The DOI matches its Crossref record; 266 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of methodologies for the non-invasive characterisation of commercial Li-ion cells
Open accessAbstract
Lithium-ion cells currently power almost all electronic devices and power tools; they are a key enabling technology for electric vehicles and are increasingly considered to be the technology of choice for grid storage. In line with this increased applicability, there is also an increase in the development of new commercial lithium-ion cell technologies that incorporate innovative functional components (electrode material compositions and electrolyte formulations) and designs, leading to a diverse range of performance characteristics. The uniqueness of each technology in-turn gives rise to unique evolutions of cell performance as the cell degrades because of usage. Non-destructively measuring and subsequently tracking the evolution of lithium-ion cell characteristics is valuable for both industrial engineers and academic researchers. To proceed in this regard, stakeholders have often devised their own procedures for characterising lithium-ion cells, typically without considering unification, comparability or compatibility. This makes the comparison of technologies complicated. This comprehensive review for the first time has analysed and discusses the various international standards and regulations for the characterisation and electrical testing of lithium-ion cells, specifically for high-power automotive and grid applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Marongiu, A., & Sauer, D. U. (2015) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj7010014 · Cited by 11
RetractedIssues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices
Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212741 · Cited by 15,072
Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications
(2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471716243 · Cited by 5,322
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
LixCoO2 (0<x<-1): A new cathode material for batteries of high energy density
Mizushima, K., Jones, P. C., Wiseman, P. J., & Goodenough, J. B. (1980) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-5408(80)90012-4 · Cited by 3,856
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Impedance spectroscopy theory, experiment, and applications
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0327 · Cited by 2,299
A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries
Hu, X., Li, S., & Peng, H. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.013 · Cited by 2,179
Mechanisms for Lithium Insertion in Carbonaceous Materials
Dahn, J. R., Zheng, T., Liu, Y., & Xue, J. S. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5236.590 · Cited by 2,123
Cited by
Lithium Plating Mechanism, Detection, and Mitigation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lin, X., Khosravinia, K., Hu, X., Li, J., & Lu, W. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953 · Cited by 490
Review on state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries: Characterizations, estimations and applications
Yang, S., Zhang, C., Jiang, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128015 · Cited by 435
Key challenges for a large-scale development of battery electric vehicles: A comprehensive review
Lebrouhi, B. E., Khattari, Y., Lamrani, B., Maaroufi, M., Zeraouli, Y., & Kousksou, T. (2021) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.103273 · Cited by 276
Aging mechanisms, prognostics and management for lithium-ion batteries: Recent advances
Wang, Y., Xiang, H., Soo, Y.-Y., & Fan, X. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114915 · Cited by 142
Li, A. G., West, A. C., & Preindl, M. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119030 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Barai, A., Uddin, K., Dubarry, M., Somerville, L., McGordon, A., Jennings, P., & Bloom, I.
- Venue
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2910052146
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 266
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of methodologies for the non-invasive characterisation of commercial Li-ion cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pecs.2019.01.001
- The paper
- Barai, A., Uddin, K., Dubarry, M., Somerville, L., McGordon, A., Jennings, P., & Bloom, I. (2019). A comparison of methodologies for the non-invasive characterisation of commercial Li-ion cells. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2019.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
