Smoking Services and their associations with short-term quit outcomes, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Michie, 2012, Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTherefore, BCTTv1 requires structure to facilitate recall and access, and increase speed and accuracy of use.
“Therefore, it requires structure to facilitate recall and access to the BCTs, and thus increase speed and accuracy of use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis proliferation of systems leads to duplication of effort and undermines the potential to accumulate evidence across reviews.
“This proliferation of systems leads to duplication of effort and undermines the potential to accumulate evidence across reviews.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAs the number of identified BCTs has increased, so has the need for such a structure to improve usability.
“As the number of identified BCTs has increased, so also has the need for such a structure, to improve the usability of the taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationA hierarchically structured taxonomy provides the advantage of making it more coherent to, and useable by, those applying it.
“A true, that is hierarchically structured, taxonomy provides the advantage of making it more coherent to, and useable by, those applying it.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Stavri, 2012, Classification systems in behavioural science: current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe TDF is an integrative framework of theoretical constructs of behaviour change originally developed by 18 psychological theorists, 16 health service researchers, and 30 health psychologists.
“The TDF is an integrative framework of theoretical constructs of behaviour change that was originally developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists.45”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Michie, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA method developed for this purpose is the reliable specification of interventions in terms of BCTs.
“A method developed for this purpose is the reliable specification of interventions in terms of BCTs.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEvidence is emerging that some BCTs from BCTTv1 occur more frequently than others in descriptions of BCIs.
“Evidence is already emerging to suggest that some BCTs from BCTTv1 occur more frequently than others in descriptions of BCIs.40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTheories of behaviour change summarise what is known about the mechanisms of behaviour change and the conditions in which behaviour change is most likely to occur.
“Theories of behaviour change summarise what is known about the mechanisms of behaviour change and the conditions in which behaviour change is most likely to occur.8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Michie, 2012, Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt would appear that the lower-level groupings are more in line with the TDF domains than the empirically higher-order groupings, suggesting that the higher-level grouping shared by respondents does not align as well with the theoretical domains.
“It would appear that the lower-level groupings are more in line with the TDF domains than the empirically higher-order groupings, suggesting that the higher-level grouping shared by respondents does not align as well with the theoretical domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn effective training programme is built on four basic principles: setting training goals, demonstration of knowledge and skills, practice or rehearsal of skills, and provision of feedback to trainees during and after practice.
“An effective training programme is built on four basic principles: (1) setting training goals involving provision of information or concepts to be learned, (2) demonstration of knowledge and skills to be learned, (3) practice or rehearsal of skills learned and (4) provision of feedback to trainees during and after practice.92,93”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe first version of the TDF contains 12 theoretical domains synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs; the validated version has 14 domains.
“The first version of the TDF contains 12 theoretical domains synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs related to behaviour change; the validated version 61 suggested minor modifications, with 14 domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Cane, 2012, Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe differences in sex and country of residence were an artefact of the selection process as there was no duplication of participants across the two sort tasks.
“This was an artefact of the selection process as there was no duplication of participants across the two sort tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe sample size for the closed-sort task was based on estimates given for content-validation exercises, with 2-24 participants being shown to be sufficient and more than five participants reducing the influence of rater outliers.
“The sample size for the closed-sort task was based on estimates given for content-validation exercises, with 2-24 participants being shown to be sufficient [74][75][76][77] and more than five participants reducing the influence of rater outliers.78”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [74][75][76][77]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] Carmines, 1979 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThere was no overlap in participants between the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks.
“There was no overlap in participants between the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCollaborative or co-operative training strategies and active learning techniques such as discussion are more effective than traditional, lecture-style training for acquiring new knowledge, building skills and increasing motivation to continue to improve skills.
“The research literature suggests that collaborative or co-operative training strategies (i.e.working together in small groups towards a common goal) and active learning techniques such as discussion are more effective than traditional, lecture-style training for acquiring new knowledge, building skills and increasing motivation to continue to improve skills.91”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Pollock, 2011, Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings, J Polit Sci Educ source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA previous study linking 35 BCTs to 11 theoretical domains from the original TDF showed good reliability across four researchers, with 71% agreement over 385 possible links.
“A previous study linking 35 BCTs to 11 theoretical domains from the original TDF showed good reliability across four researchers, with 71% agreement over the 385 possible links.43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Michie, 2008, From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques, Appl Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningUse of an open-sort grouping task allowed individual groupings to hold equal weight and be aggregated using empirical techniques.
“First, use of an open-sort grouping task allowed for the individual groupings of BCTs defined by participants to hold equal weight within the final solution and be aggregated using empirical techniques (hierarchical cluster analysis in the 'bottom-up' sort task and DCV methods in the 'top-down' sort task).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe grouping of BCTs in the 'top-down' sort task has helped illuminate relationships between particular BCTs and theoretical domains and could aid the selection of BCTs in the construction of theory-based interventions.
“The grouping of BCTs in the 'top-down' sort task has helped illuminate relationships between particular BCTs and theoretical domains and could aid the selection of BCTs in the construction of theory-based interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe TDF has been used by research teams across many countries and health-care systems to investigate implementation problems and inform interventions.
“The TDF has been used by research teams across many countries and health-care systems to investigate implementation problems and inform interventions to change professional practice.[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSkills are more likely to be retained and improve future practice if trainees feel challenged, receive positive feedback and find the learning process interesting and enjoyable.
“Skills are more likely to be retained and improve future practice if trainees feel challenged, receive positive feedback and find the learning process interesting and enjoyable.93,94”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe TDF was validated using two sort tasks, producing a refined TDF containing 87 theoretical constructs categorised across 14 domains.
“The TDF was validated using two sort tasks, 61 producing a refined TDF containing 87 theoretical constructs relevant to behaviour change categorised across 14 domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, intentions, goals, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Cane, 2012, Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBCTs in distinct groupings are clearly perceived to share a common mode of action in changing behaviour, whereas BCTs in less distinct groupings may be viewed as having less distinct or more than one mode of action.
“BCTs in distinct groupings are clearly perceived to share a common mode of action in changing behaviour whereas BCTs in less distinct groupings may be viewed as having less distinct or more than one mode of action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis finding suggests that these BCTs may have evolved from several different behavioural domains, theoretical approaches or disciplines and, therefore, may be less associated with a particular theoretical domain.
“This finding suggests that these BCTs may have evolved from several different behavioural domains, theoretical approaches or disciplines and, therefore, may be less associated with a particular theoretical domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoder training incorporating these principles and BCTs has previously been evaluated in applying the taxonomy to specify BCT content in written intervention descriptions of behavioural support in smoking cessation, and training in this context was a 3-hour workshop delivered to a mixture of research psychologists and non-psychologist practitioners.
“Coder training incorporating these principles and BCTs has previously been evaluated in applying the taxonomy to specify BCT content in written intervention descriptions of behavioural support in smoking cessation, and training in this context was a 3-hour workshop delivered to a mixture of research psychologists and non-psychologist practitioners.95”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThose who had been involved in study 1 and/or 2 were not eligible for tutorial training.
“Those who had been involved in study 1 and/or 2 were not eligible for this training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPABAK was used rather than Cohen's kappa or percentage agreement because it adjusts for coders sharing bias in the use of categories and high prevalence of negative agreement.
“PABAK was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic 101 or percentage agreement because it adjusts for (1) coders sharing bias in the use of categories and (2) high prevalence of negative agreement (i.e. when both coders agree the BCT is absent).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe effect of training was evaluated on trainee coding of just one intervention description before and after training for each method.
“It is important to remember that effect of training was evaluated on trainee coding of just one intervention description before and after training for each of the methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationErrorless learning has been shown to be effective in learning new terms.
“Furthermore, the early part of the workshop focused on simple coding tasks working up to more difficult tasks in an attempt to approach 'errorless learning' as this has been shown to be effective in learning new terms.98”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Warmington, 2014, Enhancing the learning of new words using an errorless learning procedure: evidence from typical adults, Memory source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo overcome potential practice effects, the assessments were administered in a counterbalanced design, with a random 50% of trainees completing assessment task A at the beginning and B at the end, and the other half completing B followed by A.
“To overcome potential practice effects, the assessments were administered in a counterbalanced design, so that a random 50% of trainees completed assessment task A at the beginning and B at the end, and the other half completed B followed by A.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenCoders who had been involved in the development of BCTTv1 or in the sort tasks to determine hierarchical structure were not eligible for workshop training.
“Coders who had been involved in the development of BCTTv1 or in the sort tasks to determine hierarchical structure were not eligible for this training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is feasible that engagement style and delivery of support, guidance and feedback differed across expert tutors despite similar experience.
“While guided by a training manual, it is feasible that the engagement style and delivery of support, guidance and feedback differed across expert tutors despite having a similar level of experience to one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the current study, differences in the efficacy of training across tutorial groups were not compared.
“In the current study, we did not compare differences in the efficacy of training across the tutorial groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDespite attempts to ensure diversity, the sample of trainees was predominantly female and from the UK.
“It is also important to acknowledge that, despite attempts to ensure diversity of trainees, our sample were predominantly female and from the UK.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReliable and valid application of BCTTv1 requires skills and, therefore, training.
“Although BCTTv1 represents an advance in methods for specifying BCIs, reliable and valid application of BCTTv1 will require skills and, therefore, training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataKS checked the allocation of coder feedback to content categories, with discrepancies resolved through discussion.
“KS (see Acknowledgments) then checked allocation of coder feedback to content categories.Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion between the two researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quality of published intervention descriptions is generally poor, with techniques described using different terminology and labelling.
“However, the quality of published intervention descriptions is generally poor, 95 with techniques described using different terminology and referred to using different labelling.104,105”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [104] Glasziou, 2010, Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Hoffmann, 2013, Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTutorial training allows consolidation of learning and practice between sessions, which may account for the higher proportion of competent coders following training.
“The fact that tutorial training allows consolidation of learning and practice between sessions may account for the higher proportion of competent coders following training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTraining in using BCTTv1 in the form of 1-day workshops or group tutorials held over 6 weeks increased average trainee agreement with expert consensus and doubled the proportion achieving the competence threshold to 46% and 78% respectively.
“Training in using BCTTv1 in the form of 1-day workshops or group tutorials held over 6 weeks increased average trainee agreement with expert consensus and doubled the proportion achieving the competence threshold to 46% and 78% respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAs the use of BCT methodology increases, BCT content as reported in intervention descriptions is likely to become clearer, leading to increased ease of identifying BCTs.
“As the use of BCT methodology increases, BCT content as reported in intervention descriptions is likely to become much clearer, leading to increased ease of identifying BCTs.95”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe increase in confidence may be due to the learning environment provided by tutorials, including a support network and more time for reflection and practice between sessions.
“This may be due to the learning environment provided by tutorials which includes a support network built over the period of multiple and regular sessions, and more time for reflection and practice between sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTraining increased workshop trainees' confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in descriptions of BCIs, but did not improve intercoder agreement for either method.
“Training also increased workshop trainees' confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in descriptions of BCIs, but did not improve intercoder agreement for either method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTrainees were randomly allocated into coding pairs across tutorial groups using a random number generator.
“Trainees were randomly allocated into coding pairs across tutorial groups using a random number generator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationByrt et al. proposed PABAK, which results in more meaningful indices for data such as BCT coding when prevalence is low and bias may occur; it was chosen by Michie et al. as most appropriate for BCTTv1.
“Byrt et al. 99 proposed the 'PABAK', which results in considerably more meaningful indices for data such as BCT coding when the prevalence of each BCT is low and bias may occur; therefore, it was the statistic chosen by Michie et al. 40 as the most appropriate to measure intercoder reliability in applying BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [99] Byrt, 1993, Bias, prevalence and kappa, J Clin Epidemiol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningPrevalence-and-bias-adjusted kappa was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic.
“Prevalence-and bias-adjusted kappa was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic.101”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] Cohen, 1968, Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychol Bull source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGwet et al. suggest further adjustment for chance agreement when two coders make random ratings, in the AC1 statistic.
“Gwet et al. 110 suggest that further adjustment should be made for chance agreement that might occur when two coders make random ratings and make allowance for this in the alternative chancecorrected statistic to kappa (AC1) statistic 110”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] Gwet, 2002, Inter-rater reliability: dependency on trait prevalence and marginal homogeneity, Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment Series
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPoor reliability, or good reliability between newly trained coders without agreement with expert consensus, would both be unsatisfactory outcomes.
“Poor reliability or a good level of reliability between newly trained coders but without agreement with expert consensus would both be unsatisfactory outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningWhen the description is simply unclear, BCTTv1 should enable agreement between coders as it specifies that coders should not infer presence of a BCT from vague descriptions.
“On the other hand, when the description is simply unclear, BCTTv1 should enable agreement between coders as it clearly specifies that coders should not infer the presence of a BCT from vague descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLandis and Koch suggested kappa scores of 0.60-0.79 can be described as 'substantial' and ≥0.80 as 'outstanding', but conventionally 0.70 is taken as indicative of acceptable intercoder reliability.
“Landis and Koch 102 have suggested that kappa scores of 0.60-0.79can be described as 'substantial' and that scores of ≥ 0.80 can be described as 'outstanding' but, conventionally, 0.70 is taken to indicative of acceptable intercoder reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe extensive discussions in taxonomy development might result in enhanced agreement owing to tacit knowledge beyond explicit labels and definitions.
“The extensive discussions involved in taxonomy development described by Michie et al. 40 might result in enhanced agreement owing to tacit knowledge beyond the explicit BCT labels and definitions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataOf the 26 BCTTv1 BCTs meeting the criterion, nine had 'outstanding' and 14 'substantial' reliabilities.
“Of the 26 BCTTv1 BCTs meeting this criterion, nine were found to have 'outstanding' and 14 'substantial' reliabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGood test-retest reliability was observed across all coders, indicating that those who performed well at time 1 also performed well at time 2.
“Good test-retest reliability was observed across all coders, indicating that those coders who performed well at time 1 were also those who performed well at time 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenKappa tends to underestimate identification reliability when the number of instances is small or asymmetric, thus PABAK overcomes these problems.
“Kappa tends to underestimate identification reliability when the number of instances is small or has asymmetric distribution between agreements and disagreements, thus PABAK overcomes these problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationWe used consensus about presence of BCTs as a criterion against which trained coder codings were judged and concurrent validity was assessed.
“We used this consensus about the presence of BCTs in the descriptions as a criterion against which trained coder codings were judged and concurrent validity was assessed.107”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] Abraham, 2015, Reliability of identification of behavior change techniques in intervention descriptions [published online ahead of print August 20 2015], Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe trained coders (n=48) were randomised into 24 pairs using a random number generator.
“The trained coders (n = 48) were randomised into 24 pairs using a random number generator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHigh reliability with poor validity might occur for reasons such as misleading pre-coding discussion or a misleading cue in the intervention description.
“High reliability with poor validity might occur for a variety of reasons such as misleading pre-coding discussion or a misleading cue in the intervention description.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA random number generator was used to allocate descriptions to coder pairings.
“A random number generator was also used to allocate descriptions to coder pairings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenIt is possible for two coders to reach good agreement but be wrong, i.e., reliable but not valid.
“Fourth, it is quite possible for two coders to reach good agreement but be wrong, that is it is reliable but not valid.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationImproved coding systems cannot facilitate detection of a BCT if the description omits to mention it; Lorencatto et al. found published descriptions reported on average less than half the BCTs included in longer protocol descriptions.
“Improved coding systems cannot facilitate detection of a BCT if the description omits to mention that it was included in the intervention; Lorencatto et al. 12 found that published descriptions reported, on average, less than half the BCTs that were included in the longer protocol descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Lorencatto, 2013, Assessing fidelity of delivery of smoking cessation behavioural support in practice, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReliability statistics indicate levels of agreement but do not quantify the degree of error that might be incurred when scientists try to replicate interventions from descriptions.
“Although these reliability statistics indicate levels of agreement, they do not quantify the degree of error that might be incurred when scientists try to replicate interventions from their descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataValidity was reasonably high and remained stable over a 1-month period.
“Validity was reasonably high and remained stable over a 1-month period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEstimates of validity require a criterion against which codes are judged, but for intervention descriptions such a criterion does not exist.
“Estimates of validity require a criterion against which the codes are judged, but in the case of intervention descriptions such a criterion does not exist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningQuota sampling ensured protocols were selected from each of three broad categories.
“Quota sampling ensured that protocols were selected from each of these three broad categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbraham and Michie assessed reliability between the two coders who developed the 26 BCT definitions and between the first author and two other trained coders.
“Abraham and Michie 20 assessed reliability between the two coders who developed the 26 BCT definitions (the authors) and also between the first author and two other coders trained to use the taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationBCTTv1 might enable authors to report fuller, clearer descriptions of their evaluated interventions.
“BCTTv1 might enable authors to report fuller, clearer descriptions of their evaluated interventions.17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Michie, 2011, Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe criterion of 'at least five identifications' was set because more frequent BCTs give greater confidence that PABAK is a useful indicator of reliability.
“We set the criteria of 'at least five identifications' because the more frequent the BCTs, the greater the confidence that PABAK is a useful indicator of reliability of judging the BCT to be present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataAcross 78 reliability tests of 26 defined BCTs and BCT clusters across 195 published intervention descriptions, the average kappa per technique was 0.79, with only three BCTs yielding kappa scores <0.70.
“Across 78 reliability tests (of identification of 26 defined BCTs and BCT clusters across 195 published intervention descriptions) the average kappa per technique was 0.79 with only three BCTs yielding kappa scores of < 0.70.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost researchers would probably accept that BCT definitions generating kappa scores of 0.70 can be reliably identified but may have reservations about lower scores.
“Most researchers would probably accept that BCTs definitions generating kappa scores of 0.70 can be reliably identified but may have reservations about those with lower scores.108”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] Johnston, 2013, Specifying the active content of behaviour change interventions: the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1), Revista de Psicología de la Salud (New Age) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf an intervention contained some BCTs that were reliably coded and some that were not, replication might fail owing to omission of poorly recognised BCTs.
“So, for example, if an intervention contained some BCTs that were reliably coded and some that were not, replication of the intervention might fail owing to the omission of poorly recognised BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThirty-two coders completed the exercise at time 2 (16 coding pairs, comprising the same trained coders as time 1).
“Thirty-two coders completed the exercise at time 2 (16 coding pairs, comprising the same trained coders as time 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFailure to replicate might also occur if the intervention description was badly written, either by omitting aspects or by lack of clarity.
“There might also be failure to replicate if the intervention description was badly written, either by omitting aspects of the intervention or by lack of clarity in the description.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAn independent coder (KS) checked allocation of feedback to themes.
“An independent coder (KS) then checked allocation of feedback to themes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenVarious authors have proposed different methods of assessing kappa that adjust for its limitations.
“Finally, various authors have proposed different methods of assessing kappa that adjust for its limitations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAt time 1, 40 coders (20 coding pairs) of the 48 completed the exercise, generating 8-12 (as opposed to planned 12) sets of reliability data for each of the 40 intervention descriptions.
“At time 1, 40 coders (20 coding pairs) of the 48 coders completed the exercise generating 8-12 (as opposed to the planned 12) sets of reliability data for each of the 40 intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationConventionally, 0.70 is regarded as indicative of acceptable or good inter-rater reliability as indicated by Cohen's kappa.
“Guidance on interpretation of Cohen's kappa and other reliability statistics has been published and, conventionally, 0.70 is regarded as indicative of acceptable of good inter-rater reliability as indicated by Cohen's kappa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the absence of evidence-based guidance on interpretation of PABAK scores, we report means above and below 0.70 and 0.80.
“In the absence of evidence-based guidance on interpretation of PABAK scores, we report means above and below 0.70 and 0.80.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBCT identifications rated with low confidence could indicate problems with specific BCTs or ambiguity of descriptions, which might prevent good intercoder reliability and accurate replication.
“Fifth, BCT identifications rated with low confidence by coders could indicate problems with specific BCTs or ambiguity of specific intervention descriptions, which might prevent achievement of good intercoder reliability and accurate replication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCoders made extensive use of BCTTv1, justifying the large number of BCTs included.
“Thus, coders made extensive use of BCTTv1, justifying the large number of BCTs included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt may be important to distinguish between perceived professional competence of those delivering interventions and their 'credibility'.
“Plus it may be important to distinguish between perceived professional competence of those delivering the interventions and their 'credibility', which could also be based on common group membership.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPABAK is as good as AC1 for rare BCTs but not for frequent BCTs.
“Comparison of the pattern of results for frequent and rare BCTs suggests that PABAK is as good as AC1 for the rare but not for the frequent BCTs, while the poor reliabilities (using PABAK) were more common for frequently occurring BCTs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe consistent difference between the scores indicates that AC1 takes account of more sources of error in these data and is more appropriate for establishing the level of agreement in BCT coding.
“The use of more than one statistic to assess agreement is a relatively new approach and the consistent difference between the scores indicates that the AC1 takes account of more sources of error in these data and, therefore, is more appropriate for establishing the level of agreement in BCT coding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBCTTv1 provides a uniquely comprehensive list of BCTs.
“BCTTv1 provides a uniquely comprehensive list of BCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataCoders provided clear feedback suggesting that further distinction between BCT groupings was needed.
“Nonetheless, coders provided clear feedback suggesting that further distinction between such BCTs groupings was needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataStudy 5a was a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of providing BCTTv1, without training, on the writing of BCI descriptions.
“Study 5a examined the effects of providing BCTTv1, without training, in a RCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIt may be appropriate to remain somewhat circumspect about trained coders' feedback on clarity of BCT definitions because confidence in BCT identification was not related to observed intercoder reliability or to trained coder agreement with experienced coder consensus.
