Cited by 680Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)

Open access
Michie, Susan, Wood, Caroline E, Johnston, Marie, Abraham, Charles, Francis, Jill J, Hardeman, Wendy·2015·Health Technology Assessment

Abstract

Background: Meeting global health challenges requires effective behaviour change interventions (BCIs). This depends on advancing the science of behaviour change which, in turn, depends on accurate intervention reporting. Current reporting often lacks detail, preventing accurate replication and implementation. Recent developments have specified intervention content into behaviour change techniques (BCTs) – the ‘active ingredients’, for example goal-setting, self-monitoring of behaviour. BCTs are ‘the smallest components compatible with retaining the postulated active ingredients, i.e. the proposed mechanisms of change. They can be used alone or in combination with other BCTs’ (Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev 2012; 6 :1–6). Domain-specific taxonomies of BCTs have been developed, for example healthy eating and physical activity, smoking cessation and alcohol consumption. We need to build on these to develop an internationally shared language for specifying and developing interventions. This technology can be used for synthesising evidence, implementing effective interventions and testing theory. It has enormous potential added value for science and global health. Objective: (1) To develop a method of specifying content of BCIs in terms of component BCTs; (2) to lay a foundation for a comprehensive methodology applicable to different types of complex interventions; (3) to develop resources to support application of the taxonomy; and (4) to achieve multidisciplinary and international acceptance for future development. Design and participants: Four hundred participants (systematic reviewers, researchers, practitioners, policy-makers) from 12 countries engaged in investigating, designing and/or delivering BCIs. Development of the taxonomy involved a Delphi procedure, an iterative process of revisions and consultation with 41 international experts; hierarchical structure of the list was developed using inductive ‘bottom-up’ and theory-driven ‘top-down’ open-sort procedures ( n = 36); training in use of the taxonomy (1-day workshops and distance group tutorials) ( n = 161) was evaluated by changes in intercoder reliability and validity (agreement with expert consensus); evaluating the taxonomy for coding interventions was assessed by reliability (intercoder; test–retest) and validity ( n = 40 trained coders); and evaluating the taxonomy for writing descriptions was assessed by reliability (intercoder; test–retest) and by experimentally testing its value ( n = 190). Results: Ninety-three distinct, non-overlapping BCTs with clear labels and definitions formed Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1). BCTs clustered into 16 groupings using a ‘bottom-up’ open-sort procedure; there was overlap between these and groupings produced by a theory-driven, ‘top-down’ procedure. Both training methods improved validity (both p < 0.05), doubled the proportion of coders achieving competence and improved confidence in identifying BCTs in workshops (both p < 0.001) but did not improve intercoder reliability. Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 of the 93 BCTs. Good within-coder agreement was observed after 1 month ( p < 0.001). Validity was good for 14 of 15 BCTs in the descriptions. The usefulness of BCTTv1 to report descriptions of observed interventions had mixed results. Conclusions: The developed taxonomy (BCTTv1) provides a methodology for identifying content of complex BCIs and a foundation for international cross-disciplinary collaboration for developing more effective interventions to improve health. Further work is needed to examine its usefulness for reporting interventions. Funding: This project was funded by the Medical Research Council Ref: G0901474/1. Funding also came from the Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.

Verified 2026-10-06 · 2 references not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).

TL;DR

This suite of five studies developed and evaluated Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1), a consensus-based taxonomy of 93 distinct behaviour change techniques (BCTs) hierarchically clustered into 16 groupings. BCTTv1 was shown to be usable reliably and validly by trained coders for identifying BCTs in intervention descriptions, but evidence that it improves reporting of observed interventions was mixed and not clearly supportive.

Key findings

  • Study 1/2 produced BCTTv1: 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings. The open-sort task yielded 16 groupings; 59 of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with 47 significant and 12 borderline. There was a significant association between the 16 “bottom-up” groupings and 13 “top-down” groupings (χ² = 437.80; p < 0.001), but only six of 208 pairings achieved satisfactory evidence of similarity.
  • Study 3 found training improved trainee agreement with expert consensus for both 1-day workshops and distance group tutorials (both p < 0.05), with the proportion achieving competence (PABAK > 0.60) doubling: 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training. Confidence in identifying BCTs improved in workshops (p < 0.001), but intercoder agreement did not improve for either method (workshops p = 0.08; tutorials p = 0.57).
  • Study 4 found 80 of the 93 BCTs were identified by at least one trained coder. Good intercoder reliability was observed for 80 BCTs: 64 of 80 (80%) achieved mean PABAK ≥ 0.70 and 59 of 80 (74%) achieved ≥ 0.80. Test-retest reliability was good (p < 0.001), and concurrent validity was good for 14 of 15 BCTs. Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs: 9 of 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve PABAK > 0.70.
  • Studies 5a–5c found unclear benefit of BCTTv1 for reporting observed interventions. Study 5a showed no difference with taxonomy alone (all p > 0.05). Study 5b found descriptions by trained writers with BCTTv1 were rated poorer in quality than untrained writers without BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05), but reliability of BCT identification was greater for trained writers with BCTTv1 (mean PABAK trained = 0.87; untrained = 0.84; p < 0.05). Study 5c found within-person quality was higher after training with BCTTv1 (all p < 0.05 except replicability of mode of delivery), with no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).

Methods

  • The paper reports a suite of five empirical studies using Delphi methods with an International Advisory Board, open-sort and closed-sort tasks, training evaluation, reliability/validity coding, and within- and between-participant experimental designs. A total of 400 participants were involved across studies, with some taking part in more than one study.
  • Study 1 used a two-round Delphi exercise with 14 international behaviour change experts plus International Advisory Board and study team feedback to develop BCT labels and definitions. Study 2 used 18 open-sort participants and 18 closed-sort participants to generate and compare “bottom-up” and “top-down” hierarchical structures. Study 3 evaluated training with 161 trainee coders (1-day workshops and distance group tutorials). Study 4 used 40 trained coders to code 40 intervention descriptions at two time points 1 month apart. Studies 5a–5c involved 166 writers, 12 untrained raters, and 12 trained coders.
  • Main analyses included prevalence-and-bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) for intercoder reliability, test-retest reliability, and agreement with expert consensus; cluster analysis and discriminant content validity methods for sort tasks; and t-tests, ANOVA, and repeated-measures ANOVA for training and reporting studies.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the Delphi exercise involved 14 individuals, with a predominance of European experts from a psychological background; that arbitrary cut-offs were used for amending BCT labels and definitions; and that training covered only 24 of the 93 BCTs. It also states that study 5’s video-observation writing task was artificial, constrained by time pressure, and that training condition was confounded with time of day; the quality measures’ psychometric properties were not established.
  • The paper states that samples were predominantly female and from the UK, limiting diversity; that tutorial groups were not directly compared for efficacy; and that more training is required to become expert in using BCTTv1. It also notes that reliability was poorer for frequently identified BCTs and that some BCTs (e.g. credible source, social support unspecified, instruction on how to perform behaviour) required further refinement.
  • The text makes evident that the reporting studies did not show a clear benefit of BCTTv1 for writing observed intervention descriptions, and that the negative findings in study 5b may reflect task demands, insufficient training in report writing, or the artificial nature of the task rather than the taxonomy itself.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/hta19990

Cites

176 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 141 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Study 5a: quality, reliability of BCT identification and validity did not differ for descriptions written by untrained writers with and without BCTTv1 (all p > 0.05).

    “Study 5a: quality, reliability of BCT identification (between trained coders) and validity (trained coder agreement with expert consensus) did not differ for descriptions written by untrained writers with and without BCTTv1 (all p > 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Training improved trainee confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in workshops.

    “Trainee confidence in identifying BCTs assessed improved in workshops (p < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
    • Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
  • Findingown data

    Training did not improve intercoder agreement for either workshop or distance group tutorial method.

    “Intercoder agreement did not improve for either method (workshops p = 0.08 and tutorials p = 0.57).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
    • Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
  • Findingown data

    Training doubled the proportion achieving competence (agreement with expert consensus PABAK > 0.60) for both workshop and distance group tutorial trainees.

    “with the proportion achieving competence (i.e.agreement with expert consensus PABAK > 0.60) doubling (both p < 0.05)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
    • Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
  • Findingown data

    Only providing the taxonomy made no difference (study 5a).

    “while only providing the taxonomy made no difference (study 5a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 156
  • May combine two claims. 174
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Groupings were created by those with experience of BCIs: average of 15.11 groupings (SD 6.11, range 5-24 groupings).

    “Groupings were created by those with experience of BCIs: average of 15.11 groupings (standard deviation 6.11, range 5-24 groupings).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    BCTTv1 comprises 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings.

    “It comprises 93 distinct, clearly labelled, well-defined BCTs hierarchically organised into 16 groupings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Study 5c: There were no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).

    “There were no differences in reliability (p = 0.50) or validity (p = 0.28).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 'bottom-up' method resulted in 16 groupings, which had some overlap with the theory-driven groupings.

    “The 'bottom-up' method resulted in 16 groupings, which had some overlap with the theory-driven groupings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Forty-six per cent of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training.

    “Forty-six per cent of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved competence after training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
    • Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 15 BCTs agreed by expert consensus to be present in the descriptions, good agreement was achieved for 14, indicating good validity.

    “Of the 15 BCTs agreed by expert consensus to be present in the descriptions, good agreement was achieved for 14, thus indicating good validity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fifty-nine of the BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of the 14 theoretical domains; 47 were significant and 12 were of borderline significance.

    “Fifty-nine of the BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of the 14 theoretical domains; 47 were significant and 12 were of borderline significance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    BCTTv1 is the first cross-behaviour taxonomy to be established by an international group of experienced BCT coders.

    “The BCTTv1 is the first cross-behaviour taxonomy to be established by an international group of experienced BCT coders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Lack of a methodology for unpacking the 'black box' of behaviour change interventions prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    One additional BCT was identified by the study team, given a label and definition and added to the system.

    “One additional BCT was identified by the study team, given a label and definition and added to the system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs; 9 out of the 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve a good level of reliability (PABAK > 0.70).

    “Reliability was poorer for frequent BCTs; 9 out of the 16 frequently identified BCTs failed to achieve a good level of reliability, that is a PABAK score of > 0.70.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 124 BCTs in the prototype classification system, 31 were removed: five composite BCTs and 26 BCTs overlapping with others, which were rated to have better definitions.

    “Of the 124 BCTs in the prototype classification system, 31 were removed: five composite BCTs and 26 BCTs overlapping with others, which were rated to have better definitions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Training was evaluated positively by trainees with both types of training receiving uniformly high ratings in terms of usefulness.

    “Training was evaluated positively by trainees with both types of training receiving uniformly high ratings in terms of usefulness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.
    • Rests on an assumption: This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On the basis of Delphi second-round scores, 38 BCTs were judged satisfactory and 32 requiring further consideration.

    “On the basis of these scores, 38 BCTs were judged to be 'satisfactory' and 32 'requiring further consideration'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie et al. 40

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On the basis of Delphi first-round scores, 21 BCTs were judged satisfactory and 73 requiring further consideration.

    “On the basis of these scores, 21 BCTs were judged to be 'satisfactory' and 73 'requiring further consideration'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie et al. 40

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 70 BCTs reconsidered in the second round, seven labels were amended, 35 definitions were rephrased, and seven BCTs were removed, giving 63 BCTs.

    “Of the 70 BCTs reconsidered, seven labels were amended, 35 definitions were rephrased and seven BCTs were removed, giving 63 BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Feedback from the International Advisory Board led to the addition of two and removal of four BCTs.

    “Feedback from members led to the addition of two and the removal of four BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    These experts were drawn from a variety of disciplines including psychology, behavioural medicine and health promotion, and from seven countries.

    “These experts were drawn from a variety of disciplines including psychology, behavioural medicine and health promotion, and from seven countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, the Netherlands, Finland and Germany).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 73 reconsidered BCTs in the first round, four were removed, four were divided, and one was added, giving 74 BCTs.

    “Of the 73 reconsidered BCTs, four were removed, four were divided and one BCT was added, giving 74 BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BCTs were grouped using an inductive 'bottom-up' method based on similarity of active ingredients, yielding 16 distinct sets of BCTs.

    “The BCTs were grouped using an inductive 'bottom-up' method based on the similarity of their active ingredients.This process yielded 16 distinct sets of BCTs, as follows (with number of BCTs in parentheses): scheduled consequences (10), reward/threat (7), repetition/replacement (7), antecedents (4), associations (8), covert learning (3), natural consequences (6), feedback and monitoring (5), goals”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the higher-order groupings created by the top-down task, there were only two similarly strong overlaps with the BCTs allocated to the equivalent TDF domains, indicating that the relationship between higher-order sorting strategies and theoretically derived groupings is not strong.

    “For the higher-order groupings created by the top-down task, there were only two similarly strong overlaps with the BCTs allocated to the equivalent TDF domains indicating that the relationship between higher-order sorting strategies and theoretically derived groupings is not strong.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The least distinct groupings (social support, comparison of behaviour, self-belief, comparison of outcome, identity) comprised BCTs relating to social support, social comparisons, and self and identity, suggesting less clarity about BCTs within these theoretical domains.

    “The least distinct groupings (i.e.'social support', 'comparison of behaviour', 'self-belief', 'comparison of outcome' and 'identity') comprised BCTs relating to social support, social comparisons, and self and identity, suggesting that there is less clarity about the BCTs within these theoretical domains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within these domains, 59 (68%) of the BCTs were considered reliably allocated, with a further 12 (14%) having borderline statistical significance and six being allocated to multiple domains.

    “Within these domains, 59 (68%) of the BCTs were considered to be reliably allocated, with a further 12 (14%) BCTs having borderline statistical significance (p > 0.05 but p < 0.1) and six being allocated to multiple domains (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Examination of the hierarchical structure of BCTTv1 uncovered a 'higher-order' grouping strategy taken by experts in the 'bottom-up' task, and some groupings within the 16-grouping solution are more clearly distinct from others.

    “Examination of the hierarchical structure of BCTTv1 uncovered a 'higher-order' grouping strategy taken by the behaviour change experts in the 'bottom-up' task and the dendrogram indicates that some groupings of BCTs within the 16-grouping solution can be considered as more clearly distinct from others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Eighteen of 19 participants approached from the pool of experts completed the open-sort task.

    “Eighteen of 19 participants approached from the pool of experts completed the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs, 18 were clearly grouped into one of the 14 domains and the remaining seven BCTs were not reliably allocated to any domain even though they could be identified reliably in the intervention descriptions.

    “Of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs in Michie et al., 40 18 were clearly grouped into one of the 14 domains and the remaining seven BCTs were not reliably allocated to any domain even though they could be identified reliably in the intervention descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie et al., 40

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The age of participants did not differ significantly between the two sort tasks, but the number of female and male participants did, as did the country of residence.

    “Although the age of participants did not differ significantly between the two sort tasks [t(34) = 0.77; p > 0.10] the number of female and male participants did [χ 2 (1) = 4.33; p < 0.05] as did the country of residence (χ 2 = 20.76;p < 0.001) (Monte-Carlo simulation using 2000 replicates was used to compute the p-value given that a number of the expected cell values were < 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The authors improved the quality of BCTTv1 labels and definitions and developed a hierarchical structure of BCTTv1.

    “In order to enhance understanding and use of BCTs in BCIs, we have improved the quality of their labels and definitions, and developed a hierarchical structure of BCTTv1.73”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] Cane, 2015, From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs, Br J Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The closed-sort task was conducted on an earlier version of the taxonomy containing 87 BCTs and the open-sort task an even earlier version containing 85 BCTs.

    “The closed-sort task was conducted on an earlier version of the taxonomy containing 87 BCTs and the open-sort task an even earlier version containing 85 BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Six of the open-sort task groupings (repetition and substitution, goals and planning, covert learning, self-belief, scheduled consequences, antecedents) showed a high level of overlap with the BCTs assigned to the equivalent TDF domains, suggesting that experts may have sorted BCTs by theoretical constructs or domains across both tasks.

    “Six of the open-sort tasks groupings, 'repetition and substitution, 'goals and planning', 'covert learning', 'self-belief', 'scheduled consequences' and 'antecedents', showed a high level of overlap with the BCTs assigned to the equivalent TDF domains, suggesting that experts may have sorted BCTs by theoretical constructs or domains (implicitly or explicitly) across both tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eighteen people (72%) met the eligibility criteria and all who were eligible consented to complete the closed-sort task.

    “Eighteen people (72%) met the eligibility criteria and all who were eligible consented to complete the task (Table 1 shows demographic information).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All TDF domains had BCTs allocated to them in the closed-sort task, with numbers ranging from 15 for social/professional role and identity to 68 for behavioural regulation.

    “All TDF domains had BCTs allocated to them in the closed-sort task, with the number of BCTs allocated ranging from 15 for social/professional role and identity to 68 for behavioural regulation (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants for the closed-sort task reported moderately high levels of expertise in behaviour change theory (mean = 3.17, SD = 0.71) and in delivering BCIs (mean = 2.17, SD = 1.38).

    “Participants for the closed-sort task reported moderately high levels of expertise in behaviour change theory (mean = 3.17, SD = 0.71) and in delivering BCIs (mean = 2.17, SD = 1.38) as measured on 5-point scales (scores are reversed so a higher score indicates more experience).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This allocation was reliable for 12 of the 14 domains, with BCTs allocated consistently with high confidence across experts (p < 0.05).

    “This allocation was reliable for 12 of the 14 domains, that is BCTs were allocated consistently with high confidence across experts, leading to p < 0.05 (see Table 2 for frequencies and see Table 4 for confidence ratings, ICC values and related p-values).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Other domains also showed high agreement but had fewer associated BCTs: behavioural regulation had only one assigned BCT but achieved good agreement, while goals had five BCTs assigned with good agreement.

    “Other domains also showed high agreement but had fewer associated BCTs -'behavioural regulation' had only one assigned BCT but achieved good agreement, while 'goals' had five BCTs assigned with good agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the 'top-down' task, 59 out of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to one or more TDF domains, with a further 12 BCTs having borderline statistical significance.

    “In this 'top-down' task, 59 out of 87 BCTs were reliably allocated to one or more of the TDF domains with a further 12 BCTs having borderline statistical significance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A few trainees commented on the 'Ready, steady, point!' exercises as being a useful method to increase their ability to identify BCTs at speed.

    “A few trainees commented on the 'Ready, steady, point!' exercises as being a useful method to increase their ability to identify BCTs at speed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, high confidence ratings increased for 13 out of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (behaviour), self-monitoring of outcome(s) of

    “Ratings increased for 13 out of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, non-specific reward, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (behaviour), self-monitoring of outcome(s) of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, agreement with expert consensus increased for 11 of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of

    “Agreement with expert consensus increased for 11 of the 17 BCTs: credible source, information about social and environmental consequences, social support (unspecified), monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback, demonstration of the behaviour, adding objects to the environment, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Training increased confidence in identifying BCTs assessed for both training methods and significantly so among workshop trainees.

    “Training increased confidence in identifying BCTs assessed for both training methods and significantly so among workshop trainees.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Time constraints on the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' were particularly an issue for trainees from different time zones.

    “This was particularly an issue for trainees from different time zones.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For one-day workshops, change in agreement with expert consensus across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.56; p = 0.59.

    “However, change across the 12 BCTs was non-significant, t(11) = 0.56; p = 0.59.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    For distance group tutorials, the BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and after training.

    “As for workshops, the BCT 'material reward' achieved good reliability before training and this was also achieved after training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Trainees commented that they occasionally found the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' difficult to put into practice owing to time constraints.

    “Trainees commented that they occasionally found them difficult to put into practice owing to time constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, across the BCTs assessed, trainee agreement with expert consensus increased, t(16) = 2.35; p < 0.05.

    “Across the BCTs assessed, trainee agreement with expert consensus also increased, t(16) = 2.35; p < 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Many trainees commented that the tutorials provided a useful opportunity to learn 'the consensus answers and the rationale behind coding' for specific BCTs and then 'discuss any reasons for discrepancies with other members of the group'.

    “Many of the trainees commented that the tutorials provided a useful opportunity to learn 'the consensus answers and the rationale behind coding' for specific BCTs and then 'discuss any reasons for discrepancies with other members of the group'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, the number of high confidence ratings (++) that trainees assigned did not change, t(51) = -0.57; p = 0.57.

    “Confidence for BCTs identified: the number of high confidence ratings (i.e.'++') that trainees assigned did not change, t(51) = -0.57;p = 0.57.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For one-day workshops, the number of high confidence ratings (++) that trainees assigned increased from before training (mean = 8.38, SD = 1.91) to after training (mean = 9.56, SD = 1.93), t(108) = 4.89; p < 0.001.

    “Confidence for BCTs identified: the number of high confidence ratings (i.e.'++') that trainees assigned increased, t(108) = 4.89; p < 0.001 (before training: mean number of BCTs = 8.38, SD = 1.91; after training: mean number of BCTs = 9.56, SD = 1.93).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Change from before to after training competence was significant for workshops, F(1,216) = 9.66; p < 0.05, and for tutorials, F(1,102) = 38.38; p < 0.001.

    “Change from before to after training competence was significant for workshops, F(1,216) = 9.66; p < 0.05, and for tutorials, F(1,102) = 38.38;p < 0.001.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The majority commented that having access to a wide range and number of excerpts taken from published reports provided a useful opportunity to practice applying the taxonomy.

    “The majority commented that having access to a wide range and number of excerpts taken from published reports provided a useful opportunity to practice applying the taxonomy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the majority agreed that the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' components were both useful in principle, feedback suggested that trainees generally wanted more guidance on how to use them.

    “Although the majority agreed that the 'Learning Log' and 'Buddy system' components were both useful in principle, feedback suggested that trainees generally wanted more guidance on how to use them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The opportunity to apply new knowledge and skills in a number of coding tasks followed by group discussion was evaluated as being a useful approach by trainees.

    “The opportunity to apply new knowledge and skills in a number of coding tasks followed by group discussion was evaluated as being a useful approach by trainees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, intercoder agreement increased for 8 out of the 17 BCTs: feedback on behaviour, credible source, demonstration of the behaviour, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform behaviour and material reward (behaviour) (average increase in PABAK = 0.38, SD = 0.26; range = 0.08-0.69).

    “Across the BCTs assessed, intercoder agreement increased for 8 out of the 17 BCTs: feedback on behaviour, credible source, demonstration of the behaviour, goal-setting (outcome), behavioural practice/rehearsal, self-monitoring of behaviour, instruction on how to perform behaviour and material reward (behaviour) (average increase in PABAK for these eight BCTs = 0.38, SD = 0.26; range = 0.08-0.69).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After training, 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score of ≥ 0.60, meeting the acceptable standard of competence (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14).

    “After training, the proportion of trainees reaching this threshold increased across both methods: 46% of workshop trainees and 78% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score of ≥ 0.60 therefore meeting the acceptable standard of competence (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.50, SD = 0.28; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.72, SD = 0.14).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before training, 22% of workshop trainees and 35% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score (agreement with expert consensus) of ≥ 0.60 (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11).

    “Before training, 22% of workshop trainees and 35% of tutorial trainees achieved a PABAK score (in terms of agreement with expert consensus) of ≥ 0.60 (workshops: mean PABAK = 0.39, SD = 0.29; tutorials: mean PABAK = 0.57, SD = 0.11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, change in intercoder agreement across the 17 BCTs was non-significant, t(16) = 0.28; p = 0.78.

    “However, change across the 17 BCTs was non-significant, t(16) = 0.28; p = 0.78.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The majority of tutorial trainees had a moderate level of expertise in BCIs (mean = 3.50, SD = 0.71).

    “The majority of tutorial trainees had a moderate level of expertise in BCIs (mean = 3.50, SD = 0.71).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, 54% (n = 28) of trainees had previously used a BCT taxonomy to code BCIs and 69% (n = 36) to describe BCIs.

