Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire – physician version (SDM-Q-Doc)

Scholl, Isabelle, Kriston, Levente, Dirmaier, Jörg, Buchholz, Angela, Härter, Martin·2012·Patient Education and Counseling

DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Multivariate Data Analysis.
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Untitled work
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 1×
“[16] and theories from the fields of general psychology [17], social psychology [18], and decision analysis [19].”
Background
Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003) · Department of Psychology - University of Koblenz-Landau · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.12784 · Cited by 8,975
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,370
Multivariate Data Analysis
(2008) · Environmental Chemometrics · doi:10.1201/9781420067972-10 · Cited by 8,170
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 1×
“[3], it is important to take into account the dynamics of this interaction between the patient and the clinician.”
Background
Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions
Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16 · Cited by 3,053
Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8 · Cited by 2,976
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Smith, A. F. M., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2345300 · Cited by 2,305
The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample
Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Hölzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A., & Härter, M. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034 · Cited by 918
Self-citation
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Légaré, F., Ratté, S., Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Gravel, K., Graham, I. D., & Turcotte, S. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub2 · Cited by 823
Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.
(2000) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 737
The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision‐making tasks
Elwyn, G., Hutchings, H., Edwards, A., Rapport, F., Wensing, M., Cheung, W., & Grol, R. (2005) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x · Cited by 496
The Shared Decision-Making Continuum
Kon, A. A. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1208 · Cited by 459
Measurement of shared decision making – a review of instruments
Scholl, I., Loon, M. K.-V., Sepucha, K., Elwyn, G., Légaré, F., Härter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012 · Cited by 314
Self-citation
Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q)
Simon, D., Schorr, G., Wirtz, M., Vodermaier, A., Caspari, C., Neuner, B., Spies, C., Krones, T., Keller, H., Edwards, A., et al. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012 · Cited by 176
Self-citation
Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor–patient relationships: A dyadic analysis of doctor–patient communication
Kenny, D. A., Veldhuijzen, W., Weijden, T. V. D., LeBlanc, A., Lockyer, J., Légaré, F., & Campbell, C. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.065 · Cited by 162
Communication Discrepancies Between Physicians and Hospitalized Patients
Olson, D. P. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.239 · Cited by 133
Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners’ decision support and communication skills
Guimond, P., Bunn, H., O'Connor, A. M. C., Jacobsen, M. J., Tait, V., Drake, E. R., Graham, I. D., Stacey, D., & Elmslie, T. (2003) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00043-0 · Cited by 109
Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making
Melbourne, E., Sinclair, K., Durand, M., Légaré, F., & Elwyn, G. J. (2009) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.009 · Cited by 96
Measuring (shared) decision-making – a review of psychometric instruments
Simón, D., Loh, A., & Härter, M. C. (2007) · Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen - German Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.029 · Cited by 86
Self-citation
The Emerging Importance and Relevance of Shared Decision Making to Clinical Practice
Braddock, C. H. (2010) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x10381344 · Cited by 85
Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support
Kryworuchko, J., Stacey, D., Bennett, C. L., & Graham, I. D. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.011 · Cited by 82
Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review
Légaré, F., Moher, D., Elwyn, G. J., LeBlanc, A., & Gravel, K. (2007) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-30 · Cited by 74
Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice
Melbourne, E., Roberts, S., Durand, M., Newcombe, R. G., Légaré, F., & Elwyn, G. J. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.019 · Cited by 71
Instruments for Evaluating Shared Medical Decision Making: A Structured Literature Review
Dy, S. M. (2007) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558707305941 · Cited by 66
Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung
H�rter, M., N. Giersdorf, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., A. Loh, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., C. Bieber, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., C. Caspari, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., A. Deinzer, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., T. Doering, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., W. Eich, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., J. Hamann, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., C. Heesen, A. M. D. B.-F. ?. P. A. P. I. M. E., et al. (2004) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-004-0905-5 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice: Time to Get Back to Basics
Braddock III, C. H., Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L., & Levinson, W. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.24.2313 · Cited by 19
Patient–physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions
Behrend, L., Maymani, H., Diehl, M., Gizlice, Z., Cai, J., & Sheridan, S. (2010) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00614.x · Cited by 14

Authors: Scholl, I., Kriston, L., Dirmaier, J., Buchholz, A., & Härter, M.
Venue: Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2012-08
Volume: 88
Issue: 2
Pages: 284-290
ISSN: 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005
OpenAlex: W2085909344
Cited by: 306
References: 31
FWCI: 10.82
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review