Cited by 109Family and Disability Support ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFamily Support in Illness

Chronic Sorrow in Parents of Children with a Chronic Illness or Disability: An Integrative Literature Review

Coughlin, Mary Beth, Sethares, Kristen A.·2017·Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Problem This integrative review aims to synthesize the findings of studies on chronic sorrow in parents, to analyze the findings along three specific research questions, and to identify areas for future research. Eligibility criteria Studies of parents, mothers and/or fathers of non-adult children published in peer-reviewed journals that answered the research questions: 1) How does the experience of chronic sorrow differ between mothers and fathers? 2) What factors have been identified to impact the experience of chronic sorrow over time? 3) What strategies by health care providers for helping parents cope with chronic sorrow have been identified to be most and least helpful? Sample Nineteen studies from a literature search within the databases of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Psycarticles and SocIndex were included in the review. Results Findings suggest that mothers experience more intense chronic sorrow compared with fathers. Health care crises and developmental milestones are potent triggers for resurgence of chronic sorrow. Helpful strategies by healthcare providers include providing information, helping to procure respite and being empathetic and compassionate. Conclusions Healthcare providers need to understand that chronic sorrow is a normal consequence of having a child with a chronic illness or disability. Implications Family-centered interventions should be individualized and aimed at providing increased comfort to parents in times of need. Further research that looks…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.06.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents of children with a chronic illness are at risk for psychosocial problems such as anxiety and depression.

    “Therefore, these parents are at risk for psychosocial problems (Collis et al., 2019; Coughlin & Sethares, 2017; Haverman et al., 2013; van Oers et al., 2014) such as anxiety and depression (Pinquart, 2019a, 2019b).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coughlin, M. B., & Sethares, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
Corresponding author
Coughlin, Mary Beth
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
37
Pages
108-116
ISSN
0882-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737792079
Cited by
109
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
chronic sorrow, parental grief, parents of children with chronic illness, children with disabilities, mothers versus fathers, developmental milestones, respite care, empathetic care, family-centered intervention, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Quality of Life, United States, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review