“It may be appropriate to remain somewhat circumspect about trained coders' feedback on clarity of BCT definitions as confidence in BCT identification was not related to observed intercoder reliability (and indeed tended to be negatively correlated) or to trained coder agreement with experienced coder consensus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGuessing may be more likely for common than for rare BCTs, which would result in occurrence of the random effects that AC1 controls and confirms the need to use AC1 rather than PABAK in studies assessing reliability.
“As was suggested by our comparison of confidence ratings across BCT categories, guessing may be more likely for common than for rare BCTs.This would result in occurrence of the random effects that AC1 controls and confirms the need to use AC1 rather than PABAK in studies assessing reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUsing observed interventions is a rather artificial scenario because usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.
“However, this is a rather artificial scenario as usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe importance of message-source credibility has been recognised for over half a century.
“The importance of message-source credibility has been recognised for over half a century 151”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Hovland, 1953
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe writers of intervention descriptions reflected a range of potential users of BCTTv1: primary researchers, systematic reviewers, funders, policy-makers and practitioners, and both trained and untrained users of BCTTv1.
“The writers of intervention descriptions ('writers') reflected a range of potential users of BCTTv1: primary researchers, systematic reviewers, funders, policy-makers and practitioners, and both trained and untrained users of the BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGuessing may be more likely for frequently occurring BCTs than for rare BCTs, meaning that random effects such as those that AC1 controls for could emerge.
“Guessing may be more likely for frequently occurring BCTs than for rare BCTs meaning that random effects, such as those that AC1 controls for, could emerge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe BCT 'credible source' requires further clarification and specification.
“This is clearly a BCT that requires further clarification and specification but should be retained because of its relevance to behaviour change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe high reliability observed might not be maintained in intervention descriptions of poorer quality.
“However, as reported above, we used a sample of descriptions included in well-cited journals that publish BCI protocols related to health improvement and this reliability might not be maintained in intervention descriptions of poorer quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe high correlation between the measures indicates that the pattern of relative agreement across BCTs is adequately represented by either score, although PABAK may result in fewer frequently observed BCTs achieving reliability above thresholds such as 0.70.
“The high correlation between the measures indicates that the pattern of relative agreement across BCTs is adequately represented by either score, although the PABAK may result in fewer frequently observed BCTs achieving reliability above thresholds such as 0.70, as used here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningValidity of BCTTv1 is demonstrated among new users and does not depend on additional discussion and cues that may have influenced the experienced coders.
“Thus, validity of BCTTv1 is demonstrated among new users and does not depend on additional discussion and cues that may have influenced the experienced coders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt may be important to distinguish between characteristics of those delivering interventions and the content of what they deliver.
“Finally, it may be important to distinguish between characteristics of those delivering interventions and the content of what they deliver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe taxonomy can be used both by developers and implementers of BCIs and by those wishing to identify effective BCTs within complex interventions.
“The taxonomy can be used both by developers and implementers of BCIs and by those wishing to identify effective BCTs within complex interventions (e.g.systematic reviews).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataUntrained raters were 12 practitioners unfamiliar with BCTTv1.
“Untrained raters were 12 practitioners unfamiliar with BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo establish consensus about the presence of BCTs in the videos, four BCT coders independently coded both videos using BCTTv1, discrepancies were discussed, and all coders agreed the final codings.
“Consensus on BCTs delivered: to establish consensus about the presence of BCTs in the videos, four BCT coders who had been involved in developing BCTTv1 (MJ, JF, SM and WH) independently coded both videos using BCTTv1.Each video was coded by two coders and discrepancies were discussed within each of the pairs.If a resolution was not obvious, SM and the study researcher (CW) reviewed the remaining”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCoders were randomly allocated to a set of descriptions using the same randomisation methods as described for raters.
“Behaviour change technique coding of written descriptions (coders): using the same randomisation methods as described for raters, coders were randomly allocated to a set of descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationParticipants under high mental load and in a stressful situation displayed greater levels of physiological stress reaction when asked to relax than participants who were not asked to relax.
“Participants under high mental load and in a stressful situation displayed greater levels of physiological stress reaction when asked to relax than participants who were not asked to relax.157”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Wegner, 1997, Ironic effects of trying to relax under stress, Behav Res Ther source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe value of BCTTv1 is demonstrated by the number of people wishing training in its use.
“The value of this resource is demonstrated by the number of people wishing training in its use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBCTTv1 is a comprehensive cross-behaviour and consensus-based BCT taxonomy representing significant progress towards a shared language for reliable and accurate description of intervention content.
“but it has produced BCTTv1, a comprehensive cross-behaviour and consensus-based BCT taxonomy representing significant progress towards a shared language for reliable and accurate description of intervention content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataStudy 5c used a within-person design to assess change in the quality of BCI descriptions before training without provision of BCTTv1 and after training with provision of BCTTv1.
“Study 5c used a within-person design to assess change in the quality of BCI descriptions before training, without provision of BCTTv1 and quality of descriptions after training, with provision of BCTTv1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTherapists who participated in a training programme showed unexpected deterioration in skills after training.
“Furthermore, therapists who participated in a training programme showed unexpected deterioration in skills after training.158”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] Henry, 1993, Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: mediators of therapists’ responses to training, J Consult Clin Psych source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo help ensure unfamiliarity with BCTTv1, only practitioners who had registered but who had not yet started their training with the NCSCT were invited to take part.
“To help ensure unfamiliarity with BCTTv1, only practitioners who had registered but who had not yet started their training with the NCSCT were invited to take part.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen the project began, there was widespread and growing use of the taxonomy developed by Abraham and Michie and various research groups were developing their own taxonomies for application to different kinds of intervention.
“When this project began, there was widespread and growing use of the taxonomy developed by Abraham and Michie 20 and various research groups were developing their own taxonomies for application to different kinds of intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abraham and Michie 20
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is evidence of a paradoxical effect of incentives on skilled performance, described as a choking effect.
“For example, there is evidence of a paradoxical effect of incentives on skilled performance, described as a 'choking effect'.156”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Baumeister, 1984, Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance, J Pers Soc Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo counteract potential practice and ordering effects, two videos with the same target behaviour (smoking cessation) were administered in a counterbalanced design.
“To counteract potential practice and ordering effects, we used two videos with the same target behaviour (smoking cessation) and these were administered in a counterbalanced design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor the RCTs in studies 5a and 5b, writers were randomised into two groups by selecting a letter from a bag containing equal numbers of A and B and a total equal to the number of workshop attendees.
“Randomisation for RCTs (studies 5a and 5b): at the start of the workshop, writers were randomised into two groups to complete the writing task by selecting a letter (either A or B) from a bag containing equal numbers of A and B and a total equal to the number of workshop attendees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe clarity and replicability results in study 5c report only a small effect that might not be meaningful in practice and could be due to practice effects because trained writing followed untrained writing.
“Even so, the latter results report only a small effect, one that might not be meaningful in practice and could simply be due to practice effects as the trained writing followed the untrained writing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe lack of clear benefit is not simply due to lack of power, because Study 5a, which had the largest number of writers, did not show the benefit of training except for reliability of BCT identification.
“This is not simply due to lack of power as even Study 5a which had the largest number of writers did not show the benefit of training except for reliability of BCT identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo overcome potential confounding effects of possible differences in task difficulty between videos, two videos were used and were shown in a counterbalanced design.
“To overcome potential confounding effects of possible differences in task difficulty between videos, two videos were used and were shown in a counterbalanced design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe writing task was an unusual task and was outside the normal activities involved in intervention development and reporting.
“In terms of the writing task, this was an unusual task and was outside the normal activities involved in intervention development and reporting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThese studies confounded training condition with time of day, which was inevitable given the resources of the study.
“In terms of design, these studies confounded training condition with time of day, which was inevitable given the resources of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe e-learning programme and 1-day workshops are good introductions but unlikely on their own to bring participants to the level of expertise required for research and implementation.
“However, we consider that this programme, and 1-day workshops, are good introductions but unlikely, on their own, to bring participants to the level of expertise required for research and implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe experimental paradigm was probably too artificial and implemented too hastily to be a good basis for the evaluation.
“In retrospect, this experimental paradigm was probably too artificial and implemented too hastily for it to have been a good basis for the evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe nature of the reporting task was rather artificial and probably not a good test of BCTTv1.
“Therefore, although the findings of our studies did not support the added value of using BCTTv1 in reporting observed interventions, the nature of the task was rather artificial and so probably not a good test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe writing task was constrained by the time available within the workshop format and it was difficult to decide on the appropriate time allowed for completing the task.
“The task was constrained by the time available within the workshop format and it was also difficult to decide on the appropriate time allowed for completing the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping a consensus about how BCTs link to theoretical mechanisms will require intensive work to develop a methodology.
“Just as developing a consensus list of BCT labels and definitions required intensive work to develop a methodology, so developing a consensus about how BCTs link to theoretical mechanisms will require intensive work to develop a methodology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: When links between BCTs and theoretical constructs are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.
- Rests on an assumption: Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPsychologists are likely familiar with behaviour change concepts and therefore likely relatively easy to train to use the taxonomy, but wide application will require usability across a range of backgrounds and expertise.
“Whilst psychologists are likely to be familiar with behaviour change concepts and therefore likely to be relatively easy to train to use the taxonomy, its wide application will require usability across a range of backgrounds and expertise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough guidelines aid assessment of whether intervention components are reported, standardised measures for assessing the quality of reporting of active ingredients and mode of delivery in intervention descriptions are still developing.
“Although there are guidelines which aid the assessment of whether or not intervention components are reported, the standardised measures for assessing the quality of reporting of active ingredients and mode of delivery in intervention descriptions is still developing.155”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] Chan, 2013, SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMore widespread use of BCTTv1 is likely to identify ambiguities or uncertainties about labels, definitions and examples, and ways in which they can be improved.
“More widespread use of BCTTv1 is likely to identify ambiguities or uncertainties about labels, definitions and examples, and ways in which they can be improved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe likely future identification of further BCTs means that maintaining reliability and accuracy in using the taxonomy becomes more challenging.
“The likely future identification of further BCTs in addition to the already extensive nature of BCTTv1 mean that maintaining reliability and accuracy in using the taxonomy becomes more challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough the training was sufficient to train the principles underlying use of the taxonomy and to get acceptable inter-rater reliability and agreement with expert judgements, more training is required to become expert in using the method.
“Although this is sufficient to train the principles underlying the use of the taxonomy and to get an acceptable degree of inter-rater reliability and agreement with expert judgements, our findings show that more training is required to become expert in using the method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe online training course remains to be evaluated and the team is not yet in a position to offer training or assessment of skills in using BCTTv1 to report intervention descriptions.
“This remains to be evaluated and we are not yet in a position to offer training or assessment of skills in using BCTTv1 to report intervention descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a recent review identifying 83.
“A large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a recent review identifying 83.160,161”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [160] Davis, 2014, Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across disciplines: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [161] Michie, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe authors developed measures of clarity and replicability specifically for studies 5a, 5b and 5c and ensured that active content was rated separately from mode of delivery of the intervention.
“Hence, we developed measures of clarity and replicability specifically for studies 5a, 5b and 5c and ensured that active content was rated separately from mode of delivery of the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBCTTv1 provides a means of characterising intervention content to facilitate intervention implementation, delivery and evaluation, and is useful for synthesising evidence.
“Although BCTTv1 provides a means of characterising intervention content to facilitate intervention implementation, delivery and evaluation, and it is also useful for synthesising evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA cross-disciplinary review identified 83 theories used to explain behaviour change.
“A large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a cross-disciplinary review identifying 83.160,176”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [160] Davis, 2014, Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across disciplines: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [176] Michie, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFurther work needs to be done to establish the psychometric properties of the measures of clarity and replicability.
“However, further work needs to be done to establish their psychometric properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningGiven that published reports and existing manuals can effectively be coded into BCTs, there are likely to be benefits of using BCT methodology.
“Given that published reports and existing manuals can effectively be coded into BCTs, there are likely to be benefits of using BCT methodology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe work conducted in this series of studies represents a step-change in the methodology for reporting the content of BCIs.
“The work conducted in this series of studies represents a step-change in the methodology for reporting the content of BCIs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBehaviour change technique methodology is a starting point for investigating the effectiveness of single BCTs and combinations of BCTs, and for investigating how other factors may make BCTs more or less effective.
“Behaviour change technique methodology is a starting point for investigating the effectiveness of single BCTs and the combinations of BCTs that typically characterise interventions in evidence synthesis.It is also a starting point for investigating how other factors, such as mode of delivery, intervention intensity, target behaviour, target population and context, may make BCTs more or less effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTen percent of all urine tests were repeated, and none were discordant.
“We repeated 10% of all urine tests; none were discordant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe QuickScreen Pro Multi-Drug Screening Test has an estimated mean detection time in urine of 43.6 to 66.9 hours for methamphetamine and 88.4 hours for benzoylecgonine.
“For this assay, the estimated mean detection time in urine ranges from 43.6 to 66.9 hours for methamphetamine and is 88.4 hours for benzoylecgonine, a cocaine metabolite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenStudy staff monitored the collection of all urine samples and tested the samples immediately after their provision.
“Study staff monitored the collection of all urine samples and tested the samples immediately after their provision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMultiple auditors were used to raise professionals' awareness of their own practice and their team's practice by engaging them in audits.
“Multiple auditors were used to raise professionals' awareness of their practice, and the practice of their team, by engaging them in audits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe importance of scientific journals ensuring that intervention content is well specified for replication and implementation has been recognised across the research community.
“The importance of scientific journals ensuring that intervention content is well specified for replication and implementation has been recognised across the research community.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Albrecht, 2013, Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo formal study of rater agreement was conducted.
“No formal study of rater agreement was conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe existing videos used in phase 2a contained an appropriate range of behaviour change techniques suitable for use in that phase.
“The existing videos contained an appropriate range of BCTs (from NCSCT www.ncsct.co.uk 35 ) suitable for use in this phase”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCSCT www.ncsct.co.uk 35
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningInformation from coding delivery of BCTs can be used to improve the training of those who deliver interventions and their long-term implementation.
“Such information can be used to improve the training of those who deliver interventions and their long-term implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenHaving access to the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 allows intervention designers to consider a large range of BCTs that might be effective and appropriate for their target behaviour and population.
“Having access to the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 allows intervention designers to consider a large range of BCTs that might be effective and appropriate for their target behaviour and population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataIt may be important to expand from the initial 22 BCTs to fully specify the intervention.
“Nevertheless, coders in study 4 used 80 BCTs to describe the 40 intervention descriptions and it may therefore be important to expand from the initial 22 BCTs to fully specify the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe content and format of the informed choice invitation were refined through extensive piloting using 'think aloud' techniques.
“The content and format of the informed choice invitation were refined through extensive piloting using 'think aloud' techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationBCTTv1 may be used to inform the development of measures for assessing delivery of BCTs.
“BCTTv1 may also be used to inform the development of measures for assessing delivery of BCTs.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Lorencatto, 2014, A method for assessing fidelity of delivery of telephone behavioral support for smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA scripted protocol was used to avoid the provision of counseling around the results of urine testing.
“Such a protocol was used to avoid the provision of counseling around the results of the urine testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs BCTTv1 is applied to a wider range of populations, settings and behaviours, adaptations of language and possibly concepts will be needed and new BCTs will be identified.
“As BCTTv1 is applied to a wider range of populations, settings and behaviours, adaptations of language and possibly concepts will be needed and new BCTs will be identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTwo medical files from the total sample were double coded by the first investigator to check for consistency.
“Two medical files from the total sample were double coded by the first investigator to check for consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBarrier identification was conducted concurrently with the audit process, using two methods recommended for implementation research.
“Barrier identification was conducted concurrently with the audit process.To identify barriers, we used two methods that have been recommended for implementation research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo allow attribution of improvements in adolescent outcomes to the incentives, only outcome data from adolescents admitted after sites were randomly assigned to study conditions were used in Target A-CRA-related analyses.
“In order to attribute improvements in adolescent outcomes to the incentives, only outcome data from adolescents admitted to the AAFT project after sites were randomly assigned to the study conditions will be used in Target A-CRA-related analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLike all technologies, its usefulness will be determined by its application and dissemination by researchers, those designing and delivering interventions, funding agencies, journal editors and policy-makers.
“Like all technologies, its usefulness will be determined by its application and dissemination by researchers, those designing and delivering interventions, funding agencies, journal editors and policy-makers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA second limitation of sticking with behaviour domain taxonomies is that it limits generalisation of all potential BCTs across behaviours and, therefore, the possibility of generating general models of behaviour change or investigating ways in which BCTs influence different behaviours.
“A second limitation of sticking with behaviour domain taxonomies is that it limits generalisation of all potential BCTs across behaviours and, therefore, the possibility of generating general models of behaviour change or investigating ways in which BCTs influence different behaviours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBCTTv1 was developed using robust methods and is based on expert consensus.
“Finally, in contrast to earlier taxonomies, BCTTv1 was developed using robust methods and is based on expert consensus, and BCTs in earlier taxonomies (e.g.motivational interviewing) were removed from BCTTv1 as they did not meet the definition of a BCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAs BCTTv1 is used to design and specify the content of interventions across wider ranges of delivery modes and contexts, it is likely that additional BCTs will be identified.
“As BCTTv1 is used to design and specify the content of interventions across wider ranges of delivery modes and contexts, it is likely that additional BCTs will be identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOther studies have employed a similar reduced-frequency urine testing schedule.
“other studies have employed a similar schedule”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBoth invitations were designed to be comprehensible to those with a reading age of 11 or above, with Flesch Reading Ease scores of 71.52 and 72.88 for the standard and informed choice invitations respectively.
“Both invitations were designed to be comprehensible to those with a reading age of 11 or above (Flesch Reading Ease score was 71.52 and 72.88 for the standard and the informed choice invitations, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationRisk information is most readily understood when presented using frequencies.
“Previous studies have shown that risk information is most readily understood using frequencies in this way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBrief educational reminder messages added to test result reports were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.
“The reminder messages were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe scripted protocol for reporting urine test results and administering vouchers required no formal training and was developed by an author with extensive expertise in delivering contingency management interventions.
“The protocol, which required no formal training, was developed by one of us (SS) who has extensive expertise in delivering CM interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe BCTTv1 is a technological advance that represents a step change in the translation of behavioural science into practice and in strengthening the science itself.
“The BCTTv1 is a technological advance that represents a step change in the translation of behavioural science into practice and in strengthening the science itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation'Behavioural substitution' was identified from a systematic review of brief alcohol interventions, but this effective BCT had not been identified in several reviews of physical activity, healthy eating and smoking cessation interventions.
“For example, 'behavioural substitution' was identified from a systematic review of brief alcohol interventions, 29 but this effective BCT had not been identified in several reviews of physical activity, healthy eating and smoking cessation interventions, e.g.Carroll et al. 183”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Michie, 2012, Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [183] Carroll, 1994, Implementing treatment and protecting the validity of the independent variable in treatment matching studies, J Stud Alcohol Suppl source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSouth African policy required written consent for HIV testing, although WHO guidelines for provider-initiated testing and counselling allow for only verbal consent.
“According to policy in South Africa, written consent was required (although the WHO guidelines for PITC allow for only verbal consent).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe degree of implementation of an evidence-based treatment can be as important as its efficacy, with the largest effects coming from well-implemented, highly efficacious interventions.
“Research has suggested that the degree of implementation can be as important as the efficacy of the EBT, with the biggest effects coming from well-implemented, highly efficacious interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Lack of a methodology for unpacking the 'black box' of behaviour change interventions prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.
“Lack of a methodology for unpacking this 'black box' prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.
“There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.
“The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
“The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
“This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There was no prior agreed methodology for developing a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques.
“There was no prior agreed methodology for this work and there are limitations to the methods we have used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The experts who participated in the sort tasks followed the instruction to group BCTs by similarity of active ingredients.
“Instructions guided the experts to 'group together BCTs which have similar active ingredients i.e. by the mechanism of change, NOT the mode of delivery'.73”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hierarchical structure and grouping of BCTs within the taxonomy will increase the speed by which BCTs can be recalled by users.
“The hierarchical structure and grouping of BCTs within the taxonomy has practical use in that it is predicted to increase the speed by which BCTs can be recalled by users.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Links between BCTs and theory can be used to inform the design and evaluation of BCIs.
“It also has theoretical interest in that links between BCTs and theory can be used to inform the design and evaluation of BCIs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Expert coding, assessed as consensus between expert coders, is the nearest available objective standard of validity for BCT coding.
“Expert coding, assessed here as a consensus between expert coders, is the nearest we have to an objective standard of 'validity'.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The increasing use of the BCT approach, particularly for specifying interventions in evidence synthesis, has prompted high demand for training in the reliable and valid application of BCTTv1.
“The increasing use of the BCT approach, in particular for specifying interventions in evidence synthesis, has prompted high demand for training in the reliable and valid application of BCTTv1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Training in the most frequently occurring BCTs is appropriate because training in 93 BCTs is not feasible within the proposed training intensity and duration, and because frequently occurring BCTs are more accessible and useful for trainees to learn.
“The decision was made to train coders in the most frequently occurring BCTs as training in 93 BCTs was not feasible within the proposed training intensity and duration, and because frequently occurring BCTs would be more accessible to trainees as well as more useful for them to learn.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 40 intervention descriptions are representative of published BCI descriptions.
“Forty descriptions of BCIs were used to test reliability of identification of BCT labels and definitions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The coders trained for this study are typical of those likely to want to use BCT labels and definitions to identify intervention components associated with greater intervention effectiveness.