    “Previous experience: 54% (n = 28) of trainees had previously used a BCT taxonomy to code BCIs and 69% (n = 36) to describe BCIs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Tutorial trainees reported that the combination of practical tasks and the opportunity for structured discussion during the tutorial sessions was particularly useful.

    “Tutorial trainees reported that the combination of practical tasks and the opportunity for structured discussion during the tutorial sessions was particularly useful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For one-day workshops, across BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings increased, t(11) = 2.89; p < 0.05.

    “Across BCTs assessed, the number of high confidence ratings also increased, t(11) = 2.89; p < 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Training was effective for some BCTs, defined as poor agreement and intercoder agreement before training but good after training; for example, behavioural practice/rehearsal.

    “We identified BCTs for which training was effective, that is when agreement and intercoder agreement were poor before training but good after training; for example, behavioural practice/rehearsal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    For distance group tutorials, intercoder agreement across trainees did not change, t(25) = 0.57; p = 0.57.

    “Intercoder agreement between trainees: intercoder agreement across trainees did not change, t(25) =0 .57;p = 0.57.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Training was evaluated positively by trainees with all components receiving high usefulness ratings (workshops: mean = 4.62, SD = 0.68; range = 3-5; tutorials: mean = 4.30, SD = 0.67; range 4-5).

    “Training was evaluated positively by trainees with all components receiving high ratings (on the scale of 1-5) in terms of usefulness (workshops: mean = 4.62, SD = 0.68; range = 3-5; tutorials: mean = 4.30, SD = 0.67; range 4-5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean PABAK scores for experienced coders for the 15 BCTs ranged from 0.60 to 0.90 (overall mean=0.77); all but one BCT achieved ≥0.70.

    “Mean PABAK scores for experienced coders for the 15 BCTs (see Table 13) ranged from 0.60 to 0.90 (overall mean = 0.77); all but one BCT achieved a mean PABAK score of ≥ 0.70.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The poorest validity was for 'credible source', with 'social support (practical)' and 'goal-setting (outcome)' also low; all three had also shown low intercoder reliability.

    “The poorest validity was for 'credible source', with 'social support (practical)' and 'goals-setting (outcome)' also being low and all three of these had also shown low intercoder reliability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sixteen BCTs failed to reach the 0.70 PABAK threshold, with nine falling below 0.60; all were frequently identified.

    “Sixteen BCTs failed to reach the 0.70 PABAK threshold with nine falling below 0.60.All were frequently identified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our analyses have shown that reliability of BCT identification was not positively correlated with coder confidence and indeed tended to be negatively correlated.

    “However, our analyses have shown that reliability of BCT identification was not positively correlated with coder confidence and indeed tended to be negatively correlated.109”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] Wynne, 1987, Inability of trained nurses to perform basic life support, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean reliability scores for experienced and trained coders were correlated with a large effect size [r(13)=0.69; p<0.01] but were significantly different [t(14)=3.01; p<0.01], with experienced coders achieving higher PABAK scores for 13 of 15 BCTs.

    “The mean reliability scores for experienced coders and trained coders were correlated with a large effect size [r(13) = 0.69; p < 0.01, two tailed] but were significantly different [t(14) = 3.01; p < 0.01] with experienced coders achieving higher PABAK scores for 13 out of the 15 BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean PABAK validity scores across trained coder consensus pairs did not significantly change with time [t(31)=0.84; p=0.41] and scores on the two occasions were correlated [r(30)=0.67; p<0.001].

    “The mean PABAK validity scores across trained coder consensus pairs did not significantly change with time [t(31) = 0.84; p = 0.41] and scores on the two occasions were correlated [r(30) = 0.67; p < 0.001].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean PABAK scores ranged from 0.30 to 1.00 over the 80 BCTs identified; 64/80 (80%) achieved ≥0.70 and 59/80 (74%) achieved ≥0.80, indicating good intercoder reliability across BCTs by trained coders.

    “Mean PABAK scores ranged from 0.30 to 1.00 over the 80 BCTs identified, and 64 out of the 80 observed BCTs (80%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0. 70 and 59(74%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.80 indicating that good intercoder reliability was observed across BCTs by trained coders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Over the 32 coders providing data at both time points, mean PABAK scores ranged from 0.84 to 0.99; 14/32 (44%) achieved ≥0.80 and 18/32 (56%) achieved ≥0.90.

    “Over the 32 coders providing data at both time points, mean PABAK scores for the two occasions ranged from 0.84 to 0.99, and 14 out of the 32 coders (44%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.80 and 18 (56%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.90.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The remaining 12 BCTs with PABAK <0.70 were goal-setting (outcome) (0.61), prompts/cues (0.66), feedback on outcome(s) of behaviour (0.62), adding objects to the environment (0.57), information about health consequences (0.50), feedback on behaviour (0.57), social support (practical) (0.51), goal-setting (behaviour) (0.48), information about social and environmental consequences (0.50), instructi

    “The remaining 12 were goal-setting (outcome) (0.61), prompts/cues (0.66), feedback on outcome(s) of behaviour (0.62), adding objects to the environment (0.57), information about health consequences (0.50), feedback on behaviour (0.57), social support (practical) (0.51), goal-setting (behaviour) (0.48), information about social and environmental consequences (0.50), instruction on how to perform”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All occasionally and rarely identified BCTs achieved mean PABAK ≥0.70, but only 6/22 (27%) of frequently identified BCTs reached the 0.70 threshold.

    “All of the BCTs under 'occasionally' and 'rarely' identified categories achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.70 but only 6 out of the 22 (27%) of the BCTs in the 'frequently' identified category reached the 0.70 threshold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Concurrent validity scores for the 15 BCTs at time 1 ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, with four BCTs having scores <0.70.

    “Concurrent validity scores for the 15 BCTs at time 1 ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, with four BCTs having scores < 0.70.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Twenty of the 22 frequently identified BCTs meet the 0.70 threshold when reliability is represented by AC1, but only six meet it when represented by PABAK [χ2(1, n=44)=15.89; p<0.001].

    “Twenty of the 22 of the BCTs from the 'frequently' identified category meet the threshold of 0.70 when reliability is represented by AC1 but only six meet this threshold when represented by PABAK [χ 2 (degrees of freedom = 1, n = 44) = 15.89;p < 0.001].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Poorer reliabilities were more common for frequently occurring BCTs; just 12 of the 22 (55%) achieved mean PABAK scores of at least 0.68 and six (27%) achieved at least 0.70.

    “Poorer reliabilities were more common for frequently occurring BCTs; just 12 of the 22 (55%) achieved mean PABAK scores of ≥ 0.68 and six (27%) achieved ≥ 0.70.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reliability was high and similar over the 40 intervention protocols coded.

    “We found that reliability was high and similar over the 40 intervention protocols coded.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BCT 'credible source' created considerable difficulty as indicated by low reliability and validity for coders, and also low reliability for the experienced coders.

    “The BCT 'credible source', created considerable difficulty as indicated by low reliability and validity for coders, but also low reliability for the experienced coders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BCT 'credible source' showed poor intercoder reliability among coders and poor validity.

    “This BCT showed poor intercoder reliability among coders and poor validity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both prompts/cues and adding objects to the environment fell below the 0.70 threshold.

    “Both prompts/cues and adding objects to the environment also fell below the 0.70 threshold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Free response feedback was categorised into three themes: BCT definitions and labels that remain unclear/require refinement; improving reliable and valid application; and methods to improve the usability of BCTTv1.

    “Free response feedback was categorised into three themes: (1) BCT definitions and labels that remain unclear/require refinement, (2) improving reliable and valid application and (3) methods to improve the usability of BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Good intercoder reliability was observed across the 80 identified BCTs, with 80% achieving mean PABAK scores of at least 0.70 and 74% with scores of at least 0.80.

    “Good intercoder reliability was observed across the 80 identified BCTs, with 80% achieving mean PABAK scores of at least 0.70 and 74% with scores of ≥ 0.80.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four BCTs achieved intercoder reliability mean PABAK scores of 0.68 and 0.69 at time 1: problem-solving (0.69), demonstration of the behaviour (0.69), self-monitoring of behaviour (0.69) and monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback (0.68).

    “Four BCTs achieved intercoder reliability mean PABAK scores of 0.68 and 0.69, at time 1.These were: problem-solving (0.69), demonstration of the behaviour (0.69), self-monitoring of behaviour (0.69) and monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour without feedback (0.68).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Coders' confidence in identifying BCTs was not related to either intercoder agreement or to agreement with experienced coders.

    “Coders' confidence in identifying BCTs was not related to either intercoder agreement or to agreement with experienced coders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Trained coders' confidence in their BCT identifications increased from time 1 to time 2 and varied across BCTs.

    “Trained coders' confidence in their BCT identifications increased from time 1 to time 2, and varied across BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Coders tended to find several pairs of BCTs difficult to distinguish: instruction on how to perform the behaviour versus demonstration of the behaviour; goal-setting (behaviour) versus goal-setting (outcome); goal-setting (behaviour) versus action planning; and restructuring the physical environment versus adding objects to the environment.

    “Coders tended to find several 'pairs' of BCTs difficult to distinguish: instruction on how to perform the behaviour versus demonstration of the behaviour; goal-setting (behaviour) versus goal-setting (outcome); goal-setting (behaviour) versus action planning and restructuring the physical environment versus adding objects to the environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BCTTv1 defines 93 separate BCTs, 80 of which were identified by coders in 40 published intervention descriptions.

    “BCTTv1 defines 93 separate BCTs, 80 of which were identified by coders in 40 published intervention descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Study 5c, a total of 78 written intervention descriptions were assessed, 39 written before training and 39 written by the same writers after training using BCTTv1.

    “A total of 78 written intervention descriptions were assessed; 39 written before training and 39 written by the same writers following training and using BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The process involved much iteration through testing, refinement and consultation with 77 users and training 351 coders and writers in the taxonomy to identify BCTs in descriptions and report observed interventions.

    “The process involved much iteration through testing, refinement and consultation with 77 users and training 351 coders and writers in the taxonomy to identify BCTs in descriptions and report observed interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In Study 5c, writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a useful, good and desirable concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were used, with all means above the mid-point of the scale.

    “Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In Study 5c, quality of written intervention descriptions, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged greater for descriptions written after training using BCTTv1.

    “Quality of written intervention descriptions (RQ 1a): quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery and replicability of mode of delivery was judged to be greater for descriptions written after training using BCTTv1: clarity of active ingredients”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In an earlier study, means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were above the mid-point for both groups of writers.

    “Means for perceived difficulty of the writing task were also above the mid-point for both groups of writers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Descriptions produced in the trained and/or BCTTv1 condition were only found to perform better than the control condition for reliability of identification of BCTs in study 5b and for rated clarity and replicability of descriptions in study 5c.

    “As Tables 16 and 17 show, the descriptions produced in the trained and/or BCTTv1 condition were only found to perform better than those of the control condition for the reliability of identification of BCTs (study 5b) and for the rated clarity and replicability of the descriptions (study 5c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Expert consensus established the presence/absence of 21 BCTs in video 1 and 15 BCTs in video 2.

    “This process established expert consensus about the presence/absence of 21 BCTs in video 1 and 15 BCTs in video 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Since launching in early 2014, the BCTTv1 app has received 500 downloads via the Google Play and Apple App stores.

    “Since launching in early 2014, the app has received 500 downloads via the Google Play™ store and Apple App SM store (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    To date, the team have trained 350 people in eight full- and four half-day workshops and 75 people in group tutorials.

    “To date, we have trained 350 people in eight full-and four half-day workshops and 75 people in group tutorials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In an earlier study, writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a useful, good and desirable concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were used, with all means above the mid-point of the scale.

    “Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BCTTv1 was developed and evaluated in a series of stages involving 400 behaviour change experts.

    “This taxonomy was developed and evaluated in a series of stages involving 400 behaviour change experts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Demand for face-to-face training remains high; since completion of the project, the team have facilitated a further 100 workshops, training approximately 3000 researchers, practitioners and policy-makers.

    “Demand for face-to-face training remains high.Since completion of the project, the team have facilitated a further 100 workshops, training approximately 3000 researchers, practitioners and policy-makers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task, as means were above the mid-point of the scale.

    “However, the data for the 'easy-difficult' paired adjective item suggest that both groups considered using BCTTv1 as being a difficult task as means were above the mid-point of the scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery, replicability of active ingredients and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged to be greater for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.

    “Quality of written intervention descriptions (RQ 1a): quality, in terms of clarity of active ingredients, clarity of mode of delivery, replicability of active ingredients and replicability of mode of delivery, was judged to be greater for descriptions written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1: clarity of active ingredients”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A total of 85 written intervention descriptions were assessed in study 5b: 29 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and 56 written by trained writers using BCTTv1.

    “A total of 85 written intervention descriptions were assessed; 29 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1 and 56 written by trained writers using BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used.

    “Writers thought that using BCTTv1 to write intervention descriptions was a 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' concept and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable if the taxonomy were to be used (all means above mid-point of the scale).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BCTTv1 is a hierarchical taxonomy of 93 distinctive, non-overlapping BCTs clustered into 16 groupings, each with a clear label, definition and examples.

    “This resulted in a hierarchical taxonomy of 93 distinctive, non-overlapping BCTs clustered into 16 groupings, each with a clear label, definition and examples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A total of 42 written intervention descriptions were assessed in study 5a: 18 written by untrained writers using BCTTv1 and 24 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.

    “A total of 42 written intervention descriptions were assessed: 18 written by untrained writers using BCTTv1 and 24 written by untrained writers not using BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The training was four distance group tutorials, substantially less than the training that the authors' research groups used when applying precursor taxonomies.

    “The training was four distance group tutorials, which is substantially less than the training that the authors' research groups used when applying precursor taxonomies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Face-to-face training is labour intensive for trainers, and the study team has been unable to meet the demand from users wanting to be trained.

    “As face-to-face training, delivered either in a 1-day workshop or distance group tutorial format, is labour intensive for the trainers, the study team has been unable to meet the demand from users wanting to be trained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both workshop and distance group tutorial training formats increased validity of coding BCTs in intervention descriptions.

    “We showed that both workshop and distance group tutorial training formats increased validity of coding BCTs in intervention descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Recruitment was conducted via known networks and contacts, resulting in the 400 people involved being predominantly from Europe and the USA, with only a sprinkling from countries beyond.

    “Constraints in terms of both time and financial resources meant that recruitment was conducted via known networks and contacts, with the result that the 400 people involved in the work were predominantly from Europe and the USA, with only a sprinkling from countries beyond this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most of the training focused on identifying BCTs from written descriptions and videos; only 30 minutes was devoted to how to write sentences about active ingredients using BCTTv1 with a single task, and no emphasis was placed on writing down other intervention components alongside active ingredients.

    “Most of the training focused on identifying BCTs from written descriptions and videos; however, only 30 minutes was devoted to how to write sentences about active ingredients using the BCTTv1 with a single task, and no emphasis was placed on the importance of writing down other intervention components, e.g.delivery procedures, alongside the active ingredients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants did not express dissatisfaction with the writing task in their feedback.

    “Nevertheless, participants did not express dissatisfaction with this task in their feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingnone given

    Our experience has shown that a large number of users and potential users wish to undergo formal training in the use of BCTTv1.

    “Our experience has shown that a large number of users and potential users wish to undergo formal training in the use of BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Training in BCTTv1 was as likely to make descriptions worse as to improve them, although it was limited to the context of reporting interventions for which the only source of information was watching a brief video.

    “Our training was as likely to make the descriptions worse as it was to improve them, although it was limited to the context of reporting interventions for which the only source of information was watching a brief video.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The time pressure of the workshops meant that the videos were very brief and there was not time to show them more than once.

    “Additionally, the time pressure of the workshops meant that the videos were very brief and there was not time to show them more than once (which many participants requested).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All seven participants enrolled while the initial contingency management procedures were in place reported difficulty adhering to the intervention schedule, and only two attended at least 12 of their 36 visits.

    “All seven participants enrolled in the study while the above procedures were in place reported difficulty adhering to the intervention schedule, and only two attended ≥ 12 of their 36 visits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Literature reviews find that even essential elements of interventions are frequently omitted from intervention descriptions; an analysis of trials and reviews found that 67% of pharmacological intervention descriptions were adequate, compared with only 29% of non-pharmacological intervention descriptions.

    “Literature reviews find that even essential elements of interventions are frequently omitted from intervention descriptions; an analysis of trials and reviews found that 67% of pharmacological intervention descriptions were adequate, compared with only 29% of non-pharmacological intervention descriptions.41”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Glasziou, 2008, What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates specifying intervention content in terms of BCTs.

    “The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions advocates this approach (Craig P, Dieppe O, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ 2008;337:a1655).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Craig P, Dieppe O, MacIntyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.BMJ 2008;337:a1655

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The TIDieR checklist and guide for reporting all types of interventions was developed using consensus methods with international participants from several disciplines and proposes a minimum set of information.

    “The TIDieR checklist and guide for reporting all types of interventions was developed using consensus methods with international participants from several disciplines and proposes a minimum set of information: brief name, why (rationale), what materials, what procedure, who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, changes, how well monitored and how well delivered.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Hoffmann, 2014, Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent meta-analysis found that BCIs are often not designed on a clear theoretical foundation; only 22.5% of 235 implementation studies explicitly used theories of behaviour change, and the majority of those doing so gave no clear explanation for why the selected theories had been used.

    “However, a recent meta-analysis found that BCIs are often not designed on a clear theoretical foundation; for example, only 22.5% of 235 implementation studies explicitly used theories of behaviour change 58,59 and the majority of those doing so gave no clear explanation for why the selected theories had been used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [58] Prestwich, 2014, Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis, Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59] Davies, 2010, A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Therefore, there is a clear need for improving methods for applying theory to intervention design to increase understanding of how BCTs exert their influences.

    “Therefore, there is a clear need for improving methods for applying theory to intervention design to increase our understanding of how BCTs exert their influences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abraham and Michie developed the first cross-behaviour BCT taxonomy, building on previous intervention content analyses.

    “Abraham and Michie 20 developed the first cross-behaviour BCT taxonomy, building on previous intervention content analyses.18,19”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Hardeman, 2000, Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods, Int J Obes (Lond) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Albarracín, 2005, A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the 93 items of BCTTv1, it is necessary to group the BCTs to make the taxonomy more memorable and useable.

    “Given the 93 items of BCTTv1, it is necessary to group the BCTs to make the taxonomy more memorable and useable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The resulting BCTs have relevance among experts from varied behavioural domains, disciplines and countries, and potential relevance to the populations from which they were drawn.

    “Therefore, the resulting BCTs have relevance among experts from varied behavioural domains, disciplines and countries, and potential relevance to the populations from which they were drawn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Morton et al. had considerable difficulty in identifying the necessary components of motivational interviewing and as a result found it difficult to synthesise evidence of efficacy.

    “Morton et al. 44 had considerable difficulty in identifying the necessary components of motivational interviewing and as a result found it difficult to synthesise evidence of efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Morton, 2015, The effectiveness of motivational interviewing for health behaviour change in primary care settings: a systematic review [published online ahead of print 2014], Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample of experts had some diversity but was predominantly European and from a psychological background.

    “Although we had some diversity of expertise, we acknowledge the predominance of European experts from a psychological background within our sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Grouping BCTs by theory would help guide understanding of the functional relationships between BCTs, the underlying mechanisms through which they exert their effects, and the most effective ways in which BCTs can be applied.

    “Grouping BCTs by theory would help guide understanding of the functional relationships between BCTs, the underlying mechanisms through which they exert their effects and the most effective ways in which BCTs can be applied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Although subsequent development of classification systems of defined and reliably identifiable BCTs has been accompanied by a progressive increase in their comprehensiveness and clarity, this work has been conducted by only a few research groups, but with each developing their own methodology.

    “Although the subsequent development of classification systems of defined and reliably identifiable BCTs has been accompanied by a progressive increase in their comprehensiveness and clarity, this work has been conducted by only a few research groups, but with each developing their own methodology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Delphi-type methods involved 14 individuals, an appropriate number for these methods.

    “Our Delphi-type methods involved 14 individuals, an appropriate number for these methods, 51 but a number that makes the choice of participants important.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Pill, 1971, The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography, Socio Econ Plan Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The importance of understanding the theoretical underpinnings of BCTs has been highlighted in previous research.

    “The importance of understanding the theoretical underpinnings of BCTs has been highlighted in previous research.10,21,56,57”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] Michie, 2009, Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] Dombrowski, 2012, Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care, Patient Educ Couns source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Taylor, 2012, The impact of theory on the effectiveness of worksite physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis and meta-regression, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effective BCTs have been identified for interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating, and to support smoking cessation, reduce excessive alcohol consumption, prevent sexually transmitted infections and change professional behaviour.

    “Effective BCTs have been identified for interventions to increase physical activity and healthy eating, 23,48 and to support smoking cessation, 27,46 reduce excessive alcohol consumption, 29 prevent sexually transmitted infections 19,30 and change professional behaviour.49”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [23] Michie, 2009, Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression, Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Dombrowski, 2010, Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Michie, 2011, Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation, Addict Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] West, 2010, Behavior change techniques used by the English Stop Smoking Services and their associations with short-term quit outcomes, Nicotine Tob Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Michie, 2012, Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, Addiction source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Therefore, BCTTv1 requires structure to facilitate recall and access, and increase speed and accuracy of use.

    “Therefore, it requires structure to facilitate recall and access to the BCTs, and thus increase speed and accuracy of use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This proliferation of systems leads to duplication of effort and undermines the potential to accumulate evidence across reviews.

    “This proliferation of systems leads to duplication of effort and undermines the potential to accumulate evidence across reviews.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As the number of identified BCTs has increased, so has the need for such a structure to improve usability.

    “As the number of identified BCTs has increased, so also has the need for such a structure, to improve the usability of the taxonomy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    A hierarchically structured taxonomy provides the advantage of making it more coherent to, and useable by, those applying it.

    “A true, that is hierarchically structured, taxonomy provides the advantage of making it more coherent to, and useable by, those applying it.37”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Stavri, 2012, Classification systems in behavioural science: current systems and lessons from the natural, medical and social sciences, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The TDF is an integrative framework of theoretical constructs of behaviour change originally developed by 18 psychological theorists, 16 health service researchers, and 30 health psychologists.

    “The TDF is an integrative framework of theoretical constructs of behaviour change that was originally developed by 18 psychological theorists in collaboration with 16 health service researchers and 30 health psychologists.45”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Michie, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A method developed for this purpose is the reliable specification of interventions in terms of BCTs.

    “A method developed for this purpose is the reliable specification of interventions in terms of BCTs.20”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Evidence is emerging that some BCTs from BCTTv1 occur more frequently than others in descriptions of BCIs.

    “Evidence is already emerging to suggest that some BCTs from BCTTv1 occur more frequently than others in descriptions of BCIs.40”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Theories of behaviour change summarise what is known about the mechanisms of behaviour change and the conditions in which behaviour change is most likely to occur.

    “Theories of behaviour change summarise what is known about the mechanisms of behaviour change and the conditions in which behaviour change is most likely to occur.8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Michie, 2012, Theories and techniques of behaviour change: developing a cumulative science of behaviour change, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It would appear that the lower-level groupings are more in line with the TDF domains than the empirically higher-order groupings, suggesting that the higher-level grouping shared by respondents does not align as well with the theoretical domains.

    “It would appear that the lower-level groupings are more in line with the TDF domains than the empirically higher-order groupings, suggesting that the higher-level grouping shared by respondents does not align as well with the theoretical domains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An effective training programme is built on four basic principles: setting training goals, demonstration of knowledge and skills, practice or rehearsal of skills, and provision of feedback to trainees during and after practice.

