Systematic reviews of pain and online interventions for cancer patients show evidence of mixed efficacy and highlight need for more rigorously designed research

Butow, Phyllis; Smith, Allan ‘Ben’

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.003

Cited by 6Cancer survivorship and careCardiac Health and Mental HealthPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic reviews of pain and online interventions for cancer patients show evidence of mixed efficacy and highlight need for more rigorously designed research

Butow, Phyllis, Smith, Allan ‘Ben’·2015·Patient Education and Counseling

DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.003

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.003

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Initial results of e-mental health interventions have been promising for patients with cancer.
“The initial results of e-mental health interventions have been promising for patients with cancer.10 11 56”
From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [56]

Rethinking the Dose-Response Relationship Between Usage and Outcome in an Online Intervention for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial
Donkin, L., Hickie, I. B., Christensen, H., Naismith, S. L., Neal, B., Cockayne, N. L., & Glozier, N. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2771 · Cited by 193
Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?
Gustafson, D. H., Hawkins, R. P., Mctavish, F. M., Pingree, S., Chen, W. C., Volrathongchai, K., Stengle, W., Stewart, J. A., & Serlin, R. C. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x · Cited by 163
A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients.
McAlpine, H., Joubert, L., Martin-Sanchez, F., Merolli, M., & Drummond, K. J. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.002 · Cited by 160
A randomized, controlled study of internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
Salzer, M. S., Palmer, S. C., Kaplan, K., Brusilovskiy, E., Ten Have, T., Hampshire, M., Metz, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1586 · Cited by 131
Effect of internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study
Høybye, M. T., Dalton, S. O., Deltour, I., Bidstrup, P. E., Frederiksen, K., & Johansen, C. (2010) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605646 · Cited by 128
Patient Education, Coaching, and Self-Management for Cancer Pain
Lovell, M. R., Luckett, T., Boyle, F. M., Phillips, J. L., Agar, M. R., & Davidson, P. M. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.52.4850 · Cited by 109
Educational interventions for cancer pain. A systematic review of systematic reviews with nested narrative review of randomized controlled trials
Adam, R., Bond, C. M., & Murchie, P. (2014) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.003 · Cited by 86
Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve Cancer Pain Management
Cummings, G. G., Olivo, S. A., Biondo, P. D., Stiles, C. R., Yurtseven, Ö., Fainsinger, R. L., & Hagen, N. A. (2011) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.017 · Cited by 79
Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of an online psychological intervention to reduce distress in men treated for localised prostate cancer
Wootten, A. C., Abbott, J.-A. M., Meyer, D., Chisholm, K., Austin, D. W., Klein, B., McCabe, M., Murphy, D. G., & Costello, A. J. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.024 · Cited by 77
Efficacy of pain education in cancer patients
Jho, H. J., Myung, S., Chang, Y.-J., Kim, D.-H., & Ko, D. H. (2013) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1756-0 · Cited by 33
Pain in Patients With Cancer
Goodwin, P. J., Bruera, E. D., & Stockler, M. R. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.55.3818 · Cited by 30
Experience and Knowledge of Pain Management in Patients Receiving Outpatient Cancer Treatment: What Do Older Adults Really Know about Their Cancer Pain?
Baker, T. A., O’Connor, M. L., & Krok, J. L. (2013) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/pme.12244 · Cited by 29
Exploring Oral Literacy in Communication With Hospice Caregivers
Wittenberg-Lyles, E. M., Goldsmith, J. V., Oliver, D. P., Demiris, G., Kruse, R. L., & Stee, S. K. V. (2013) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.006 · Cited by 24

Flagged first, then by citations

Sorted by citations

Online psychological interventions to reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and general distress in those with chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
White, V., Linardon, J., Stone, J. E., Holmes-Truscott, E., Olive, L., Mikocka-Walus, A., Hendrieckx, C., Evans, S., & Speight, J. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720002251 · Cited by 90
Untitled work
(2020) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 41
Effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depression symptoms in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.
Liu, T.-T., Xu, J., Cheng, H., Zhang, Y.-Y., Wang, S., Lin, L., & Tian, L. (2022) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.09.003 · Cited by 37
Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct
Bäuerle, A., Martus, P., Erim, Y., Schug, C., Heinen, J., Krakowczyk, J. B., Steinbach, J., Damerau, M., Bethge, W., Dinkel, A., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056973 · Cited by 12
Web-based MINDfulness and Skills-based distress reduction in cancer (MINDS): study protocol for a multicentre observational healthcare study
Bäuerle, A., Teufel, M., Schug, C., Skoda, E.-M., Beckmann, M., Schäffeler, N., Junne, F., Erim, Y., Zipfel, S., & Graf, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036466 · Cited by 11
Mindfulness and skills-based eHealth intervention to reduce distress in cancer-affected patients in the Reduct trial: Intervention protocol of the make it training optimized
Heinen, J., Bäuerle, A., Schug, C., Krakowczyk, J. B., Strunk, S. E., Wieser, A., Beckord, J., Jansen, C., Dries, S., Pantförder, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1037158 · Cited by 7
“Although more qualitatively sound research is needed (15, 16), previous studies suggest that digital psychooncological interventions are feasible and effective (16, 17).”
Background

Development and psychometric validation of the second version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q II)
Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Grace, S. L., Thomas, S. G., Evans, M. F., & OH, P. I. (2014) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.019 · Cited by 45
Translation, adaptation, and psychometrically validation of an instrument to assess disease-related knowledge in Spanish-speaking cardiac rehabilitation participants: The Spanish CADE-Q SV
Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Fernández, R., Quesada, D., Anchique, C. V., Gordillo, X., Arrieta-Loaiciga, B., Reyes, P., & OH, P. I. (2020) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.07.016 · Cited by 9
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire – Short Version: A Tool to Evaluate Knowledge of Cardiac Rehabilitation Components
Yang, L., Luo, S., Yang, S., Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Yan, X., Tian, M., & Wu, Y. (2021) · Global Heart · doi:10.5334/gh.912 · Cited by 16
Development, pilot testing and psychometric validation of a short version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire: The CADE-Q SV
Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Sandison, N., & OH, P. I. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.002 · Cited by 55
Development and Validation of the Filipino Version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire Version 2 (FILIPINO CADE-Q II)
Cuenza, L. R., Albano, B. B. P., Ramirez, J. M., Magbag, R., Quito, B. J., Ebba, E., & Bongosia, L. (2017) · Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.65564/pjim.11152cb14f

Authors: Butow, P., & Smith, A. ‘.
Affiliations: The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author: Butow, Phyllis
ORCID: Butow, Phyllis
Smith, Allan ‘Ben’
Venue: Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2015-03
Volume: 98
Issue: 3
Pages: 267-268
ISSN: 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.003
OpenAlex: W2160712584
Cited by: 6
References: 13
Citations by year: 2022: 3 · 2020: 3
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation, patient knowledge assessment, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, educational needs assessment, cardiovascular risk factors, exercise knowledge, heart failure, percutaneous coronary intervention
MeSH terms: Humans, Neoplasms, Pain, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Systematic reviews of pain and online interventions for cancer patients show evidence of mixed efficacy and highlight need for more rigorously designed research

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks