The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress in biofuel production from gasification
Open accessAbstract
Biofuels from biomass gasification are reviewed here, and demonstrated to be an attractive option. Recent progress in gasification techniques and key generation pathways for biofuels production, process design and integration and socio-environmental impacts of biofuel generation are discussed, with the goal of investigating gasification-to-biofuels’ credentials as a sustainable and eco-friendly technology. The synthesis of important biofuels such as bio-methanol, bio-ethanol and higher alcohols, bio-dimethyl ether, Fischer Tropsch fuels, bio-methane, bio-hydrogen and algae-based fuels is reviewed, together with recent technologies, catalysts and reactors. Significant thermodynamic studies for each biofuel are also examined. Syngas cleaning is demonstrated to be a critical issue for biofuel production, and innovative pathways such as those employed by Choren Industrietechnik, Germany, and BioMCN, the Netherlands, are shown to allow efficient methanol generation. The conversion of syngas to FT transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel over Co or Fe catalysts is reviewed and demonstrated to be a promising option for the future of biofuels. Bio-methane has emerged as a lucrative alternative for conventional transportation fuel with all the advantages of natural gas including a dense distribution, trade and supply network. Routes to produce H2 are discussed, though critical issues such as storage, expensive production routes with low efficiencies remain. Algae-based fuels are in the research and development stage, but are shown to have immense potential to become commercially important because of their capability to fix large amounts of CO2, to rapidly grow in many environments and versatile end uses. However, suitable process configurations resulting in optimal plant designs are crucial, so detailed process integration is a powerful tool to optimize current and develop new processes. LCA and ethical issues are also discussed in brief. It is clear that the use of food crops, as opposed to food wastes represents an area fraught with challenges, which must be resolved on a case by case basis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review
Mata, T. M., Martins, A. A., & Caetano, N. S. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020 · Cited by 5,685
An overview of the chemical composition of biomass
Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2010) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 · Cited by 2,519
Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels
Alonso, D. M., Bond, J. Q., & Dumesic, J. A. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c004654j · Cited by 2,333
The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000
Dry, M. E. (2002) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00453-9 · Cited by 2,061
Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma
Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177970 · Cited by 1,596
Microalgae biorefinery: High value products perspectives
Chew, K. W., Yap, J. Y., Show, P. L., Suan, N. H., Juan, J. C., Ling, T. C., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,336
Biodiesel from microalgae: A critical evaluation from laboratory to large scale production
Rawat, I., Ranjith Kumar, R., Mutanda, T., & Bux, F. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.004 · Cited by 977
Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass
Demirbas, A. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.016 · Cited by 796
Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp.
Brown, T. M., Duan, P., & Savage, P. E. (2010) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef100203u · Cited by 745
Biofuels: environment, technology and food security
Escobar, J. C., Lora, E. S., Venturini, O. J., Yáñez, E. E., Castillo, E. F., & Almazan, O. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.014 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Dogu, O., Pelucchi, M., Van de Vijver, R., Van Steenberge, P. H. M., D'hooge, D. R., Cuoci, A., Mehl, M., Frassoldati, A., Faravelli, T., & Van Geem, K. M. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100901 · Cited by 698
The future of hydrogen energy: Bio-hydrogen production technology
Xu, X., Zhou, Q., & Yu, D. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.261 · Cited by 526
Promising evolution of biofuel generations. Subject review
Alalwan, H. A., Alminshid, A. H., & Aljaafari, H. A. S. (2019) · Renewable Energy Focus · doi:10.1016/j.ref.2018.12.006 · Cited by 505
Sustainability of the four generations of biofuels – A review
Mat Aron, N. S., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Show, P. L., Chen, W., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2020) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.5557 · Cited by 479
Santos, R. G. D., & Alencar, A. C. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.133 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Anthony, E. J.
- Venue
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 189-248
- ISSN
- 0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2610240964
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in biofuel production from gasification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.04.001
- The paper
- Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Anthony, E. J. (2017). Progress in biofuel production from gasification. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.