    “An effective training programme is built on four basic principles: (1) setting training goals involving provision of information or concepts to be learned, (2) demonstration of knowledge and skills to be learned, (3) practice or rehearsal of skills learned and (4) provision of feedback to trainees during and after practice.92,93”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [92] Salas, 2001, The science of training: a decade of progress, Annu Rev Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [93] Salas, 2002, Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: some food for thought, Int J Manag Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first version of the TDF contains 12 theoretical domains synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs; the validated version has 14 domains.

    “The first version of the TDF contains 12 theoretical domains synthesised from 128 theoretical constructs related to behaviour change; the validated version 61 suggested minor modifications, with 14 domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Cane, 2012, Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The differences in sex and country of residence were an artefact of the selection process as there was no duplication of participants across the two sort tasks.

    “This was an artefact of the selection process as there was no duplication of participants across the two sort tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The sample size for the closed-sort task was based on estimates given for content-validation exercises, with 2-24 participants being shown to be sufficient and more than five participants reducing the influence of rater outliers.

    “The sample size for the closed-sort task was based on estimates given for content-validation exercises, with 2-24 participants being shown to be sufficient [74][75][76][77] and more than five participants reducing the influence of rater outliers.78”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [74][75][76][77]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] Carmines, 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    There was no overlap in participants between the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks.

    “There was no overlap in participants between the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' sort tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Collaborative or co-operative training strategies and active learning techniques such as discussion are more effective than traditional, lecture-style training for acquiring new knowledge, building skills and increasing motivation to continue to improve skills.

    “The research literature suggests that collaborative or co-operative training strategies (i.e.working together in small groups towards a common goal) and active learning techniques such as discussion are more effective than traditional, lecture-style training for acquiring new knowledge, building skills and increasing motivation to continue to improve skills.91”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] Pollock, 2011, Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings, J Polit Sci Educ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A previous study linking 35 BCTs to 11 theoretical domains from the original TDF showed good reliability across four researchers, with 71% agreement over 385 possible links.

    “A previous study linking 35 BCTs to 11 theoretical domains from the original TDF showed good reliability across four researchers, with 71% agreement over the 385 possible links.43”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Michie, 2008, From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques, Appl Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Use of an open-sort grouping task allowed individual groupings to hold equal weight and be aggregated using empirical techniques.

    “First, use of an open-sort grouping task allowed for the individual groupings of BCTs defined by participants to hold equal weight within the final solution and be aggregated using empirical techniques (hierarchical cluster analysis in the 'bottom-up' sort task and DCV methods in the 'top-down' sort task).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The grouping of BCTs in the 'top-down' sort task has helped illuminate relationships between particular BCTs and theoretical domains and could aid the selection of BCTs in the construction of theory-based interventions.

    “The grouping of BCTs in the 'top-down' sort task has helped illuminate relationships between particular BCTs and theoretical domains and could aid the selection of BCTs in the construction of theory-based interventions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The TDF has been used by research teams across many countries and health-care systems to investigate implementation problems and inform interventions.

    “The TDF has been used by research teams across many countries and health-care systems to investigate implementation problems and inform interventions to change professional practice.[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Skills are more likely to be retained and improve future practice if trainees feel challenged, receive positive feedback and find the learning process interesting and enjoyable.

    “Skills are more likely to be retained and improve future practice if trainees feel challenged, receive positive feedback and find the learning process interesting and enjoyable.93,94”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93] Salas, 2002, Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: some food for thought, Int J Manag Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [94] Bandura, 1977, Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The TDF was validated using two sort tasks, producing a refined TDF containing 87 theoretical constructs categorised across 14 domains.

    “The TDF was validated using two sort tasks, 61 producing a refined TDF containing 87 theoretical constructs relevant to behaviour change categorised across 14 domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, intentions, goals, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] Cane, 2012, Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    BCTs in distinct groupings are clearly perceived to share a common mode of action in changing behaviour, whereas BCTs in less distinct groupings may be viewed as having less distinct or more than one mode of action.

    “BCTs in distinct groupings are clearly perceived to share a common mode of action in changing behaviour whereas BCTs in less distinct groupings may be viewed as having less distinct or more than one mode of action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This finding suggests that these BCTs may have evolved from several different behavioural domains, theoretical approaches or disciplines and, therefore, may be less associated with a particular theoretical domain.

    “This finding suggests that these BCTs may have evolved from several different behavioural domains, theoretical approaches or disciplines and, therefore, may be less associated with a particular theoretical domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Coder training incorporating these principles and BCTs has previously been evaluated in applying the taxonomy to specify BCT content in written intervention descriptions of behavioural support in smoking cessation, and training in this context was a 3-hour workshop delivered to a mixture of research psychologists and non-psychologist practitioners.

    “Coder training incorporating these principles and BCTs has previously been evaluated in applying the taxonomy to specify BCT content in written intervention descriptions of behavioural support in smoking cessation, and training in this context was a 3-hour workshop delivered to a mixture of research psychologists and non-psychologist practitioners.95”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Those who had been involved in study 1 and/or 2 were not eligible for tutorial training.

    “Those who had been involved in study 1 and/or 2 were not eligible for this training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    PABAK was used rather than Cohen's kappa or percentage agreement because it adjusts for coders sharing bias in the use of categories and high prevalence of negative agreement.

    “PABAK was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic 101 or percentage agreement because it adjusts for (1) coders sharing bias in the use of categories and (2) high prevalence of negative agreement (i.e. when both coders agree the BCT is absent).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [99] Byrt, 1993, Bias, prevalence and kappa, J Clin Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [101] Cohen, 1968, Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The effect of training was evaluated on trainee coding of just one intervention description before and after training for each method.

    “It is important to remember that effect of training was evaluated on trainee coding of just one intervention description before and after training for each of the methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Errorless learning has been shown to be effective in learning new terms.

    “Furthermore, the early part of the workshop focused on simple coding tasks working up to more difficult tasks in an attempt to approach 'errorless learning' as this has been shown to be effective in learning new terms.98”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] Warmington, 2014, Enhancing the learning of new words using an errorless learning procedure: evidence from typical adults, Memory source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To overcome potential practice effects, the assessments were administered in a counterbalanced design, with a random 50% of trainees completing assessment task A at the beginning and B at the end, and the other half completing B followed by A.

    “To overcome potential practice effects, the assessments were administered in a counterbalanced design, so that a random 50% of trainees completed assessment task A at the beginning and B at the end, and the other half completed B followed by A.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Coders who had been involved in the development of BCTTv1 or in the sort tasks to determine hierarchical structure were not eligible for workshop training.

    “Coders who had been involved in the development of BCTTv1 or in the sort tasks to determine hierarchical structure were not eligible for this training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    It is feasible that engagement style and delivery of support, guidance and feedback differed across expert tutors despite similar experience.

    “While guided by a training manual, it is feasible that the engagement style and delivery of support, guidance and feedback differed across expert tutors despite having a similar level of experience to one another.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    In the current study, differences in the efficacy of training across tutorial groups were not compared.

    “In the current study, we did not compare differences in the efficacy of training across the tutorial groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Despite attempts to ensure diversity, the sample of trainees was predominantly female and from the UK.

    “It is also important to acknowledge that, despite attempts to ensure diversity of trainees, our sample were predominantly female and from the UK.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reliable and valid application of BCTTv1 requires skills and, therefore, training.

    “Although BCTTv1 represents an advance in methods for specifying BCIs, reliable and valid application of BCTTv1 will require skills and, therefore, training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    KS checked the allocation of coder feedback to content categories, with discrepancies resolved through discussion.

    “KS (see Acknowledgments) then checked allocation of coder feedback to content categories.Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion between the two researchers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quality of published intervention descriptions is generally poor, with techniques described using different terminology and labelling.

    “However, the quality of published intervention descriptions is generally poor, 95 with techniques described using different terminology and referred to using different labelling.104,105”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [104] Glasziou, 2010, Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [105] Hoffmann, 2013, Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tutorial training allows consolidation of learning and practice between sessions, which may account for the higher proportion of competent coders following training.

    “The fact that tutorial training allows consolidation of learning and practice between sessions may account for the higher proportion of competent coders following training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Training in using BCTTv1 in the form of 1-day workshops or group tutorials held over 6 weeks increased average trainee agreement with expert consensus and doubled the proportion achieving the competence threshold to 46% and 78% respectively.

    “Training in using BCTTv1 in the form of 1-day workshops or group tutorials held over 6 weeks increased average trainee agreement with expert consensus and doubled the proportion achieving the competence threshold to 46% and 78% respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    As the use of BCT methodology increases, BCT content as reported in intervention descriptions is likely to become clearer, leading to increased ease of identifying BCTs.

    “As the use of BCT methodology increases, BCT content as reported in intervention descriptions is likely to become much clearer, leading to increased ease of identifying BCTs.95”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [95] Lorencatto, 2013, Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psych source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase in confidence may be due to the learning environment provided by tutorials, including a support network and more time for reflection and practice between sessions.

    “This may be due to the learning environment provided by tutorials which includes a support network built over the period of multiple and regular sessions, and more time for reflection and practice between sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Training increased workshop trainees' confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in descriptions of BCIs, but did not improve intercoder agreement for either method.

    “Training also increased workshop trainees' confidence in identifying BCTs assessed in descriptions of BCIs, but did not improve intercoder agreement for either method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Trainees were randomly allocated into coding pairs across tutorial groups using a random number generator.

    “Trainees were randomly allocated into coding pairs across tutorial groups using a random number generator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Byrt et al. proposed PABAK, which results in more meaningful indices for data such as BCT coding when prevalence is low and bias may occur; it was chosen by Michie et al. as most appropriate for BCTTv1.

    “Byrt et al. 99 proposed the 'PABAK', which results in considerably more meaningful indices for data such as BCT coding when the prevalence of each BCT is low and bias may occur; therefore, it was the statistic chosen by Michie et al. 40 as the most appropriate to measure intercoder reliability in applying BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [99] Byrt, 1993, Bias, prevalence and kappa, J Clin Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Prevalence-and-bias-adjusted kappa was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic.

    “Prevalence-and bias-adjusted kappa was used rather than Cohen's kappa statistic.101”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [101] Cohen, 1968, Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gwet et al. suggest further adjustment for chance agreement when two coders make random ratings, in the AC1 statistic.

    “Gwet et al. 110 suggest that further adjustment should be made for chance agreement that might occur when two coders make random ratings and make allowance for this in the alternative chancecorrected statistic to kappa (AC1) statistic 110”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [110] Gwet, 2002, Inter-rater reliability: dependency on trait prevalence and marginal homogeneity, Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment Series

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Poor reliability, or good reliability between newly trained coders without agreement with expert consensus, would both be unsatisfactory outcomes.

    “Poor reliability or a good level of reliability between newly trained coders but without agreement with expert consensus would both be unsatisfactory outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When the description is simply unclear, BCTTv1 should enable agreement between coders as it specifies that coders should not infer presence of a BCT from vague descriptions.

    “On the other hand, when the description is simply unclear, BCTTv1 should enable agreement between coders as it clearly specifies that coders should not infer the presence of a BCT from vague descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Landis and Koch suggested kappa scores of 0.60-0.79 can be described as 'substantial' and ≥0.80 as 'outstanding', but conventionally 0.70 is taken as indicative of acceptable intercoder reliability.

    “Landis and Koch 102 have suggested that kappa scores of 0.60-0.79can be described as 'substantial' and that scores of ≥ 0.80 can be described as 'outstanding' but, conventionally, 0.70 is taken to indicative of acceptable intercoder reliability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [102] Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    The extensive discussions in taxonomy development might result in enhanced agreement owing to tacit knowledge beyond explicit labels and definitions.

    “The extensive discussions involved in taxonomy development described by Michie et al. 40 might result in enhanced agreement owing to tacit knowledge beyond the explicit BCT labels and definitions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Of the 26 BCTTv1 BCTs meeting the criterion, nine had 'outstanding' and 14 'substantial' reliabilities.

    “Of the 26 BCTTv1 BCTs meeting this criterion, nine were found to have 'outstanding' and 14 'substantial' reliabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Michie, 2013, The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions, Ann Behav Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Good test-retest reliability was observed across all coders, indicating that those who performed well at time 1 also performed well at time 2.