“The coders trained for this study seem typical of those likely to want to use BCT labels and definitions to identify intervention components associated with greater intervention effectiveness, for example when conducting meta-analyses.20,23,48,56”
The paper relies on this without support.
Interventions are usually developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion, so using observed interventions is an artificial scenario.
“However, this is a rather artificial scenario as usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.
“The normal practice would not be to describe an intervention after observing it on a video, it would be to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Intervention descriptions usually emerge from reading and discussions.
“Intervention descriptions usually emerge from reading and discussions, and a better evaluation would be to investigate the impact on this process of using BCTTv1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Assessing validity of BCT identification is less well established than using indices of reliability of BCT identification.
“While the use of indices of reliability of BCT identification is an accepted method, assessing validity of BCT identification is less well established.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consensus following independent judgements by experienced expert coders is the best available approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements can be evaluated.
“We used consensus following independent judgements by experienced, 'expert', coders as our best approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements could be evaluated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When links between BCTs and theoretical constructs are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.
“When links are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.
“Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Dividing the assistance prompt into 'prescription given' and 'referral made' simplifies documentation and operationalizes the fourth A (Assist) by making clear that referral and prescription are the two primary options available to provider and patient.
“This approach was meant to simplify the documentation process and operationalize the 4th A, Assist, to make it clear that referral and prescription were the two primary options available to the provider and patient.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brief educational messages attached to test result reports influence providers' future requests for the targeted tests.
“The reminder messages were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing taxonomies of active elements demonstrate the feasibility of creating a taxonomy grounded in cognitive and behavioral theories, but in their current form fail to differentiate the delivery, receipt, and application of active elements.
“The existing taxonomies described earlier demonstrate the feasibility of this goal, but in their current form fail to differentiate the delivery, receipt, and application of the active elements”
From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Michie et al. (2015)
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMichie et al. (2015) Taxonomy of Behavioral Change Techniques is not fully compatible with the authors' model but provides a comprehensive roadmap for developing a taxonomy of active elements.
“Although Michie et al. (2015) Taxonomy of Behavioral Change Tech niques is not fully compatible with our model, they provide a compre hensive roadmap for developing such a taxonomy”
From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Michie et al., 2015
BCTTv1 is an extensive, integrated, hierarchical classification system for reliably specifying intervention components in terms of 93 BCTs, organised into 16 groupings.
“This is an extensive, integrated, hierarchical classification system for reliably specifying intervention components in terms of 93 BCTs, organised into 16 groupings [15, 16, 22–24].”
Reliability will be calculated using Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK).
“Reliability will be calculated using Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa PABAK [84], as has been used in previous BCT coding research to allow for the high prevalence of negative agreement and differences between coders in their threshold for coding a BCT [15].”
BCTs will be assigned to groups of experts using stratified random allocation.
“BCTs will be rank-ordered according to their frequency of use in interventions [15] and these will be assigned to groups of experts using stratified random allocation.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Different BCTs are named as the four just below the reliability threshold
MajorTwo passages identify four BCTs scoring 0.68 or 0.69 at time 1, but their lists differ; the later passage names demonstration and self-monitoring where the earlier one names action planning and behavioural practice/rehearsal.
“problem-solving (0.68), action planning (0.68), behavioural practice/rehearsal (0.68) and monitoring of behaviour by others without feedback (0.69)”
“problem-solving (0.69), demonstration of the behaviour (0.69), self-monitoring of behaviour (0.69) and monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback (0.68)”
Study 5c names different exceptions to its quality improvement
MinorThe summary identifies replicability of mode of delivery as the exception to significant quality improvements. The detailed results instead identify replicability of active ingredients as non-significant and include mode of delivery among the improvements.
“quality of descriptions written by trained writers, with BCTTv1, was higher than descriptions written by the same writers, before training and not using BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05 except replicability of mode of delivery).”
“quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery and replicability of mode of delivery was judged to be greater for descriptions written after training using BCTTv1: clarity of active ingredients For replicability of active ingredients, this was non-significant F(1,74) = 3.57; p = 0.06.”
Test-retest counts reverse the reliability thresholds
MinorAmong the same 32 coders, the number scoring at least 0.90 cannot exceed the number scoring at least 0.80. The reported counts are 18 and 14, respectively.
“14 out of the 32 coders (44%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.80”
“18 (56%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.90”
Listed study 5 workshop attendance does not total 166 writers
MinorThe attendance figures for the six listed workshops sum to 142, not the stated 166 writers.
Reported 166 · recomputed 142
“They were held at Newcastle University (n = 26), the University of Oxford (n = 16), Queens University in Belfast (n = 45), the University of Aberdeen (n = 24), University College London (n = 15) and the University of Manchester (n = 16).”
Conflicting counts of frequently identified BCTs with poor reliability
MinorThe summary says nine of 16 frequently identified BCTs failed the 0.70 reliability threshold. The detailed results say 16 BCTs failed it and that all 16 were frequently identified.
“Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs; 9 out of the 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve a good level of reliability, that is a PABAK score of > 0.70.”
“Sixteen BCTs failed to reach the 0.70 PABAK threshold with nine falling below 0.60.All were frequently identified.”
Theoretical-domain allocation counts differ from Table 2
MinorThe narrative reports six allocations for goals and environmental context and five for emotion. Table 2 gives five, five and four, respectively, in its column for allocations with p < 0.10.
“goals (6), environmental context and resources (6), skills (5), emotion (5)”
“Goals 29 5 Memory, attention and decision processes 49 0 Environmental context and resources 42 5 Social influences 42 10 Emotion 44 4”
Twenty-four BCTs minus 18 leaves six, not seven
MinorThe discussion says seven of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs remained after 18 were allocated, but the remainder is six. The earlier results also list six unlinked BCTs.
Reported 7 · recomputed 6
“Of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs in Michie et al., 40 18 were clearly grouped into one of the 14 domains and the remaining seven BCTs were not reliably allocated to any domain”
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925 · see citing works
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Widiger, T. A. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10518-009 · Cited by 19,767 · see citing works
Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Foreman, K., Lim, S., Shibuya, K., Aboyans, V., Abraham, J., Adair, T., Aggarwal, R., Ahn, S. Y., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0 · Cited by 14,070 · see citing works
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697 · see citing works
Self-citationDeveloping and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995 · see citing works
Self-citationHoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548 · see citing works
Self-citationWeighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736 · see citing works
Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · Cited by 7,629 · see citing works
Self-citationSPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gotzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., Dickersin, K., Hrobjartsson, A., Schulz, K. F., Parulekar, W. R., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586 · Cited by 6,251 · see citing works
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884 · see citing works
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485 · see citing works
Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000
Mokdad, A. H. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238 · Cited by 5,211 · see citing works
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Kurian, G. T. (2011) · The Encyclopedia of Political Science · doi:10.4135/9781608712434.n1341 · Cited by 5,045 · see citing works
Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 · Cited by 4,888 · see citing works
Self-citationA sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829 · see citing works
Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & the TREND Group (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.361 · Cited by 2,817 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.92.1.111 · Cited by 2,650 · see citing works
A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions
Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379 · Cited by 2,525 · see citing works
Self-citationWebb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1376 · Cited by 2,517 · see citing works
Self-citationFisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455 · Cited by 2,459 · see citing works
Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering
Suzuki, R., & Shimodaira, H. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117 · Cited by 2,456 · see citing works
McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.521684 · Cited by 2,279 · see citing works
(2014) · Cited by 2,276 · see citing works
Self-citationEffective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016136 · Cited by 2,229 · see citing works
Self-citationByrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v · Cited by 2,179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Health Technology Assessment, 19(99), doi: 10.”
Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change.
Riley, M. W., Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1954) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087772 · Cited by 2,039 · see citing works
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00341.x · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Self-citationBernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074003379 · Cited by 1,761 · see citing works
Michie, S., Ashford, S., Sniehotta, F. F., Dombrowski, S. U., Bishop, A., & French, D. P. (2011) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.540664 · Cited by 1,756 · see citing works
Self-citationThe science of training: a decade of progress
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · Cited by 1,703 · see citing works
Dusenbury, L. (2003) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/18.2.237 · Cited by 1,671 · see citing works
Baumeister, R. F. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610 · Cited by 1,665 · see citing works
Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis
Potter, W. J., & Levine‐Donnerstein, D. (1999) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909889909365539 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00043-3 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(66)80048-8 · Cited by 1,548 · see citing works
Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society.
Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505 · Cited by 1,546 · see citing works
Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.941722 · Cited by 1,411 · see citing works
Self-citationFrench, S. D., Green, S. E., O’Connor, D. A., McKenzie, J. E., Francis, J. J., Michie, S., Buchbinder, R., Schattner, P., Spike, N., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-38 · Cited by 1,338 · see citing works
Self-citationCollins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Strecher, V. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
LIGNAC, G. O. (1951) · PubMed · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M. P. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-40 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
Self-citationThe assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials
Borrelli, B. (2011) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Guha, M. (2007) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504120710737987 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
clValid : An R Package for Cluster Validation
Brock, G. N., Pihur, V., Datta, S., & Datta, S. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v025.i04 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Vollmar, H. C., Mayer, H., Ostermann, T., Butzlaff, M. E., Sandars, J. E., Wilm, S., & Rieger, M. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Davies, P., Walker, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-14 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., & Shepperd, S. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography
Pill, J. (1971) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis
Prestwich, A., Sniehotta, F. F., Whittington, C., Dombrowski, S. U., Rogers, L., & Michie, S. (2014) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032853 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Self-citationUK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Murray, C. J., Richards, M. A., Newton, J. N., Fenton, K. A., Anderson, H. R., Atkinson, C., Bennett, D., Bernabé, E., Blencowe, H., Bourne, R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60355-4 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.654964 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationDombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Avenell, A., Johnston, M., MacLennan, G., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.513298 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Self-citationFrancis, J. J., O’Connor, D., & Curran, J. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-35 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement in nursing research
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Michie, S., Hyder, N., Walia, A., & West, R. (2011) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.016 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement in Nursing Research
Marrone, S. R. (1992) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)69465-4 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
The Influence of Acoustic and Semantic Similarity on Long-term Memory for Word Sequences
Baddeley, A. (1966) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640746608400047 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Cahill, K., & Lancaster, T. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub4 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it?
Davidson, K. W., Goldstein, M. G., Kaplan, R. M., Kaufmann, P. G., Knatterud, G. L., Orleans, C. T., Spring, B. J., Trudeau, K. J., & Whitlock, E. P. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2603_01 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Aveyard, P., Begh, R., Parsons, A., & West, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03770.x · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Cane, J., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Ladha, R., & Michie, S. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12102 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citationHoffmann, T. C., Erueti, C., & Glasziou, P. P. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f3755 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
ABC of Behaviour Change Theories
Michie, S., West, R., Campbell, R., Brown, J., & Gainforth, H. L. (2014) · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationRothman, A. J. (2004) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-1-11 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7435.343 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationMichie, S., Abraham, C., Eccles, M. P., Francis, J. J., Hardeman, W., & Johnston, M. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-10 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption
Michie, S., Whittington, C., Hamoudi, Z., Zarnani, F., Tober, G., & West, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03845.x · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Self-citationHardeman, W., Griffin, S., Johnston, M., Kinmonth, A., & Wareham, N. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801100 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationPeters, G.-J., de Bruin, M., & Crutzen, R. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.848409 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
for the CONSORT Group*, Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-002-0188-x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Albrecht, L., Archibald, M., Arseneau, D., & Scott, S. D. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-52 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Michie, S., Jochelson, K., Markham, W. A., & Bridle, C. (2009) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2008.078725 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationthe Canada PRIME Plus Team, Patey, A. M., Islam, R., Francis, J. J., Bryson, G. L., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-52 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationFrancis, J. J., Stockton, C., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Cuthbertson, B. H., Grimshaw, J. M., Hyde, C., Tinmouth, A., & Stanworth, S. J. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910708x397025 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationGardner, B., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., Eccles, M. P., & Michie, S. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.039 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationTaylor, N., Conner, M., & Lawton, R. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.533441 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice
Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I., Altman, D. G., Bastian, H., Boutron, I., Brice, A., Jamtvedt, G., Farmer, A., Ghersi, D., Groves, T., et al. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3852 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationWoolf, S. H. (2005) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.406 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., Strupp, H. H., Butler, S. F., & Binder, J. L. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.3.441 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., Strupp, H. H., Butler, S. F., & al, E. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.3.441 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Inter-Rater Reliability: Dependency on Trait Prevalence and Marginal Homogeneity
Gwet, K. L. (2002) · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: Predictors and consequences
Hardeman, W., Michie, S., Fanshawe, T., Prevost, A. T., Mcloughlin, K., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2008) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440701615948 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationWyse, R. J., Wolfenden, L., Campbell, E., Brennan, L., Campbell, K. J., Fletcher, A., Bowman, J., Heard, T. R., & Wiggers, J. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-216 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Morton, K., Beauchamp, M., Prothero, A., Joyce, L., Saunders, L., Spencer-Bowdage, S., Dancy, B., & Pedlar, C. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.882006 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
West, R., Walia, A., Hyder, N., Shahab, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq074 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationDurantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Mitchell, A. L., Earl, A. N., & Gillette, J. C. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
de Bruin, M., Viechtbauer, W., Hospers, H. J., Schaalma, H. P., & Kok, G. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015989 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.539913 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
the Canada PRIme Plus Team, Bussières, A., Patey, A. M., Francis, J., Sales, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-82 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationDyson, J., Lawton, R., Jackson, C., & Cheater, F. (2011) · Journal of Infection Prevention · doi:10.1177/1757177410384300 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Beenstock, J., Sniehotta, F. F., White, M., Bell, R., Milne, E. M., & Araujo-Soares, V. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-36 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Combinations of techniques that effectively change health behavior: evidence from Meta-CART analysis
Dusseldorp, E., van Genugten, L., van Buuren, S., Verheijden, M. W., & van Empelen, P. (2014) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000018 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Dixon, D., Johnston, M., McQueen, M., & Court-Brown, C. (2008) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-114 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationEmerging themes in distance learning research and practice: some food for thought
Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00081 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Identifying Evidence-Based Competences Required to Deliver Behavioural Support for Smoking Cessation
Michie, S., Churchill, S., & West, R. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9235-z · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnston, M., Dixon, D. L., Hart, J., Glidewell, L., Schröder, C. D., & Pollard, B. (2014) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12095 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationIronic effects of trying to relax under stress
Wegner, D. M., Broome, A., & Blumberg, S. J. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00078-2 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Improving patients’ understanding, recall, satisfaction and compliance
Ley, P. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3228-0_5 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Assessing fidelity of delivery of smoking cessation behavioural support in practice
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Christopherson, C., & Michie, S. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-40 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationInability of trained nurses to perform basic life support
Wynne, G., Marteau, T. M., Johnston, M., Whiteley, C. A., & Evans, T. R. (1987) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1198 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationKennedy, A., Rogers, A., Chew-Graham, C., Blakeman, T., Bowen, R., Gardner, C., Lee, V., Morris, R., & Protheroe, J. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0129-5 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Applying the behaviour change technique (BCT) taxonomy v1: A study of coder training
Wood, C. E., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Michie, S. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0290-z · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationKauth, M. R., Sullivan, G., Blevins, D., Cully, J. A., Landes, R. D., Said, Q., & Teasdale, T. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-75 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Cahill, K., Moher, M., & Lancaster, T. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub3 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
What does the chronic pain grade questionnaire measure?
Dixon, D., Pollard, B., & Johnston, M. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.004 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationSmoak, N. D., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Johnson, B. T., & Carey, M. P. (2006) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000185575.36591.fc · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Amemori, M., Michie, S., Korhonen, T., Murtomaa, H., & Kinnunen, T. H. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-50 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationTowards better communication in cancer care: a framework for developing evidence-based interventions
Schofield, P. E., & Butow, P. N. (2003) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2003.07.001 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
McKenzie, J. E., French, S. D., O'Connor, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Mortimer, D., Michie, S., Francis, J., Spike, N., Schattner, P., Kent, P. M., et al. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-11 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationCarroll, K. M., Kadden, R. M., Donovan, D. M., Zweben, A., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1994) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement · doi:10.15288/jsas.1994.s12.149 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
Pears, S. L., Morton, K., Bijker, M., Sutton, S. R., Hardeman, W., & on behalf of the VBI Programme Team (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1703-8 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationReliability of Identification of Behavior Change Techniques in Intervention Descriptions
Abraham, C., Wood, C. E., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Richardson, M., & Michie, S. (2015) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9727-y · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationAraújo-Soares, V., McIntyre, T., MacLennan, G., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2009) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440802040707 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Rosenkranz, R. R., Behrens, T. K., & Dzewaltowski, D. A. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-81 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ramsay, C. R., Thomas, R. E., Croal, B. L., Grimshaw, J., & Eccles, M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-71 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Menza, T. W., Jameson, D. R., Hughes, J. P., Colfax, G. N., SHOPTAW, S. J., & Golden, M. R. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-774 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Leon, N., Naidoo, P., Mathews, C., Lewin, S. A., & Lombard, C. J. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-8 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Healthy eating and obesity prevention for preschoolers: a randomised controlled trial
Skouteris, H., McCabe, M. P., Swinburn, B. A., & Hill, B. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-220 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Writing Health Communication: An Evidence-Based Guide
Abraham, C., & Kools, M. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446288054 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationFrancis, J. J., Tinmouth, A., Stanworth, S. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Johnston, M., Hyde, C., Stockton, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D., & Eccles, M. P. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-70 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Sydney Diabetes Prevention Program: A community-based translational study
Colagiuri, S., Vita, P., Cardona, M., Singh, M. F., Farrell, L., Milat, A., Haas, M. R., & Bauman, A. E. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-328 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
West, R., Evans, A., & Michie, S. (2011) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr120 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationCastelnuovo, G., Manzoni, G. M., Cuzziol, P., Cesa, G., Tuzzi, C., Villa, V., Liuzzi, A., Petroni, M. L., & Molinari, E. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-204 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors
Hoffmann, T., English, T., & Glasziou, P. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-20 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
McCleary, N., Duncan, E. M., Stewart, F., & Francis, J. J. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-146 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationClaesson, I., Josefsson, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-766 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A method for assessing fidelity of delivery of telephone behavioral support for smoking cessation
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Bruguera, C., & Michie, S. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035149 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationSemantic cuing and the scale insensitivity of recency and contiguity.
Polyn, S. M., Erlikhman, G., & Kahana, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0022475 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A process evaluation of a "physical activity pathway" in the primary care setting
Bull, F., & Milton, K. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-463 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Michie, S., Johnston, M., & Carey, R. (2016) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6439-6_1661-2 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCluskey, A., & Middleton, S. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-18 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hardeman, W., Kinmonth, A., Michie, S., Sutton, S., & the ProActive Project Team (2009) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-16 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationCoder training: theoretical training or practical socialization?
