Cited by 14Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChild and Adolescent HealthPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Care Coordination for Children with Special Healthcare Needs Anticipating Transition: A Program Evaluation

Morton, Beth, Damato, Elizabeth G., Ciccarelli, Mary R., Currie, Jackson·2021·Journal of Pediatric Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Nearly 20% of U.S. children have special healthcare needs (CSHCN). Difficulties experienced with navigating the array of services for these children has highlighted the value of care coordination to improve care, reduce costs and increase satisfaction. This study evaluated the services delivered within a care coordination program at a transition consultation center for CSHCN. It also compared the advancement of youth by age group toward graduation criteria. Design and methods Using a program evaluation method, data were collected via a retrospective chart review. The convenience sample included clinical records from 100 patients aged 11-22 who had a chronic disease or disability. Results The comparison of services for those with diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy and Down syndrome were uniformly high in supporting primary care and health care financing. Medicaid waiver assistance was provided more frequently to younger adolescents while older adolescents more commonly received support in all other graduation criteria, including primary and specialty care, healthcare financing and decision-making supports. Conclusions Youth served in a transition care coordination program receive a high volume and broad array of services. There are some variations in the types of services by diagnosis and level of support need. Older youth show greater advancement toward graduation criteria. Practice implications This in-depth chart review provides a valuable descrip…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morton, B., Damato, E. G., Ciccarelli, M. R., & Currie, J.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Morton, Beth
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
61
Pages
7-14
ISSN
0882-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134619862
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
care coordination, children with special health care needs, transition to adult care, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, chronic disease, disability, primary care, health care financing, decision support, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Delivery of Health Care, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Retrospective Studies, United States, Program Evaluation, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review