    “Good test-retest reliability was observed across all coders, indicating that those coders who performed well at time 1 were also those who performed well at time 2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Kappa tends to underestimate identification reliability when the number of instances is small or asymmetric, thus PABAK overcomes these problems.

    “Kappa tends to underestimate identification reliability when the number of instances is small or has asymmetric distribution between agreements and disagreements, thus PABAK overcomes these problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    We used consensus about presence of BCTs as a criterion against which trained coder codings were judged and concurrent validity was assessed.

    “We used this consensus about the presence of BCTs in the descriptions as a criterion against which trained coder codings were judged and concurrent validity was assessed.107”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Abraham, 2015, Reliability of identification of behavior change techniques in intervention descriptions [published online ahead of print August 20 2015], Ann Behav Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trained coders (n=48) were randomised into 24 pairs using a random number generator.

    “The trained coders (n = 48) were randomised into 24 pairs using a random number generator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    High reliability with poor validity might occur for reasons such as misleading pre-coding discussion or a misleading cue in the intervention description.

    “High reliability with poor validity might occur for a variety of reasons such as misleading pre-coding discussion or a misleading cue in the intervention description.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A random number generator was used to allocate descriptions to coder pairings.

    “A random number generator was also used to allocate descriptions to coder pairings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    It is possible for two coders to reach good agreement but be wrong, i.e., reliable but not valid.

    “Fourth, it is quite possible for two coders to reach good agreement but be wrong, that is it is reliable but not valid.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Improved coding systems cannot facilitate detection of a BCT if the description omits to mention it; Lorencatto et al. found published descriptions reported on average less than half the BCTs included in longer protocol descriptions.

    “Improved coding systems cannot facilitate detection of a BCT if the description omits to mention that it was included in the intervention; Lorencatto et al. 12 found that published descriptions reported, on average, less than half the BCTs that were included in the longer protocol descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Lorencatto, 2013, Assessing fidelity of delivery of smoking cessation behavioural support in practice, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reliability statistics indicate levels of agreement but do not quantify the degree of error that might be incurred when scientists try to replicate interventions from descriptions.

    “Although these reliability statistics indicate levels of agreement, they do not quantify the degree of error that might be incurred when scientists try to replicate interventions from their descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Validity was reasonably high and remained stable over a 1-month period.

    “Validity was reasonably high and remained stable over a 1-month period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Estimates of validity require a criterion against which codes are judged, but for intervention descriptions such a criterion does not exist.

    “Estimates of validity require a criterion against which the codes are judged, but in the case of intervention descriptions such a criterion does not exist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Quota sampling ensured protocols were selected from each of three broad categories.

    “Quota sampling ensured that protocols were selected from each of these three broad categories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abraham and Michie assessed reliability between the two coders who developed the 26 BCT definitions and between the first author and two other trained coders.

    “Abraham and Michie 20 assessed reliability between the two coders who developed the 26 BCT definitions (the authors) and also between the first author and two other coders trained to use the taxonomy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Abraham, 2008, A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions, Health Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    BCTTv1 might enable authors to report fuller, clearer descriptions of their evaluated interventions.

    “BCTTv1 might enable authors to report fuller, clearer descriptions of their evaluated interventions.17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Michie, 2011, Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The criterion of 'at least five identifications' was set because more frequent BCTs give greater confidence that PABAK is a useful indicator of reliability.

    “We set the criteria of 'at least five identifications' because the more frequent the BCTs, the greater the confidence that PABAK is a useful indicator of reliability of judging the BCT to be present.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Across 78 reliability tests of 26 defined BCTs and BCT clusters across 195 published intervention descriptions, the average kappa per technique was 0.79, with only three BCTs yielding kappa scores <0.70.

    “Across 78 reliability tests (of identification of 26 defined BCTs and BCT clusters across 195 published intervention descriptions) the average kappa per technique was 0.79 with only three BCTs yielding kappa scores of < 0.70.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most researchers would probably accept that BCT definitions generating kappa scores of 0.70 can be reliably identified but may have reservations about lower scores.

    “Most researchers would probably accept that BCTs definitions generating kappa scores of 0.70 can be reliably identified but may have reservations about those with lower scores.108”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] Johnston, 2013, Specifying the active content of behaviour change interventions: the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1), Revista de Psicología de la Salud (New Age) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If an intervention contained some BCTs that were reliably coded and some that were not, replication might fail owing to omission of poorly recognised BCTs.

    “So, for example, if an intervention contained some BCTs that were reliably coded and some that were not, replication of the intervention might fail owing to the omission of poorly recognised BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Thirty-two coders completed the exercise at time 2 (16 coding pairs, comprising the same trained coders as time 1).

    “Thirty-two coders completed the exercise at time 2 (16 coding pairs, comprising the same trained coders as time 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Failure to replicate might also occur if the intervention description was badly written, either by omitting aspects or by lack of clarity.

    “There might also be failure to replicate if the intervention description was badly written, either by omitting aspects of the intervention or by lack of clarity in the description.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    An independent coder (KS) checked allocation of feedback to themes.

    “An independent coder (KS) then checked allocation of feedback to themes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Various authors have proposed different methods of assessing kappa that adjust for its limitations.

    “Finally, various authors have proposed different methods of assessing kappa that adjust for its limitations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    At time 1, 40 coders (20 coding pairs) of the 48 completed the exercise, generating 8-12 (as opposed to planned 12) sets of reliability data for each of the 40 intervention descriptions.

    “At time 1, 40 coders (20 coding pairs) of the 48 coders completed the exercise generating 8-12 (as opposed to the planned 12) sets of reliability data for each of the 40 intervention descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Conventionally, 0.70 is regarded as indicative of acceptable or good inter-rater reliability as indicated by Cohen's kappa.

    “Guidance on interpretation of Cohen's kappa and other reliability statistics has been published and, conventionally, 0.70 is regarded as indicative of acceptable of good inter-rater reliability as indicated by Cohen's kappa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    In the absence of evidence-based guidance on interpretation of PABAK scores, we report means above and below 0.70 and 0.80.

    “In the absence of evidence-based guidance on interpretation of PABAK scores, we report means above and below 0.70 and 0.80.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    BCT identifications rated with low confidence could indicate problems with specific BCTs or ambiguity of descriptions, which might prevent good intercoder reliability and accurate replication.

    “Fifth, BCT identifications rated with low confidence by coders could indicate problems with specific BCTs or ambiguity of specific intervention descriptions, which might prevent achievement of good intercoder reliability and accurate replication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Coders made extensive use of BCTTv1, justifying the large number of BCTs included.

    “Thus, coders made extensive use of BCTTv1, justifying the large number of BCTs included.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may be important to distinguish between perceived professional competence of those delivering interventions and their 'credibility'.

    “Plus it may be important to distinguish between perceived professional competence of those delivering the interventions and their 'credibility', which could also be based on common group membership.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    PABAK is as good as AC1 for rare BCTs but not for frequent BCTs.

    “Comparison of the pattern of results for frequent and rare BCTs suggests that PABAK is as good as AC1 for the rare but not for the frequent BCTs, while the poor reliabilities (using PABAK) were more common for frequently occurring BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The consistent difference between the scores indicates that AC1 takes account of more sources of error in these data and is more appropriate for establishing the level of agreement in BCT coding.

    “The use of more than one statistic to assess agreement is a relatively new approach and the consistent difference between the scores indicates that the AC1 takes account of more sources of error in these data and, therefore, is more appropriate for establishing the level of agreement in BCT coding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    BCTTv1 provides a uniquely comprehensive list of BCTs.

    “BCTTv1 provides a uniquely comprehensive list of BCTs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Coders provided clear feedback suggesting that further distinction between BCT groupings was needed.

    “Nonetheless, coders provided clear feedback suggesting that further distinction between such BCTs groupings was needed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Study 5a was a randomised controlled trial examining the effects of providing BCTTv1, without training, on the writing of BCI descriptions.

    “Study 5a examined the effects of providing BCTTv1, without training, in a RCT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    It may be appropriate to remain somewhat circumspect about trained coders' feedback on clarity of BCT definitions because confidence in BCT identification was not related to observed intercoder reliability or to trained coder agreement with experienced coder consensus.

    “It may be appropriate to remain somewhat circumspect about trained coders' feedback on clarity of BCT definitions as confidence in BCT identification was not related to observed intercoder reliability (and indeed tended to be negatively correlated) or to trained coder agreement with experienced coder consensus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Guessing may be more likely for common than for rare BCTs, which would result in occurrence of the random effects that AC1 controls and confirms the need to use AC1 rather than PABAK in studies assessing reliability.

    “As was suggested by our comparison of confidence ratings across BCT categories, guessing may be more likely for common than for rare BCTs.This would result in occurrence of the random effects that AC1 controls and confirms the need to use AC1 rather than PABAK in studies assessing reliability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Using observed interventions is a rather artificial scenario because usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.

    “However, this is a rather artificial scenario as usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The importance of message-source credibility has been recognised for over half a century.

    “The importance of message-source credibility has been recognised for over half a century 151”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [151] Hovland, 1953

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The writers of intervention descriptions reflected a range of potential users of BCTTv1: primary researchers, systematic reviewers, funders, policy-makers and practitioners, and both trained and untrained users of BCTTv1.

    “The writers of intervention descriptions ('writers') reflected a range of potential users of BCTTv1: primary researchers, systematic reviewers, funders, policy-makers and practitioners, and both trained and untrained users of the BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Guessing may be more likely for frequently occurring BCTs than for rare BCTs, meaning that random effects such as those that AC1 controls for could emerge.

    “Guessing may be more likely for frequently occurring BCTs than for rare BCTs meaning that random effects, such as those that AC1 controls for, could emerge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The BCT 'credible source' requires further clarification and specification.

    “This is clearly a BCT that requires further clarification and specification but should be retained because of its relevance to behaviour change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The high reliability observed might not be maintained in intervention descriptions of poorer quality.

    “However, as reported above, we used a sample of descriptions included in well-cited journals that publish BCI protocols related to health improvement and this reliability might not be maintained in intervention descriptions of poorer quality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The high correlation between the measures indicates that the pattern of relative agreement across BCTs is adequately represented by either score, although PABAK may result in fewer frequently observed BCTs achieving reliability above thresholds such as 0.70.

    “The high correlation between the measures indicates that the pattern of relative agreement across BCTs is adequately represented by either score, although the PABAK may result in fewer frequently observed BCTs achieving reliability above thresholds such as 0.70, as used here.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Validity of BCTTv1 is demonstrated among new users and does not depend on additional discussion and cues that may have influenced the experienced coders.

    “Thus, validity of BCTTv1 is demonstrated among new users and does not depend on additional discussion and cues that may have influenced the experienced coders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may be important to distinguish between characteristics of those delivering interventions and the content of what they deliver.

    “Finally, it may be important to distinguish between characteristics of those delivering interventions and the content of what they deliver.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The taxonomy can be used both by developers and implementers of BCIs and by those wishing to identify effective BCTs within complex interventions.

    “The taxonomy can be used both by developers and implementers of BCIs and by those wishing to identify effective BCTs within complex interventions (e.g.systematic reviews).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Untrained raters were 12 practitioners unfamiliar with BCTTv1.

    “Untrained raters were 12 practitioners unfamiliar with BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To establish consensus about the presence of BCTs in the videos, four BCT coders independently coded both videos using BCTTv1, discrepancies were discussed, and all coders agreed the final codings.

    “Consensus on BCTs delivered: to establish consensus about the presence of BCTs in the videos, four BCT coders who had been involved in developing BCTTv1 (MJ, JF, SM and WH) independently coded both videos using BCTTv1.Each video was coded by two coders and discrepancies were discussed within each of the pairs.If a resolution was not obvious, SM and the study researcher (CW) reviewed the remaining”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Coders were randomly allocated to a set of descriptions using the same randomisation methods as described for raters.

    “Behaviour change technique coding of written descriptions (coders): using the same randomisation methods as described for raters, coders were randomly allocated to a set of descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Participants under high mental load and in a stressful situation displayed greater levels of physiological stress reaction when asked to relax than participants who were not asked to relax.