Hak, T., & Bernts, T. (1996) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf02393420 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Developmental microRNA expression profiling of murine embryonic orofacial tissue
Mukhopadhyay, P., Brock, G. N., Pihur, V., Webb, C. L., Pisano, M., & Greene, R. M. (2010) · Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.20684 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lorencatto, F., West, R., Seymour, N., & Michie, S. (2013) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032106 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationAhmad, A., Hugtenburg, J. G., Welschen, L. M. C., Dekker, J. M., & Nijpels, G. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-133 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Evaluating Active U: an internet-mediated physical activity program
Buis, L. R., Poulton, T. A., Holleman, R. G., Sen, A., Resnick, P., Goodrich, D. E., Palma-Davis, L., & Richardson, C. R. (2009) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-331 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Taylor, R. W., Brown, D. A., Dawson, A. M., Haszard, J. J., Cox, A., Rose, E. A., Taylor, B. J., Meredith-Jones, K. A., Treacy, L., Ross, J., et al. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-271 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Murphy, S., Raisanen, L., Moore, G. F., Edwards, R. T., Linck, P., Williams, N. H., Din, N. U., Hale, J., Roberts, C., McNaish, E., et al. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-352 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Abraham, C. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446288054.n7 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationMcKenzie, J. E., O'Connor, D. A., Page, M. J., Mortimer, D. S., French, S. D., Walker, B. F., Keating, J. L., Grimshaw, J. M., Michie, S., Francis, J. J., et al. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-86 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationStavri, Z., & Michie, S. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.641101 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationShelley, D., & Cantrell, J. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-25 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Garner, B. R., Godley, S. H., Dennis, M. L., Godley, M. D., & Shepard, D. S. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Lau, R., Stewart, K., Namara, K. M., Jackson, S., Hughes, J., Peterson, G. M., Bortoletto, D. A., McDowell, J., Bailey, M., Hsueh, A., et al. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-34 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Werkman, A. M., Hulshof, P. J. M., Stafleu, A., Kremers, S., Kok, F. J., Schouten, E. G., & Schuit, A. J. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-110 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Warmington, M., & Hitch, G. J. (2014) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.807841 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Dombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Johnston, M., Broom, I., Kulkarni, U., Brown, J., Murray, L., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.003 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationRamos, M., Ripoll, J., Estrades, T., Socias, I. M., Fe, A., Duro, R., González, M. J., & Servera, M. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-89 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Gonseth, S., Abarca, M., Madrid, C., & Cornuz, J. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-348 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Neuroticism and self-reported somatic health: A twin study
Vassend, O. M., Røysamb, E., & Nielsen, C. S. (2011) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.540665 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Namara, K. M., George, J., O'Reilly, S. L., Jackson, S., Peterson, G. M., Howarth, H. D., Bailey, M., Duncan, G., Trinder, P., Morabito, E., et al. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-264 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ivers, N. M., Tu, K., Francis, J., Barnsley, J. M., Shah, B. R., Upshur, R. E. G., Kiss, A., Grimshaw, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-98 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationQuinn, F. X., Johnston, M., & Johnston, D. W. (2013) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2013.814773 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationSiddiqi, K., Khan, A. Z., Ahmad, M., & Shafiq‐ur‐Rehman (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-160 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Michie, S., Johnson, B. T., & Johnston, M. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.912538 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationStorrø, O., Øien, T., Dotterud, C. K., Jenssen, J. A., & Johnsen, R. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-443 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Bilardi, J., Fairley, C. K., Temple-Smith, M. J., Pirotta, M. V., McNamee, K. M., Bourke, S., Gurrin, L. C., Hellard, M. E., Sanci, L. A., Wills, M. J., et al. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-70 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Wyers, C. E., Breedveld-Peters, J. J. L., Reijven, P. L. M., van Helden, S., Guldemond, N., Severens, J. L., Verburg, A. D., Meesters, B., van Rhijn, L. W., & Dagnelie, P. C. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-212 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
McNamara, R., Robling, M., Hood, K., Bennert, K., Channon, S., Cohen, D., Crowne, E., Hambly, H., Hawthorne, K., Longo, M., et al. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-36 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Spijkers, W., Jansen, D. E. M. C., de Meer, G., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-131 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Johnston, V., Walker, N. K., Thomas, D., Glover, M., Chang, A. B., Bullen, C., Morris, P., Brown, N. J., Hoorn, S. V., Borland, R., et al. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-114 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
[EDITORIAL NOTE] Providing full manuals and intervention descriptions: Addiction policy
WEST, R. (2008) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02341.x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pilling, S. A., Williams, M. B., Brackett, R. H., Gourley, R., Weg, M. W. V., Christensen, A. J., Kaboli, P. J., & Reisinger, H. S. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-23 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Contrasting syntactic and semantic units in the analysis of online discussions
Murphy, E., & Ciszewska-Carr, J. (2005) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1319 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hobbs, L., Campbell, R. J., Hildon, Z. J., & Michie, S. (2011) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMann, E., Kellar, I., Sutton, S. R., Kinmonth, A. L., Hankins, M. C., Griffin, S. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-768 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Marketing depression care management to employers: design of a randomized controlled trial
ROST, K. M., & Marshall, D. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-22 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Johnson, B. T., & Michie, S. (2014) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.900722 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationMcAlister, F. A., Majumdar, S. R., Padwal, R. S., Fradette, M., Thompson, A., Tsuyuki, R. T., Grover, S. A., Dean, N., & Shuaib, A. M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-27 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Brousseau, N., Sauvageau, C., Ouakki, M., Audet, D., Kiely, M., Couture, C., Paré, A. B., & Deceuninck, G. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-750 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Intervening to Improve the Safety of Occupational Driving
Ludwig, T. D., & Geller, S. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315809311 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
de Bruin, M., & Viechtbauer, W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044029 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sanfélix‐Genovés, J., Peiró, S., Sanfélix‐Gimeno, G., Hurtado, I., de la Torre, M. P., Trillo-Mata, J. L., & Giner-Ruiz, V. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-292 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Reliability and Utility of the SHARP Taxonomy of Behaviour Change Techniques
(13056234), C. A., (13398663), A. G., (15832205), T. H.-M., (15832208), M. W., & (15832211), B. J. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Use of a liquid nicotine delivery product to promote smoking cessation
Geimer, N., Olson, C. E., Baumgarten, D., Kepner, J. L., & Mahoney, M. C. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-155 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- NICE, 2007, Behaviour Change: The Principles for Effective Interventions (PH6)
- Dixon, 2012, Health Behavior Change Competency Framework: Competences to Deliver Interventions to Change Lifestyle Behaviors That Affect Health
- West, 2013, Carbon monoxide verified 4-week quit rates in the English Stop Smoking Services before versus after establishment of the National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, Smok Br, 1, 1
- NCSCT, National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training
- Michie, 2005, Behaviour change interventions: developing a classification system
- University College London, The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Project. Collaborators
- World Health Organization, 1992, ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
- University College London, The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Project
- Michie, 2013, Encyclopeadia of Behavioural Medicine, 182
- British Websites, BCTTv1. Online Training
- Johnston, 2013, Specifying the active content of behaviour change interventions: the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1), Revista de Psicología de la Salud (New Age), 1, 131, 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Gwet, 2012, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Multiple Raters
- NICE, 2014, Behaviour Change: The Principles for Effective Interventions (PH6)
- NICE, 2014, Behaviour Change: Individual Approaches (PH49)
- NCSCT, Very Brief Advice Training Module
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., Bragge, P., Brazinova, A., Büki, A., Chesnut, R. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x · Cited by 2,609 · see citing works
Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
“…by individual researchers demonstrated ‘substantial agreement’ across coders for need-supportive behaviours (Kappa = .723 p < .001; Landis & Koch, 1977) and ‘moderate agreement’ for BCTs (Kappa = .508, p < .001); the kappa for BCTs is typical for the BCT literature (e.g., Michie et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMichie, S., Yardley, L., West, R., Patrick, K., & Greaves, F. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7126 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Self-citationTeixeira, P. J., Marques, M. M., Silva, M. N., Brunet, J., Duda, J. L., Haerens, L., La Guardia, J., Lindwall, M., Lonsdale, C., Markland, D., et al. (2020) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000172 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationSkivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., Boyd, K., Craig, N. J., French, D., McIntosh, E., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25570 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Michie, S., Carey, R. N., Johnston, M., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., & Connell, L. E. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Self-citationAhmadi, A., Noetel, M., Parker, P. D., Ryan, R. M., Ntoumanis, N., Reeve, J., Beauchamp, M. R., Dicke, T., Yeung, A. S., Ahmadi, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000783 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
The Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Michie, S., West, R., Sheals, K., & Godinho, C. A. (2018) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibx019 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
“’s [3, 9] taxonomy of BCTs, 93 BCTs, Implications Practice: When deciding what combination of BCTs to use in an intervention, assessment of likely effectiveness needs to be based on integration of findings across different methods; until a formal method for doing this is developed, conclusions need to be subject to ma…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationO. B. O. T. C.-S. G., Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Montgomery, P., Macdonald, G., Michie, S., Hopewell, S., & Moher, D. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnston, M., Carey, R., Bohlen, L. C., Johnston, D. W., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., Groarke, H., & Michie, S. (2020) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa050 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citationLinks Between Behavior Change Techniques and Mechanisms of Action: An Expert Consensus Study
Bohlen, L. C., Carey, R., de Bruin, M., Rothman, A. J., Johnston, M., Kelly, M. P., & Michie, S. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kay082 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationMichie, S., Thomas, J., Johnston, M., Aonghusa, P. M., Shawe-Taylor, J. S., Kelly, M. P., Deleris, L. A., Finnerty, A. N., Marques, M. M., Norris, E., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Self-citationKaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Garnett, C., Crane, D., Brown, J., Muirhead, C., Redmore, J., O'Donnell, A., Newham, J. J., de Vocht, F., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011479.pub2 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Self-citationon behalf of the CONSORT-SPI Group, Montgomery, P., Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Macdonald, G. M., Michie, S., Hopewell, S., & Moher, D. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Jin, K., Khonsari, S., Gallagher, R. D., Gallagher, P., Clark, A. M., Freedman, B., Briffa, T. G., Bauman, A. E., Redfern, J., & Neubeck, L. (2019) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1177/1474515119826510 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0
Knittle, K. P., Heino, M. T. J., Marques, M. M., Stenius, M., Beattie, M. M., Ehbrecht, F., Hagger, M. S., Hardeman, W., & Hankonen, N. E. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0798-9 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationIribarren, S., Akande, T. O., Kamp, K., Barry, D., Kader, Y. G., & Suelzer, E. M. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/21563 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Behavior change interventions: the potential of ontologies for advancing science and practice
Larsen, K. R. T., Michie, S., Hekler, E. B., Gibson, B., Spruijt‐Metz, D., Ahern, D. K., Cole-Lewis, H. J., Ellis, R. J. B., Hesse, B. W., Moser, R. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9768-0 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions
Hekler, E. B., Michie, S., Pavel, M., Rivera, D. E., Collins, L. M., Jimison, H. B., Garnett, C., Parral, S., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.013 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationYamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S., & Levy, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205847 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Future directions of multiple behavior change research
Geller, K. S., Lippke, S., & Nigg, C. R. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9809-8 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Moller, A. C., Merchant, G., Conroy, D. E., West, R., Hekler, E., Kugler, K. C., & Michie, S. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9818-7 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationRealizing the full potential of behavioural science for climate change mitigation
Nielsen, K. S., Cologna, V., Bauer, J. M., Berger, S., Brick, C., Dietz, T. M., Hahnel, U. J. J., Henn, L., Lange, F., Stern, P. C., et al. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-01951-1 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Changing Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1
Marques, M. M., Wright, A. J., Corker, E., Johnston, M., West, R., Hastings, J., Zhang, L. M., & Michie, S. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19363.1 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationTong, H. L., Quiroz, J. C., Kocaballi, A. B., Fat, S. C. M., Dao, K. P., Gehringer, H., Chow, C. K., & Laranjo, L. (2021) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106532 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Chapman, E., Haby, M. M., Toma, T., de Bortoli, M. C., Illanes, E., Oliveros, M., & Barreto, J. O. M. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-0974-3 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Kebede, M. M., Zeeb, H., Peters, M., Heise, T. L., & Pischke, C. R. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0216 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Efficacy of a medication adherence enhancing intervention in transplantation: The MAESTRO-Tx trial