    “Participants under high mental load and in a stressful situation displayed greater levels of physiological stress reaction when asked to relax than participants who were not asked to relax.157”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [157] Wegner, 1997, Ironic effects of trying to relax under stress, Behav Res Ther source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The value of BCTTv1 is demonstrated by the number of people wishing training in its use.

    “The value of this resource is demonstrated by the number of people wishing training in its use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BCTTv1 is a comprehensive cross-behaviour and consensus-based BCT taxonomy representing significant progress towards a shared language for reliable and accurate description of intervention content.

    “but it has produced BCTTv1, a comprehensive cross-behaviour and consensus-based BCT taxonomy representing significant progress towards a shared language for reliable and accurate description of intervention content.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Study 5c used a within-person design to assess change in the quality of BCI descriptions before training without provision of BCTTv1 and after training with provision of BCTTv1.

    “Study 5c used a within-person design to assess change in the quality of BCI descriptions before training, without provision of BCTTv1 and quality of descriptions after training, with provision of BCTTv1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Therapists who participated in a training programme showed unexpected deterioration in skills after training.

    “Furthermore, therapists who participated in a training programme showed unexpected deterioration in skills after training.158”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [158] Henry, 1993, Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: mediators of therapists’ responses to training, J Consult Clin Psych source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To help ensure unfamiliarity with BCTTv1, only practitioners who had registered but who had not yet started their training with the NCSCT were invited to take part.

    “To help ensure unfamiliarity with BCTTv1, only practitioners who had registered but who had not yet started their training with the NCSCT were invited to take part.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When the project began, there was widespread and growing use of the taxonomy developed by Abraham and Michie and various research groups were developing their own taxonomies for application to different kinds of intervention.

    “When this project began, there was widespread and growing use of the taxonomy developed by Abraham and Michie 20 and various research groups were developing their own taxonomies for application to different kinds of intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abraham and Michie 20

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is evidence of a paradoxical effect of incentives on skilled performance, described as a choking effect.

    “For example, there is evidence of a paradoxical effect of incentives on skilled performance, described as a 'choking effect'.156”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [156] Baumeister, 1984, Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance, J Pers Soc Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To counteract potential practice and ordering effects, two videos with the same target behaviour (smoking cessation) were administered in a counterbalanced design.

    “To counteract potential practice and ordering effects, we used two videos with the same target behaviour (smoking cessation) and these were administered in a counterbalanced design.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    For the RCTs in studies 5a and 5b, writers were randomised into two groups by selecting a letter from a bag containing equal numbers of A and B and a total equal to the number of workshop attendees.

    “Randomisation for RCTs (studies 5a and 5b): at the start of the workshop, writers were randomised into two groups to complete the writing task by selecting a letter (either A or B) from a bag containing equal numbers of A and B and a total equal to the number of workshop attendees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The clarity and replicability results in study 5c report only a small effect that might not be meaningful in practice and could be due to practice effects because trained writing followed untrained writing.

    “Even so, the latter results report only a small effect, one that might not be meaningful in practice and could simply be due to practice effects as the trained writing followed the untrained writing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The lack of clear benefit is not simply due to lack of power, because Study 5a, which had the largest number of writers, did not show the benefit of training except for reliability of BCT identification.

    “This is not simply due to lack of power as even Study 5a which had the largest number of writers did not show the benefit of training except for reliability of BCT identification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To overcome potential confounding effects of possible differences in task difficulty between videos, two videos were used and were shown in a counterbalanced design.

    “To overcome potential confounding effects of possible differences in task difficulty between videos, two videos were used and were shown in a counterbalanced design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The writing task was an unusual task and was outside the normal activities involved in intervention development and reporting.

    “In terms of the writing task, this was an unusual task and was outside the normal activities involved in intervention development and reporting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These studies confounded training condition with time of day, which was inevitable given the resources of the study.

    “In terms of design, these studies confounded training condition with time of day, which was inevitable given the resources of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The e-learning programme and 1-day workshops are good introductions but unlikely on their own to bring participants to the level of expertise required for research and implementation.

    “However, we consider that this programme, and 1-day workshops, are good introductions but unlikely, on their own, to bring participants to the level of expertise required for research and implementation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The experimental paradigm was probably too artificial and implemented too hastily to be a good basis for the evaluation.

    “In retrospect, this experimental paradigm was probably too artificial and implemented too hastily for it to have been a good basis for the evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The nature of the reporting task was rather artificial and probably not a good test of BCTTv1.

    “Therefore, although the findings of our studies did not support the added value of using BCTTv1 in reporting observed interventions, the nature of the task was rather artificial and so probably not a good test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The writing task was constrained by the time available within the workshop format and it was difficult to decide on the appropriate time allowed for completing the task.

    “The task was constrained by the time available within the workshop format and it was also difficult to decide on the appropriate time allowed for completing the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Developing a consensus about how BCTs link to theoretical mechanisms will require intensive work to develop a methodology.

    “Just as developing a consensus list of BCT labels and definitions required intensive work to develop a methodology, so developing a consensus about how BCTs link to theoretical mechanisms will require intensive work to develop a methodology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: When links between BCTs and theoretical constructs are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.
    • Rests on an assumption: Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Psychologists are likely familiar with behaviour change concepts and therefore likely relatively easy to train to use the taxonomy, but wide application will require usability across a range of backgrounds and expertise.

    “Whilst psychologists are likely to be familiar with behaviour change concepts and therefore likely to be relatively easy to train to use the taxonomy, its wide application will require usability across a range of backgrounds and expertise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although guidelines aid assessment of whether intervention components are reported, standardised measures for assessing the quality of reporting of active ingredients and mode of delivery in intervention descriptions are still developing.

    “Although there are guidelines which aid the assessment of whether or not intervention components are reported, the standardised measures for assessing the quality of reporting of active ingredients and mode of delivery in intervention descriptions is still developing.155”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [155] Chan, 2013, SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials, BMJ source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    More widespread use of BCTTv1 is likely to identify ambiguities or uncertainties about labels, definitions and examples, and ways in which they can be improved.

    “More widespread use of BCTTv1 is likely to identify ambiguities or uncertainties about labels, definitions and examples, and ways in which they can be improved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The likely future identification of further BCTs means that maintaining reliability and accuracy in using the taxonomy becomes more challenging.

    “The likely future identification of further BCTs in addition to the already extensive nature of BCTTv1 mean that maintaining reliability and accuracy in using the taxonomy becomes more challenging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although the training was sufficient to train the principles underlying use of the taxonomy and to get acceptable inter-rater reliability and agreement with expert judgements, more training is required to become expert in using the method.

    “Although this is sufficient to train the principles underlying the use of the taxonomy and to get an acceptable degree of inter-rater reliability and agreement with expert judgements, our findings show that more training is required to become expert in using the method.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The online training course remains to be evaluated and the team is not yet in a position to offer training or assessment of skills in using BCTTv1 to report intervention descriptions.

    “This remains to be evaluated and we are not yet in a position to offer training or assessment of skills in using BCTTv1 to report intervention descriptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a recent review identifying 83.

    “A large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a recent review identifying 83.160,161”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [160] Davis, 2014, Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across disciplines: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [161] Michie, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors developed measures of clarity and replicability specifically for studies 5a, 5b and 5c and ensured that active content was rated separately from mode of delivery of the intervention.

    “Hence, we developed measures of clarity and replicability specifically for studies 5a, 5b and 5c and ensured that active content was rated separately from mode of delivery of the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    BCTTv1 provides a means of characterising intervention content to facilitate intervention implementation, delivery and evaluation, and is useful for synthesising evidence.

    “Although BCTTv1 provides a means of characterising intervention content to facilitate intervention implementation, delivery and evaluation, and it is also useful for synthesising evidence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A cross-disciplinary review identified 83 theories used to explain behaviour change.

    “A large number of theories have been used to explain behaviour change, with a cross-disciplinary review identifying 83.160,176”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [160] Davis, 2014, Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across disciplines: a systematic review, Health Psychol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [176] Michie, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Further work needs to be done to establish the psychometric properties of the measures of clarity and replicability.

    “However, further work needs to be done to establish their psychometric properties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given that published reports and existing manuals can effectively be coded into BCTs, there are likely to be benefits of using BCT methodology.

    “Given that published reports and existing manuals can effectively be coded into BCTs, there are likely to be benefits of using BCT methodology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The work conducted in this series of studies represents a step-change in the methodology for reporting the content of BCIs.

    “The work conducted in this series of studies represents a step-change in the methodology for reporting the content of BCIs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Behaviour change technique methodology is a starting point for investigating the effectiveness of single BCTs and combinations of BCTs, and for investigating how other factors may make BCTs more or less effective.

    “Behaviour change technique methodology is a starting point for investigating the effectiveness of single BCTs and the combinations of BCTs that typically characterise interventions in evidence synthesis.It is also a starting point for investigating how other factors, such as mode of delivery, intervention intensity, target behaviour, target population and context, may make BCTs more or less effect”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Ten percent of all urine tests were repeated, and none were discordant.

    “We repeated 10% of all urine tests; none were discordant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    The QuickScreen Pro Multi-Drug Screening Test has an estimated mean detection time in urine of 43.6 to 66.9 hours for methamphetamine and 88.4 hours for benzoylecgonine.

    “For this assay, the estimated mean detection time in urine ranges from 43.6 to 66.9 hours for methamphetamine and is 88.4 hours for benzoylecgonine, a cocaine metabolite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Study staff monitored the collection of all urine samples and tested the samples immediately after their provision.

    “Study staff monitored the collection of all urine samples and tested the samples immediately after their provision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Multiple auditors were used to raise professionals' awareness of their own practice and their team's practice by engaging them in audits.

    “Multiple auditors were used to raise professionals' awareness of their practice, and the practice of their team, by engaging them in audits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The importance of scientific journals ensuring that intervention content is well specified for replication and implementation has been recognised across the research community.

    “The importance of scientific journals ensuring that intervention content is well specified for replication and implementation has been recognised across the research community.15”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Albrecht, 2013, Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations, Implement Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No formal study of rater agreement was conducted.

    “No formal study of rater agreement was conducted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The existing videos used in phase 2a contained an appropriate range of behaviour change techniques suitable for use in that phase.

    “The existing videos contained an appropriate range of BCTs (from NCSCT www.ncsct.co.uk 35 ) suitable for use in this phase”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NCSCT www.ncsct.co.uk 35

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Information from coding delivery of BCTs can be used to improve the training of those who deliver interventions and their long-term implementation.

    “Such information can be used to improve the training of those who deliver interventions and their long-term implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Having access to the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 allows intervention designers to consider a large range of BCTs that might be effective and appropriate for their target behaviour and population.

    “Having access to the 93 BCTs of BCTTv1 allows intervention designers to consider a large range of BCTs that might be effective and appropriate for their target behaviour and population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    It may be important to expand from the initial 22 BCTs to fully specify the intervention.

    “Nevertheless, coders in study 4 used 80 BCTs to describe the 40 intervention descriptions and it may therefore be important to expand from the initial 22 BCTs to fully specify the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The content and format of the informed choice invitation were refined through extensive piloting using 'think aloud' techniques.

    “The content and format of the informed choice invitation were refined through extensive piloting using 'think aloud' techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    BCTTv1 may be used to inform the development of measures for assessing delivery of BCTs.

    “BCTTv1 may also be used to inform the development of measures for assessing delivery of BCTs.31”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Lorencatto, 2014, A method for assessing fidelity of delivery of telephone behavioral support for smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psychol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A scripted protocol was used to avoid the provision of counseling around the results of urine testing.

    “Such a protocol was used to avoid the provision of counseling around the results of the urine testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As BCTTv1 is applied to a wider range of populations, settings and behaviours, adaptations of language and possibly concepts will be needed and new BCTs will be identified.

    “As BCTTv1 is applied to a wider range of populations, settings and behaviours, adaptations of language and possibly concepts will be needed and new BCTs will be identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two medical files from the total sample were double coded by the first investigator to check for consistency.