Dobbels, F., Bleser, L. D., Berben, L., Kristanto, P., Dupont, L., Nevens, F., Vanhaecke, J., Verleden, G. M., & Geest, S. D. (2017) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.01.007 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Ran, Y., Lewis, A. N., Dawkins, E., Grah, R., Vanhuyse, F., Engström, E., & Lambe, F. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.026 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Palmer, M. J., Barnard, S., Perel, P., & Free, C. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012675.pub2 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Domin, A., Spruijt‐Metz, D., Theisen, D., Ouzzahra, Y., & Vögele, C. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/24308 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Evidence-based interventions to reduce tuberculosis stigma: a systematic review
Sommerland, N., Wouters, E., Mitchell, E. M. H., Ngicho, M., Redwood, L., Masquillier, C., van Hoorn, R., van den Hof, S., & Rie, A. V. (2017) · The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · doi:10.5588/ijtld.16.0788 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Bohlen, L. C., Michie, S., de Bruin, M., Rothman, A. J., Kelly, M. P., Groarke, H., Carey, R., Hale, J., & Johnston, M. (2020) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaaa078 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using the Health Action Process Approach
Schwarzer, R., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.007 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Applying the behaviour change technique (BCT) taxonomy v1: A study of coder training
Wood, C. E., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Michie, S. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0290-z · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationJasmin, K., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.01.006 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology
Marques, M. M., Carey, R., Norris, E., Evans, F., Finnerty, A. N., Hastings, J., Jenkins, E., Johnston, M., West, R., & Michie, S. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15906.2 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationPahl, S., & Wyles, K. J. (2016) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c6ay02647h · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Systematic review of context-aware digital behavior change interventions to improve health
Craig, K. J. T., Morgan, L., Chen, C.-H., Michie, S., Fusco, N., Snowdon, J., Scheufele, E. L., Gagliardi, T. A., & Sill, S. (2020) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa099 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Behaviour Change Technique Ontology: Transforming the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1
Marques, M. M., Wright, A. J., Corker, E., Johnston, M., West, R., Hastings, J., Zhang, L., & Michie, S. (2023) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19363.2 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationApplying theories of health behaviour and change to hearing health research: Time for a new approach
Coulson, N., Ferguson, M., Henshaw, H., & Heffernan, E. (2016) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2016.1161851 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Morgan, E. H., Schoonees, A., Sriram, U., Faure, M. C., & Seguin‐Fowler, R. A. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012547.pub2 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0660-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationMichie, S., Johnston, M., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., Carey, R., Bohlen, L. C., Groarke, H., Anderson, N., & Zink, S. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09010 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationKönig, L. M., Allmeta, A., Christlein, N., Emmenis, M. V., & Sutton, S. R. (2022) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2022.2047096 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Paudyal, V., MacLure, K., Buchanan, C., Wilson, L., Macleod, J., & Stewart, D. C. (2017) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.03.002 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Depression and smoking cessation: evidence from a smoking cessation clinic with 1-year follow-up
Stepankova, L., Kralikova, E., Zvolska, K., Pankova, A., Ovesna, P., Blaha, M., & Brose, L. S. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9869-6 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Brown, H., Bucher, T., Collins, C. E., & Rollo, M. E. (2018) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12768 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science
Norris, E., & O'Connor, D. B. (2019) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1679373 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Garnett, C. V., Crane, D., Brown, J., Kaner, E., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C. R., Hickman, M., Beard, E., Redmore, J., de Vocht, F., et al. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kax029 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, X., Blaschke, T. F., Thomas, B. V., Geest, S. D., Jiang, S., Gao, Y., Li, X., Buono, E. W., Buchanan, S., Zhang, Z., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14101115 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
van Ommen, B., Wopereis, S., van Empelen, P., van Keulen, H. M., Otten, W., Kasteleyn, M. J., Molema, J. J. W., de Hoogh, I. M., Chavannes, N. H., Numans, M. E., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2017.00381 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Moore, S. A., Hrisos, N., Flynn, D., Errington, L., Price, C., & Avery, L. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-018-0730-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Balsa, J., Félix, I. B., Cláudio, A. P., Carmo, M. B., Silva, I. C. E., Guerreiro, A., Guedes, M. J., Henriques, M. A., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2020) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-020-01583-w · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Kebede, M. M., Liedtke, T. P., Möllers, T., & Pischke, C. R. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7135 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Systematic review of conservation interventions to promote voluntary behavior change
Thomas‐Walters, L., McCallum, J., Montgomery, R., Petros, C., Wan, A. K. Y., & Veríssimo, D. (2022) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.14000 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.041 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Multilevel Interventions Targeting Obesity: Research Recommendations for Vulnerable Populations
Stevens, J., PRATT, C. A., Boyington, J., Nelson, C. R., Truesdale, K. P., Ward, D. S., Lytle, L. A., Sherwood, N. E., Robinson, T. N., Moore, S. M., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.011 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
de Bruin, M., Black, N., Javornik, N., Viechtbauer, W., Eisma, M. C., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Williams, A. J., West, R., Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1709098 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationNorris, E., Marques, M. M., Finnerty, A. N., Wright, A. J., West, R., Hastings, J., Williams, P., Carey, R., Kelly, M. P., Johnston, M., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15904.1 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationNutrition Education and Dietary Behavior Change Games: A Scoping Review
Baranowski, T., Ryan, C., Hoyos-Cespedes, A., & Lu, A. S. (2018) · Games for Health Journal · doi:10.1089/g4h.2018.0070 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Majid, U., Kim, C., Cako, A., & Gagliardi, A. R. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209826 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Behavioral interventions to extend sleep duration: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Baron, K. G., Duffecy, J. L., Reutrakul, S., Levenson, J. C., McFarland, M., Lee, S., & Qeadan, F. (2021) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101532 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Lee, J., Bullen, C., Amor, Y. B., Bush, S. R., Colombo, F., Gaviría, A., Karim, S. S. A., Kim, B., Lavis, J. N., Lazarus, J. V., et al. (2021) · International Health · doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihab022 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationDonevant, S. B., Dawson, R. M., Culley, J. M., Habing, B., & Adams, S. A. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy104 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Enhancing parental support through parent-education programs in youth sport: a systematic review
Burke, S., Sharp, L.-A., Woods, D., & Paradis, K. F. (2021) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2021.1992793 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Links between behaviour change techniques and mechanisms of action: an expert consensus studyPreprint
Bohlen, L. C., Carey, R., de Bruin, M., Rothman, A. J., Johnston, M., Kelly, M. P., & Michie, S. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fge86 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationMoore, A. P., Rivas, C. A., Stanton-Fay, S., Harding, S., & Goff, L. M. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7411-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Watson, J., Dreibelbis, R., Aunger, R. V., Deola, C., King, K., Long, S., Chase, R. P., & Cumming, O. (2018) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.09.002 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Crayton, E., Fahey, M., Ashworth, M. J., Besser, S. J., Weinman, J. A., & Wright, A. J. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9906-0 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory
Łuszczyńska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Ware, L. J., Prioreschi, A., Bosire, E. N., Cohen, E., Draper, C. E., Lye, S. J., & Norris, S. A. (2019) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.04.009 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies
Cohen, Z. D., Barnes-Horowitz, N. M., Forbes, C. N., & Craske, M. G. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104364 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
O’Shea, O., McCormick, R., Bradley, J. M., & O'Neill, B. M. (2016) · Physical Therapy Reviews · doi:10.1080/10833196.2016.1261237 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Lambe, F., Ran, Y., Jürisoo, M., Holmlid, S., Muhoza, C., Johnson, O., & Osborne, M. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104703 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Schröder, K., Öberg, B. E., Enthoven, P., Kongsted, A., & Abbott, A. D. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05197-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
McHale, F., Ng, K., Taylor, S. L., Bengoechea, E. G., Norton, C., O'Shea, D. B., & Woods, C. B. (2021) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981211044988 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Warner, L. M., & French, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.032 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Remediating professionalism lapses in medical students and doctors: A systematic review
Brennan, N., Price, T., Archer, J. C., & Brett, J. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14016 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Binning, J., Woodburn, J., Bus, S. A., & Barn, R. (2018) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3105 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Brown, T. J., Hardeman, W., Bauld, L., Holland, R., Maskrey, V., Naughton, F., Orton, S., USSHER, M. H., & Notley, C. J. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.031 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationChanging Behavior Using Ecological Models
Salmon, J., Hesketh, K. D., Arundell, L., Downing, K. L., & Biddle, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.017 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Review: Nudge interventions to promote healthy diets and physical activity
Laiou, E., Rapti, I., Schwarzer, R., Fleig, L., Cianferotti, L., Ngo, J., Rizos, E. C., Wetle, T. F., Kahlmeier, S., Vigilanza, A., et al. (2021) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102103 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Onukwugha, F. I., Smith, L. A., Kaseje, D., Wafula, C., Kaseje, M., Orton, B., Hayter, M., & Magadi, M. A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261973 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Martinengo, L., Jabir, A. I., Goh, W. W. T., Lo, N. Y. W., Ho, M. R., Kowatsch, T., Atun, R. A., Michie, S., & Car, L. T. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/39243 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationWood, C. E., Hardeman, W., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0448-9 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationFrench, D., Miles, L. M., Elbourne, D. R., Farmer, A. A., Gulliford, M. C., Locock, L., Sutton, S. R., McCambridge, J., Bower, P., Clemes, S. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.028 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Stewart, D. C., Thomas, B., MacLure, K., Wilbur, K., Wilby, K. J., Pallivalapila, A., Dijkstra, A., Ryan, C. A., Elkassem, W., Awaisu, A., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204987 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Shoesmith, E., Huddlestone, L., Lorencatto, F., Shahab, L., Gilbody, S. M., & Ratschen, E. (2021) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15452 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Norris, E., Wright, A. J., Hastings, J., West, R., Boyt, N., & Michie, S. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16682.1 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationHailey, V., Rojas‐García, A., & Kassianos, A. P. (2022) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-021-01323-z · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Black, N., Eisma, M. C., Viechtbauer, W., Johnston, M., West, R., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Michie, S., & de Bruin, M. (2020) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14969 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationMaben, J., Aunger, J. A., Abrams, R., Wright, J. M., Pearson, M., Westbrook, J. I., Jones, A., & Mannion, R. (2023) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-023-03102-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Lacasse, M., Audétat, M., Boileau, É., Fon, N. C., Dufour, M.-H., Laferrière, M.-C., Lafleur, A., Rue, È. L., Lee, S., NENDAZ, M. R., et al. (2019) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1596239 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Dawson, R. M., Felder, T. M., Donevant, S. B., McDonnell, K. K., Card, E. B., King, C. C., & Heiney, S. P. (2019) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12333 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Changing Behavior Using Self-Determination Theory
Hagger, M. S., Hankonen, N. E., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.008 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Implicit Processes, Self-Regulation, and Interventions for Behavior Change
Quinton, T. S., & Brunton, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00346 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Michie, S., Wood, C. E., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J. J., & Hardeman, W.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- City, University of London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michie, Susan
- Venue
- Health Technology Assessment
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 99
- Pages
- 1-188
- ISSN
- 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
- 2046-4924
- PMC
- PMC4781650
- OpenAlex
- W2186580260
- Semantic Scholar
- 4a3d10d88ba6875c77917bf09b5ae8f9e27cd1f6
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 60.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- behaviour change techniques, behaviour change interventions, taxonomy development, intervention reporting, intervention description, coding reliability, intercoder reliability, test-retest reliability, validity, Delphi consensus, complex interventions, training workshop, global health, mechanisms of change, theory-based intervention design
- MeSH terms
- Data Accuracy, Behavior Therapy, Classification, Delphi Technique, Humans, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Global Health, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review