    “Two medical files from the total sample were double coded by the first investigator to check for consistency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Barrier identification was conducted concurrently with the audit process, using two methods recommended for implementation research.

    “Barrier identification was conducted concurrently with the audit process.To identify barriers, we used two methods that have been recommended for implementation research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To allow attribution of improvements in adolescent outcomes to the incentives, only outcome data from adolescents admitted after sites were randomly assigned to study conditions were used in Target A-CRA-related analyses.

    “In order to attribute improvements in adolescent outcomes to the incentives, only outcome data from adolescents admitted to the AAFT project after sites were randomly assigned to the study conditions will be used in Target A-CRA-related analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Like all technologies, its usefulness will be determined by its application and dissemination by researchers, those designing and delivering interventions, funding agencies, journal editors and policy-makers.

    “Like all technologies, its usefulness will be determined by its application and dissemination by researchers, those designing and delivering interventions, funding agencies, journal editors and policy-makers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A second limitation of sticking with behaviour domain taxonomies is that it limits generalisation of all potential BCTs across behaviours and, therefore, the possibility of generating general models of behaviour change or investigating ways in which BCTs influence different behaviours.

    “A second limitation of sticking with behaviour domain taxonomies is that it limits generalisation of all potential BCTs across behaviours and, therefore, the possibility of generating general models of behaviour change or investigating ways in which BCTs influence different behaviours.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    BCTTv1 was developed using robust methods and is based on expert consensus.

    “Finally, in contrast to earlier taxonomies, BCTTv1 was developed using robust methods and is based on expert consensus, and BCTs in earlier taxonomies (e.g.motivational interviewing) were removed from BCTTv1 as they did not meet the definition of a BCT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As BCTTv1 is used to design and specify the content of interventions across wider ranges of delivery modes and contexts, it is likely that additional BCTs will be identified.

    “As BCTTv1 is used to design and specify the content of interventions across wider ranges of delivery modes and contexts, it is likely that additional BCTs will be identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Other studies have employed a similar reduced-frequency urine testing schedule.

    “other studies have employed a similar schedule”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Both invitations were designed to be comprehensible to those with a reading age of 11 or above, with Flesch Reading Ease scores of 71.52 and 72.88 for the standard and informed choice invitations respectively.

    “Both invitations were designed to be comprehensible to those with a reading age of 11 or above (Flesch Reading Ease score was 71.52 and 72.88 for the standard and the informed choice invitations, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    Risk information is most readily understood when presented using frequencies.

    “Previous studies have shown that risk information is most readily understood using frequencies in this way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Brief educational reminder messages added to test result reports were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.

    “The reminder messages were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The scripted protocol for reporting urine test results and administering vouchers required no formal training and was developed by an author with extensive expertise in delivering contingency management interventions.

    “The protocol, which required no formal training, was developed by one of us (SS) who has extensive expertise in delivering CM interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The BCTTv1 is a technological advance that represents a step change in the translation of behavioural science into practice and in strengthening the science itself.

    “The BCTTv1 is a technological advance that represents a step change in the translation of behavioural science into practice and in strengthening the science itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    'Behavioural substitution' was identified from a systematic review of brief alcohol interventions, but this effective BCT had not been identified in several reviews of physical activity, healthy eating and smoking cessation interventions.

    “For example, 'behavioural substitution' was identified from a systematic review of brief alcohol interventions, 29 but this effective BCT had not been identified in several reviews of physical activity, healthy eating and smoking cessation interventions, e.g.Carroll et al. 183”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] Michie, 2012, Identification of behaviour change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption, Addiction source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [183] Carroll, 1994, Implementing treatment and protecting the validity of the independent variable in treatment matching studies, J Stud Alcohol Suppl source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    South African policy required written consent for HIV testing, although WHO guidelines for provider-initiated testing and counselling allow for only verbal consent.

    “According to policy in South Africa, written consent was required (although the WHO guidelines for PITC allow for only verbal consent).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The degree of implementation of an evidence-based treatment can be as important as its efficacy, with the largest effects coming from well-implemented, highly efficacious interventions.

    “Research has suggested that the degree of implementation can be as important as the efficacy of the EBT, with the biggest effects coming from well-implemented, highly efficacious interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
291 of 291
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lack of a methodology for unpacking the 'black box' of behaviour change interventions prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.

    “Lack of a methodology for unpacking this 'black box' prevents progress in developing more effective interventions and in reliably implementing effective ones.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.

    “There is a need for consensus about labels and definitions that can be understood across disciplines, behavioural domains and countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.

    “The 93-item BCT list poses problems for easy recall of, and ready access to, the BCTs and thus its speed and accuracy of use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.

    “The process of coding interventions into BCTs is a highly skilled task requiring familiarity with labels and definitions and ability to make a series of complex interpretative judgements.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.

    “This requires an effective programme of coder training to ensure sufficient level of skills to demonstrate reliability and validity of identifying BCTs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There was no prior agreed methodology for developing a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques.

    “There was no prior agreed methodology for this work and there are limitations to the methods we have used.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The experts who participated in the sort tasks followed the instruction to group BCTs by similarity of active ingredients.

    “Instructions guided the experts to 'group together BCTs which have similar active ingredients i.e. by the mechanism of change, NOT the mode of delivery'.73”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hierarchical structure and grouping of BCTs within the taxonomy will increase the speed by which BCTs can be recalled by users.

    “The hierarchical structure and grouping of BCTs within the taxonomy has practical use in that it is predicted to increase the speed by which BCTs can be recalled by users.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Links between BCTs and theory can be used to inform the design and evaluation of BCIs.

    “It also has theoretical interest in that links between BCTs and theory can be used to inform the design and evaluation of BCIs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Expert coding, assessed as consensus between expert coders, is the nearest available objective standard of validity for BCT coding.

    “Expert coding, assessed here as a consensus between expert coders, is the nearest we have to an objective standard of 'validity'.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The increasing use of the BCT approach, particularly for specifying interventions in evidence synthesis, has prompted high demand for training in the reliable and valid application of BCTTv1.

    “The increasing use of the BCT approach, in particular for specifying interventions in evidence synthesis, has prompted high demand for training in the reliable and valid application of BCTTv1.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Training in the most frequently occurring BCTs is appropriate because training in 93 BCTs is not feasible within the proposed training intensity and duration, and because frequently occurring BCTs are more accessible and useful for trainees to learn.

    “The decision was made to train coders in the most frequently occurring BCTs as training in 93 BCTs was not feasible within the proposed training intensity and duration, and because frequently occurring BCTs would be more accessible to trainees as well as more useful for them to learn.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 40 intervention descriptions are representative of published BCI descriptions.

    “Forty descriptions of BCIs were used to test reliability of identification of BCT labels and definitions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The coders trained for this study are typical of those likely to want to use BCT labels and definitions to identify intervention components associated with greater intervention effectiveness.

    “The coders trained for this study seem typical of those likely to want to use BCT labels and definitions to identify intervention components associated with greater intervention effectiveness, for example when conducting meta-analyses.20,23,48,56”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Interventions are usually developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion, so using observed interventions is an artificial scenario.

    “However, this is a rather artificial scenario as usually interventions are developed in an iterative process of reading and discussion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The normal practice is not to describe an intervention after observing it on a video; it is to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.

    “The normal practice would not be to describe an intervention after observing it on a video, it would be to describe it after reading and discussion, without a strict time pressure.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intervention descriptions usually emerge from reading and discussions.

    “Intervention descriptions usually emerge from reading and discussions, and a better evaluation would be to investigate the impact on this process of using BCTTv1.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Assessing validity of BCT identification is less well established than using indices of reliability of BCT identification.

    “While the use of indices of reliability of BCT identification is an accepted method, assessing validity of BCT identification is less well established.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Consensus following independent judgements by experienced expert coders is the best available approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements can be evaluated.

    “We used consensus following independent judgements by experienced, 'expert', coders as our best approximation to a criterion of validity against which judgements could be evaluated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When links between BCTs and theoretical constructs are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.

    “When links are made, this is usually the result of the researchers' judgement rather than being based on evidence, pilot work or a systematic methodology of establishing this.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.

    “Behaviour change techniques are technologies and in themselves are agnostic with regard to the role of theories.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dividing the assistance prompt into 'prescription given' and 'referral made' simplifies documentation and operationalizes the fourth A (Assist) by making clear that referral and prescription are the two primary options available to provider and patient.

    “This approach was meant to simplify the documentation process and operationalize the 4th A, Assist, to make it clear that referral and prescription were the two primary options available to the provider and patient.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Brief educational messages attached to test result reports influence providers' future requests for the targeted tests.

    “The reminder messages were intended to influence future requests for the targeted tests.”
23 of 23

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Different BCTs are named as the four just below the reliability threshold

    Major

    Two passages identify four BCTs scoring 0.68 or 0.69 at time 1, but their lists differ; the later passage names demonstration and self-monitoring where the earlier one names action planning and behavioural practice/rehearsal.

  • Study 5c names different exceptions to its quality improvement

    Minor

    The summary identifies replicability of mode of delivery as the exception to significant quality improvements. The detailed results instead identify replicability of active ingredients as non-significant and include mode of delivery among the improvements.

  • Test-retest counts reverse the reliability thresholds

    Minor

    Among the same 32 coders, the number scoring at least 0.90 cannot exceed the number scoring at least 0.80. The reported counts are 18 and 14, respectively.

  • Listed study 5 workshop attendance does not total 166 writers

    Minor

    The attendance figures for the six listed workshops sum to 142, not the stated 166 writers.

    Reported 166 · recomputed 142

  • Conflicting counts of frequently identified BCTs with poor reliability

    Minor

    The summary says nine of 16 frequently identified BCTs failed the 0.70 reliability threshold. The detailed results say 16 BCTs failed it and that all 16 were frequently identified.

  • Theoretical-domain allocation counts differ from Table 2

    Minor

    The narrative reports six allocations for goals and environmental context and five for emotion. Table 2 gives five, five and four, respectively, in its column for allocations with p < 0.10.

  • Twenty-four BCTs minus 18 leaves six, not seven

    Minor

    The discussion says seven of the 24 most frequently identified BCTs remained after 18 were allocated, but the remainder is six. The earlier results also list six unlinked BCTs.

    Reported 7 · recomputed 6

7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. NICE, 2007, Behaviour Change: The Principles for Effective Interventions (PH6)
  2. Dixon, 2012, Health Behavior Change Competency Framework: Competences to Deliver Interventions to Change Lifestyle Behaviors That Affect Health
  3. West, 2013, Carbon monoxide verified 4-week quit rates in the English Stop Smoking Services before versus after establishment of the National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, Smok Br, 1, 1
  4. NCSCT, National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training
  5. Michie, 2005, Behaviour change interventions: developing a classification system
  6. University College London, The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Project. Collaborators
  7. World Health Organization, 1992, ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
  8. University College London, The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Project
  9. Michie, 2013, Encyclopeadia of Behavioural Medicine, 182
  10. British Websites, BCTTv1. Online Training
  11. Johnston, 2013, Specifying the active content of behaviour change interventions: the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1), Revista de Psicología de la Salud (New Age), 1, 131, 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gwet, 2012, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Multiple Raters
  13. NICE, 2014, Behaviour Change: The Principles for Effective Interventions (PH6)
  14. NICE, 2014, Behaviour Change: Individual Approaches (PH49)
  15. NCSCT, Very Brief Advice Training Module

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michie, S., Wood, C. E., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J. J., & Hardeman, W.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Michie, Susan
Venue
Health Technology Assessment
Published
2015-11
Volume
19
Issue
99
Pages
1-188
ISSN
  • 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-4924
OpenAlex
W2186580260
Cited by
680
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
60.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, behaviour change interventions, taxonomy development, intervention reporting, intervention description, coding reliability, intercoder reliability, test-retest reliability, validity, Delphi consensus, complex interventions, training workshop, global health, mechanisms of change, theory-based intervention design
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Behavior Therapy, Classification, Delphi Technique, Humans, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Global Health, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review